Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Most Senior Route For Your Company  
User currently offlineB-HOP From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2000, 623 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 6781 times:

Pilots/Cabin crew:

What is your company's most senior/popular route, I understand in Europe/US they are allocated on a seniority basis, in Asia, it is mostly rostered into the flight.

Kev


Live life to max!!!
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAtlwest1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1046 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 6747 times:

At FL for cabin crew the most senior routes are ATL-LAX,PHX,SFO,SEA,LAS done as a day turn or a redeye. They are usually worth high hours and you can fly maybe 7-9 a month and be done. Some fly there bare minimum(70hrs) so that can be accomplished by flying 6 of those day turns maybe 7. The internationals tend to be free range.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co. or Airt
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4234 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6716 times:

At ZW, the most senior crew domicile on the CA side is PHL, but DCA and ORF also have very senior guys as well. On the FO side, LGA is the most senior domicile.

As for routes, for whatever reason Stand Up trips (Often called CDO's or High Speeds at other carriers) are popular among senior guys. The way the routes are built though, it is tough to say which is senior because these always seem to be changing. I can tell you that one senior ORF captain says he always bids trips through LGA because with the notirous long taxis and inbound holding, the flights always end up over blocked, which means more money for him.


User currently offlinenwaesc From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 3381 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 6246 times:

Quoting apodino (Reply 2):
On the FO side, LGA is the most senior domicile.

Wow! O_o

Wouldn't have expected to see LGA be senior for *anyone*...



"Nothing ever happens here, " I said. "I just wait."
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4234 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 6204 times:

Quoting nwaesc (Reply 3):


Wouldn't have expected to see LGA be senior for *anyone*...

It boils down to this. LGA is an easy commute, and since there are no more RON aircraft, the trips do not start real early or end real late the way they do in other locales (ORF is notorious for this). Thus a lot of crews can be based in LGA and don't have to spend a lot of money on crashpads and stuff, especially if they live elsewhere in the Northeast where there is easy service to LGA from.

PHL and DCA are hub cities with lots of service but the trips start earlier or end later in those cities, which is why they tend to be more senior on the captain side, because Captains are more likely to be able to afford hotel rooms near the airport than FOs, which is why LGA is more senior on the FO side.

ORF is notorious for trips starting real early and ending real late. On top of that ORF is not known as an easy city to commute to. However a lot of people agree that the people based in ORF are arguably among the most pleasant people to work with out of any crew domicile.

RDU also has Early Shows and Late endings, but this domicile is so small that people who are based there are usually people that don't have to commute much.


With the slot deal in place, the LGA domicile is most likely going bye bye. And with the limited RDU schedule that ZW now operates, I am not sure how much longer a domicile can be justified there. MKE would be a justifiable domicile with the amount of RON mx there, but I don't see it happening. If it did happen though, MKE would quickly become the most senior domicile at ZW without question.


User currently offlinesflaflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5261 times:

I would not have expected ORF to be a crew base for ZW. Does anyone have info on that base (when, why) it was chosen?

User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4234 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4783 times:

Quoting sflaflight (Reply 5):
I would not have expected ORF to be a crew base for ZW. Does anyone have info on that base (when, why) it was chosen?

Sure do, ORF is ZWs second biggest MX facility (Behind PHL) and as a result overnights several aircraft in ORF. Because of all the RON's that they have in ORF, it is more economical to the company to maintain a crew domicile in ORF rather than overnight a bunch of crew members in hotels. ORF has been a ZW domicile ever since the US flying started back in 2005.

LGA is almost certainly going to close with the slot deal, and I wouldn't be surprised to see RDU shut down as well. One thing to note is that although CLT is ZW's second largest city in terms of number of departures, they do not RON a single plane in CLT and thus have no crew domicile or MX presence at all in CLT. For the same reason, with the CAE MX base that just opened up, CAE may become a domicile in the near future.


User currently onlineatcsundevil From Germany, joined Mar 2010, 1143 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4565 times:

Quoting apodino (Reply 6):
Sure do, ORF is ZWs second biggest MX facility (Behind PHL) and as a result overnights several aircraft in ORF. Because of all the RON's that they have in ORF, it is more economical to the company to maintain a crew domicile in ORF rather than overnight a bunch of crew members in hotels. ORF has been a ZW domicile ever since the US flying started back in 2005.

Sounds a bit like what LOF did with their RIC crew base for a few years until it transferred to IAD last year, no? Even though the crew base transferred, my understanding is that they still have their mx fac in RIC.



1954 1974 1990 2014 -- Los geht's!
User currently offlinemjzair From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 398 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 4356 times:

Quoting apodino (Reply 4):
However a lot of people agree that the people based in ORF are arguably among the most pleasant people to work with out of any crew domicile.

I really don't want to hijack this thread, but as an LGA FO, I might argue this point, and on top of that, I really don't think this is an appropriate statement to make on a public forum such as this one.


But yes, being so regionalized, I don't think there is a senior trip per say, just senior start and end times.. it seems like at LGA all the trips are just rearrangements of BGR, RIC or CHS overnights, so the trips just seem to go in order of weekends off, late reports, early finishes.


User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3382 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 4137 times:

New York (any airport) usually goes senior or junior or both.

What do I mean?

There's a contingent of people that want to be there because they live there or live near there.

Then there's contingent of people that have an easier commute there (fly in)

Then there are the airlines such as DL, B6, AA, and CO which have rather large bases there and people get forced there due to seniority (or lack thereof)


User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7499 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3787 times:

Ive heard DFW-NRT is the most senior at AA. Could be wrong tho.


Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlinedavid21487 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3579 times:

You'll see all single and double digit seniority numbers on ATL-DXB, and ATL-JNB. I looked at a DXB rotation the other day and out of a crew of 11, the most junior person was number 846.


-- Step! Jump! Slide! --
User currently offlineUALFAson From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 697 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3549 times:

With UA at IAD, my mom said the NRT and PEK nonstops went very senior. In fact, before she retired, with 37 years of seniority, she couldn't hold certain NRT lines with certain days off.

She also said the Middle East flights went senior at first with everyone wanting to see a new part of the world, but quickly started going very junior. MXP used to go very senior before UA discontinued the route.

I would think that with most US-based carriers at least, the super long-haul flights tend to go the most senior mainly because you only have to work 3-4 of them a month.



"We hope you've enjoyed flying with us as much as we've enjoyed taking you for a ride."
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7123 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3435 times:

How about domestic widebody trips?
I am thinking like MIA-JFK-MIA on a 767 or 777 thats a days work leave in the morning back at night. I would think they go senior? Any info?



"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offline777STL From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3566 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3391 times:

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 10):
Ive heard DFW-NRT is the most senior at AA. Could be wrong tho.

I don't doubt it. The few times I've flown it, the entire cabin crew all seemed to be >50 years old.



PHX based
User currently offlineUALFAson From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 697 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3213 times:

Quoting flymia (Reply 13):
How about domestic widebody trips?
I am thinking like MIA-JFK-MIA on a 767 or 777 thats a days work leave in the morning back at night. I would think they go senior? Any info?

Day trips are hit or miss. Some F/As like being home at night; the down side is that you usually work them 3-4 days in a row, which can be a lot.

Crew that commute to their bases would rather work one 3-day or longer trip than to have to keep coming back and forth to the airport.

I don't think aircraft type really has much of an impact. A few people may have biases for or against certain widebody aircraft but crews are typically much more concerned with how many hours the line is worth, how many days they get off and what days of the week, and maybe how nice the layover destination is (CDG and MXP being favs, for example).



"We hope you've enjoyed flying with us as much as we've enjoyed taking you for a ride."
User currently offlineGman3 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 290 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

As a FA for United, I would think that our SEA-NRT is the most senior trip in our system... Most of the flight attendants have Area Codes for seniority numbers. Not too many on that trip have a seniority number over 1000.

User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4913 posts, RR: 43
Reply 17, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3034 times:

On narrow body, and the B767 at AC high credit day turns go the highest. YYZ-UVF-YYZ, YYZ-SJO-YYZ, YYZ-SFO-YYZ, etc. On a normal month, one can work only 8 days.

On the B777, it appears to be the high time 3 day pairings, giving a 9 day month. YYZ-HKG-YYZ, YYZ-PEK-YYZ, YYZ-NRT-YYZ, etc.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineWNCrew From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 1444 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2881 times:

At WN it's anything low-leg and HIGH paying. Our duty day is the shortest in the industry for FA's so we can't do BWI-LAX/SEA turns... too long of a day, but I know out of MDW they have LAX/PHX/OAK/SEA/LAS/SFO turns and those go senior.

As for multi-day pairings, we no longer have 4-days so I'd say high-paying 2-day trips go next. We had a 2-day that paid 19.5hrs MDW-LAX-HOU-JAN (10:10 rest) JAN-HOU-PHX-OMA-MDW I hear it was KILLER but it pays as much as our lowest 3-day.

at WN we all tend to do the same KIND of flying. You can't bid into or out of any specific aircraft type so we all pretty much work whatever. I like low-legs and decent pay. All that boarding and deplaning when we're NOT paid is exhausting, but we do flu service on all flights (we try) and it's just too much. Everyone thinks we do a lot of legs in a day... sometimes, but for me, I can say it's been about 4yrs since I've worked more than 5 legs in a day.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4234 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2657 times:

Quoting WNCrew (Reply 18):

at WN we all tend to do the same KIND of flying. You can't bid into or out of any specific aircraft type so we all pretty much work whatever. I like low-legs and decent pay. All that boarding and deplaning when we're NOT paid is exhausting, but we do flu service on all flights (we try) and it's just too much. Everyone thinks we do a lot of legs in a day... sometimes, but for me, I can say it's been about 4yrs since I've worked more than 5 legs in a day.

A lot of regional FA Unions would love to have workrules like you describe.


User currently offlineWNCrew From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 1444 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2622 times:

Quoting apodino (Reply 19):
A lot of regional FA Unions would love to have workrules like you describe.

I think a lot of FA's in general would love to have our work rules, we're VERY lucky. I'm sure that's in part due to the fact that we're fairly Uncomplicated. We have, essentially ONE fleet, ONE crew size, ONE type of service, no language speaker program, no Intl ops.... it's simple.


...back to the topic at hand!



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Are The Most Senior Regional Routes? posted Wed Jan 14 2009 22:01:14 by HVNandrew
The Most Profitable Route Of Swiss(LX) posted Fri Dec 8 2006 00:26:37 by B773ER
The Most Important Thing For Indian Aviation posted Sat Aug 6 2005 16:14:11 by Texdravid
The Most Flown Route In One Day? posted Tue Jul 13 2004 05:37:08 by TriJetFan1
The Most Odd Equipment For Various Airlines.... posted Sun Jun 8 2003 01:38:56 by Zrs70
The Most Profitable Route? posted Thu May 23 2002 15:45:34 by B-HOP
NYC-LON The Most Profitable Route In The World? posted Sat Jul 7 2001 08:04:25 by TOMASKEMPNER
The Most Unusual Visitors At Your Apt posted Thu Jul 5 2001 07:40:52 by Kevin
Most Serviced Route By Your "fav" Airline. posted Sat Jun 16 2001 14:01:33 by Jm-airbus320
What Is The Route Which Makes The Most For ... posted Tue Dec 26 2000 17:57:31 by GKirk
The Most Profitable Route Of Swiss(LX) posted Fri Dec 8 2006 00:26:37 by B773ER
The Most Important Thing For Indian Aviation posted Sat Aug 6 2005 16:14:11 by Texdravid
The Most Flown Route In One Day? posted Tue Jul 13 2004 05:37:08 by TriJetFan1
The Most Odd Equipment For Various Airlines.... posted Sun Jun 8 2003 01:38:56 by Zrs70
The Most Profitable Route? posted Thu May 23 2002 15:45:34 by B-HOP
NYC-LON The Most Profitable Route In The World? posted Sat Jul 7 2001 08:04:25 by TOMASKEMPNER
The Most Unusual Visitors At Your Apt posted Thu Jul 5 2001 07:40:52 by Kevin
Most Serviced Route By Your "fav" Airline. posted Sat Jun 16 2001 14:01:33 by Jm-airbus320