Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hawaiian Runway Incursion At KIX  
User currently onlineha763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3632 posts, RR: 5
Posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4726 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hawaiian's flight from KIX had a runway incursion at KIX on Oct. 12. The pilots apparently received and acknowledged instructions to not enter the runway, but they did. A ANA Cargo flight was on approach and about 4 miles out. ATC ordered the Hawaiian aircraft off the runway and the ANA Cargo aircraft went around. The second and third links are videos of the story from a couple Hawaii news stations.

http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20111013p2a00m0na010000c.html

http://www.khon2.com/mostpopular/sto...-Japan/pPrB6zAHAUCF6GTfwTutsQ.cspx

http://www.kitv.com/news/29473185/detail.html

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineskytony From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4553 times:

The second link has a video. Did anybody notice the shot of the A330 taxiing with the engine cowling open? Is that normal?


Lower your expectations! You will always be pleasantly surprised!
User currently offlineATLFlyer323 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4533 times:

Quoting skytony (Reply 1):
Did anybody notice the shot of the A330 taxiing with the engine cowling open? Is that normal?

It was actually a 767 I believe, and if you look closely the engine cowling, it is not open, it's painted a deep blue/purple (I assume the original had to be replaced for some reason). I think that's what you are referring to.

-ATLFlyer323



Everyday, the fluffy temptation of wheat!
User currently offlinen901wa From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 450 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4428 times:

If you look close at the nose wheel of the A330 in that shot, you can see the tugs wheels, so it was under tow. And you can tow with the fan cowl open, as long as you have both hold open rods locked in. Looks like they spliced a few video shots   HTH

User currently onlineha763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3632 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4261 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting skytony (Reply 1):
Did anybody notice the shot of the A330 taxiing with the engine cowling open? Is that normal?

That shot was from a flight that turned back due to loss of oil pressure. This was within the first week of HA starting A330 operations.

There is a HA pilot on a.net. I would like to see if he heard anything about this incident.


User currently offlineaztrainer From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 561 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2143 times:

Yes, there was good editing of the 767 with a United or Delta cowling and then the 330 normal, then the one with the engine cowl open and being towed, and then back to a different 330 under its own power taxing.

Not being a pilot, but being very aware of contextual differences in language construction and articulation. I wonder how much of this was a simple difference in common language or the difference is sentence construction?


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4911 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2118 times:

The HA aircraft was "Cleared to the holding position". This is a worldwide term meaning taxi up to, but hold short of the runway.

This is very confusing to North American pilots, as up until recently we used the (used to be legal) term, "Cleared to position and hold". This clearance meant taxi onto the runway, line up, and wait for take off clearance. This term was recently changed at North American airports for that confusion possibility.

We used to get memos all the time, reminding us when flying internationally to use caution when hearing the "Cleared to the holding position", it does not mean "Cleared to position and hold". While it is not justification for making the error, one can certainly see how it happened.

Hopefully as the "Cleared to position and hold" fades further from our memory, this confusion will end.

Ironically enough, a few weeks ago at LAX, (among the best controllers on the earth), we were cleared "To position and hold ... er ... I mean cleared to line up and wait". We are only human.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NPR: US 27 Runway Incursion At BOS Today posted Thu Jun 18 2009 16:06:31 by PHX Flyer
Runway Incursion At ABE On 9/19 posted Tue Sep 23 2008 09:50:15 by HangarRat
Another Runway Incursion At O'Hare International posted Wed Jul 23 2008 13:52:37 by AmricanShamrok
Runway Incursion At MIA posted Tue Feb 26 2008 17:04:40 by RJdxer
Runway Incursion At YYC? posted Mon Apr 23 2007 18:16:28 by BA84
Aircraft Runway Incursion At JFK posted Tue Jul 26 2005 23:10:06 by AeroPiggot
Runway Incursion At MUC posted Wed May 5 2004 05:51:32 by Damirc
Runway Incursion At DFW posted Sat Nov 23 2002 23:32:35 by Sleekjet
Hawaiian Moving Terminals At SFO, More To Come? posted Wed Oct 12 2011 00:19:49 by flySFO
BA Tries To Keep 3rd Runway Alive At LHR. posted Fri Sep 16 2011 09:27:19 by readytotaxi