In addition, 76 738s were delivered in 2009-2010, and another 54 are scheduled for delivery in 2011-2013. Seven 777-200 a/c are scheduled for delivery between 2013-2016, and 42 789 a/c are scheduled for delivery beginning 4Q2014.
The views expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect my employer’s views.
LONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 764 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 14465 times:
Can't wait for the new F and J product on the 77W! I hope AA doesn't mess up this opportunity and plans for a true F suite and copies CX's new style business class seats...but I can dream. Since the first one should be coming a year from now, when can we expect to see an announcement on the new premium product(s), spring perhaps?
brilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4579 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 11344 times:
Quoting LONGisland89 (Reply 6): Can't wait for the new F and J product on the 77W! I hope AA doesn't mess up this opportunity and plans for a true F suite and copies CX's new style business class seats...but I can dream. Since the first one should be coming a year from now, when can we expect to see an announcement on the new premium product(s), spring perhaps?
I won't hold my breath on this one, as their immediate competition DL and UA are not pushing the bar very high IMHO. I hope that AA will try to develop their product along the same way as CX and BA, but they have a long way to go and I have not heard of any upgrading along the lines of CX or BA. Please tell me if I am wrong.
Thrust From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2691 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9175 times:
I have to admit, I'm kind of disappointed I'll have to wait an additional year to al777-300ER in the AA colorscheme. I'm actually quite shocked that UA, NW or DL never expressed interest in replacing their 747 fleet with 773ERs years ago. Obviously UA has selected the A350, but DL appears interested in keeping the 747s indefinitely, even though they are flying some of the first ones ever built. The 773ER can carry nearly as many passengers over the same distance at about half the cost of a 744 (and much greater fuel efficiency as well) from what I have heard and read.
DeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8673 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9056 times:
Quoting Thrust (Reply 17): DL appears interested in keeping the 747s indefinitely, even though they are flying some of the first ones ever built. The 773ER can carry nearly as many passengers over the same distance at about half the cost of a 744 (and much greater fuel efficiency as well) from what I have heard and read.
Yes, but one must remember it is cheaper operate what you have (even if it is less efficient) than to buy something new. DL didn't choose the 744, they got them from NW. Since they have them now, they're making the best out of them
LAXtoATL From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 1771 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 8615 times:
Quoting Thrust (Reply 17): The 773ER can carry nearly as many passengers over the same distance at about half the cost of a 744 (and much greater fuel efficiency as well) from what I have heard and read.
You have the fuel efficiency part correct, but the cost of a 20 year old 744 is a lot less than a new 773ER (or even a used 773ER). It would be a much different cost analysis if you were purchasaing a new 744 and a new 773ER.
Lufthansa411 From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 692 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (4 years 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 8297 times:
Quoting LAXtoATL (Reply 19): You have the fuel efficiency part correct, but the cost of a 20 year old 744 is a lot less than a new 773ER (or even a used 773ER). It would be a much different cost analysis if you were purchasaing a new 744 and a new 773ER.
That is not entirely correct either- it depends on a lot of different variables. If the 744's in your example were maintained only to the minimum standard or with the cheapest parts available it may well be more cost effective to have new aircraft. However, if from day 1 those 747's were maintained like they were going to be staying in the fleet for 20 years, it would be cheaper to keep the 747's. Same scenario with AA. Eventually, you get to a point where older aircraft are no longer able to perform as reliably as new aircraft, and the downtime and reliability issues with them are more costly than purchasing new aircraft.
Nothing in life is to be feared; it is only to be understood.
And this is where the fleet planners make their money, finding that point. Maybe DL determined they'd have the 744s in just short of the point where getting 77Ws are more efficient, and are waiting for a future date to replace the 744s with something better than the 77Ws, whatever that would be in the future. The airlines are smart, not immune to mistakes and not absent of questionable actions, but I'm sure DL researched the 744s quite extensively and have good reasons to keep them versus buying 77Ws
Thanks for the info, and has there been any mention of 77W options?
Also, are the 'nose numbers' an abbreviation of the registration, like N1777LA for instance, and has the FAA considered a three or four letter registration sequence in addition to the numbers plus two letters?
KC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12319 posts, RR: 51
Reply 24, posted (4 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5921 times:
They are internal AA hull numbers, or ship numbers but I guess you could call them nose numbers. AA usually uses a one or two number and one or two letters in their 3 degit number system to track individual airplanes. Many airlines use a similar system although some may just use the registration number, shortened to a 3 charicter sequence.
For AA, their system is (the first number);
"3" is for the B-767-300ER
"7" is for the B-777-200ER/-300ER (the -200ER starts with "77" then a letter).
I don't remember the rest.
: Airbus and Boeing helped line up financing for American, both internally and externally. American also developed a cozy relationship with General Ele
: You are correct. Yes it has been discussed to death on here. Both Airbus and Boeing provided incentives to lessors who will be purchasing the planes
: Has AA not firmed up their 787-9 orders yet? I've not really been following this, and would have thought the 787 would be included in such a schedule.
: Not firmed yet. Hinges on negotiating a pay scale with the union to operate that type. The purchase agreement with Boeing gives AA up until 18months
: According to aerotransport.org, all 130 firm are for the A321-200 (these are the non-neo on order). Given CO's preference for Boeing, I wonder if thi
: Sorry to nitpick, but all AA's 200ERs begin with one 7 not two. For example, 7AJ, 7BF, 7CB, etc.
: UA has stated more than once they are staying with their 359 orders. Their stated intention is to replace their 744 fleet.
: Internal fleet numbers for AA are: - 251 to 293: MD-80 - 318 to 339: B767-200ER - 342 to 399: B767-300ER - 401 to 587: MD-80 - 610 to 643: B757-200 -
: 35 of the first 737-800s are part of a sale-leaseback transaction with Aercap Lease Finance. Aercap has itself already arranged a credit facility wit
: Really? I find that hard to believe, but hey, who knows. On pictures from the press release, they show 319s and 321s. I know that's not saying much,
: Looks like the DFW airport and AMR are in the planning stage for 100 seaters: http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/11...a-new-dfw-airport-takes-shape.ht
: Does anyone know what the rough configuration will be for the A319s and the A321s? I know that AA has mentioned putting some off the A321s in a 3-clas
: I, too, find it hard to believe. I suppose AA could get the first batch of 130 Airbus aircraft as non-NEO A321s, and then make the second batch, say,
: That hasn't been settled upon yet by AMR (internally-speaking).
: Does the A321 have the range of the 757's AA uses on its Hawaii and thin TATL routes?
: This interest of ours called aviation requires a lot of patience, doesn't it?
: Thanks for the info, that really is a massive fleet upgrade in a relatively short timeframe. No wonder the narrowbody order was split up between A&