JAGflyer From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 3704 posts, RR: 3 Posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 14144 times:
During BA and AF's use of the aircraft, was regular cargo loaded on the aircraft? Perhaps as a "premium" rush service to JFK/LHR/CDG. Generally cargo is loaded on pallets or containers (with the exception of aircraft which are strictly bulk-load only (ie. 737). Would regularly booked cargo fly Concorde or was it all transported on the non-supersonic flights? Judging by most cargo I've seen, it consists of large quantities which are already pre-palleted or in containers from or to be loaded onto other flights.
Support the beer and soda can industry, recycle old airplanes!
If I remember right the cargo capacity of Concorde was around 2-2.5 tons. I doubt it was put on a pallet or put in containers, but I could be wrong. Regardless, it would not have been in large quantities.
contrails15 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13806 times:
Buddy of mine worked the Concorde at JFK for BA. He said it was a nightmare to load. The cargo hold is extremely narrow and ceiling is low. Not much space for luggage and did tell me they had cargo but it was not much. Maybe a ton at most and that was very rare. What was so interesting is the fast pace time in which last bag had to be on the belt. I think it was 20 mins for the last one to be put on. When your paying fares like that, ones bag better be waiting for them no more then 20 mins.
okie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3493 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 13489 times:
Other than some time sensitive documents the 3 or 4 hour gain of getting freight through on Concorde was eaten up by Customs and then making connections to domestic flights.
If you were not receiving the freight at the point of entry then there was little to be gained by the extra charges of Concorde, especially if you were moving freight on into the interior of the US.
planesailing From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 817 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 13176 times:
My girlfriends dad works for a major international courier company and when Concorde was flying he was offered the chance to fly a package over to New York. He has a fear of flying, so refused the opportunity, but what an amazing 'job' to do!
PanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 10336 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 12013 times:
...as mentioned already, it was mainly on board courier material that went in both directions, at pemium rates both for the airline as well as for the courier company. A lot of money was made in that business especially in the 80s, The SKY. was the limit.
Oak522 From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5372 times:
One of the freight companies (FedEx, I think) used to offer "Supersonic Express" or something for a small fortune. I had to send some documents to South Africa once and used it--routing and exact time taken, not sure--but it worked a hell of a lot faster than posting something.
TheBigOne From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3716 times:
If memory serves me right, I believe Concorde was occasionally used to transport time sensitive medication across the Atlantic. I vaguely remember seeing a documentary about either a vaccine or an anti-venom being transported as it had to reach its final destination within 5 hours.
Reach for the stars - they are closer than you think!