Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does Anybody Have Photos Of The Airbus AE316/7?  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3398 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 11850 times:

I know the AE316/7, was a RJ project, that seat 95 and 115 passengers, which Airbus was working on with China and Singapore. I also know that the AE316/7, had a cross section around the size of an DC-9 type a/c. So I wonder, do any body here, have a photo of the AE316/7 designs, and if you do, please post it ? Thank you  

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedfwrevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 957 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 11825 times:



Ask and ye shall receive  


User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3398 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 11722 times:

Quoting dfwrevolution (Reply 1):
Ask and ye shall receive

Your are right about that. Thank you for the photo.  


User currently offlineBureaucromancer From Canada, joined Feb 2010, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 10688 times:

Is there any more information about this program out there somewhere?

User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 10497 times:

Couldn't resist..... http://www.cardatabase.net/modifieda...inerphotos/photos/big/00002955.jpg

http://milehighcustoms.com/forum/uploads/post-7-1124258387.jpg
http://milehighcustoms.com/forum/uploads/post-7-1124258387.jpg

Quoting Bureaucromancer (Reply 3):
Is there any more information about this program out there somewhere?

A post from an old thread.....

"User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11091 posts, RR: 69
Reply 7, posted Fri Dec 13 2002 05:47:16 your local time (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Airbus Industrie Asia (AIA) was planning on developing the AE316 and AE317 under a joint venture with Aviation Industries of China (AVIC) and Singapore Technologies.

It would have resembled the A320 family similar in length to the A318. The AE316 would have seated 95 to 105 passengers, while the larger stretched AE317 would have seated 115 to 125 passengers. The key difference between these 2 aircraft and the A320 family however would have been a narrower fuselage. It would have a 5-abreast seat configuration in economy instead of 6-abreast as on the current A320 family. It was originally called the AE100.

This aircraft would have been a TRUE 717 competitor as it would have been much much lighter than the A318.

Unfortunately this aircraft never became a reality.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2535 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 10145 times:

It B737-100 was 28.67m long but the A318 is 31.44m long, ¿could have been possible to further shorten the 6 abreast A318 and make it an A317?


I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlineBureaucromancer From Canada, joined Feb 2010, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9915 times:

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 5):
could have been possible to further shorten the 6 abreast A318 and make it an A317?

Technically it wouldn't have been hard at all, but the economics of the A318 are bad enough.

Honestly I have to say that from the looks of it it's a real shame that Airbus went with the A318 over the AE316/7, although I suppose the logic of the decision is clear enough. Honestly it still seems like a good concept post NEO introduction but for the glut of aircraft in that size range now... I assume that if Airbus had gone with this they could quite easily have beaten things like the C-Series and MRJ into service (how would it compare time wise the E-190/195?), and the commonality could have gone a long way in terms of early sales. The experience lightening the A320 technology wouldn't have hurt the NEO program either for that matter, with the potential for the new technology to eventually end up back in the A320s.


User currently offlineamccann From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 9738 times:

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 5):
could have been possible to further shorten the 6 abreast A318 and make it an A317?

Possibly, but because the reduced moment arm between the wing and tail I imagine the tail would need to be scaled up. I believe Airbus has been able to utilize the same tail for the A318 as the rest of the A32X series, however anything much shorted than the A318 I would imagine would require a scaled up tail. Similarly, when Boeing produced the 747SP the vertical tail was increased in area because the reduced moment arm.

Long story short, possible yes, but as Bureaucromancer said, the economics would have been terrible.



What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. - Ronald Reagan
User currently onlinebennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 9706 times:

What are the production implication of a narrower fuselage?.

User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5374 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 9642 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 4):

Well those pics are of the experimental Airbus DC3-A313 (first pic) and the A314.  

The DC3-A313 was considered too retro looking but it was thought it might make a great jump plane.

The A314 was an experiment into providing maximum safety for passengers which is why it had 8 exits (four main and four over wing). Even with this much passenger safety designed into it, it never caught on.

Also range was a bit of an issue for both these birds.

 

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4376 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 9642 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 4):
Couldn't resist.....

The second looks OK, but on the first photo the wing is too much to the front... Nice photos, and the only photos I assume.


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7361 posts, RR: 17
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 9410 times:

Quoting amccann (Reply 7):
I believe Airbus has been able to utilize the same tail for the A318 as the rest of the A32X series, however anything much shorted than the A318 I would imagine would require a scaled up tail.

My understanding is that the tail of, for example, the A319, is 11.80 meters high while that of the 318 is 12.56 meters. The difference can be seen here:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerry Stegmeier
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Eddie Heisterkamp


Note the larger all-white area at the top of the 318's tail.


User currently onlineegnr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 508 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 9406 times:

Quoting amccann (Reply 7):
I believe Airbus has been able to utilize the same tail for the A318 as the rest of the A32X series

The A319,320,321 share the same vertical tail, but the A318 features a taller fin. You can see the extension above the rudder on the LAN A318 below left compared with the A319 on the right.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bruno Guimaraes Orofino
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alejandro Ruiz



VV701 beat me to it!

[Edited 2011-12-02 01:54:18]

[Edited 2011-12-02 01:54:37]


7late7, A3latey, Sukhoi Superlate... what's going on?
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 9005 times:

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 10):
on the first photo the wing is too much to the front.

Rumor had it that it was returned to the manufacturer due to a bad nose-up attitude, which also made the carrier wary of taking delivery of its sibling.  .

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 10):
and the only photos I assume.

Ahh, they also had a very early prototype of an A300 variant, but wind tunnel testing had disastrous results.....

http://pluchette.free.fr/A307.jpg


.....it ended up as a model for children's toys and key chains for airplane geeks!  



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5374 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 8846 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 13):
Ahh, they also had a very early prototype of an A300 variant, but wind tunnel testing had disastrous results.....

Though I would LOVE to see it's take off performance! Pretty much vertical I would presume.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineamccann From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 8576 times:

Quoting egnr (Reply 12):
The A319,320,321 share the same vertical tail, but the A318 features a taller fin. You can see the extension above the rudder on the LAN A318 below left compared with the A319 on the right.

I didn't know that, thanks for pointing that out to me. I wonder if a further reduced moment arm would require an increased horizontal tail as well, or if the current tail has enough remaining control authority that it would not pose an issue.



What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. - Ronald Reagan
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Photos Of The Old PVD Terminal? posted Sun Apr 9 2006 07:37:27 by Gift4tbone
Any Photos Of The 3 New DC 10 Of Avianca posted Mon Apr 12 2004 05:14:59 by MATURRO727
Do Any Airlines Have The A300 B4 In Their Fleet? posted Mon Mar 26 2001 01:38:44 by Mbj-11
Do You Have Photos Of Your First Jet Ride? posted Thu Mar 22 2001 03:22:41 by SJC-Alien
Any Chance For A Return Of The "Red Tail"? posted Sun May 9 2010 19:01:18 by toxicmegacolon
USA: Do Any Airline Have "Fly Pass" Anymore? posted Mon Jul 30 2007 22:05:53 by Bofredrik
Any Interior 787 Photos From The Ceremony? posted Tue Jul 10 2007 04:13:32 by Deltadude8
Who Has Received Photos Of The 787 Fuselage Gaps? posted Wed Jun 13 2007 20:40:52 by WINGS
Anyone Have A Schedule Of The 380s JFK Visit? posted Tue Mar 6 2007 00:09:12 by RJpieces
Does Anyone Have Pictures Of The Old SAV Airport posted Thu Sep 1 2005 04:29:13 by Liedetectors