"JetBlue and Singapore Airlines Partner to Offer New Connections to Destinations Worldwide
- New connections available from New York/JFK and Newark-
- Singapore to launch A380 flights from JetBlue's JFK home in January -
NEW YORK and SINGAPORE, Dec. 19, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ --JetBlue Airways (NASDAQ: JBLU), New York's Hometown Airline(TM), and Singapore Airlines, one of the world's most respected carriers, today announce the launch of a new interline agreement that will offer customers new travel options from JetBlue destinations in the United States to Europe, Singapore and beyond. "
Looks like B6 keeps rolling with these partners! 14 now!
blr380 From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 147 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6959 times:
No big deal - just an interline agreement. You can have interline with any airline/alliance - doesn't deserve a thread of its own. If it is codeshare or FFM agreements - its is certainly worth talking about. Anyhow, I am all for BT6 growth and love to see TATL service on their own metal some day.
steex From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 1425 posts, RR: 9 Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6018 times:
Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 6):
Except when they did it with AA, everyone on here took that to mean a merge was imminent.
The difference is that AA and B6 also traded slots and focused their agreement on non-overlapping markets while otherwise still fighting for the same traffic - an issue that obviously is not in play here. They specifically used the term "commercial collaboration" for their relationship, which is far more than what we see here with SQ. That's the reason people analyzed it so deeply, not because it was a simple codeshare.
Don't get me wrong, it's still a nice addition for B6 and worth noting.
infinit From Singapore, joined Jul 2008, 307 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3177 times:
Commercial collaboaration? I wonder what the extent of the collaboration will be. There isn't a lot of information there.
Well SQ is a big brand. Probably the 'Gucci' of the commercial airline industry if you will so this could just be for publicity's sake when they might just be codesharing on a very select few routes. But I'm not sure, it could really be a bigger collaboration than that
Their write up about SQ is sketchy compared to the comprehensive one they gave themselves lol.
planetime From Singapore, joined Mar 2006, 719 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1036 times:
Quoting cysafan (Reply 15): So that means JFK T5 will handle SQ 's A380s instead of T4 This part seems a bit misleading.
I think they will stay at T4, maybe when B6 builds their international wing at JFK they might move in. Is it planned to accomodate the A380? What is the status of the T5i.... did not hear anything after they razed the old T6.
contrails15 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1181 posts, RR: 0 Reply 17, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 983 times:
Quoting planetime (Reply 16): I think they will stay at T4, maybe when B6 builds their international wing at JFK they might move in. Is it planned to accomodate the A380? What is the status of the T5i.... did not hear anything after they razed the old T6.
T5i will not acconmodate the A380. Its not gonna be a very large terminal. Its mainly gonna be just B6 flights but the gates will be able to take a widebody. It just wont be an A380. Demo. is still going on. I would say sometime in 2015 at best. If they get Turner construction again, maybe even sooner. They built T5 in record time and believe me, it shows. There are no drawings available to the public yet but I'm sure there out there. I'm going by a pretty good source to the above.