kaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11217 posts, RR: 41 Reply 7, posted (2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 8464 times:
It was indeed a -400; this aircraft only joined Sriwijaya on 22nd November! Previously, it was stored for a while after being with BremenFly, then before that Olympic as SK-BKN and N401KW with Carnival. LN 2380. In service since Oct 1992.
na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 8432 posts, RR: 11 Reply 8, posted (2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 8409 times:
Quoting kaitak (Reply 7):
It was indeed a -400; this aircraft only joined Sriwijaya on 22nd November! Previously, it was stored for a while after being with BremenFly, then before that Olympic as SK-BKN and N401KW with Carnival. LN 2380. In service since Oct 1992.
A 734 has a different window pattern with 13-1-3 windows in front of the overwing exit (right side). 733 has 12-5 on the right side, like the one in the photo (first window near front door plugged). So, it must be a 733!
Gonzalo From Chile, joined Aug 2005, 726 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 8203 times:
Quoting RJLover (Reply 4): Please note, the IATA code for Yogyakarta is JOG.
YOG appears to be a tiny little "airport" in Northern Ontario, Canada.
Thanks, my mistake. It has been corrected already by our moderators.
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 9): The aircraft in the photos is clearly a -300 as already mentioned by others.
I believe you, but it was not so clear for me, the pics are blurry to say the least, but I guess it was my mistake again.
But 400 or 300, is a classic anyway
According to the article, that was a long ride for the passengers. They aborted a first landing in JOG, then diverted to Solo where they aborted the approach too, landed in Surabaya, and after refueling departed to Yogyakarta again, only to overran the runway after landing
G.
[Edited 2011-12-20 11:49:50]
Circling the world, that's the way to live !! DC-3 / EMB-110 / Fokker F-27 / Ab318-19-20 / B732 / B763
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 10167 posts, RR: 66 Reply 11, posted (2 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 8038 times:
Glad it wasn't more serious.
Quoting rl757pvd (Reply 1): Thats quite the burm right near the runway... thats why we have runway safety area standards here in the US...
Looks to me like it is a road descending through a shallow cutting, not an embankment. Doubt it meets ICAO regs though, the clearway and RESAs certainly don't.
A340Spotter From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1958 posts, RR: 31 Reply 13, posted (2 months 4 days ago) and read 7650 times:
Quoting kaitak (Reply 7): It was indeed a -400; this aircraft only joined Sriwijaya on 22nd November! Previously, it was stored for a while after being with BremenFly, then before that Olympic as SK-BKN and N401KW with Carnival. LN 2380. In service since Oct 1992.
AvHerald has amended the aircraft...
737-36N cn 28333 / ln 2810, delivered to Virgin Express as OO-VEB back in 1996 and has spent time at quite a few airlines including Pace here in the US (N374PA).
Regards
JSD
"Irregardless, it's a Cat III airplane, we don't need an alternate!"
737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 220 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (2 months 4 days ago) and read 7548 times:
I find the comments section of the article amusing, mostly about how to egress via the slides. I wonder if one of them have ever egressed an aircraft on the slide. I can say I have many times. We have to test slide deployment and of course we HAVE to slide down them (for fun). It is not a big deal, really. I guess if you didn't remove high heels it might be a problem. There's just too many folks who comment on things they no absolutely nothing about. JMO.
Indeed.. And thank god there's no serious injury's either
But, The there is two things bugging me.. On a local Indonesian news article, It says that The aircraft was flown by one of Sriwijaya Airlines Senior pilots
And JOG airport is re-open now.. but the plane hasn't been moved yet.. Its still in the same place where it is yesterday.. Is it going to disturb an inbound or an outbound airplane?
Gonzalo From Chile, joined Aug 2005, 726 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 597 times:
Some updated information :
The aircraft was the 4th to land after the weather improved, the three preceding flights had landed safely. The touchdown of SJ-230 was described as very smooth.
NTSC investigators arrived on scene on Dec 21st 2011 and released the aircraft to be moved off its final position by late Dec 21st after collecting evidence, the airport resumed operation on Dec 22nd about 06:00L (23:00Z Dec 21st).
Rgds.
G.
Circling the world, that's the way to live !! DC-3 / EMB-110 / Fokker F-27 / Ab318-19-20 / B732 / B763
Sponsor Message: 
From Chile, joined Aug 2005, 726 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4367 posts, 
From Germany, joined Feb 2007, 1981 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 135 posts, 
From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 531 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 11217 posts, 
From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 17839 posts, 
From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 10167 posts, 
From Australia, joined May 2008, 743 posts, 
From Indonesia, joined Feb 2011, 18 posts, 
Is it going to disturb an inbound or an outbound airplane?
Printer friendly format 
