Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA's Discontinued Routes To Cover ATR Reduction  
User currently offlineSJUSXM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 294 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 12 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 7010 times:

source: AA

To cover the reduction in ATR flying at DFW, AA has announced the following discontinuations:

ORD-TRI
DFW-AGS
MIA-SAV
MIA-RSW

AA will continue serving DFW-SAV and DFW/ORD-RSW

in addition, the discontinuation of ORD-YYC, DFW-FAY and LAX-BOI has been moved up to Jan-31st from Feb-9th


AT7, ER3, ER4, ER5, CR7, E70, E75, F100, M82, M83, 722, 732, 738, 752, 762, 763, AB6, 320, 321, 772, 77W
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinesmoot4208 From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1322 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (2 years 12 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6784 times:

I wonder if this means the rest of the SJU hub will go then. Or were the remaining routes all flown by ERJs already? MIA-RSW/SAV is kind of surprising. ORD-TRI and DFW-AGS were longer thinner routes so not too surprising

User currently offlineLONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 741 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 12 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6461 times:

Wow, I've been traveling between MIA-RSW since the early 90's. I can remember a time when there used to be 8 or so daily frequencies.

User currently offlineSJUSXM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 294 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 12 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6366 times:

Quoting smoot4208 (Reply 1):
I wonder if this means the rest of the SJU hub will go then. Or were the remaining routes all flown by ERJs already?

SJU is still ATR's, but the ones being returned from the leases are all DFW based. They are the closest ones to their lease expiration. The announcement that DFW is going all RJ/mainline I think keeps MIA/SJU relatively safe for now at least.



AT7, ER3, ER4, ER5, CR7, E70, E75, F100, M82, M83, 722, 732, 738, 752, 762, 763, AB6, 320, 321, 772, 77W
User currently offlinenomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 12 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6283 times:

Strategic Chapter 11 move. As MAH pointed out on another post, AA can and props to DFW (and ORD if they wanted to) with another carrier that offers lower costs. RJs with 50 seats or less may be here now, but they will be gone as soon as AA can replace them or opt out of contracts at the airports.

User currently onlineAirMatt From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 90 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 5599 times:

Surprised by the MIA-RSW cut. I've taken that flight countless times and it's always full. I know full flights don't indicate profitability, but still a shame.

User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4926 times:

Quoting SJUSXM (Thread starter):
DFW-AGS

Wow 874mi in an old ATR. Must be desperate to get to DFW.   



"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlinecelltower From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 10 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4833 times:

Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 6):

I believe the DFW - AGS flights are currently operated by RJ's.


User currently offlineThreeIfByAir From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 709 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4812 times:

Quoting smoot4208 (Reply 1):
I wonder if this means the rest of the SJU hub will go then. Or were the remaining routes all flown by ERJs already? MIA-RSW/SAV is kind of surprising. ORD-TRI and DFW-AGS were longer thinner routes so not too surprising

The ATRs are perfect for SJU operations - I doubt they will be gone. Cargo capacity on the ATRs is much greater than the ERJs and the ATRs have better short field performance which is important, as several several airports served from SJU have runways under 6000ft.

As was said in the other thread, AA is playing hardball with the lessors since these ATR frames are getting older and probably can't be placed with another carrier for much $$$. We all know that AA doesn't want most of the ERJs long-term either, but at these mainland US airports, runway length is not an issue.


User currently offlineSJUSXM From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 294 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3830 times:

Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 6):
Wow 874mi in an old ATR. Must be desperate to get to DFW

This is an RJ route, but the plane is needed to backfill the ATR's that are leaving DFW. Same with FAY and TRI. The MIA-xxx routes are ATR and ORD-YYC is a CR7



AT7, ER3, ER4, ER5, CR7, E70, E75, F100, M82, M83, 722, 732, 738, 752, 762, 763, AB6, 320, 321, 772, 77W
User currently offlineGEN2STEW From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 99 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3000 times:

With the great speed of the AA/AE BK I must assume that there is already a plan in place for future regional/hub flying. Maybe, maybe not an AMR company...   


I don't know why blessings wear disguises. If I were a blessing, I'd run around nude!
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12930 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (2 years 12 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2857 times:

Quoting SJUSXM (Thread starter):
discontinuations

Wow, that's corporatespeak at its finest!  

I should stop paying my bills, and when bill collectors call, I can tell them it's just a discontinuation!  



Inspiration, move me brightly!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA Old Routes To Oceania,help Please! posted Sat Aug 26 2000 16:49:07 by Blink182
AA: AmericanConnection/TSA To Start Miami Routes posted Mon Apr 7 2008 10:29:33 by MAH4546
Why Does AA Use Super80s On Routes To Mexico posted Wed Jun 6 2007 03:47:54 by AAden
Discontinued AA LAX Routes posted Sat Sep 2 2006 21:40:50 by Tommy767
AA - Will They Launch More Routes To Ireland? posted Wed Aug 24 2005 18:18:33 by EI321
New Rumored AA Routes To Germany posted Tue Apr 5 2005 07:18:31 by NYCAAer
AA Routes To CUN posted Tue Dec 28 2004 00:31:13 by Thrust
AA Routes To HNL posted Wed Mar 10 2004 05:25:37 by Thrust
AA Routes To Be Booted posted Thu Nov 13 2003 06:59:18 by Thrust
AA Hawaiian Routes - "Where They Come From/go To?" posted Fri May 30 2003 00:41:39 by Flyingbronco05