Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Emirates Ops At JFK  
User currently offlineplanetime From Singapore, joined Mar 2006, 719 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4962 times:

I flew on the JFK-DXB flight several times and all times the flight seems full/full/full. Why is EK not putting another flight to JFK or upgrading to the 380 on the 77w flight? They must be making good $$$ on this route, F/J were all full all the times I flew on it.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWhappeh From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1562 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4581 times:

It used to be the A380 and when I flew it with the 380 the aircraft had around 100 people on it. I remember it being a big deal they were switching back to the 777.


-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4539 times:

Quoting Whappeh (Reply 1):
It used to be the A380 and when I flew it with the 380 the aircraft had around 100 people on it. I remember it being a big deal they were switching back to the 777.

They have two daily services, one of which is still/again on the A388. They pulled the A388 from the JFK runs for a very short while because they needed it for YYZ. As soon as another one was delivered, it went back to the JFK flight.

I don't know of a single flight DXB-JFK-DXB with a load factor below 65%.

Depending on slot availability, EK will grow (either 3rd daily, or double A388) at JFK in the medium term.



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12419 posts, RR: 100
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3966 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting something (Reply 2):
Depending on slot availability, EK will grow (either 3rd daily, or double A388) at JFK in the medium term.

It will also depend on premium vs. Y demand. Right now, the A388s belong on the routes that sell J. (Then again, how EK utilized the A388 to sell J at MAN still amazes me...) I suspect we'll see 2X A380 long before 3X/day.



Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlinesandyb123 From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2007, 1039 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3267 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 3):
Then again, how EK utilized the A388 to sell J at MAN still amazes me

MAN has a very affluent population within its catchment. The are also a lot of business links between the midlands, Northern England and Dubai. EK also give a lot of upgrades to Skywards members.

Sndyb123



DC3, 727, 737, 744, 753, 777, A32X, A345, A388, ERJ145, E190, BaE146, D328, ATR72, Q400
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12419 posts, RR: 100
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3174 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sandyb123 (Reply 4):
The are also a lot of business links between the midlands, Northern England and Dubai.

I recall reading, prior to A388 launch at MAN, that EK was having trouble selling the premium tickets at MAN. Either the economy turned up enough or the big plane drew attention. I won't claim to know all the details of the market. I'll just note I'm pleasantly surprised by how well EK has done selling J at MAN.

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 3):
It will also depend on premium vs. Y demand. Right now, the A388s belong on the routes that sell J. (Then again, how EK utilized the A388 to sell J at MAN still amazes me...) I suspect we'll see 2X A380 long before 3X/day.
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 5):
the big plane drew attention.

The A380 is a marketing tool for EK, which is literally the only reason why there's even an option of three daily before double A388.

MAN is a very competitive market. Simply being EK won't win the customer's favor anymore, especially since the products of the EY and QR are on par or better in all classes (personally, I much prefer EYs premium offering to EKs gaudy wood and gold boxes). The EK A388 is a huge attraction at MAN and that generates a lot of market exposure/publicity for EK.
For similar reasons I believe EK will serve DUS on the whale in the medium term as well (in spite of the same lack of actual premium demand).



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12419 posts, RR: 100
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2771 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting something (Reply 6):
The EK A388 is a huge attraction at MAN and that generates a lot of market exposure/publicity for EK.
For similar reasons I believe EK will serve DUS on the whale in the medium term as well (in spite of the same lack of actual premium demand).

So much for 'what will EK do with all those A380s.  

I wonder how long the novelty will last? It was there with the 747 and eventually faded away. I'd love to know the premium travel stats for EK and MAN pre and post the A380.

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlinepanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4792 posts, RR: 25
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2675 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting something (Reply 2):
They pulled the A388 from the JFK runs for a very short while because they needed it for YYZ. As soon as another one was delivered, it went back to the JFK flight.

Actually they pulled the A388 off of JFK due to the global economic meltdown in 2009; the A388 would lose less money on YYZ than JFK at that point....


User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2569 times:

Quoting panamair (Reply 8):
Quoting something (Reply 2):
They pulled the A388 from the JFK runs for a very short while because they needed it for JFK flight.

Actually they pulled the A388 off of JFK due to the global economic meltdown in 2009; the A388 would lose less money on JFK at that point....

What other reason would they have had to move the bird from JFK to BKK)? They had struggling filling it at JFK while their 77Ws at
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 7):
I wonder how long the novelty will last?
http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1324035423.html

In that quoted article in the ''Süddeutsche Zeitung'', Clark says that he expected the A380 novelty effect to last about half a year and is surprised it still hasn't diminished. In another article about SQ I read that SQ charges slightly higher fares for their A388 flights compared to the 77Ws, yet the A388 attracts much higher sales. (That was supposedly one of their reasons to bring it to ZRH).

http://www.airliners.de/verkehr/netz.../emirates-will-weitere-a380-/25961

Quote:
Die Flüge mit der A380 sind fast immer voll. Ich habe in meinen 40 Jahren in diesem Geschäft kein Flugzeug gesehen, das so populär ist

''The A380 flights are almost always sold out. I've never seen an aircraft that popular in my entire 40 years career in the industry.''

In the same article (subscribers and German only) he also points out that he had expected the novelty effect to last a good half a year, but that it still hasn't diminished. He then goes on to say that he wants to order more, but that future growth will be limited by capacity restrictions at DXB.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 7):
So much for 'what will EK do with all those A380s.

In an interview with the WSJ Tim Clarke said that, ''the entire American network will be flown exclusively by giant Airbus A380s within five years.''

tiny.cc/tupzv (edit to hide actual link; forum kept messing it up).

I want to say that Emirates' strategy is rather predictable because it follows a very logical, but prudent strategy. Next to DUS, I see MXP and even BCN high on the list as A380 second-tier market A380 destinations. FRA is way overdue as well.

It's funny how slow the A380 is selling because airlines are worried about filling them in the off-season, whilst EK can't get them quick enough.

[Edited 2012-01-01 18:23:52]


..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlineHB-IWC From Greece, joined Sep 2000, 4480 posts, RR: 72
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

Emirates is currently operating 20 A388 frames and the next 4 aircraft, accounting for deliveries well into the second half of 2012 have already been incorporated into the schedules. I believe the airline will add extra equipment to the New York market, but will do so with a third daily flight to JFK in the afternoon DXB departure bank with a schedule along the following pattern:

DXB JFK 1500 2030
JFK DXB 0100 2145

We should also not discard the option that EK may be looking into serving EWR instead.


User currently offlineplanetime From Singapore, joined Mar 2006, 719 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2441 times:

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 10):
We should also not discard the option that EK may be looking into serving EWR instead.

With a bigger Indian Sub-continent population in Jersey than New York it would not be out of the picture. But you are right highly likely JFK would be added service rather than EWR service.


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12419 posts, RR: 100
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1985 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting something (Reply 9):
In another article about SQ I read that SQ charges slightly higher fares for their A388 flights compared to the 77Ws, yet the A388 attracts much higher sales. (That was supposedly one of their reasons to bring it to ZRH).

This I do not doubt. I still know dozens of people who alter their trip itinerary (e.g., add a stop they wouldn't otherwise) to fly the A380.

Quoting something (Reply 9):
In an interview with the WSJ Tim Clarke said that, ''the entire American network will be flown exclusively by giant Airbus A380s within five years.''

I think the existing destinations will be mostly A380. I wonder about SFO (lower premium yield).

Quoting something (Reply 9):
tiny.cc/tupzv (edit to hide actual link; forum kept messing it up).

I too cannot post WSJ links in these forums. Anyone know why?

Quoting HB-IWC (Reply 10):
We should also not discard the option that EK may be looking into serving EWR instead.

Instead or 'in parallel.'   I fully expect to see EK at EWR.

I do agree with planetime that at this point JFK is more likely to see additional service prior to a EWR launch. However, EWR within 3 years should be a given. .

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue Ops At JFK posted Mon Nov 20 2006 17:40:24 by Captaink
Emirates A345 At JFK posted Tue Jul 6 2004 09:05:18 by Mark777300
Emirates A380 Get Stuck At JFK? posted Mon Mar 2 2009 13:47:46 by Contrails15
DL Prepares For Summer Ops Problems At JFK posted Mon Apr 23 2007 02:25:30 by Laxintl
Terminal 7 At JFK Ground Ops posted Mon Aug 8 2005 09:10:02 by RJpieces
Ryan A330-300 At JFK? posted Tue Dec 20 2011 12:35:17 by contrails15
Residents Complaining About Noise At JFK posted Sun Dec 11 2011 08:16:24 by washingtonian
Old Pan Am Pics From Terminal 3 At JFK posted Wed Dec 7 2011 03:34:25 by washingtonian
83 Year Old Stripped Searched At JFK posted Sun Dec 4 2011 06:22:29 by aztrainer
AB & ZB Ops At RSW posted Wed Nov 30 2011 08:45:31 by csturdiv