Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Possible Reason For AF Leaving Seattle  
User currently offlineER757 From Cayman Islands, joined May 2005, 2431 posts, RR: 7
Posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2768 times:

I was always curious as to why AF turned over SEA/CDG to DL since I know the load factors were consistently very good on the flights. Now that the holidays are over and everyone's back to work I finally had a chance to talk with my contacts at Port of Seattle. What I was told is that it was due to cargo - or more specifically lack of cargo. Apparently AF was never able to garner a decent chunk of the Seattle to Europe air freight market which they were counting on in order to fill up the bellies on those flights. It makes sense they might have a rough time with CV and MP flying several freighters a week along with BA, who have been flying to SEA forever having ample capacity on their 744's. Those carriers would be able to offer lower cargo rates due to the extra capacity or so it would seem. Then there's LH who have always been aggressive when it comes to air cargo. What I wasn't able to find out is whether DL figures they can get the cargo revenue on the SEA/CDG flight or if it just isn't that important to them. Since this info didn't come to me from AF themselves, I can't say for certain it's valid, but I will say that my sources at POS have been consistently reliable in the past and I've no reason to doubt them as a result.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1972 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2760 times:

DL and AF have ATI, I guess that DL's planes could do even better than AF's planes did.


2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineBigGSFO From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2887 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2492 times:

Well I think under the ATI/JV provision DL has to operate a certain percentage of the transatlantic flights. So perhaps the shift to DL has to do with that, as well as right sizing the aircraft to maximize yields in the market.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
French Court: CO responsible for AF Concorde crash posted Mon Dec 6 2010 02:28:20 by alasdair1982
Any Reason For UAE 744 In CVG? posted Tue Sep 21 2010 04:21:47 by xjramper
Reason For Easyjet Cancellation? posted Tue Aug 17 2010 05:28:42 by booforty
Tokyo Will Be Next Route For AF's A380 posted Tue Jun 8 2010 04:05:57 by LondonCity
Record Losses For AF-KL - €1.3 Billion (US$1.58bn) posted Wed May 19 2010 05:42:46 by 777
Reason for this FX flight ANC-MSY? posted Sun May 2 2010 06:51:34 by MSYtristar
France Resumes Search For AF 447 Wreckage posted Wed Feb 17 2010 10:58:50 by BA84
The Reason For Regional Subsidiaries posted Wed Feb 17 2010 08:36:11 by Initious
New Destination For AF In Africa : Bata posted Wed Feb 10 2010 08:23:23 by FlySSC
Any Reason For Different Cockpit Colors? posted Sat Feb 6 2010 15:18:34 by LHCVG