Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Porter Increases YTZ Rents Up To 300%  
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1098 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 5306 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/...-billy-bishop-airport-by-up-to-300

According to the article Porter is increasing the rent at YTZ from 30-300% and what is worse is evicting the two flight schools that rent hangar space on the island. With Buttonville closing this means that there will no longer be a flight school in Toronto which is a real shame. I wonder if ORNGE will also be kicked out?

Quote:

No monetary figures were provided by Porter, but several tenants contacted by the Toronto Star — all of whom did not want to be identified in case the hike could be renegotiated — said the increase ranged from 30 to 300 per cent. They say the amount could jeopardize business and force them out of the airport.

While Deluce acknowledged that the flight schools “could not be accommodated in their current form,” he said arrangements are still in the process of being made for the schools to either move to another airport or another space, still at Billy Bishop, with a new landlord.

Representatives from both flight schools declined to comment Tuesday.

Deluce said Porter recognizes the price may now be too high for some tenants and is aiming to help some who wish to move with the transition to another airport, naming alternatives in Brampton, Oshawa, Tillsonburg and Barrie.



DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineac033 From Hong Kong, joined Jun 2008, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 5071 times:

30% is for the flight school

300% is for Air Canada Express

I guess that is another way to kick Air Canada out of the YTZ


User currently offlinebennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7816 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 4992 times:

If the flight school leaves, does Porter have new tenants ready to move in?.

User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1098 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4789 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

My guess is they want the space for themselves, plus they would have more ramp space with the flight school planes out of the way.


DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5478 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4634 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Reply 3):

I wonder if Porter can get into anti trust problems by using their monopoly status at YTZ to drive out competition.

They don't actually own the airport, do they?



What the...?
User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5164 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4614 times:

They have just generated a lot of ill will and bad press in Toronto. Not a good thing. There was a news clip on AM680 in Toronto, and the word of 'average Joe' on the street was not flattering.

I have always maintained that as long as Porter does not abuse their monopoly, they should be allowed to grow and survive without competition. It appears the honeymoon is over.

Once Air Canada leaves, and they likely will, and with a stronghold on YTZ, I wonder how much longer the $45 tickets to YUL will be around?



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineWestJet747 From Canada, joined Aug 2011, 1939 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4599 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Thread starter):
According to the article Porter is increasing the rent at YTZ from 30-300%

Numbers aren't made public, but apparently this hike is to put YTZ rent in line with costs at similar airports.

Quoting YYZatcboy (Thread starter):
I wonder if ORNGE will also be kicked out?

ORNGE is doing enough to kick themselves out at the moment. That company is up to their neck in government heat right now and their CEO and founder just took an indefinite leave.

Quoting ac033 (Reply 1):
I guess that is another way to kick Air Canada out of the YTZ

AC is going to pay. Their head is too far up their own you-know-what to gracefully exit. Just wait for the lawsuit.....

Quoting ac033 (Reply 1):
If the flight school leaves, does Porter have new tenants ready to move in?.

Yep, themselves.

Quoting YYZatcboy (Reply 3):
they would have more ramp space with the flight school planes out of the way.

   If there's one thing they need it's space. If the flight schools leave then I could see the Island Air hangar being demolished in favour of a couple more gates.



Flying refined.
User currently offlinekrisyyz From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1593 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4429 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Thread starter):
I wonder if ORNGE will also be kicked out?

I thought they were already planning on moving their base to YHM. Apparently they will have an easier time responding to calls from YHM, but I'm sure the cost issue played into that decision as well.


I'm a big fan of Porter, but they seem more set on winning this "fight" with AC than public relations. Porter has a great reputation in Toronto, AC not so much. I'm also not too impressed with seeing flight school having to abandon YTZ as it's a great place to practice a steep approach.

KrisYYZ


User currently offlineaamd11 From UK - Wales, joined Nov 2001, 1061 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4378 times:

Has it been confirmed at all which tenants exactly are paying the increased rents?

The flight schools are all but confirmed based on what Deluce has said... however, is AC one of the tenants that is subject to a rate hike? The story seems to indicate that the focus is more on the other properties (hangar space and the offices within), rather than the terminal itself where Sky Regional's operations are concentrated.


User currently offlineyyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 9, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4100 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 5):
I wonder how much longer the $45 tickets to YUL will be around?

Porter must remain competitive with AC and WS out of YYZ so fares will remain low even without YTZ competition

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 6):
Numbers aren't made public, but apparently this hike is to put YTZ rent in line with costs at similar airports.

Then it sounds reasonble.

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 6):
If the flight schools leave then I could see the Island Air hangar being demolished in favour of a couple more gates.

Flights schools dont really have a place at growing commercial airports. That Porter grew like a phoenix and has displaced flight schools quickly is just a fact of business. DT Toronto benefits far more from Porter than flight schools anyway so its good for the DT community.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5164 posts, RR: 43
Reply 10, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3841 times:

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 9):
Porter must remain competitive with AC and WS out of YYZ so fares will remain low even without YTZ competition

That hasn't happened in the past. Maybe thinking "the world" is watching them, and with recent bad press, they will not abuse the monopoly.

Recently Deluce announced that Porter is making money. Now, not being a public corporation there is no way to verify that, however, if it is true .... then Porter has been able to show that it is possible to provide a high level of service for a competitive price, and still make money. (Again, that hasn't happened in the past).



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1418 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3747 times:

Quoting krisyyz (Reply 7):
I thought they were already planning on moving their base to YHM. Apparently they will have an easier time responding to calls from YHM, but I'm sure the cost issue played into that decision as well.

The ORNGE base in YHM is on "hold" for now.

Cal   



*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
User currently offlineflyguy89 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 2019 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3675 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Thread starter):
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/...-billy-bishop-airport-by-up-to-300

According to the article Porter is increasing the rent at YTZ from 30-300% and what is worse is evicting the two flight schools that rent hangar space on the island. With Buttonville closing this means that there will no longer be a flight school in Toronto which is a real shame. I wonder if ORNGE will also be kicked out?

I say good for them. As long as it's all done legally, they should be allowed to make as much money as they possibly can from YTZ. The airport was underdeveloped and virtually unused until Porter came into the picture, and even then, Porter is the only reason AC is back at YTZ.


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5164 posts, RR: 43
Reply 13, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3604 times:

Quoting flyguy89 (Reply 12):
Porter is the only reason AC is back at YTZ.

Technically ... Porter is the reason AC was kicked out of YTZ. Legally.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineyyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 14, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3491 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 13):
Technically ... Porter is the reason AC was kicked out of YTZ. Legally.

Technically, AC kicked itself out of the market by reducing daily flights from 29 to just 5 and not investing in any terminal capacity to ensure a long term presence, making themselves vulnerable to any landlord wanting change.

Quoting longhauler (Reply 10):
Quoting yyz717 (Reply 9):
Porter must remain competitive with AC and WS out of YYZ so fares will remain low even without YTZ competition

That hasn't happened in the past.

Yes it has. Ever since Porter started, its fares have been competitive with YYZ fares to the same cities.

Quoting longhauler (Reply 10):
Maybe thinking "the world" is watching them, and with recent bad press, they will not abuse the monopoly.

There is no such thing as a monopoly at YTZ even if Porter was/becomes the only carrier. YTZ is not an isolated airport....Porter competes with AC mainline and Westjet everyday, just from adjacent airports.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineAirCanada787 From Canada, joined Nov 2010, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3412 times:

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 6):
Numbers aren't made public, but apparently this hike is to put YTZ rent in line with costs at similar airports.

When I read that I wondered if they really meant that they were increasing costs to match other airports in the Toronto area. Its often mentioned that Pearson is one of the more expensive airports to operate in and out of, so are they trying to match the fees that Pearson can command? If so I think that its a pipe dream since the two airports really can't even be compared.

Quoting longhauler (Reply 13):
Quoting flyguy89 (Reply 12):
Porter is the only reason AC is back at YTZ.

Technically ... Porter is the reason AC was kicked out of YTZ. Legally.

  



The mind, like a parachute, functions only when open.
User currently offlineWestJet747 From Canada, joined Aug 2011, 1939 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3388 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 10):
Maybe thinking "the world" is watching them, and with recent bad press, they will not abuse the monopoly.

That is a non-issue, the "godd press" has far outweighed the "bad press".

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 14):
There is no such thing as a monopoly at YTZ even if Porter was/becomes the only carrier. YTZ is not an isolated airport....Porter competes with AC mainline and Westjet everyday, just from adjacent airports

Not to mention that if AC leaves (and that's a big if), those slots will have to go to someone. Since the TPA, not REGCO, make that decision, there's no guarantee they will go to PD. There could be an American carrier, or even Pascan or WS (assuming current fleet rumours are true) in there this time next year.

Quoting AirCanada787 (Reply 15):
When I read that I wondered if they really meant that they were increasing costs to match other airports in the Toronto area. Its often mentioned that Pearson is one of the more expensive airports to operate in and out of, so are they trying to match the fees that Pearson can command? If so I think that its a pipe dream since the two airports really can't even be compared.

I assume by "similar airports" that they don't mean geographically, but rather airports with similar levels of traffic and service.



Flying refined.
User currently offlinewhiteguy From Canada, joined Nov 2003, 840 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3274 times:

Quoting yyz717 (Reply 14):
Technically, AC kicked itself out of the market by reducing daily flights from 29 to just 5 and not investing in any terminal capacity to ensure a long term presence, making themselves vulnerable to any landlord wanting change.

At a time when the industry was still recovering from 9/11 and business travel was way down. If they would've kept their 29 flights a day they would have been bleeding even worse. There obviously was no market at the time fir that many flights. By the time the market had started to recover AC/Jazz was kicked out by Porter ownership!


User currently offlinepolaris From Canada, joined Feb 2000, 1150 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

It amazes me what Porter and Deluce are allowed to get away with at that airport.

User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11719 posts, RR: 60
Reply 19, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2912 times:

A few questions on a similar theme;

- Is Porter profitable?
- Is there a link between airline owner and airport owner?
- How dependant will the airport be on Porter for profitability?
- How much is the airport site worth if redeveloped?

Not wishing to be alarmist, but rent (and fuel) increases are a mechanism used to drive business away from sites so they are no longer viable and can be redeveloped.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineairontario From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 563 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2853 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 19):
- Is Porter profitable?
- Is there a link between airline owner and airport owner?
- How dependant will the airport be on Porter for profitability?
- How much is the airport site worth if redeveloped?

1. Porter says they're profitable. Are they actually? We don't know. They are growing, and people seem to be happy with the product...but their load factors are worrisome.

2. The CEO of Porter bought the airport before Porter started, and evicted Air Canada/Jazz before starting Porter

3. Porter is responsible for more than 3/4 of the traffic at the airport. The rest is split between AC/Sky Regional, Air Ambulances and general aviation.

4. A lot. Real Estate in Toronto is going up and up, and has no sign of stopping. I can't imagine what a piece of land that size would be worth.


User currently offlinepnwtraveler From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 2296 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2842 times:

Quoting whiteguy (Reply 17):
Quoting yyz717 (Reply 14):Technically, AC kicked itself out of the market by reducing daily flights from 29 to just 5 and not investing in any terminal capacity to ensure a long term presence, making themselves vulnerable to any landlord wanting change.
At a time when the industry was still recovering from 9/11 and business travel was way down. If they would've kept their 29 flights a day they would have been bleeding even worse. There obviously was no market at the time fir that many flights. By the time the market had started to recover AC/Jazz was kicked out by Porter ownership!

First of all I am an Aeroplan junkie and choose AC over any other carrier, especially US airlines when doing cross border trips especially for service as much as point. However, AC ticked me off by reducing flights to YTZ. On one trip when I wanted to switch my return segement to a YYZ flight rather than sit and wait for the next highly inconvenient YTZ flight, they would only do so if I paid a change fee. I called over the AC concierge and told him I would never fly in or out of YTZ with AC or one of its partners ever again. The sole purpose in using YTZ is to save time and if they weren't going to offer enough volume of flights it made the airport useless for me. Off the record an AC employee present had to admit that there was no competition so they were ignoring the airport potential because regardless it was cheaper and more cost effective for them to have as much volume fly out of YYZ. The wanted people to do exactly what I was doing, as long as I didn't get so mad I switched to WestJet or Jetsgo at the time. They were right I wasn't about to do either. The Concierge overroad the policy and put me on a YYZ flight. But the point is that North America is all about frequency and AC knew that clearly. I have never flown out of YTZ again. I am looking forward to trying Porter but just haven't had an opportunity yet.

Sorry but the reduction was well underway before 9/11 so that just exasperated the situation and gave AC an excuse. 9/11 and the security changes it caused, actually strengthened the case for using YTZ more but AC still went the other way. I am sorry AC deserved and deserves what it gets out of YTZ simply for ignoring customers and putting the lack of competition ahead of them. They could have easily marketed YTZ much stronger but clearly chose to mimimize it.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26021 posts, RR: 22
Reply 22, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2830 times:

Quoting airontario (Reply 20):
2. The CEO of Porter bought the airport before Porter started, and evicted Air Canada/Jazz before starting Porter

Porter owns the terminal building, not the airport. The airport is owned by the Toronto Port Authority, a Federal government agency.


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11719 posts, RR: 60
Reply 23, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2797 times:

Quoting airontario (Reply 20):
1. Porter says they're profitable. Are they actually? We don't know. They are growing, and people seem to be happy with the product...but their load factors are worrisome.

2. The CEO of Porter bought the airport before Porter started, and evicted Air Canada/Jazz before starting Porter

3. Porter is responsible for more than 3/4 of the traffic at the airport. The rest is split between AC/Sky Regional, Air Ambulances and general aviation.

4. A lot. Real Estate in Toronto is going up and up, and has no sign of stopping. I can't imagine what a piece of land that size would be worth.

Thanks for the quick reply - to be honest they are concerning answers. The only good thing I can see is that he (Deluce) comes from an airline background - if he's got jet fuel running in his blood then hopefully he's just out to 'get' AC and maintain his airline's domination.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineBureaucromancer From Canada, joined Feb 2010, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2698 times:

Quoting airontario (Reply 20):
4. A lot. Real Estate in Toronto is going up and up, and has no sign of stopping. I can't imagine what a piece of land that size would be worth.

Well, yes and no. The airport is also on an island which is (apart from some very heavily regulated residences on the other end) otherwise a city park. The chances that any kind of commercial redevelopment of the airport lands would be allowed are virtually nil. In the real world that land is either an airport (and one of about the same size as currently) or getting turned into a park.

I have to agree that the company is getting worryingly monopolistic in terms of Air Canada, but really I cant fault them for wanting the flight schools gone. The island is turning very quickly into a fairly significant commercial airport, was never able to support itself on GA alone and really was never that well positioned for flight training anyway. There is a real problem with a lack of flight training capacity in the GTA once the Island schools go and Buttonville shuts down, but the Pickering site is still on the table and as time goes on I'm thinking a GA facility out there makes a lot of sense.


25 flyguy89 : Why are they concerning? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Deluce doesn't own YTZ, but just the terminal facilities, so other than selling facilities to t
26 Bureaucromancer : Does anyone know if there would be any legal problems with an airline directly owning and operating a private field for its exclusive use? Would it ac
27 Post contains images PlymSpotter : They aren't if he doesn't physically own the airport land. The first reply said he did, which made me suspicious that a situation was being engineere
28 WestJet747 : I agree. too many people look at the dictionary definition of monopoly at not the real-world free market interpretation of it. Even if PD is the only
29 Bureaucromancer : The TPA is spending significant amounts of public funds to keep the field open (actually, it looks like for the last year or two they have broken eve
30 YYZYYT : Not necessarily. The leases to the flight schools and GA tenants are probably older and may well be well - WELL - below market value. I have seen oth
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Porter Starting YTZ-EWR Tomorrow, 3/31/08 posted Sun Mar 30 2008 12:03:40 by Olympus69
Porter And YTZ... posted Fri Sep 1 2006 02:19:49 by NorthStarDC4M
United Airlines Increases Ticket Fares By 3% posted Wed Jun 22 2005 21:06:41 by LorM
Increases In Frequency By AC? posted Sun Mar 13 2005 03:18:01 by AC787
Air Arabia Increases SHJ Traffic By 30% A Month! posted Thu Mar 25 2004 19:40:59 by MEA310
Mexicana Increases MEX-GRU To 7x With 332 By 2010! posted Tue Dec 29 2009 17:48:42 by Fyano773
Porter Announces Seasonal YTZ-MYR posted Thu Nov 12 2009 12:12:13 by Steex
POE (Porter) 9001 - YYZ To YTZ? posted Mon Nov 3 2008 06:44:44 by AAmd11
Porter To Maintain YTZ-YOW-YHZ Year-Round posted Wed Aug 8 2007 15:53:39 by YOW
Chinese A320 Line To Complete 300 Frames By 2016 posted Fri Jun 29 2007 14:16:24 by EI321