Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pmco IAH-AMS  
User currently offlineCO772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5597 times:

Sorry if this has been discussed; I couldn't find in the forum. I was looking to book IAH-AMS on UA/CO but could not find the non-stop flight on CO.com. It seems to end in early April; afterwards all IAH-AMS flights connect through UA/CO hubs. Hopefully this hasn't been nixed...

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25300 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

Quoting CO772 (Thread starter):
I was looking to book IAH-AMS on UA/CO but could not find the non-stop flight on CO.com. It seems to end in early April; afterwards all IAH-AMS flights connect through UA/CO hubs. Hopefully this hasn't been nixed...

Maybe you just picked dates when the nonstop was full? I tried 2 or 3 random dates in May/June/July and the IAH-AMS nonstops appear.


User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4428 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5405 times:

Quoting CO772 (Thread starter):
I was looking to book IAH-AMS on UA/CO but could not find the non-stop flight on CO.com. It seems to end in early April; afterwards all IAH-AMS flights connect through UA/CO hubs. Hopefully this hasn't been nixed...

They are currently scheduled to operate the route 6 weekly until April 13th and from October 5th (otherwise daily). Moreover it seems as if they will send the 787 to AMS as of October 5th...


User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5059 times:

Thanks for the info. 787 on IAH-AMS would be awesome.  

User currently offlineSASMD82 From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 771 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4780 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LJ (Reply 2):
Moreover it seems as if they will send the 787 to AMS as of October 5th...

Very good news for AMS! I think it is a bit strange that CO will send the 787 to AMS as I think that the 787 will be a premium aircraft (cabin configuration) whereas AMS is not a premium destination (low yield destination). Isn't the 764 more logical?


User currently offlineiahcsr From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 3433 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4674 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Most likely IAHAMS is a good proving/training international route for the 788?


Working very hard to Fly Right....
User currently offlineyellowtail From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 6165 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4510 times:

Quoting SASMD82 (Reply 4):
Very good news for AMS! I think it is a bit strange that CO will send the 787 to AMS as I think that the 787 will be a premium aircraft (cabin configuration) whereas AMS is not a premium destination (low yield destination).

How is AMS not a premium destinations from IAH with all that oil traffic (Shell etc)? Remember KL use to run a BBJ on it. The 788 is in fact a good choice here....may provide a product differentiation from KL and may prove useful to lure some of those business pax over to UA



When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No-one has ever collided with the sky.
User currently offlinefreakyrat From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 868 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4399 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I booked the IAH-AMS flight on CO/UA the last week in June. As far as I know it's still good.

User currently onlineBralo20 From Belgium, joined May 2008, 624 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4389 times:

Quoting SASMD82 (Reply 4):
Very good news for AMS! I think it is a bit strange that CO will send the 787 to AMS as I think that the 787 will be a premium aircraft (cabin configuration) whereas AMS is not a premium destination (low yield destination). Isn't the 764 more logical?

With the current 787 layout of UA/CO you can hardly call the bird "premium"... No first, only business and 9 abreast in Y+ and Y....

Unless they change the layout for later birds of course...


User currently offlineco772 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4184 times:

IAH-AMS is a heavy oil route... I've seen BF both packed and realatiely empty on previous flights. I never saw it packed on the 777 which was probably part of the reason for the downgrade.

How many 787's will UA have in OCT? It would seem hard to do AKL and AMS with less than three. 787 to AMS would be great but I'll settle for the 764 w/ the lie flat seats.  


User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4428 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3963 times:

Quoting Bralo20 (Reply 8):

With the current 787 layout of UA/CO you can hardly call the bird "premium"... No first, only business and 9 abreast in Y+ and Y....

AMS is no F-class market (only SQ and CX will offer F-class out of AMS this Summer) thus you don't need F-class to AMS...

Quoting yellowtail (Reply 6):

How is AMS not a premium destinations from IAH with all that oil traffic (Shell etc)?

Most oil traffic doesn't have to be in AMS (and if I'm not mistaken Shell has a contract with Skyteam..). The transfer pax won't use UA as it doesn't have a hub at AMS, thus that traffic is mostly going to KL. With the BBJ gone, the number of C-class seats to/from AMS has decreased very much.


User currently offlineIAHworldflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

I understand that UA/CO was able to regain the Shell contract from KL. That is why the Privatair BBJ has gone away, and why KL has cancelled their planned second daily to IAH with an A333 this summer. I had not heard that the AMS route was going to go to 787 this Fall, but with securing the Shell contract I can see that as a factor in the decision to put it on this route.

User currently offlineHooverman From Netherlands, joined Oct 2011, 110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1781 times:

Quoting IAHworldflyer (Reply 11):
I understand that UA/CO was able to regain the Shell contract from KL. That is why the Privatair BBJ has gone away, and why KL has cancelled their planned second daily to IAH with an A333 this summer. I had not heard that the AMS route was going to go to 787 this Fall, but with securing the Shell contract I can see that as a factor in the decision to put it on this route.

Was this contract ever before in non-KLM hands? This must be a serious blow to KLM since this is one of their few premium routes?

Quoting LJ (Reply 10):
AMS is no F-class market (only SQ and CX will offer F-class out of AMS this Summer) thus you don't need F-class to AMS...

There are others: EK, MH, CI, KE but some may vanish after equipment change.


User currently offlineIAHworldflyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

Quoting Hooverman (Reply 12):
Was this contract ever before in non-KLM hands? This must be a serious blow to KLM since this is one of their few premium routes?

If I remember correctly, KL and CO shared the contract from maybe 2001 until 2006 or so. The point at which KL got it exclusively was when they started using the BBJ in all J configuration for a second daily.


User currently offlineyellowtail From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 6165 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

Perhaps the promise of a 788 on the route was the deciding factor in soliciting the business


When in doubt, hold on to your altitude. No-one has ever collided with the sky.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Anybody Know How To Book PrivatAir IAH-AMS? posted Tue May 20 2008 17:13:53 by AA737-823
KLM Running A 737 From AMS-IAH-AMS? posted Wed Apr 4 2007 21:29:45 by Gregarious119
Continental IAH-AMS 2 X Daily posted Wed Jan 7 2004 23:13:00 by Artsyman
IAH-AMS posted Sun Oct 5 2003 04:58:23 by Zona8
CO IAH-AMS posted Wed Jun 19 2002 22:46:04 by Triley1057
CO Launches IAH-AMS posted Wed May 1 2002 00:22:29 by Republic
KLM Service From IAH-AMS posted Mon Apr 17 2000 01:41:23 by Hole_Courtney
CO 47 AMS-IAH B764 Diverts MSY posted Tue Dec 9 2008 18:58:33 by 71Zulu
KLM Celebrates 50 Years AMS-IAH! posted Mon Sep 3 2007 11:11:31 by KL911
Anyone Flown Privatair AMS-IAH Yet? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 18:30:24 by COrocks