Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Lanka/Sri Lankan  
User currently offlineChris From Canada, joined May 1999, 160 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

A recent article in Airways magazine about Sri Lankan Airways shows they have four L1011s still in their fleet. Does anyone know if they still have Air Lanka titles and colors or will they not be repainted as Sri Lankan plans to retire them in 2000. Chris

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSriLankan From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 117 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1435 times:

Chris

No, they will not be painting the L1011's in the new colours. As a matter of fact the Tristars will be phased out end of this year.


User currently offlineAirLanka From Australia, joined Oct 1999, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1428 times:

It is correct. Four Air Lanka Tristars (4R-ULA, ULB, ULC and ULE) will not be painted in new SriLankan livery. Last of the Tristars will go out of service in April 2000 when the new A330-200s have repleced them all. Till then SriLankan will progressively phase out the TriStars as the new A330s roll out from Toulouse.

All new A330s will bear SriLankan livery and the A340 SriLankan dry leased July 1999. The remaining 3 A340s and 2 A320s will need a new paint job and will be done in near future



A taste of Paradise
User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1523 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1429 times:

I am not sure if the A320s will get the new colours, because aren't they planning to sell them off too? Apparently the A330s are replacements for the TriStars AND A320s.

User currently offlineAirLanka From Australia, joined Oct 1999, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1422 times:

Gardermoen, where did you hear that AirLanka is going to sell the A320? I don't think they would; because they have short thin regional routes such as South Indian cities to operate with A320. Also there are some middle east destinations which are ideal for A320 in terms of range and payload; such as Doha and Karachi. I don't think they would get rid of the A320 and I have not heard or seen any indication so far.


A taste of Paradise
User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1523 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1420 times:

I have read this many times. Most recently about a week ago in some article I think in the Daily News of Sri Lanka. And also more than a year ago whenthe A330 order was first put through. I remember the discussion about how the A330 would not be suitable for some airports in South India(Trichy, Trivandrum etc). I do agree with you that the A320 is ideal for its regional routes, esp to South India and some Gulf routes. This equipment would be the right sort to start the long-awaited Dhaka service. The A330 is far too large for frequent services to neighbouring destinations and for opening up new regional routes.

User currently offlineF-WWKH From Taiwan, joined Jun 1999, 322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1424 times:

That new 'color-scheme' is a huge step backwards for Air Lanka. Which well-paid executive came up with that corporate identity?

User currently offlineAirLanka From Australia, joined Oct 1999, 180 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1423 times:

F-WWKH I could not agree with you more. When I first saw it I thought they could have done better. I would have kept the old peakok in red and white only in the tail (like Qantas) with pure white body and then put a nice big green/blue peacock feather between the two front Doors and Big Letters "AirLanka" just behind that (bit similar to Air NZ). That would be much nicer and I know most of the staff were not happy with the new look. They called it the strangled peacock.

However I must admit after the initial reaction I am somewhat getting used to it.

As for Gardermoen, I agree it is best to keep the A320s to open up new routes like Dhaka, Kathmandu and Calcutta.



A taste of Paradise
User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1523 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

Some execs at Emirates came up with the logo. Cant you see traces of Emirates in the new logo? I have heard about a huge fuss in Sri Lanka over the logo. Apparently when the Sri Lankan govt sold the share off to Emirates, the condition was that the name "Air Lanka" was to be retained, but look what they did! .I must say the A330s do look better than what I initially expected.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Deccan To Start Sri Lankan Subsidiary. posted Fri Nov 18 2005 06:01:29 by Himmat01
Sri Lanka Allows Competition To Sri Lankan posted Thu May 19 2005 18:51:51 by Eksath
Air Rage/love On Sri Lankan Court Outcome posted Wed Aug 4 2004 17:04:48 by Eksath
Oman Air Add Sri Lanka posted Sat Aug 17 2002 17:28:25 by Airmale
Sri Lankan Starting Jeddah posted Tue Nov 14 2006 17:52:09 by 777way
Sri Lankan Fleet Renewal Plan posted Wed Mar 15 2006 13:08:04 by FCKC
Emirates + Sri Lankan posted Sun Mar 5 2006 01:57:01 by Newagebird
Who Took Air Lanka's Tristars? posted Thu Feb 16 2006 18:50:07 by YOWza
Sri Lankan Reports Profitable Year posted Tue Sep 20 2005 18:11:38 by 7of9
Sri Lankan Planning More Flights Into India posted Thu Sep 1 2005 17:02:49 by Zizou