Capt.Fantastic From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 777 posts, RR: 0 Posted (13 years 10 months 4 hours ago) and read 1820 times:
I was wondering what determines which markets British Airways serves out of Heathrow vs. Gatwick. I know they serve some markets from both airports, but many are exclusive to one airport or the other; e.g. Beunos Aires, Abijan, Lagos, Dallas, and many others are only served from Gatwick. What's the deal on this? And don't people get confused about which airport to go to? Your thoughts please.
SouthRebels From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 3 hours ago) and read 1766 times:
Well, I am not sure how they decide which markets are served from which airport. However, as for, "And don't people get confused about which airport to go to?" Think about it. How could you get confused. Look at your tickets, it will say London Heathrow (LHR) or London Gatwick (LGW). Chicago, New York, Houston, Washington, Dallas, etc., etc., they all have two or more airports and not to many people get confused.
N175DZ From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2000, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1730 times:
For services to the US, an agreement called BermudaII lists the cities that can be served (by any carrier) from LHR. All others must originate at LGW.
For other services, I think it may be a historic thing, or just the way BA percieves its markets. I think LGW serves more 'leisure' routes, and LHR is aimed more at business travel. Oddly enough BA (at the last count) served more destinations from LGW than LHR.
As for getting confused - the codes usually make that impossible. London has lots of airports - LHR. LGW, STN, LCY, etc. People cope!
Capt.Fantastic From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 777 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1688 times:
Some stats for you:
Excluding their affiliate and code-share partners, BA serves: 52 destinations from Gatwick and 55 destinations from Heathrow. They operate roughly 185 daily flights from LHR, compared to roughly 85 daily flights from LGW. I think whoever said that LGW was used primarily for leisure travel was right. When I look at the destinations, that does appear to be true. At Gatiwck, the 737 predominates to the European & GB markets, while the larger A320, 757, and 767 are used out of Heathrow. I don't think you will see a BA 757 at Gatwick.
BA serves 11 US destination from Gatiwck and 11 from Heathrow. But there are 28 LHR-USA flights compared to only 12 LGW-USA flights.
I addressed the issue of "confusion" because the less-seasoned BA traveler may associate British Airways with Heathrow. Particularly if they have only flown out of LHR in the past. I'm sure plenty of novice travelers have shown up at the LHR counter checking in for Gatwick departures. If they use e-tickets over there, that may make it worse.
RickB From United Kingdom, joined May 2003, 243 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1646 times:
Confusion may come from the BA timetable which includes all its London airports under one destination section 'London'. You can only distinguish which airport your actually flying in to by identifying the terminal number (i.e. 1 - 4 for Heathrow, North or South for Gatwick, etc.).
I have flown into both Gatwick a couple of times with passengers who's connecting flight has been from a different airport and they havent been aware of it - At least they got to enjoy the bus journey round the M25 that awaited them !!
VS11 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1150 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1621 times:
As far as I remember the Bermuda agreement says that only two American and only two British carriers can serve a specific route between any pair of American and British airports. I do not think the agreement specifies which airports in the US you can fly to from LHR. It says that e.g. only 2 British and only 2 American carriers can fly LHR-JFK.
Regarding which markets are served from LGW - those that are less profitable, and that require lighter aircraft because the runway at Gatwick is not long enough, which is a restriction on the weight of aircraft and thus on the destination (longer distances require more fuel, which makes aircraft heavier and you need longer runway for heavier aircraft). And ultimately all of the above affect the type of connections you can make at LGW, and that is why BA wants to keep LHR to itself because it can serve more people making connections via London. It is still possible to connect via LGW/LHR but it is more expensive and inconvenient. For comparison take FRA - only one huge airport where connecting is exceptionally easy. No hassle for transfer, and accordingly LHR is loosing to FRA, and that is why the management of BA has been heard to cry loud for T5 at LHR.
For those interested, there is a very good study published by Harvard Business School on the building of Charles de Gaulle and Gatwick airports that details public projects planning and national mentality. I do not remember the name but for those interested I can dig up the name.