Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue And JAL Form Interline Agreement  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2057 times:

JetBlue announced another interline partnership today with Japan Airlines

Customers may book itineraries for combined travel on JetBlue and JAL via JFK and LAX effective February 15th.

Additionally the partnership will expand to cover BOS transfers effective April 22nd.


Story:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/JetBlu...s-Begin-prnews-1173966994.html?x=0

Per previous B6 earnings call that stated they were working on growing such partnerships including additional West Coast opportunities.

=

[Edited 2012-02-14 07:41:35]


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1990 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2018 times:

This I've been waiting for for quite a while, though I'm a bit disappointed that it's only interline (at least for now). Then again, since there is a JV on those flights with AA, maybe that could somehow get factored into the current arrangement?


2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25369 posts, RR: 49
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Yeah its interline, and actually some of the potential markets are a bit odd imo.

For instance from LAX, only B6 cities are JFK, BOS, FLL. Though these are also flown by AA. Not sure how many JL passengers would book away from OW partner AA and ignore mileage earning to go fly B6 instead.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinetharanga From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 1865 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 2):
Not sure how many JL passengers would book away from OW partner AA and ignore mileage earning to go fly B6 instead.

Is there anything to lose by interlining, even if relatively few pax take advantage? You still get a few more pax than you would have otherwise.

[Edited 2012-02-14 14:58:30]

User currently offlineflyorski From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 987 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1516 times:

I think we will see more and more JetBlue agreements struck with different Oneworld members. For this interline deal, congrats to B6 and JAL, hopefully both parties gain greatly from this agreement.


"None are more hopelessly enslaved, than those who falsly believe they are free" -Goethe
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25311 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1414 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 2):
Yeah its interline, and actually some of the potential markets are a bit odd imo.

Since it's presumably just a standard interline ticketing agreement, why would they limit it to certain routes/destinations? Why not just make it apply in general wherever they connect, like virtually all interline agreements?


User currently offlinetharanga From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 1865 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1342 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 5):
Why not just make it apply in general wherever they connect, like virtually all interline agreements?

I think something gets lost in all of these repetitive topics about B6 interlining with somebody new - that this is run-of-the-mill normal for everybody else; B6 is just catching up.


User currently offlineMercure1 From French Polynesia, joined Jul 2008, 1470 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

Airlines experience cost for interlining.

Besides things like IT, inventory management, pricing, marketing, audit, settlement and accounting cost, there are fees at airports.
I suspect B6 likes to maintain minimal list of interline city-pairs to limit airport handling cost. For example at most airports one must join consortium or contract with companies to deliver baggage between terminals. This cost money. Imagine if B6 had to join such handling at their entire network for just very small number of passengers. They probably focus on top traffic city pairs only and allow interline in those with airlines like JAL.

So yes interline is pretty basic process in airline industry, however there are cost and operational complexity involved which as we know LCC try to reduce not increase.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA And Maersk/Sterling Interline Agreement Ends posted Fri Feb 24 2006 14:30:01 by Richardw
AirTran And BA Sign Interline Agreement posted Wed Apr 3 2002 22:14:21 by Srbmod
El Al And Jetblue Sign Interline Agreement posted Mon Jul 26 2010 08:50:04 by El-Al
CO Interline Agreement With HP And UA posted Sun Feb 18 2007 22:28:27 by HnlBoi
Jetblue And Spirit Merging,is That A Possibility? posted Sat Jan 21 2012 18:49:21 by doulasc
JetBlue And Singapore Team Up! posted Mon Dec 19 2011 08:21:20 by jfklganyc
AA And HU Announce Codeshare Agreement posted Wed Dec 7 2011 12:55:58 by realsim
AA And TWU Reach Tentative Agreement posted Wed Oct 26 2011 11:01:12 by lows
Air India And BMI Sign Codeshare Agreement posted Wed Sep 7 2011 06:17:40 by OA260
EK & B6 Launch Interline Agreement posted Mon Nov 15 2010 09:17:57 by jetbluefan1