Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United Drastically Increasing Pet Fees.  
User currently offlinebeau222 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 117 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2903 times:

Personally I think this is a rather drastic increase, not sure how they substantiate these prices.


http://www.stripes.com/news/shipping...arly-4-000-under-new-rule-1.168509

https://www.facebook.com/unitedairlines?sk=wall

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1386 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2655 times:

Quote:
drop its current flat rate for pets that are checked as excess baggage and instead require all animals to be shipped as cargo

Can't tell for sure, but it looks like UA is adopting former CO policies?

The link says a trans-pacific flight would go from a flat fee of $283 to $1400 to $3800 based on pet size.

What does this do to domestic USA flights?


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3076 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2567 times:

It's a moot point for me. I would never check a beloved pet into the cargo hold of an airplane. 95% or whatever the survival rate is, is not good enough for me.

However, I did notice that AS greatly increased the fee to bring a pet in the cabin a few years ago to where it would equal or exceed my own r/t SEA-SJC ticket. That kind of priced me out of the idea of taking my cat to the folks for Christmas. Not sure I get this one. It doesn't really cost the airline any additional incremental cost for one to bring a pet in the cabin. Not like they need any special handling or extra labor.


User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3592 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2531 times:

Quoting beau222 (Thread starter):
Personally I think this is a rather drastic increase, not sure how they substantiate these prices.

Maybe they really don't want to carry pets.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
However, I did notice that AS greatly increased the fee to bring a pet in the cabin a few years ago to where it would equal or exceed my own r/t SEA-SJC ticket. That kind of priced me out of the idea of taking my cat to the folks for Christmas.

That is probably their desire. They really don't want pets in the cabin or in the cargo hold...it is not worth the revenue for the additional liability, both for the pet getting injured or for the other passengers complaining (allergies and the like).


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26499 posts, RR: 75
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2531 times:

Quoting ADent (Reply 1):
What does this do to domestic USA flights?

Depends on how big your pet is.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
Not like they need any special handling or extra labor.


To be fair, there is some potential added cost in the case cleaning is needed for a sick pet or something of the sort. They are probably right to charge to defray, but the price is more than that.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2414 times:

Continental's program is well thought out. Not sure about he pricing, but it might be justified. The pets are taken in at the cargo desk, not the baggage check. The cargo desk knows what types of crates are allowed, makes sure there is water available, will place your pet in a secure, air conditioned area, then transport the pet to the aircraft separately. On hub transfers, there are air-conditioned pet transfer vehicles. On arrival, the pet is brought to you at the oversized baggage area. It's still traumatic, but not nearly as dangerous as treating a pet carrier as luggage and having the rushed baggage handlers processing and transporting the animal. That's how animals get left on a hot or cold apron, run over with tugs, etc.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1859 times:

And then you have passengers who travel freely with their 'emotional support animal' all too happy to show you their 'Doctors note' 'proving' that they can't travel without 'Fluffy'. Scam artists just playing the system on the backs of those truly in need of support animals.


Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3076 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1855 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 6):
And then you have passengers who travel freely with their 'emotional support animal' all too happy to show you their 'Doctors note' 'proving' that they can't travel without 'Fluffy'. Scam artists just playing the system on the backs of those truly in need of support animals.

Like the infamous pig in the galley of the US 757.  


User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3754 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1808 times:

Simply put, UA is adopting CO's PetSafe program (one of the best in the airline business) and is changing their fees to CO's fees.

Sometimes, higher standards mean higher prices, and PMCO had higher standards for pets than PMUA.



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
User currently offlineB777LRF From Luxembourg, joined Nov 2008, 1360 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
Not like they need any special handling or extra labor.

That's just about as far from reality as can get, that is for airlines who actually care for the cargo (pets are cargo, not baggage) they are carrying.

The CO procedures as outlined above sounds very professional and thought out. And things like that cost money, lots of money. If you fancy taking your chances transporting your pet on an airline treating your pet as baggage, good luck to you - bit the same as flying Hewa Bora Airlines as a passenger: Good chance you'll end up dead rather than at your destination.

Personally I wouldn't ever trust the safety of my dog, cat or other pet with any airline, even the likes of CO or LH who have proper procedures in place. If I had to migrate from, say, the US to Europe I'd book passage on a ship if my dog was coming with me. Small price to pay to ensure the safety of your best and most loyal friend.



From receips and radials over straight pipes to big fans - been there, done that, got the hearing defects to prove
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3076 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1732 times:

Quoting B777LRF (Reply 9):
Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
Not like they need any special handling or extra labor.

That's just about as far from reality as can get, that is for airlines who actually care for the cargo (pets are cargo, not baggage) they are carrying.

The CO procedures as outlined above sounds very professional and thought out. And things like that cost money, lots of money. If you fancy taking your chances transporting your pet on an airline treating your pet as baggage, good luck to you - bit the same as flying Hewa Bora Airlines as a passenger: Good chance you'll end up dead rather than at your destination.

Personally I wouldn't ever trust the safety of my dog, cat or other pet with any airline, even the likes of CO or LH who have proper procedures in place. If I had to migrate from, say, the US to Europe I'd book passage on a ship if my dog was coming with me. Small price to pay to ensure the safety of your best and most loyal friend.

If you had read my posting, I clearly stated that referring to taking a pet on board the cabin like carry-on luggage when I said it doesn't require any special handling or extra labor.


User currently offlinercair1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 1323 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 1696 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

As a breeder and judge - I have a bit of experience with this.
First - United in-cabin pet policy is the reason I don't fly United with pets anymore - and fly United a ;pt less, and Frontier more. It is a foolish policy in my opinion. If you know a little about the economics of people who travel with pets in cabin - you will find that this is a group of people who spend money pretty regularly. Did you watch the Westminster Kennel Club show on TV? Big bucks there. United currently charges $125 each way for the privileged of using your carry on space for a small dog/cat in a kennel. Frontier for example, $75. Note - there is no added cost to the airline - the pet rides in a bag under the seat. In fact, almost invariably, the passenger with a pet will have to check a bag, since they've used carry on space for the pet - so they would make more. It is not unusual for the pet fee to be comparable to the ticket. People who do this regularly have animals who handle it very well. I've traveled in cabin with my Scotties numerous times - people rarely know. Even people sitting in that row.

Compare how often you read about a pet disrupting a flight (I can think of one cat recently) compared to how often PASSENGERS disrupt the flight. BTW - our pets (Scottish Terriers) are non-sheding

Just a month ago - my wife went to a show in Seattle (on Frontier). During the flight she needed to use the restroom and she advised the passenger sitting beside her - you know there is a dog in there, so don't be surprised if it moves. The person was completely surprised and had not noticed.

As for in hold travel - this is something I avoid if at all possible. If I do it, I use Continental with their Petsafe program. It is well thought out and reliable - much more so than other carriers. You can tell this by just reading the rules. Most (like United), have restrictions on temperatures at airports along the route and cannot guarantee travel until the day. Continental has dedicated service vans with air conditioning and heat to deal with that - and they are much more reliable about when they can travel.

One of my concerns about UA/CO merger is will Continental's program go away. I've been told no - it will expand to United, but I hope so.

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 8):
Simply put, UA is adopting CO's PetSafe program (one of the best in the airline business) and is changing their fees to CO's fees.

Sometimes, higher standards mean higher prices, and PMCO had higher standards for pets than PMUA

This is great news - I'm happy to pay for the better service



rcair1
User currently offlineUAL747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1649 times:

Here are the rates that will go in effect 3.3.12. United just published them on their Facebook Page. Man, you should see the S%$T storm brewing over at the United FB page. Lots of Military wives going nuts! Hopefully this will calm things down.



UAL

[Edited 2012-02-16 10:59:18]

User currently offlineTOMMY767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1595 times:

Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember on a CO flight in 2004 from EWR-PBI someone brought their Kitty on board an it was below the beat in back of me. It was in a regular plasit carrying case and I didn't notice the kitty doing much throughout the entire flight....

So my question is, can you bring your cat on board when your flying the new UA or not? Does it cost more?



"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 84
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

You definitely can bring the animal on board. I don't think the onboard prices are going to go up.

NS


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1432 times:

Quoting TOMMY767 (Reply 13):
Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember on a CO flight in 2004 from EWR-PBI someone brought their Kitty on board an it was below the beat in back of me. It was in a regular plasit carrying case and I didn't notice the kitty doing much throughout the entire flight....

So my question is, can you bring your cat on board when your flying the new UA or not? Does it cost more?

Yes, the carrier must fit under the seat. There are two types, the sherpa style soft bag that is aircraft sized and a flatter but wider plastic case. Generally, it's not fair to put a full grown cat in the flatter case because they can't stand up and turn around freely, but kittens do fine in there.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Delta Increasing Baggage Fees posted Tue Jul 29 2008 13:25:50 by DLX737200
MSY To Drastically Reduce Landing Fees posted Wed Jun 29 2005 19:17:04 by MSYtristar
United: $250 For 1 Yr. Waived Bag Fees. posted Tue Oct 6 2009 11:46:14 by Luv2cattlecall
United's Excess Baggage Fees? posted Fri Feb 8 2008 05:19:22 by 764
United Airlines Fees Fees And More Fees! posted Mon Jan 22 2007 22:18:38 by ATLflyer
United's Increasing Efficiency With Nascar's Help posted Tue Apr 18 2006 19:14:45 by Pmg1704
$100 User Fees Passed posted Wed Feb 15 2012 05:45:50 by flightsimer
QF Have Started To Set Carbon Tax On Fees posted Wed Feb 15 2012 00:22:55 by fiscal
When Is United Overhauling P.s.? posted Sat Feb 11 2012 19:11:47 by VC10er
Could United Ever Take Over Concourse A/B At IAD? posted Mon Feb 6 2012 12:21:44 by washingtonian