Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Delta Connection Ending McAllen Service?  
User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6868 times:

I recently read that Delta may be ending service to McAllen, TX (MFE) in May from someone who saw it on wikipedia. It is not bookable in May on their website. Does anybody know what Load Factors have been on this route? Delta said they were doing well when they upgraded last year to CRJ700s with first class. I know airline bookings don't give an accurate picture of LFs, but I picked two random days next month and one flight has the coach cabin with only 3 seats left, and the other flight about 50%. Anybody know what is up?

McAllen has a spotty history with Delta. They tried Atlanta a long time ago, then LAX, then Memphis, and switched back to Atlanta.

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6765 times:

Yes, ATL-MFE is ending May 1st, along with MEM-LBB.

User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 6613 times:

Anybody have any statistics on the load factors for this flight? It seems weird to me that they would increase capacity and then cut it altogether.

User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6115 times:

Yeah i just read the Facebook post. Apparently they were only achieving a 60% load factor and were falling short of the 75% needed to be profitable. I am definitely sad to see Delta go away. I was actually happy that we had some more diversity in MFE. I was excited two weeks ago when UPS started up operations and I was thrilled to see the airline list growing at MFE, but I guess things werent going so good for Delta. They will be missed.


388 346 77W 787
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6050 times:

They tried to improve the prospects of MFE, by moving the flight from MEM to ATL.

The only reason they increased capacity was because of DL's self-imposed rule of providing 2-class service on routes greater than 750 miles.


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5948 times:

I actually thought that they were doing better. With the switch to ATL and replacing the CRJ200s with CRJ700s, that made me think they were doing good. I even went as far as to think that they might bring in DC9s in the future ( I know, a bit of a stretch).

What airline, if any, do you guys think has the ability to enter MFE in the future?

How about WN? maybe switching their HRL over to MFE. How are they doing in HRL?



388 346 77W 787
User currently offlineHAJflyer From Switzerland, joined Sep 2005, 1473 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5880 times:

It is really interesting that AA and DL are having a hard time establishing a solid footprint in the RGV while CO/UA successfully serves all 3 valley airports (MFE, HRL, BRO).

I considering using the DL flight a time or two, but the fares (from Europe to the RGV) were very uncompetitive and the scheduling was terrible as well (app. 4-5 hour layover in ATL); thus, I always stuck with CO.

OT: Does anyone know how the seasonal MX flight into BRO is doing and why BRO is more successful in attracting new airlines than MFE? They managed to attract AA and MX within a relatively short period of time.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7711 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5832 times:

The stage length and back-racking in connections from these south Texas cities to DL hubs is what ultimately kills these routes.

The economics on these longer routes on 50 seaters to places like ATL and MEM do not work out. A larger aircraft isn't the solution either.

CO/UA's IAH hub is able to access these markets with short connection stage lengths and give much better onward connectivity.


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5815 times:

Quoting HAJflyer (Reply 6):
OT: Does anyone know how the seasonal MX flight into BRO is doing and why BRO is more successful in attracting new airlines than MFE? They managed to attract AA and MX within a relatively short period of time.

I don't know how they are doing in terms of load factors and capacities, but I wouldn't say that they have more success. They have three airlines: AM, AA and CO and they all operate ERJs. McAllen has AA operating MD80s, CO operating B737s/ERJ145/Q400 and Allegiant operating MD80/B757(temporarily). McAllen definitely has more capacity and is a more attractive option to airlines being that is in the middle of the RGV.

My opinion is that Atlanta was not a great connecting destination. Overall, Atlanta is a very big and important city, but I don't think that there is enough demand for Atlanta here in the Valley in terms of O&D traffic.

In terms of connecting passengers, it was rough connecting spot. For anyone flying to the west or northwest, the flight all the way to Atlanta, 3-4 hr layover and then the flight all to the way to the West. Because of those two long flights, it came out to be pretty expensive. Continental and American provide shorter fights (itineraries) and hence cheaper prices.

Even if you were flying to the East coast, Continental and American were still cheaper than Delta.

I just think that Delta was a bit too pricey for the Valley and Atlanta was not a good connecting spot (although I understand why it had to be ATL)

I kind of doubt it, but just for fun, do any of you think that US would ever try to come down?



388 346 77W 787
User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5781 times:

So according to a facebook post by MFE, they are saying tha DL is pulling out of other small markets. They said that Lubbock will be losing DL service as well.


388 346 77W 787
User currently offlinebhmdiversion From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 463 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 5560 times:

The station was notified last week of the closing/route suspension.

The loads on booked traffic were slim; however, their walk-up stats were off the chart. I think I personally sold 4-7 walk up fares a day while I was there.


User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2082 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 5517 times:

ATL is a great hub, but it has some limitations. The TX hubs of UA and AA I am sure provide excellent coverage to south TX communities. No way flights to ATL can compete due to being longer flights and many connections are out of the way.

This is clearly the territory of TX hub airlines. No one else need bother.


User currently offlineCOalways From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 374 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5412 times:

Quoting CapEd388 (Reply 8):

CO operates 2 daily mainline flights as well into MFE B737-500 & B737-900ER on top of the 4 daily Q400 flts so CO has a lot of seats going between MFE & IAH


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 5384 times:

Quoting bhmdiversion (Reply 10):
however, their walk-up stats were off the chart. I think I personally sold 4-7 walk up fares a day while I was there.

I agree. I remember one time that I was there, Continental was having some flight delays, and sent some of their customers over to Delta. Another time, American sent people over to Delta cause they were also having some flight problems. IDK how common this was, but it sure did help Delta.



388 346 77W 787
User currently offlineHAJflyer From Switzerland, joined Sep 2005, 1473 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5310 times:

Quoting CapEd388 (Reply 8):
I kind of doubt it, but just for fun, do any of you think that US would ever try to come down?

CLT and PHL are not an option as they would have they same shortcomings as ATL; PHX is probably too long for a CRJ 700 (from an economical - not a technical perspective) and would limit US to westbound flights. Furthermore any members of a *alliance FF-program have plenty of more attractive options on CO/UA through IAH.

What I wonder though is whether SW will ever diversify their RGV-portfolio beyond HRL?


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5305 times:

Quoting HAJflyer (Reply 14):
What I wonder though is whether SW will ever diversify their RGV-portfolio beyond HRL?

  


Thats exactly what I was wondering. That is the only new carrier that MFE would get, if any. I don't see any other carrier being successful at MFE. I wonder if WN would add MFE or simply move from HRL to MFE.

Does anyone know how WN is doing in HRL?



388 346 77W 787
User currently offlineAVLAirlineFreq From United States of America, joined Jun 2008, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5277 times:

I've always wondered what air service to the RGV would look like if there were only a single airport in the area instead of three.

User currently offlineJosh32121 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 369 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 5214 times:

Quoting AVLAirlineFreq (Reply 16):
I've always wondered what air service to the RGV would look like if there were only a single airport in the area instead of three.

I wondered the same thing! I was booked on DL ATL-MFE in May and got a phone call from DL a week or so ago. I am now rebooked on AA, and AA has already changed their flight schedules on me twice--now arriving at 6:00 p.m. instead of 1:30. Wah wahhh. It's so weird to have a DL ticket with AA flights now. LOL

That said...in exploring replacement flight options, it was indeed bizarre to me to have these three small-ish airports just a short distance away from each other. Together, they would make for viable, steady demand, but split apart, each one struggles to maintain anything to hubs, it seems. As much as I love planes, this would be the perfect opportunity to concentrate commercial air service at one airport and run trains to connect to the other adjacent cities. It's horribly inefficient the way it is now and likely costs all three airports service they might otherwise have if there were only one airport.


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5142 times:

I agree. Having three smallish airports is not that smart or effective. Each of them has a little bit of carriers serving a small amount of destinations. Maybe if we had just one major airport in the RGV, we would have more carriers, more flights, more destinations and over all more opportunities to attract new carriers.


388 346 77W 787
User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5051 times:

Unfortunately, I don't think the cities would work together to build one airport together, and MFE is already starting an expensive expansion project. I think the only consolidation is going to come at the expense of airports losing service and fading away. Brownsville is pretty vulernable, with just a handful or regional jet flights per day on UA, AA, and Aeromexico which is 2x weekly I believe. If Southwest moved out of HRL, HRL wouldn't really have anything. MFE is central to the 4 county Rio Grande Valley area and has the most business demand, and the largest metro area by far.

By the way, I've read before that Southwest refuses to serve McAllen due to something that happened decades ago with Herb Kelleher. Does anybody know what this is? It seems silly to me for Southwest to be ignoring a goldmine for AA and United/CO at MFE, seeing as there is not much competition and no LCC's serving that market (other than Allegiant to just LAS and MCO).

As far as new airlines for MFE, I'm hoping they can also land some AeroMexico service or some other Mexican airline (only charters to Mexico at this point). Not too long ago CO served MFE-MEX. Maybe United can add a tag on one of the Q400 flights IAH-MFE-MTY or one of the regional jets to MEX.

Also hoping United or AA will add a flight to one of their other hubs, maybe ORD for either one of them.


User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5044 times:

Update: I found this regarding the McAllen-Herb Kelleher issue:

http://issuu.com/sbp-display/docs/mcallen/search?q=kelleher

It appears that in 1974, Herb Kelleher was "rebuffed" at a civic club meeting and dropped McAllen from the list of cities Southwest Airlines would serve. Geez, let it go already Herb......


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5008 times:

Quoting mfe777 (Reply 20):
It appears that in 1974, Herb Kelleher was "rebuffed" at a civic club meeting and dropped McAllen from the list of cities Southwest Airlines would serve. Geez, let it go already Herb......

  

Agreed. Are they really gonna be childish and stubborn and reject an airport that is going to bring them better business than HRL? Seems like a bad business decision. The people who "rebuffed" him are probably not even around anymore.

Anyway, lets talk about best case scenario. Lets say that Southwest does come over to MFE. What destination will they serve? Would they serve DAL to compete with AA or would they serve HOU to compete with UA?

Quoting mfe777 (Reply 19):
Also hoping United or AA will add a flight to one of their other hubs, maybe ORD for either one of them.


This is what I have been wondering/hoping for a while. I wish they would start up new routes.

P.S. - I went to HEB earlier and saw the new issue of Texas Monthly and Southwest is on the cover with the title "LUV and War". I flipped through it quickly and they just have a 2-3 page story on WN and their battle in Dallas and in the airline biz as a whole. Ill pick it up later. Heres a pic of the cover in case you guys havent seen it.




388 346 77W 787
User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 4964 times:

Quoting CapEd388 (Reply 21):
Anyway, lets talk about best case scenario. Lets say that Southwest does come over to MFE. What destination will they serve? Would they serve DAL to compete with AA or would they serve HOU to compete with UA?

I would say both DAL and HOU, and if they transfer completely from HRL then they could bring over the AUS and SAT service too. Heck, maybe even compete with Allegiant to LAS, Allegiant sometimes has daily service from MFE during high seasons.


User currently offlineCapEd388 From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 4957 times:

Quoting mfe777 (Reply 22):
I would say both DAL and HOU, and if they transfer completely from HRL then they could bring over the AUS and SAT service too. Heck, maybe even compete with Allegiant to LAS, Allegiant sometimes has daily service from MFE during high seasons.

Oh wow, that sounds very bullish. It would be great if they came over and added all those routes.

A little bit off topic, but do you know if MFE allows spotters? or if they have an area where spotters can go and take photos?



388 346 77W 787
User currently offlinemfe777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 4948 times:

Quoting CapEd388 (Reply 23):
A little bit off topic, but do you know if MFE allows spotters? or if they have an area where spotters can go and take photos?

Not sure, but there is a small park right off the southern end of the runway called Cascade Park.


25 CapEd388 : Oh yeah, thats where the swimming pool is. I have always wanted to go there or even go to the airport itself, and take pictures, but I have a feeling
26 CapEd388 : Well over all, I feel Delta tried their best. I feel like they really want to have a presence and be successful in the Valley, but they just cant, giv
27 Post contains links PSU.DTW.SCE : Here is a blast from the past: DL To Begin MEM-LBB/MFE/JFK (by DL747400 Nov 21 2008 in Civil Aviation) NW and DL really have tried over the years to m
28 Post contains images CapEd388 : Its sad to look at those posts of when they were coming down, and now they are leaving. Sad. I remember back in May 2009, i was driving on 23rd and i
29 bjorn14 : I don't think its neccesary to build another aiport (although it would be nice) The three authorities would have to agree on a single airport (MFE, H
30 PSU.DTW.SCE : This is ultimately the direction that regional air service is going to get to in the next decade as airlines shed smaller airframes. As airlines remo
31 HAJflyer : I do not think that we will end up with a single RGV airport in the next decade or two; however, I would not be too surprised if HRL and BRO were to
32 CapEd388 : Yeah, I think obviously BRO is the weakest of the three. I was reading the comments on Channel 5's facebook when they announced the Delta news and so
33 HAJflyer : Given the infrastructure they already have on the ground in HRL and the comparatively short distances in the valley I would expect them to stay put fo
34 mfe777 : I think Spirit would be an interesting addition to MFE. Allegiant is a big hit with their ultra low fares. With Spirit building up a DFW base, they co
35 Post contains images CapEd388 : Yeah thats what I was thinking as well. I was going to comment on it earlier, but I totally forgot lol , but yeah I can see them coming down. I total
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Delta Connection To Suspend Service At DAL posted Thu Mar 13 2003 19:07:28 by ScottysAir
Delta Connection/Skywest Expands Service. posted Fri Nov 16 2001 00:24:35 by JmhLUV2fly
Delta To Start Atlanta-McAllen Service posted Sat Nov 12 2005 18:27:11 by MAH4546
Delta Connection To Start MBJ Service posted Thu May 13 2004 01:19:22 by MAH4546
Former Delta (Connection) Service LBB-AMA? posted Wed Oct 15 2003 01:53:58 by Ssides
Delta Connection Service Expansion posted Wed Nov 27 2002 03:39:28 by Yvr74
Delta Connection ( Skywest ) CRJ-700 In HKG? posted Fri Jan 6 2012 23:00:43 by dlatl37
Is The First Refurbished Delta 747 Back In Service posted Sun Dec 11 2011 19:47:18 by lucky777
Delta Connection In The Northeast posted Fri Sep 30 2011 11:15:27 by apodino
Delta Connection Countdown Repaint List posted Thu Dec 23 2010 00:11:30 by qfatwa