Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LGB Airport Launches Reconfiguration Study  
User currently offlineasteriskceo From United States of America, joined May 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

"The Long Beach Airport (LGB) is launching an extensive, $1.1 million, two-year airfield geometry study in March to start analyzing the safety, operational and financial benefits of reconfiguring the 1940s-era Daugherty Field and airport property, in conjunction with forming a 'strategic plan.'"


http://lbbusinessjournal.com/long-be...reconfiguring-daugherty-field.html

What would be the real applications of this study? All I can really see being done is the official closure of the north/south runways. $1.1 million to analyze that?

Would love to hear some opinions and predictions on this. Thanks!

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3456 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1703 times:

I hope there plan includes getting rid of the NIMBYs and the stooopid 44(?) flight rule.


"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently offlineasteriskceo From United States of America, joined May 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 1):
I hope there plan includes getting rid of the NIMBYs and the stooopid 44(?) flight rule.

LOL! Not likely.  

The article cites that the FAA paid for study will evaluate the airfield geometry. I don't understanding what that means and what it will translate to.

2 years and $1.1 million dollars to give a name to the airport's shape? Anyone?


User currently offlinemercure1 From French Polynesia, joined Jul 2008, 1476 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1581 times:

Look for the rarely used, and barely maintained stubby 16-34L/R's to be formally withdrawn from use.

User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2091 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1549 times:

Quoting asteriskceo (Thread starter):
What would be the real applications of this study? All I can really see being done is the official closure of the north/south runways. $1.1 million to analyze that?

The closure of a couple of runways would save money and allow more development around the airport. More buildings could be constructed along the north and south sides of the facility.

The cost of the report was 95% paid by the FAA and a good chuck of which probably went to LGB staff. It seems kind of high but not outrageous for that kind of study.


User currently offlineasteriskceo From United States of America, joined May 2004, 467 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1522 times:

IIRC, 16L/34R has been used for RON stands. Anyone know if this is still the case?

User currently offlineICEBIRD757 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 662 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1476 times:

Quoting asteriskceo (Reply 5):
IIRC, 16L/34R has been used for RON stands. Anyone know if this is still the case?

It has been used for parking aircraft for a couple of hours but not overnight. Only 1 time do I remember an aircraft parking overnight on 16L.

Stephen



LGB....where you can watch the grass grow because the traffic is so slow.
User currently offlinegreg3322 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

Quoting ICEBIRD757 (Reply 6):
It has been used for parking aircraft for a couple of hours but not overnight. Only 1 time do I remember an aircraft parking overnight on 16L.

16R/34L was used for the AOPA conventions for the aircraft displays. I've only landed on 16R a couple of times, never 16L or 34L/R. Must keep an eye out for the wind!

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 4):
The closure of a couple of runways would save money and allow more development around the airport. More buildings could be constructed along the north and south sides of the facility.

I think this is the real reason. The old Douglas factory land between Carson and the north airport boundry would be desirable to build houses, but not with two runway extended centerlines through the property.

Greg


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DET Airport Launches Air Passenger Service posted Tue Jul 25 2006 20:11:22 by Neilalp
LGB Airport Closed? posted Tue Oct 25 2005 15:44:08 by GNDOPS
B6 CEO Talks About LGB Airport Growth posted Mon Jun 20 2005 15:57:07 by Squirrel83
Cairo International Airport Launches Website posted Fri Apr 9 2004 21:34:49 by Horus
Manchester Airport Launches New Website posted Thu Mar 4 2004 17:50:01 by Demoose
Alaska Launches PDX-LGB posted Wed Nov 12 2008 10:53:45 by LAXintl
Milton Keynes Airport - Viability Study Starts posted Sat Jun 18 2005 00:07:17 by Gilesdavies
Beirut Launches New Airport Website! posted Fri Dec 19 2003 02:47:01 by BA
EasyJet Launches Airport "beauty Parade" posted Fri Jun 13 2003 20:49:06 by Britair
Airport Satisfaction Study Results posted Tue Apr 8 2003 16:51:35 by Kramri