Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Royal Air Maroc - The Future?  
User currently offlinelisbonbearuk From Portugal, joined Jan 2010, 427 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 8593 times:

There has been lots of rumour recently about what strategy AT has for the future. But what plans does RAM have for the immediate future? When do their 787s arrive and on which routes will the be used?

New routes rumoured are:

CMN-GRU/JNB/LAD/PEK/BOM

[Edited 2012-03-04 06:13:29]

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineusdcaguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 871 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 8454 times:

Quoting lisbonbearuk (Thread starter):
CMN-GRU/JNB/LAD/PEK/BOM

The problem with AT is that its traffic mainly comes from Europe where it is in direct competition with low cost carriers to Morocco and with the European legacies to points in Africa. Due to the amount of capacity already in place exit Europe, my guess is that flights in new markets would go half empty and would attract mainly low fares, but I could be wrong. From what I've heard, JFK-CMN service on AT currently leaves a lot to be desired with things like hand soap and towels often in short supply. However, the 787 would be a step up in service over the 767 and could make AT a more attractive option. For that reason, I think AT should think about putting it on some of their prime routes - CMN-JFK, CMN-ABJ, CMN-DKR, etc. to capture more share. CMN-JNB may hold promise, but carriers like AF and LH have already put a lot of capacity in place. I don't see CMN-LAD working as it is mostly a business destination for oil companies that have contracts with carriers like LH/AF/KL/BA.

Another challenge for AT is the fact that Morocco has many destinations as a country. There are so many fascinating cities to visit that people often bypass the capital (which I find very interesting in itself) and fly directly to their chosen city. That has opened up a lot of O&D flying exit Europe, and AT has been trying hard to play that game. I think the best thing they could do is look at investing in larger RJ equipment to push up loads and hopefully yields in markets where the 737 is too much plane (such as MADRAK).


User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 1977 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 8144 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Interesting thread and interesting response. Royal Air Maroc is not an airline people talk about that much. It's kind of an "under the radar" airline.

User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3277 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 8044 times:

Well when AT takes delivery of their ATR42-600s in Fall 2012 they will have a 6-seat J class. A step in the right direction.   


"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
User currently onlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2026 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 8000 times:

They should join Oneworld and focus on their Europe/North America - West/Central Africa niche. They should look at turning their operation at CMN into something like CM at PTY - smaller planes than their competitors but much more frequency and more efficient connections. Flying all those far flung routes mentioned by the OP, even with a 787, is a recipe for bankruptcy.

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19097 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7962 times:

Quoting usflyer msp (Reply 4):
Flying all those far flung routes mentioned by the OP, even with a 787, is a recipe for bankruptcy.
Quoting lisbonbearuk (Thread starter):
CMN-GRU/JNB/LAD/PEK/BOM

AT already flies CMN-LAD via LBV twice-weekly using the 738. Started 11th Dec 2011.

Source: http://www.anna.aero/2011/12/08/roya...hes-new-route-to-luanda-in-angola/



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 931 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7776 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting usflyer msp (Reply 4):
hey should join Oneworld and focus on their Europe/North America - West/Central Africa niche. They should look at turning their operation at CMN into something like CM at PTY - smaller planes than their competitors but much more frequency and more efficient connections. Flying all those far flung routes mentioned by the OP, even with a 787, is a recipe for bankruptcy.

Most likely alliance for AT is Skyteam... they have close ties for decades with AF. And their premier international route to JFK has been a codeshare with DL for many years now.

And according to articles in Aviation Week published a number of years ago, they were actively considering Skyteam.
Haven't heard anything recent.


User currently onlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2026 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7661 times:

Quoting RobertS975 (Reply 6):
Most likely alliance for AT is Skyteam... they have close ties for decades with AF. And their premier international route to JFK has been a codeshare with DL for many years now.

And according to articles in Aviation Week published a number of years ago, they were actively considering Skyteam.
Haven't heard anything recent.

The reason I said Oneworld is because BA/IB are relatively small players in West Africa (except for BA in Ghana/Nigeria) so AT would actually add something to the alliance network instead of being almost completely duplicative with AF in Skyteam. AA has a hub at JFK just like DL does so It would not be a problem for their JFK route.


User currently offlineabrelosojos From Venezuela, joined May 2005, 5014 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7481 times:

Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 1):
The problem with AT is that its traffic mainly comes from Europe where it is in direct competition with low cost carriers to Morocco and with the European legacies to points in Africa. Due to the amount of capacity already in place exit Europe, my guess is that flights in new markets would go half empty and would attract mainly low fares, but I could be wrong. From what I've heard, JFK-CMN service on AT currently leaves a lot to be desired with things like hand soap and towels often in short supply. However, the 787 would be a step up in service over the 767 and could make AT a more attractive option. For that reason, I think AT should think about putting it on some of their prime routes - CMN-JFK, CMN-ABJ, CMN-DKR, etc. to capture more share. CMN-JNB may hold promise, but carriers like AF and LH have already put a lot of capacity in place. I don't see CMN-LAD working as it is mostly a business destination for oil companies that have contracts with carriers like LH/AF/KL/BA.

Another challenge for AT is the fact that Morocco has many destinations as a country. There are so many fascinating cities to visit that people often bypass the capital (which I find very interesting in itself) and fly directly to their chosen city. That has opened up a lot of O&D flying exit Europe, and AT has been trying hard to play that game. I think the best thing they could do is look at investing in larger RJ equipment to push up loads and hopefully yields in markets where the 737 is too much plane (such as MADRAK).

= Actually, I think AT has been very smart over the years and recognized it cannot simply compete with European LCC's and those providing P2P service into some other Moroccon cities - their hub @ CMN has actually been very effective and I do think there is plenty of opportunities to grow - take a look at their network - quietly, they have become quiet an effective and large player. Sure, if you want to go from Paris to Luanda, you can fly over-priced AF ... but for anywhere else in Europe (for the large diaspora) you can do a quick 1-stop flight to LAD. Moreover, the price sensitive traveler from CDG still has this option as well.

To be fair, this "model" was not pioneered by RAM - recognition should be given to Afriqiyah which was the one that came up with it, and was quite successful in the beginning.

Of the rumored destinations, I think JNB is most likely - GRU is saturated by now, and PEK/BOM becomes circuitous for AT to perform.

Saludos,
A.



Live, and let live.
User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5900 posts, RR: 40
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7463 times:

Quoting abrelosojos (Reply 8):
Of the rumored destinations, I think JNB is most likely - GRU is saturated by now, and PEK/BOM becomes circuitous for AT to perform.

anyhow I think GRU could be an interesting and good performing destination! The Arab community in Brazil is very big and if I am not wrong the own Marocoan population in Sao Paulo / Brazil is also not small.



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlinecedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7934 posts, RR: 54
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 7372 times:

RAM are looking at ways to use their CMN hub to serve markets where they enjoy a geographic advantage - Europe and North America to West Africa, where they enjoy excellent yield on flights to Mali, Senegal, Mauritania, Liberia et al.

Quoting klwright69 (Reply 2):
Interesting thread and interesting response. Royal Air Maroc is not an airline people talk about that much. It's kind of an "under the radar" airline.

True, the CMN hub strategy isn't well known, truly it is under the radar, but I understand it is going very well so far and they are adding more African destinations.

Quoting Avianca (Reply 9):
anyhow I think GRU could be an interesting and good performing destination! The Arab community in Brazil is very big and if I am not wrong the own Marocoan population in Sao Paulo / Brazil is also not small.

There are more Lebanese in Brazil than there are in Lebanon. Since MEA don't fly to Sao Paolo anymore (sad face), most of the traffic (of which there is tonnes) goes via Paris on Air France. Flying via Casablanca saves 675 miles of flying. RAM would half fill a 767 to GRU just with the connecting traffic out of Lebanon - remember MEA used to serve Sao Paolo with the 747-200. The loads and yield is most certainly there.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24080 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 7114 times:

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 10):
Since MEA don't fly to Sao Paolo anymore
Quoting cedarjet (Reply 10):
remember MEA used to serve Sao Paolo with the 747-200.

Minor nitpick. It's Sao Paulo (not Paolo). A very frequent error.  


User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12324 posts, RR: 35
Reply 12, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6932 times:

Well, they'll try their best to make CMN an effective hub - and like anything based in Casablanca, the fundamental things will apply as time goes by: decent quality of service (not one of the world's great airlines, but certainly not one of the worst), a modern fleet and good links to W Africa. When you look at airlines in that region, there aren't that many which are highly thought of and along the coast, right down to Nigeria, there are significant population centres, which AT can (and indeed does) serve from CMN.

User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 931 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6932 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting usflyer msp (Reply 7):
The reason I said Oneworld is because BA/IB are relatively small players in West Africa (except for BA in Ghana/Nigeria) so AT would actually add something to the alliance network instead of being almost completely duplicative with AF in Skyteam. AA has a hub at JFK just like DL does so It would not be a problem for their JFK route.

I am betting that AF owns a piece of AT. Besides, work on improving your stengths, not weakening them!


User currently onlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2026 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6748 times:

Quoting RobertS975 (Reply 13):
I am betting that AF owns a piece of AT.

AF is a minor investor in RAM. IAG is too.

Quoting RobertS975 (Reply 13):
Besides, work on improving your stengths, not weakening them!

If AT joined Skyteam, I bet that AF would push hard to change AT's strategy of attracting pax by under-cutting AF on West African routes. IAG/OW would be much more supportive.


User currently offlinelisbonbearuk From Portugal, joined Jan 2010, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 6667 times:

How many 787s are coming RAM's way, and when are they due?

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24080 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 6577 times:

Quoting lisbonbearuk (Reply 15):
How many 787s are coming RAM's way

4 on order.


User currently offlineIADLHR From Italy, joined Apr 2005, 721 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 6435 times:

Didnt they announce that IAD was on their list when the 787 starts service? I think I read that somewhere.

User currently offlineba319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8430 posts, RR: 55
Reply 18, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5902 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 1):

However, the 787 would be a step up in service over the 767 and could make AT a more attractive option.

- I've flown the 787 internationally, IMO, it is no different to any other plane out there today, I felt no more refreshed than stepping off a 777. The only way you'll have a better flight in Y is if the airline gives a decent configuration, ANA have, the majority won't.



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333,342
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24080 posts, RR: 22
Reply 19, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5870 times:

Quoting ba319-131 (Reply 18):
Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 1):

However, the 787 would be a step up in service over the 767 and could make AT a more attractive option.

That's debatable. Personally, I prefer the 767 over all other widebodies due to the 2-3-2 configuration and only a 1 in 7 chance of a middle seat.


User currently offlineandrefranca From Brazil, joined May 2011, 588 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5657 times:

GRU-CMN ? Dream on! unless they had a "tag-on" to Portugal or Spain with atractive fares then it could work...

User currently offlineSOBHI51 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jun 2003, 3241 posts, RR: 17
Reply 21, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5577 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I flew AT last week BEY-CMN on there 738 in C. Flight was on time, food was so so, service was good, plane was clean, there was only small tv monitors from the plane ceiling, but they forgot to load headsets  
The plane was full in Y and 60% in C.

Also a couple of years back i flew them CMN-RUH on 737-700 i think, we did have to do a technical stop in CAI.
I remember so food was better, but it was along flight.



I am against any terrorist acts committed under the name of Islam
User currently offlineabrelosojos From Venezuela, joined May 2005, 5014 posts, RR: 55
Reply 22, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 5183 times:

Quoting Avianca (Reply 9):
anyhow I think GRU could be an interesting and good performing destination! The Arab community in Brazil is very big and if I am not wrong the own Marocoan population in Sao Paulo / Brazil is also not small.

= GRU would be interesting prior to EK/QR/TK flights. Yields have actually gone down substantially on several of the routes.

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 10):
There are more Lebanese in Brazil than there are in Lebanon. Since MEA don't fly to Sao Paolo anymore (sad face), most of the traffic (of which there is tonnes) goes via Paris on Air France. Flying via Casablanca saves 675 miles of flying. RAM would half fill a 767 to GRU just with the connecting traffic out of Lebanon - remember MEA used to serve Sao Paolo with the 747-200. The loads and yield is most certainly there.

= But, are these Lebanese as committed to the "motherland" as the Lebanese in (say) West Africa?

Quoting usflyer msp (Reply 14):
If AT joined Skyteam, I bet that AF would push hard to change AT's strategy of attracting pax by under-cutting AF on West African routes. IAG/OW would be much more supportive.

= Wouldn't it be the same with IAG/OW wanting Iberia to strengthen its MAD hub?

Quoting andrefranca (Reply 20):

GRU-CMN ? Dream on! unless they had a "tag-on" to Portugal or Spain with atractive fares then it could work...

= Why? They used to fly it before ...

Saludos,
A.



Live, and let live.
User currently offlineusdcaguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 871 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5059 times:

Quoting ba319-131 (Reply 18):
- I've flown the 787 internationally, IMO, it is no different to any other plane out there today, I felt no more refreshed than stepping off a 777. The only way you'll have a better flight in Y is if the airline gives a decent configuration, ANA have, the majority won't.

You're right about that. The reason I said the 787 might be an attractive option is only because the 767 AT flies between CMN and JFK is so old. You will find multiple negative reviews about this aircraft on Skytrax (although that website is not to be entirely trusted). That said, I have the feeling the type of tourist that visits Morocco is just not going to care about the aircraft; having a nonstop at a cheap fare with no stop in Europe is attractive enough, unless better competition comes along.


User currently onlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2026 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 5049 times:

Quoting abrelosojos (Reply 22):
= Wouldn't it be the same with IAG/OW wanting Iberia to strengthen its MAD hub?

Obviously there would be some competition with IB in West/Central/North Africa but AT is much more established (IB serves 8 cities while AT serves 30) and Morocco has historic religious, linguistic (french and arabic) and financial ties to the region that might make many travellers prefer a transit at CMN to MAD (although MAD's facilities are far superior).

Additionally, West/Central Africa is fast-growing and IAG/OW can use RAM to establish a immediate and strong OW presence in the region and then as traffic grows they can add their own services from MAD.


25 lisbonbearuk : CMN seems to be undergoing some sort of expansion - at least T1 appaears to be getting a new look and new gates, so maybe the hub is set for major exp
26 titus95 : Not sure GRU will work well for AT. They opened GRU with 747s , "only" for the Royal Family , as this requested a direct link between Morocco and Bras
27 andrefranca : But it didn't work, we suffer from monopoly on the spain/portugal routes ( IB JJ TP ) the fares are often too high, maybe with AT flying GRU-CMN-LIS
28 ju068 : I guess that no matter which alliance they join they will have to compete with someone for the African continent. However, they have to see which alli
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Royal Air Maroc B787 posted Wed Jun 9 2010 00:21:14 by beeweel15
Royal Air Maroc To Start New Airline In Senegal posted Sun May 31 2009 14:06:23 by RoyalAirMaroc
Royal Air Maroc Hard Landing At JFK posted Wed Apr 29 2009 07:40:37 by Duckredbeard
6 ATR72-600s For Royal Air Maroc posted Thu Mar 26 2009 14:12:02 by FCKC
Royal Air Maroc Posts "good Results In 2008" posted Sun Feb 1 2009 09:53:55 by RoyalAirMaroc
Royal Air Maroc's New Website/Logo posted Sat Jan 17 2009 10:56:21 by RoyalAirMaroc
Royal Air Maroc Will Be Privatized-for Sale.. posted Wed Oct 29 2008 07:10:30 by Beaucaire
Royal Air Maroc #6365 ATL-JFK? posted Sat Jun 7 2008 13:13:23 by N737MC
Royal Air Maroc A330? posted Fri May 9 2008 06:52:07 by RoyalAirMaroc
Royal Air Maroc 747-400 posted Sun May 4 2008 08:08:07 by CXA330300