Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Do Any Japanese Airlines Use European Equipment?  
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 279 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 8094 times:

Without wishing to start an explosion of rampant xenophobia, can anyone out there answer some questions I have please? I was chewing things over in my mind this morning and was trying desperately to think of any Japanese airlines, (or indeed any branch of the Japanese armed forces), that are currently using or intending to use European equipment, i.e. aircraft or helicopters. I couldn't think of much, although I know ANA fly A320s.

Why might this be? Considering the asian market is massive for Airbus, the Japanese market must be disappointing for them. Might this be purely political or am I missing something? Or, is it simply financial, or how about the fact that European equipment just may not be good enough for Japanese needs?      

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCXfirst From Norway, joined Jan 2007, 3052 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 8059 times:

I don't know why, but I'm sure others could explain things.

But, as you said, ANA does fly A320's.

Skymark has ordered the A380 and the A330

The low cost airline Peach operates A320's as well.

Air Asia Japan (which is technically Japanese) will also operate A320's.

I'm sure there are other smaller airlines, but the two major players, are both predominantly Boeing, but I don't know the history behind this.

-CXfirst



From Norway, live in Australia
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4395 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7997 times:

Politics. Neither ANA nor JAL are really free to decide. The may decide which US type they want.

So it isn't disappointing for Airbus, it is just a given that Japanese large airlines have to buy American to slightly reduce the export inbalance with the US. Economy and state are the same entity in the machine Japan - otherwise the fact that the debth of Japan divided by its economical power are 50% higher than those of Greece would make Japan the real center of the crisis.


User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2070 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7932 times:

It will be interesting to see how Japanese airlines hold up against the A380, since all and sundry will operate the A380 into Japan, in the future even more so. Somehow the A380 seems a tough cookie to compete against, because it has the capacity to offer high-density, therefore cheap economy seats, and at the same time the space for cutting-edge premium cabins.

Does anyone remember the "A380 hub-to-hub versus 787 direct connections" game that Boeing and Airbus played early last decade, before everyone realized that these aircraft just serve very different markets? Japan really is an ideal playing field, because both ANA and JAL will try to counter the A380 with large 787 fleets. Exciting..  



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7921 times:

JAS used to have many A300-600's

User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6882 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7745 times:

ANA ordered but then cancelled A340-300s.

ANA chose RR (=European) engines for their 787s.

ANA had chosen RR (=European) engines for their 777s until BA's choice of GE scared them off.

Various branches of the Japanese armed forces fly the EH101.


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 7690 times:

Starflyer operate A320 aircraft. Are hey the only current ones?

Kind regards

Mike


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8324 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 7606 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

JAS, Japan Air Systems, a domestic airline merged into JAL had some A300's. It was the first Japanesse airline to use Airbus planes.

User currently offlinequeb From Canada, joined May 2010, 663 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 7465 times:

JAL has some Saab 340B in his fleet

User currently offlineSurfandSnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2862 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7327 times:

Politics have little or nothing to do with this. Airlines from other incredibly close U.S. allies in East Asia (namely, South Korea and Taiwan) have been avid Airbus operators for decades, dating back to the earliest versions of the A300. American aircraft producers simply did a much better job of meeting Japanese airline needs than Airbus did. If you want to examine a[n Asian] country that explicitly ties its aircraft orders to politics, China would be a prime example - see link below.

Japanese airlines have been very keen for ultra high density aircraft for their domestic short haul routes. Boeing specifically tailored two versions of the 747 (first the "SR", based on the -100, and then the "-400D") with a number of structural and operational modifications for this purpose. Boeing later unveiled the high density 777-300, which has similar capacity of 500+ pax but is substantially cheaper to operate thanks to its two engines and single deck. Moreover, these domestic types enjoy(ed) full training and parts commonality with their long haul [much lower density] 747 and 777 counterparts.

Before the advent of ETOPS in the mid-to-late 80s, it was quite impractical to be operating two engine aircraft like the A300/A310 on long haul routes from Japan - most notably to Hawaii, which as we all know is a massive draw for Japanese tourists. This would be a major reason why the 747, L-1011 and DC-10 were a natural option over the Airbus types available at the time. Airbus was much more focused on the needs of regional and transatlantic operators back then versus transpacific carriers.

A lot of people wonder why the Japanese airlines didn't go for the A380, given their historic preference for the largest/highest capacity planes available and the pressing slot situation at both major Tokyo hub airports. I'm sure the high cost of the type was one factor - NH no doubt got a killer deal on the 787s as launch customer, and thanks to decades of steadfast loyalty obviously both JL and NH enjoy much stronger relationships with Boeing than Airbus. Fleet commonality is another thing to consider - the Japanese airlines have stringent training procedures in place that far exceed those practiced virtually anywhere else in the world, driving up the cost of new/orphan fleet types versus a few (Boeing) types that are ideally suited to domestic/short haul but also international long haul ops (they have dabbled with Airbus types like the A300 and A321 in the past, but recently retired the types to streamline the fleet). The A380 may not have been at all practical for domestic ops; for one thing the key ITM airport has a ban on four engine aircraft (those >500 seat 777s still get to use it, though). As for long haul, the Japanese airlines knew that the government was starting to open up HND to long haul/international flights. This weakens the demand for NRT, but flights to HND suffer from poor times and sometimes have to use airports like Taipei's Songshan that probably can't accommodate the type. So between a split Tokyo hub operation (this has always been a major problem, seeing as how it is much easier to reach most Japanese cities via ICN than Tokyo) and all kinds of inherent restrictions on domestic as well as international routes, I can absolutely see why the Japanese carriers didn't want to shell out the big bucks for the A380. It's not like they will ever get to utilize a consolidated regional AND long haul megahub like SIN, DXB, or FRA. If they were able to feed their long haul network from Tokyo directly from the domestic market, it would be quite another story...

So, I doubt politics was the reason (or at least a primary major factor) in determining Airbus's lack of inroads to Japan. In fact, if it was political the Japanese airlines probably would have ordered more Airbus types, seeing as how the E.U. is by far the largest market for Japanese exports these days. It simply has more to do with the fact that American producers have been making aircraft that better serve the needs of Japanese airlines. Only now, with the advent of Japanese LCCs, will Airbus really start to gain ground in the Japanese market.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12229585



Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7459 posts, RR: 17
Reply 10, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 7207 times:

All Nippon operate more than thrirty A320s:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Hitoshi Ono


Hokkaido Air System operate three Saab 340s:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © H_T


Japan Air Commuter operate two Saab 340s:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kei Nagashima


Japan Air Lines operate 14 A300s:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Kazuchika Naya


StarFlyer operate five A320s:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tokyo Spotter


A few small local airlines, including Air Dolphin., First Flying and Shinchuo Koku operate the BN Islander and the latter also operates four Dornier 228s.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ep3
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Esa Kaihlanen


Bot I think that's abouit it.


User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8283 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 6971 times:

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 9):
Politics have little or nothing to do with this.

Yeah right. You don't think all the outsourcing and risk sharing Boeing has with Japanese companies, doesn't influence JL and NH's fleet decision?


User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 6614 times:

Many thanks to those out there who've thrown their hat into the ring with this one. It was a genuine question as I learn so much from this website and the forums. Thank you all for your knowledge and understanding!

User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6882 posts, RR: 63
Reply 13, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 6165 times:

Quoting VV701 (Reply 10):
Japan Air Commuter operate two Saab 340s

Two? I believe it's 11.

Quoting VV701 (Reply 10):
Japan Air Lines operate 14 A300s

Long gone, I'm afraid.  


User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 6077 times:

Thousands of Japanese are working to build the 787 , how many Japanese does Airbus hire in Japan?? 200 ?? Japanese always like to buy things Made in Japan... The 787 Fuse is made in Nagoya Japan

User currently offlineamccann From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 5486 times:

Quoting COSPN (Reply 14):
Japanese always like to buy things Made in Japan

  

Quoting COSPN (Reply 14):
The 787 Fuse is made in Nagoya Japan

Well... they make a few sections of fuselage.

Spirit AeroSystems (USA) makes section 41
Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) makes section 43
Alenia (Italy) makes section 44 and section 46
Boeing, formerly Vought Aircraft Industries (USA) makes section 47 and section 48

Fuji Heavy Industries (Japan) makes the center wing box, section 11
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) makes the main landing gear wheel well, section 45

I may have Fuji and Mitsubishi mixed up. But regardless, the Japanese make a significant portion of the 787.

[Edited 2012-03-06 19:17:55]


What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2952 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 5301 times:

Jetstar Japan will operate A320s too.

Prior to 1985, probably a lot of politics was involved in aircraft purchasing decisions, but the government has no ownership in the airline industry at the moment (except the bailout of JAL but JAL is paying back the government for the loans).

NH, JL or any other Japanese airline will decide which aircraft type suits their needs. The 767, 777, & 787 have much more Japanese content, so they have been selected ahead of competing Airbus products.

In hindsight, it would have been interesting had NH taken delivery of the A340, which would have made the introduction of the A330 much more easier. I say this now because of the delays in the 787 program. Instead of taking deliveries of 767s and 777s, they could have opted for the more popular A330.

Also recent deliveries of helicopters have been mostly to European manufacturers. Bell had a significant marketshare previously, but this has eroded severely and Sikorsky is a niche player. Robinson do have a good share in the light segment though.


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6882 posts, RR: 63
Reply 17, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 5149 times:

Quoting carpethead (Reply 16):
NH, JL or any other Japanese airline will decide which aircraft type suits their needs. The 767, 777, & 787 have much more Japanese content, so they have been selected ahead of competing Airbus products.

Excuse moi but these two sentences appear to contradict each other!

Suiting an airlines needs and having a high Japanese content have nothing to do with each other.


User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2952 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3466 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 17):
Excuse moi but these two sentences appear to contradict each other!

Suiting an airlines needs and having a high Japanese content have nothing to do with each other.

They could be contradictory but if all things are equal perhaps the equipment with more Japanese content wins out.


User currently offlinedandaire From UK - Wales, joined Jul 2008, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

The Japanese Military don't lose out either, they operate these British made beauties :-


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Esa Kaihlanen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Esa Kaihlanen




Old age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill.
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 20, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting airbazar (Reply 11):
Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 9):Politics have little or nothing to do with this.
Yeah right. You don't think all the outsourcing and risk sharing Boeing has with Japanese companies, doesn't influence JL and NH's fleet decision?

That's economics, not politics.

If Airbus decided to move about 10,000 jobs from Europe to Japan, I'm sure the Japanese airlines would look stronger at Airbus products.

Quoting PM (Reply 17):
Excuse moi but these two sentences appear to contradict each other!

Suiting an airlines needs and having a high Japanese content have nothing to do with each other.

Not really. One reason for the 'high Japanese content' is that Boeing is willing to modify, or basically customize, their designs to meet the requirements of the Japanese airlines. Airbus does some, but not as much.

But on a broader scale, for the Japanese airlines to have high domestic utilization, and to have strong tourism businesses, it takes a high standard of wage earners in Japan.

Ensuring that a lot of the money spent for new aircraft stays in Japan - to be spend by Japanese consumers, hopefully on Japanese airline tickets - is better business than sending those tens of millions of dollars to the United States or France or Germany to be spent - certainly NOT on Japanese airline tickets.


User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25106 posts, RR: 22
Reply 21, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1805 times:

Quoting PM (Reply 13):
Quoting VV701 (Reply 10):
Japan Air Lines operate 14 A300s

Long gone, I'm afraid.

And JAL didn't order the A300s. They were inherited from their merger with JAS.

As a sidenote, JAS liked the Airbus corporate livery at the time so much they adopted it as their own, no doubt with the agreement of Airbus.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerard Helmer


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Serge Bailleul - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul McCarthy


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © filmshooter



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Do Any Foreign Airlines Have Small Planes Here? posted Sat Dec 18 1999 22:37:40 by N766UA
Do Any Airlines Still Use The Old Seating Charts? posted Sun May 20 2001 15:58:20 by LAX
Do Any Airlines Operate Their Own RJs? posted Mon Aug 4 2008 16:08:38 by Soxfan
What Distribution Channels Do Airlines Use? posted Sun Aug 3 2008 08:29:04 by SInGAPORE_AIR
Why Do Airlines Use Boeing & Airbus? posted Sat Mar 17 2007 14:13:08 by Sampa737
Do Airlines Use Miles Or Nautical Miles? posted Sun Jun 18 2006 19:14:31 by QuestAir
Why Do Airlines Use The Dreamliner Livery? posted Mon Mar 6 2006 15:14:04 by RichM
Do All Airlines Use Reverse Thrust Breaking? posted Mon Oct 24 2005 04:13:26 by ANZ772
Do Any Airlines Sell Seats On Freighters posted Thu Apr 21 2005 17:59:39 by Ssides
Do Any Airlines Still Serve LAF? posted Mon Mar 21 2005 19:10:14 by 7E72004