Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Colgan Air Fined For Improper Crew Rest  
User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4236 posts, RR: 6
Posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5307 times:

Well, the news just keeps getting worse for Pinnacle Air Group. The FAA is now slapping a fine on them due to numerous crew rest violations that occured in 08 and 09. The funny thing about these is notice that the date at the end of the period in question corresponds to the BUF crash?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...rline-involved-2009-crash-15833027

While I don't think the fine is really financially significant, this is another black eye for the regional industry and will hurt them in that way more than anything monetarily. Although Pinnacle is near bankruptcy so they certainly didn't need this.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21530 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5148 times:

Quoting apodino (Thread starter):
While I don't think the fine is really financially significant, this is another black eye for the regional industry and will hurt them in that way more than anything monetarily.

If people find out about it. I haven't seen any major news about this - the only time the general public hears of these things is after an accident ("the airline was fined for [infraction] back in [year]" or something like that). I wish the fine had been more - it's pretty hard to accidentally screw up the one day off out of seven rule.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinefutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2602 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4865 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 1):
I wish the fine had been more - it's pretty hard to accidentally screw up the one day off out of seven rule.

One would think, but prior the JCBA it wasn't uncommon for a crewmember to bid for 4 day trips, be extended/junior manned into days 5 and 6, then be given 24hrs off in a hotel somewhere before heading back out on the road for another 5 or 6 days for a few weeks on end. During the 5 or 6 days on, your sleep schedule would be constantly messed with, you'd end up getting 16hr duty days and reduced rest overnights. I can see how this would have been missed by a pilot. I do agree that it should have been caught, but it is possible to miss, especially when you're on your 3rd week away from home having had 3 "days" off since the last time you slept in your own bed.



Life is better when you surf.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21530 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4730 times:

Quoting futureualpilot (Reply 2):
I can see how this would have been missed by a pilot.

So can I. What I can't see is how it can be missed by the scheduling department, sitting behind their desks with plenty of rest and the aid of computer programs.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinefutureualpilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2602 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4541 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 3):
So can I. What I can't see is how it can be missed by the scheduling department, sitting behind their desks with plenty of rest and the aid of computer programs.

In a perfect world, you'd be spot on. No reason for the mistake. In a past life it was commonplace to "move the rig." Things were different. Not saying it was right, because it wasn't, but the attitude was different in SOC. Thankfully the mentality and culture have changed for the better. Now if only the company could stay afloat.



Life is better when you surf.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21530 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

Quoting futureualpilot (Reply 4):
In a past life it was commonplace to "move the rig."

And thus the fines. The regulations exist for a reason.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinedashman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2114 times:

Not surprising this might happen. When you combine scheduling crews very near limits and FAA rest regs that read much like a Net Flix radio commercial this is bound to happen. It is interesting that there is no mention of fines or certificate action against the crew members involved. The way the regs read a crew member is not permitted to accept an illegal assignment even if crew scheduling creates it.
Seems like the FAA is doing a little CYA because their oversight didn't catch it back in 08 and 09 .


User currently offlineapodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4236 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2039 times:

Quoting dashman (Reply 6):
The way the regs read a crew member is not permitted to accept an illegal assignment even if crew scheduling creates it.

The problem with this is that when a crewmember calls scheduling out on it, crew scheduling will usually crunch numbers and tell the crew member that their trip is legal, and if they refuse it they will get the Chief Pilot involved. I have seen it happen too many times. This is not right.


User currently offlinedashman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1679 times:

If its legal it's legal. If its not then the CP can lean on you all he wants. If you accept it your wrong and you will have to answer for it in another venue. I believe they call it pilot pushing. Airlines been doing for years. The solution is simple, know your regs, dig your heels in when you are right. I really can't think in recent memory where a crew member was fired for being in compliance with the regs. You can bet your bottom dollar it is going to be a very tense conversation with the CP. I agree it is not right.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Phaseout Is Set For Colgan Air Name posted Fri Jul 9 2010 11:57:08 by KarlB737
Pinnacle Airlines Buys Colgan Air For $20 Mln posted Thu Jan 18 2007 17:31:45 by Ti717
Colgan Air Requests Relief For EAS At BFD/JHW posted Mon Sep 18 2006 23:43:09 by A330323X
LA Fined For Using Foreign Crew! posted Thu Aug 10 2006 12:08:12 by TBCITDG
UA Using 17-20H&J For Crew Rest On Int'l 777s Now? posted Sun May 21 2006 10:45:02 by FiveMileFinal
Crew Rest Areas For The B787? posted Wed Feb 2 2005 18:46:05 by SNATH
Air India To Hire Crew For First Time In 9 Years posted Fri Feb 14 2003 06:53:23 by B747-437B
Kabo Air Applies For Nigeria – US Services posted Tue Nov 8 2011 14:19:58 by LAXintl
Swappable Crew Rest Module posted Mon Oct 24 2011 13:06:26 by crazyro
EK A380 Coach Seats Near Crew Rest posted Tue Oct 18 2011 13:04:39 by N62NA