Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AB - Why No Stronger Focus On Eastern Europe?  
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3330 times:

Hi guys, in a recent press release, Air Berlin claims to concentrate on the "emerging markets" in Eastern Europe. With Berlin as their major hub, the upcoming oneworld joining (and Malev gone), this seems to be quite a good strategy. But looking at AB's route map, this area is still more like a "white spot", with the only Eastern European destinations served being KRK, GDN, BUD, LED, DME.

Why don't they launch flights to important cities like WAW, PRG, ZAG or BEG?

Also, the Baltic States are missing in AB's network, which otherwise is quite well developed in Northern Europe. So, why not launch e.g. TLL? Even KGD might be a good idea for a new route, because since KDavia went bust, the city is cut off from the big Western European airline networks.

Last but not least, why won't AB launch flights to ATH and IST? Since A3 axed Berlin, there is only the (not even daily) easyJet flight left serving Athens, and (as far as I know) even LH has announced to operate BER-IST starting this summer.

Could it be that AB currently just isn't in the financial shape to expand? Is it really that more lucrative (especially as an alliance member) to offer that many holiday flights to the Mediterranean, instead of deploying the aircraft on "decent routes"?


PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBasilFawlty From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 1331 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3263 times:

WAW is very expensive, that's why only a few low-cost carriers serve the airport. PRG already has a lot of low-cost carriers, so AB would face a lot of competition. And for the rest like ZAG, BEG, KGD etc. these countries are not members of the EU so you have to obtain traffic rights which can be difficult.


'Every year donkeys and mules kill more people than plane crashes'
User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3188 times:

Quoting BasilFawlty (Reply 1):
WAW is very expensive, that's why only a few low-cost carriers serve the airport. PRG already has a lot of low-cost carriers, so AB would face a lot of competition.

But AB is not an LCC. With them joining oneworld, I'd rather call them a "network carrier with lowcost tendencies". Isn't AB interested in getting more feed to its Berlin hub?



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineju068 From Vanuatu, joined Aug 2009, 2775 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3118 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting BasilFawlty (Reply 1):
And for the rest like ZAG, BEG, KGD etc. these countries are not members of the EU so you have to obtain traffic rights which can be difficult.

Mmmm maybe for KGD but not for BEG and ZAG. Croatia is set to join the EU in summer and Serbia has the Free Sky agreement in place.
I guess that they are not trying Zagreb for now since there it is a Star Alliance stronghold. As for Belgrade, Niki already has almost double daily flights so I guess that is how they compensate.

Niki had announced major Balkan expansion, so maybe Air Berlin is routing their Balkan passengers via Vienna?


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7633 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2762 times:

On a semi-related note, how important is DUS for AB as a hub? Wouldn't AB have more chances of success by launching new routes such as the ones discussed in this thread from DUS than from Berlin?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2706 times:

I would say because trains are a big competition on most of the routes as well.


It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 605 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2578 times:

Quoting Tobias2702 (Thread starter):
Hi guys, in a recent press release, Air Berlin claims to concentrate on the "emerging markets" in Eastern Europe. With Berlin as their major hub, the upcoming oneworld joining (and Malev gone), this seems to be quite a good strategy.

The reason for the lack of focus on East Europe is the lack of revenue potential. There is simply not enough volume to feed a hub dedicated to this market. My prediction is that BER will be a very successful O&D airport, but it will for the foreseeable future not function as a hub.

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 4):
On a semi-related note, how important is DUS for AB as a hub? Wouldn't AB have more chances of success by launching new routes such as the ones discussed in this thread from DUS

DUS cannot work as a true, viable hub for AB either, because of the limited number of slots that are available, and more than half have been gobbled up by Lufthansa. The slot constraints make it next to impossible to organize a sufficient, commercially viable number of flights in banks. This results in a relatively small number of reasonable flight connections (compared to let's say AMS or FRA) and insufficient passenger volumes to feed the flights.

To sum it up: AB is screwed with both BER and DUS, and this explains why they find themselves in such dire straits financially.


User currently offlineTobias2702 From Germany, joined Sep 2008, 731 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2417 times:

Quoting PHX Flyer (Reply 6):
My prediction is that BER will be a very successful O&D airport,

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of connecting passenger is needed to define a typical hub? Today, AB has around 7 percent connecting passengers at TXL, where there aren't even proper facities to cater for these people. I have always been under the impression that with the new, modern airport and the admission to oneworld, there would come more connecting pax for AB.



PA, AF, UK, BA, AB, DL, LH, FR, BD, A3, EZY, DY //// A319/320/346, B733/735/73G/738/744/763, AT4, 146, CR2, DH4
User currently offlineTIA From Albania, joined Mar 2006, 524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

Quoting Tobias2702 (Thread starter):
Hi guys, in a recent press release, Air Berlin claims to concentrate on the "emerging markets" in Eastern Europe. With Berlin as their major hub, the upcoming oneworld joining (and Malev gone), this seems to be quite a good strategy. But looking at AB's route map, this area is still more like a "white spot", with the only Eastern European destinations served being KRK, GDN, BUD, LED, DME.

Why don't they launch flights to important cities like WAW, PRG, ZAG or BEG?

You're only looking at flights from Berlin. I love Berlin and I would like to see it prosper, but it's not where where the demand from Eastern Europe is. Also the location of Berlin is not the most ideal for connecting opportunities. AB has more flights to Eastern Europe through other hubs and through its subsidiaries. Although I do agree with your assertion that despite their claim, AB is not concentrating in the "emerging markets" of Eastern Europe.


User currently onlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13549 posts, RR: 100
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2116 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I personally believe AB is handicapped until they operate out of one unified airport. Until BER opens and opens up more West-East connections by unifying the flights into one hub.

Quoting TIA (Reply 8):
I love Berlin and I would like to see it prosper, but it's not where where the demand from Eastern Europe is.

Hence the need for connections. I see some opportunity, but not without feed.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Special Liveries On DL's Pmnw Aircraft? posted Tue Jan 11 2011 11:42:46 by 1337Delta764
Why No New Orders On New Generation Airliners? posted Mon Jul 26 2010 18:56:43 by SandroMag
Why No LGA-BWI On FL? posted Tue Jun 15 2010 09:33:25 by JBAirwaysFan
Why No A300 B4 On The LAX-Hawaii Route? posted Sun May 2 2010 07:10:05 by 747400sp
Why No Mood Lighting On DL 77L? posted Sun Nov 29 2009 13:12:13 by Avi8tir
Why No DL Code On AM's Canada Flights? posted Fri Nov 13 2009 10:35:20 by EddieDude
Why No More Advertising On Ryanair Planes? posted Tue Oct 20 2009 11:35:09 by Birdwatching
Why No DEN-NRT On UA. posted Wed Aug 5 2009 10:31:23 by AirmaleJUM
Why No 'premium Economy' On EK? posted Wed Oct 22 2008 22:50:48 by Sandyb123
Why No Beluga Nose On Regular Airliners? posted Sun Aug 31 2008 18:22:10 by Flyf15