Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JL: MD90,734 Or 738  
User currently offlineolddominion727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 377 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1706 times:

As a travel agent I am starting to see more 738's on domestic Asia routes like BJS, PUS, KHH even SHA. My question is obviously the 738 is filling that gap more efficiently for JL. But I was under the impression when they bought JAS, both the M90 and AB6 were going. But it appears the M90 is staying, even over the 734. Do we know the criteria they've used to keep them? I would think it would be better to have more like-minded equipment cutting overhead costs... They could ditch the M90 to DL and pick up some former US 734's. Just a thought...

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4295 posts, RR: 36
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

No the MD-90s are slowly being withdrawn and sold to DL, some have left the active fleet already. Maybe they just happen to seem more active on the routes you regularly see. The withdrawl schedule is also based in how quickly Delta can refurbish them; part of their former Chinese MD-90s are still waiting in the dessert for when the rework and paint shops are available, so no use to ferry the MD-90s already and park them for a year while they can make money in Japan.


nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineCessna172RG From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1335 times:

No more 734's for JAL...if anything you'll be seeing more 738's. I have a friend who works for JAL in FUK, and yes, the MD90s are going slowly, A300s are gone, MD80s are gone, and except for their commuter operations, the fleet basically consists of the 734, 738, 762, 763, 772, 773, soon the 787, a few MD90s, and that's about it. It's sorta strange too, to see JAL without the 747s, especially the 400Ds on domestic runs, but I digress. I think that JAL is taking a hint from US carriers and is finding that the 738 can do a great job for them on a variety of routes. But, there's nothing like taking a widebody on an hour hop out of Haneda...


Save the whales...for dinner!!!
User currently offlineRWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3090 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1319 times:

Quoting Cessna172RG (Reply 2):
there's nothing like taking a widebody on an hour hop

I agree the fun of flying a huge plane, with little fuel on board for a short up and down is one of the greatest things, even a lightly loaded 757 is a rocket taking off. SEA-PDX, LAX-SAN have had 747's, DC-10's, L-1011's, A-300's, 767's, 757's, even flew an HP 747 LAS-PHX once.



Rule number One, NEVER underestimate the other guys lack of class - In honor of Mayor - Rob Ford
User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2939 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 967 times:

Quoting Cessna172RG (Reply 2):
the fleet basically consists of the 734, 738, 762, 763, 772, 773, soon the 787

762s are gone too.

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
As a travel agent I am starting to see more 738's on domestic Asia routes like BJS, PUS, KHH even SHA. My question is obviously the 738 is filling that gap more efficiently for JL. But I was under the impression when they bought JAS, both the M90 and AB6 were going. But it appears the M90 is staying, even over the 734. Do we know the criteria they've used to keep them? I would think it would be better to have more like-minded equipment cutting overhead costs... They could ditch the M90 to DL and pick up some former US 734's

To be technical, there are no domestic Asia routes unless you mean domestic & Asian routes.
JL has come a long way in downsizing. They used fly 744s on NRT-PEK!
The MD90s are leaving. In fact, the remaining 14 or so, will be phased out by March 2013.
I am not sure why you wrote US 734s, as they are some of the oldest 734s out there. If they are looking at picking up used aircraft, it would be 738s, which are much more younger and have less cycles.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Norwegian Air Shuttle : A320 Or 738? posted Fri May 4 2007 13:24:12 by FCKC
US 737's - Which Will Go First 734 Or 733? posted Tue Jun 27 2006 19:47:57 by Jfrworld
UNI Air To Replace Their MD90's, 737NG Or Airbus posted Mon Nov 28 2005 13:26:25 by MidnightMike
HA & 738 MAX Or 739ER posted Fri Jan 13 2012 11:33:13 by olddominion727
WN: Why Not The 738 And/or 739? posted Wed Jul 21 2010 14:38:46 by 777fan
Air Baltic : 738 Or A320? posted Thu Apr 15 2010 23:02:40 by FCKC
Air New Zealand : All A320 , Or All 738? posted Mon Oct 12 2009 07:00:48 by FCKC
To Lease Or Not To Lease? The MD80 V. 738 posted Mon Feb 27 2006 15:31:55 by Curious
SQ Or JL Not Flying To YYZ? posted Sat Jan 14 2006 04:45:26 by KHKAIR
738 Vs. 734 In The U.S. posted Thu Sep 1 2005 22:10:33 by Tupolev154B2