Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Russian Jet Takes Off With "hole In Wing"  
User currently offlinebobmuc From Germany, joined Nov 2011, 313 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 1 month 5 hours ago) and read 13730 times:

Hello,
couldn't find it posted:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/1190398/1/.html

It wasn't a hole, but still a kind of strange story...

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekhpn From United States of America, joined Sep 2010, 151 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 13259 times:

The story leaves much room for speculation.
Anybody able to dig up which UN 737 this was?
UN has 737-300/400/500/800 so this would seem like the first step to identifying (by A.net standard) what exactly was missing.


User currently offlinebobmuc From Germany, joined Nov 2011, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 1 hour ago) and read 13027 times:

News video with picture of the missing part:
http://rt.com/news/prime-time/transaero-plane-wing-hole-018/

Shouldn't be a problem for the 737-experts here to identify it by "A.net standard"...  


User currently offlineDualQual From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 732 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month ago) and read 12801 times:

There are a bunch of different access panels on the wing. If a cover was missing you might be able to go depending on which cover/panel etc. I don't have an MEL/CDL in front of me but if it says you can go without you can go.

User currently offlineclydenairways From Ireland, joined Jan 2007, 1197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month ago) and read 12684 times:

Well they could have at least covered it over with speed tape, it would have saved them a lot of hassle.

User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 12428 times:

Yep that's a missing access panel from a 737classic. I don't think that is a CDL item. They obviously do things a little differently in Russia. Either replace the panel with a spare, rob one from another plane or have an engineering disposition to make a temp. panel out of aluminum sheet and speed tape or speed tape alone. Another potentially interesting item in the article is the first refused takeoff due to a indication problem connected to the A/C system. Its possible the panel was loose and then blown out due to a duct leak in the strut that also caused the flight deck indication. There is a blow out panel in the strut, but if the panel was already loose, it may have been the path of least resistance. Of course it probably was unrelated but its fun to speculate.

User currently offlinedeltaffindfw From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 12311 times:

I've had that happen on a DL 732 about 7-8 years ago - PDX-DFW. Missing access panel. Pilot talked with maintenance, he added more fuel to compensate for drag, and we took off.

User currently offlineTy134A From Austria, joined Apr 2008, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 11822 times:

Russians are getting spoiled... I remember some years ago you would have been happy if it wasn't more than just a missing panel. I already had a whole cowling missing on an A28, and the pilot ment that the plane only goes up to 3500m. That made me then feel better.

I have seen a machanic with a 200 rub tool bolting (replacing 2 bolts) on the intake on a YK2 while I was sitting on seat 18f... But that was rather funny, he was so friendly and smiled to me from minus 35 degrees to the warm 7 in the plane (yes, staircase open).

I remember a flight on a YK4, on which the airline painted the toilet and refurbished it. The paind was wet and on the floor the remainders of drilling holes were to be found. Holes were drilled into direction of fuselage  for the toilet paper holder.

And a navigator I know told me they could only go up to 7500m with a certain TU3, as it can't hold the pressure much higher.

So what was the trouble on the UN flight? Hahaha, slava russkoj aviazii!!!



best trips:TU3,TU5,IL8,IL6,ILW,IL9,I14,A40,YK4,YK2,AN4,A26,A28,A81,L11,D1C,M11,AB4,313,342,345,703,722,732,741,74L,F50,F
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9873 times:

Quoting DualQual (Reply 3):
There are a bunch of different access panels on the wing. If a cover was missing you might be able to go depending on which cover/panel etc. I don't have an MEL/CDL in front of me but if it says you can go without you can go.

Deferable under CDL 54-20-02. Up to 4 panels are allowed to be missing per strut. For just one missing there is no takeoff/landing penalty. The crew was completely within procedure to continue the flight.

Quoting clydenairways (Reply 4):
Well they could have at least covered it over with speed tape, it would have saved them a lot of hassle.

That would be worse; the CDL already covers the panel missing. It doesn't cover the hole being sealed up with speedtape...the latter would require an engineering disposition.

Quoting yeelep (Reply 5):
There is a blow out panel in the strut, but if the panel was already loose, it may have been the path of least resistance.

That is the blowout panel.

Tom.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 642 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 8790 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):
That is the blowout panel.

I don't think you would call that a blowout panel. It is an access panel to the bleed air duct, wiring harnesses, pressure sensors, fuel line, hydraulic line, etc.. We have had them come off in flight due to incorrect installation, they use a type of wing nut that engages the flange on the pylon panel, if the nut doesn't rotate the 90 degrees you should see it due to the indexed collar that is marked on top. Kind of a crappy set up but in no way a safety of flight issue.


User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 6964 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):
That is the blowout panel


Nope, not a blow out panel. The blowout panel is located on the fwd strut fairing.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31573 posts, RR: 57
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 6050 times:

The picture is not displaying,but sounds like an access panel....Could be deffered under CDL.


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinetransaeroyyz From Canada, joined Dec 2010, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5144 times:

One of four Boeing 737-300s, ranging 11-25 yrs old, http://www.planespotters.net/Product...e=737-300&fleet=3697&fleetStatus=1

User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 9):
Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 8):
That is the blowout panel.

I don't think you would call that a blowout panel.

I was calling it a blowout panel because that's what the CDL called it, at least as I looked at the drawing.

Quoting yeelep (Reply 10):
Nope, not a blow out panel. The blowout panel is located on the fwd strut fairing.

Isn't that what's shown in the video? I stared at the CDL drawing for several minutes trying to locate the panel from the video against the drawing. It seems to fit the blowout panel location best.

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 11):

The picture is not displaying,but sounds like an access panel....Could be deffered under CDL.

If it's an access panel the same CDL rules apply (different CDL item from the blowout panel but same restrictions).

Tom.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 642 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3612 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't quote me too closely but I believe there are 5 total of these panels on the pylon, 2 on the side and 3 on top. I tried to find my panel book but it must be at work.

User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
Isn't that what's shown in the video? I stared at the CDL drawing for several minutes trying to locate the panel from the video against the drawing. It seems to fit the blowout panel location best.

In the picture below, the missing panel is the one on the right, the blowout panel is the one on the left with the stencil on it.



Quoting 737tdi (Reply 14):
Don't quote me too closely but I believe there are 5 total of these panels on the pylon, 2 on the side and 3 on top. I tried to find my panel book but it must be at work.

Eight total of this type of access panel per pylon. Three on top, two inboard and three outboard. One inboard and two outboard panels are hidden by the C-ducts.

[Edited 2012-03-24 07:16:14]

User currently offlineAlnicocunife From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3009 times:

Maybe their Engineering department allowed the aircraft to fly one or two cycles to get to a maintenance station. Would not be in the CDL. Still Legal.

User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31573 posts, RR: 57
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2932 times:

Quoting Alnicocunife (Reply 16):
Maybe their Engineering department allowed the aircraft to fly one or two cycles to get to a maintenance station. Would not be in the CDL. Still Legal.

True....But can special permission taken from Regulatory that is Not documented in the CDL be permitted.



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2914 times:

Check Tom's reply #8. In this case the missing panel is a CDL item, no engineering or special permission required.

User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2748 times:

Quoting yeelep (Reply 15):
In the picture below, the missing panel is the one on the right, the blowout panel is the one on the left with the stencil on it.

Thanks for that; my mental picture of where the leading edge was relative to the strut was way off. It would be nice if the CDL diagram included the leading edge.

Quoting Alnicocunife (Reply 16):
Maybe their Engineering department allowed the aircraft to fly one or two cycles to get to a maintenance station. Would not be in the CDL.

It is on the CDL.All the strut access panels and the blowout door are on there.

Tom.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 642 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2408 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting yeelep (Reply 15):
Eight total of this type of access panel per pylon. Three on top, two inboard and three outboard. One inboard and two outboard panels are hidden by the C-ducts.

I was just referencing the top of the pylon. The ones under the reversers (C ducts) can't be lost even if left unscrewed (unattached), they are captured. LOL. I forget that sometimes I have to be absolutely specific. WOW.

Been working on CFM-56-2's and 3's and 7's since 1990, kinda sorta familiar to me. You can go on but ??? Oh, not the 7 at that time.

Come on, You knew exactly what I meant but you had to be smarter. Not cool. I have removed those panels hundreds of times, gotten dirt and crap in my eyes from it. They are under the hottest spot on the engine. Takes a 1/4" dr. ratchet with a shortened bit to remove or your ratchet buries itself in the hi temp goo on the TR. Get some, buddy. Have a nice Marine Corps Day.

737tdi


User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2385 times:

Just making a clarification, not trying to one up you. From reading other post's you have made I am aware of your knowledge/familiarity of the 737. My own length of experience with the CFM's is similar to your's, except the -2, never had the pleasure.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
El Al Plane Almost Takes Off With Open Door- Again posted Mon Sep 20 2010 11:20:52 by todaReisinger
Flying Car Takes Off With Successful Test posted Wed Mar 18 2009 04:08:11 by Dimodica1
Saudi 777 Hole In Wing? posted Thu Mar 13 2008 01:53:13 by Strudders
DE 757-300 Takes Off With Open Window! posted Fri Dec 15 2006 23:52:29 by Qantas744ER
First Thai 777-200ER Takes Off! With Pics posted Tue Oct 24 2006 12:55:29 by Qantas744ER
Alaska Airlines MD-80 With Hole In Fuselage posted Wed Jan 18 2006 04:10:05 by Tallguy14
AS MD-80 With Hole In Fuselage posted Wed Dec 28 2005 02:10:20 by 3DoorsDown
NW 757 Returns W Hole In Wing posted Tue Nov 21 2000 05:44:42 by Republic
Birds Hit Boeing 767 Jet, Leave Hole In Main Wing posted Tue May 16 2006 20:03:44 by Magic48
Close Call In Melbourne Australia, Russian Jet Alm posted Mon Jun 23 2008 18:39:46 by DUALRATED
First Thai 777-200ER Takes Off! With Pics posted Tue Oct 24 2006 12:55:29 by Qantas744ER
Alaska Airlines MD-80 With Hole In Fuselage posted Wed Jan 18 2006 04:10:05 by Tallguy14
AS MD-80 With Hole In Fuselage posted Wed Dec 28 2005 02:10:20 by 3DoorsDown
NW 757 Returns W Hole In Wing posted Tue Nov 21 2000 05:44:42 by Republic
Birds Hit Boeing 767 Jet, Leave Hole In Main Wing posted Tue May 16 2006 20:03:44 by Magic48