Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IND After John Clark  
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3756 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1706 times:

Several days ago, IND director (and former JAX director) John Clark left the Indianapolis Airport Authority.

Under Clark, IND opened their new terminal, but hasn't been very successful in attracting service from new or existing airlines. Like at JAX, Clark was also known at IND for heavy travel expenses.

Could this be the change that IND needs to get back on track?


"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinemsp747 From United States of America, joined May 2010, 323 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1692 times:

I don't think the head of Airport Authority is the reason they couldn't attract new service. It's the city itself, which probably has a good level of service for its size. Building a fancy new terminal isn't what airlines are looking for. It's people to fill the seats and make their flights profitable. If there isn't enough O&D traffic there, adding more airlines and flights isn't going to work. I think the "downturn" IND has seen over the past few years is just the market right-sizing itself.

User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3756 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1670 times:

Quoting msp747 (Reply 1):
If there isn't enough O&D traffic there, adding more airlines and flights isn't going to work. I think the "downturn" IND has seen over the past few years is just the market right-sizing itself.

Keep in mind that some of IND's traffic comes from CVG's catchment area, but it used to be more before DL lowered fares from CVG. CVG's leakage reversal got to the point where IND ran an ad campaign in the Cincinnati market for the first time.

Quoting msp747 (Reply 1):
Building a fancy new terminal isn't what airlines are looking for.

  

IMO, the new terminal was a mistake for IND. The IAA could have renovated the old terminal (which was perfectly fine) for 1/8th of the cost. As a result of the new terminal, the average cost per enplanement at IND (except landing fees, which are low thanks to FedEx) almost tripled from one of the cheapest in the Midwest to one of the highest-cost. I also think that the high costs of IND are one of the reasons why you don't see NK there.



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3480 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1644 times:

Yeah I never understood why they built a new terminal there? Is increasing costs suppose to attract airlines or something? In a place like IND its a spoke the airlines don't care what it looks like.

IND is a spoke and any downturn or lack of expansion is probably because of the economy and airlines trying to offset higher fuel with high load factors. No airline has any interest in defending ind or anything. A flight to Europe seems a tough sell unless the subsidies cut any risk even then I would question the premium market to anywhere international from IND is enough to support a flight?

Look there are tons of airports in the same boat with tons of gate space and nothing else really exceptional to offer STL, RDU, COS, PIT, CVG all come to mind so it's not like ind is alone in extra gate space. The airlines seem to be focusing on the same cities nowadays and are getting more entrenched in their hubs than ever.


User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23087 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1525 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 2):
IMO, the new terminal was a mistake for IND.

The new terminal isn't the problem. The old one was decrepit, and a JAX or MDW style rebuild would have been pricey. Moreover, it wouldn't have solved one of the big problems with the old terminal, which was really long taxis (particularly in from the 23s). The difference between somewhere like JAX and IND is that the JAX terminal was perfectly located, so it would have made no sense to move it.

The problem is how they built the new terminal. It should have been less ICN and more DTW north terminal, which is a nice facility but not nearly as flashy.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3756 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1251 times:

Quoting slcdeltarumd11 (Reply 3):
No airline has any interest in defending ind or anything.

NW started the IND focus city to defend their turf and their WorldPerks frequent flyer base (#1 or #2 after the DTW/MEM/MSP hubs). As the focus city was being built up, TZ's CEO George Mikelsons claimed that NW "slaughtered my baby" and forced TZ to exit their hometown airport. At the time, NW was seen as an aggressive competitor that drove LCCs out of their turf, so Mikelsons had a point.

After the DL/NW merger, most of the P2P flying was dropped from IND, with only the hubs (except CVG) and certain focus cities staying. DL did, however, open a Sky Club at IND (which was originally to have been an NW WorldClub).

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 4):
It should have been less ICN and more DTW north terminal, which is a nice facility but not nearly as flashy.

Bingo. The new terminal cost about $1 billion, and IND could have had a modern, functional new terminal for between $300-500 million.



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW Build Up In IND After Terminal Complete? posted Mon Jan 7 2008 09:51:32 by Flyf15
Liverpool Airport To Be Renamed After John Lennon posted Fri Jun 29 2001 17:49:42 by Demoose
Longest Serving Mad Dog Retired After 31 Yrs posted Sat Mar 17 2012 23:49:10 by dcajet
Tim Clark On A380 Cracks posted Fri Mar 9 2012 15:53:16 by KAL7478
Woman Arrested After Painting Nails On Flight posted Wed Mar 7 2012 17:41:06 by flyiguy
No DL/Eagle Codeshare To LAX After April 11? posted Sat Mar 3 2012 16:50:46 by FATFlyer
What's Holding Spirit Back From IND? posted Sun Feb 19 2012 12:53:56 by FWAERJ
Ryanair 'sexist Adverts' Banned After Complaints posted Wed Feb 15 2012 01:20:56 by SKAirbus
DL Resuming IND-MCO? posted Tue Feb 14 2012 09:33:22 by Indy
Brazilian Jet Forced To Land After Pax Attack posted Sun Feb 12 2012 12:04:32 by varigb707