Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Do U.S. Airlines Get Rid Of Bad Employees?  
User currently offlineChicagoflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 11032 times:

More and more it seems I am reading about customer service meltdowns, rudeness at the ticket counters, rudeness in the aisles in flight, rudeness on the phone, and kookiness in the flight deck. Where do these employees get the carte blanche to treat passengers/customers this way and are they ever held accountable ? It really is a black eye for an airline to have even one employee be rude and discourteous to the people that pay the money to keep the airline flying. Is it part of an airline's culture to tolerate this type of "customer service?" I know unions play a big part in keeping bad employees at airlines but there is also a process where a consistently bad employee has documented instances that would eventually lead to their dismissal. Airlines really do need to start training their employees in the concept of empathy. All airline employees need to realize that in the end, they are in the CUSTOMER SERVICE industry and if they keep treating people in a way they would not want to be treated, there should be consequences ... but are there any ???

[Edited 2012-03-27 19:59:54]

51 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlineFURUREFA From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 802 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 10927 times:

Quoting Chicagoflight (Thread starter):
I know unions play a big part in keeping bad employees at airlines but there is also a process where a consistently bad employee has documented instances that would eventually lead to their dismissal.

At every airline, union or non-union, a human resources program exists to counsel and, if appropriate, terminate employees who are not performing. This process, however, is highly confidential, very complete and thus often lengthy; all employers, not just airlines, follow such a rigid, evidence process to protect the company against wrongful termination suits and other legal action. The processes at various airlines typically include first verbal counseling, written counseling, a number of written warnings (typically three), and finally termination. It can take several years to terminate an employee.

In a union environment, the process can be even more painstaking, as the company must often demonstrate repeated attempts to guide and council the employee before termination as disciplinary action for performance almost always in binding arbitration. But many non-union environments also allow for a dispute resolution or appeals process after termination.

Note, however, that in both non-union and union environments, termination for non-performance reasons is much quicker and easier. Dismissing employees for attendance issues, for instance, is more "black-and-white", reducing the possibility of legal action by the terminated.

Finally, legal issues (theft/pilferage, etc.), substance abuse issues (drugs especially), though most employers have an alcohol rehabilitation program, and any workplace violence will ensure employees are terminated immediately and without recourse -even in the most militant union work environment.

In short, it is indeed a myth that counseling programs are not in place at airlines. They are, but their major goal is not to disciplinary, but to counsel, terminating employees only if they display consistent performance issues.


User currently offlinesmi0006 From Australia, joined Jan 2008, 1533 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10798 times:

Quoting Chicagoflight (Thread starter):
I know unions play a big part in keeping bad employees at airlines but there is also a process where a consistently bad employee has documented instances that would eventually lead to their dismissal

I think unions often cop a bad wrap in this regard on A.net. I am not sure if this is the case in the US, but I have been with two companies now (in Australia) where employees should have been fired, management tried and the employee called in the union.

The union’s stance:
‘Yup your right they gotta go! But you haven’t crossed you Ts and dotted you Is, if you try now they will bring an unfair dismissal case against you, which we will be forced to represent. Go back and try again, next time these are the steps you need to have in place.’

In my current work place (within the aviation industry) the union reps have a very good rapport with management. Management often seeks the advice of the union on how to handle situations; why because the union is our collective voice and experts on workplace laws.

There is government legislation that must be followed with or without unions; sometime I feel management need to step up their people management. Perhaps in the airline game, HR and proper people management have been neglected through cost cuts.

As a case study how about we look at Southwest? Aren’t they the most heavily unionised? But aren’t they reputed to be having some of the most satisfied employees? Surely this must be reflective of their levels of employee engagement and HR practices? They also have generally good customer service from what I hear. The bad apples must be gotten rid of there somehow and yet not a huge amount of union issues? Perhaps someone can delve into this more.
One the other hand labour issues are different from country to country, perhaps the legislation in Australia and the work of unions is very different.


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4811 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10788 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FURUREFA (Reply 1):
Dismissing employees for attendance issues, for instance, is more "black-and-white", reducing the possibility of legal action by the terminated.

Of all the people I have seen fired in my 7.5 years in the industry, I'd say 98% of the people that were fired and stayed fired were let go because of attendance.

At my job there is a probationary period for new hires. I've seen some of the hardest workers not pass because of a couple attendance hiccups and I have seen others raise some real red flags with regard their work ethic pass probation because they have perfect attendance throughout the period.

Just the way it is...

[Edited 2012-03-27 21:41:28]


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinenotdownnlocked From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 935 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10735 times:

What about those bad employees in the finance department that start and/or delete routes that cause red ink upon an airline finances. Same could be said about route planners, CEO's, CFO's and all others. The OP's question is way too vague. How about pilots, technical staff, FA's, FAA liaisons, schedulers, drug testers, tug drivers, engineers, and many others? How do you get rid of bad employees?

What are your prerequisites?


User currently offlinemaxamuus From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 97 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 10679 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 3):
At my job there is a probationary period for new hires. I've seen some of the hardest workers not pass because of a couple attendance hiccups and I have seen others raise some real red flags with regard their work ethic pass probation because they have perfect attendance throughout the period.

Sadly, this is the game at my airline too. All you have to do is show up to work and you are golden. I have a co-worker who ROUTINELY sleeps thru half of his shift, yet since he has near perfect attendance management could care less.


User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10425 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 10655 times:

Quoting Chicagoflight (Thread starter):
More and more it seems I am reading about customer service meltdowns, rudeness at the ticket counters, rudeness in the aisles in flight, rudeness on the phone, and kookiness in the flight deck. Where do these employees get the carte blanche to treat passengers/customers this way and are they ever held accountable ? It really is a black eye for an airline to have even one employee be rude and discourteous to the people that pay the money to keep the airline flying. Is it part of an airline's culture to tolerate this type of "customer service?" I know unions play a big part in keeping bad employees at airlines but there is also a process where a consistently bad employee has documented instances that would eventually lead to their dismissal. Airlines really do need to start training their employees in the concept of empathy. All airline employees need to realize that in the end, they are in the CUSTOMER SERVICE industry and if they keep treating people in a way they would not want to be treated, there should be consequences ... but are there any ???

Yes, we know all that, HOWEVER, it should also be a two way street. The customers MUST realize that it's not a master/slave relationship, but one in which the employee and customer should work together to make things as smooth as possible and resolve any problems that crop up. Having said that, the employees must realize this, too.

Quoting notdownnlocked (Reply 4):
What about those bad employees in the finance department that start and/or delete routes that cause red ink upon an airline finances. Same could be said about route planners, CEO's, CFO's and all others. The OP's question is way too vague. How about pilots, technical staff, FA's, FAA liaisons, schedulers, drug testers, tug drivers, engineers, and many others? How do you get rid of bad employees?

What are your prerequisites?

I think it was perfectly clear that the OP is referring to frontline, customer facing employees, including aircrews.
There's a big difference between someone that makes a mistake in a cubicle in the HQ building and one that has a meltdown in front of a gate or plane full of pax. In the first, mostly it can be rectified without much trouble.....in the second instance, you have to correct things in front of all those passengers AND possibly, the media.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 10397 times:

You seem to suggest that these people are simply "Bad people"?

Maybe there is a lot more to it then this.

For example, the recent meltodwn by the AA cabin crew member and the JetBlue Captain I do not think suggests they are "Bad people"! Just people who have developed a mental illness and who need help. Im sure otherwise they are very lovely people who would be good at their job.

You cant be so black and white!

Also, when I receive bad customer service, I notice that a lot of the staff are not up to the mark, I wont blame the staff, Ill blame the company and its management for creating such a bad working atmosphere for its employees!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlineChicagoflight From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 10316 times:

So in general I would say then that it is more of a company culture issue. A company that constantly drums customer service customer service customer service into the workday lives of its employees will have less issues with bad employees. In reading up on this subject and with the great replies on this thread I would say that the solution to the problem lies in the culture of the company. Without hard statistics, and I would think it would be tough to find such numbers, I would tend to say that companies that have more positive cultures and that treat their employees with respect would have fewer issues.

I would be interested to hear customer service experiences from reservations to check in to boarding and inflight to baggage claim say from Singapore Airlines frequent fliers v. Delta or United fliers v. Virgin America and JetBlue fliers. I would dare say that CULTURE plays a huge role in those experiences.


User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 10246 times:

Quoting Chicagoflight (Reply 8):
So in general I would say then that it is more of a company culture issue. A company that constantly drums customer service customer service customer service into the workday lives of its employees will have less issues with bad employees.

Absolutely not. I worked for a certain "5 star airline" that drilled into us that we must be the best, we must always do what the customer wants etc etc etc. Indeed the customer got a good service to an extent but it was provided by a nervous, robotic bunch of staff who were afraid of their own shadows because of the fear of being sacked for doing the slightest thing out of standard. So when they were required to think outside the box in order to help customers in unusual circumstances they were unable to do so for fear of breaking the rules THUS not providing good customer service at a time it matters. They may still have been all smiley smiley "yes sir", "yes sir", "I cant say no cos im not allowed but I cant do what you ask of me either sir" so just creating an atmosphere of false good customer service.

Quoting Chicagoflight (Reply 8):
I would tend to say that companies that have more positive cultures and that treat their employees with respect would have fewer issues.

Absolutely. But a positive culture does not neccessarily suggest that the customer is always going to be happy. To me a good culture is a company that listens to its employees and takes their suggestions on hand. A company that supports its employees in difficult situations (you can side with the customer obviously but you can also support an employee who is only trying to impose the rules they are hired to do etc) and allows them the freedom to look outside the box when it is required.

Personally I think what makes a good employee is freedom of thought, flexibility and openess with their employer. Unfortunately in large organisations this becomes impossible as no one really knows anybody and once that big boog of proceedures is published it leaves a very limited space for personalisation and scope!

IMHO when it comes to airlines, if you want better customer service go to the smaller airlines (or smaller basis of larger airlines). The only problem here is you start to lack consistency in hard product as the smaller airlines lack the ability to have a broad standard product.



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlinebojangles From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2009, 110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 10207 times:

Tonystan, that five star airline's name wouldn't happen to start with a 'Q' would it?  

User currently offlineusdcaguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 972 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 10173 times:

Quoting tonystan (Reply 9):
IMHO when it comes to airlines, if you want better customer service go to the smaller airlines (or smaller basis of larger airlines). The only problem here is you start to lack consistency in hard product as the smaller airlines lack the ability to have a broad standard product.

One exception is Sun Country Airlines, based in MSP. They have a very consistent hard product, if only because they fly just a small fleet of 737s. In that case, you always know what to expect. Further, the staff are fantastic; they tend to be more personable and treat people like human beings instead of just another Platinum, Gold or Nobody. The large companies in the States tend to have an older mix of aircraft that includes an unsavory mix of old narrow bodies and small, run-down RJs. I'll get flamed for saying that, but you can't argue that Southwest and Sun Country don't guarantee a more standardized hard product than the legacies, even if they don't offer the same service up front.

More on topic, I believe airlines actually get rid of poor staff (those not subject to seniority rights) by laying them off during downturns. They usually know who needs to go ahead of time and then pick them out when it's time to cut back. Firing people outright isn't done that often, if only because carriers would rather have average to slightly-below-average workers doing their jobs than go through the process of firing and hiring on a regular basis, which would tend to ruin morale and not necessarily guarantee better workers in the long run.


User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 10152 times:

Quoting bojangles (Reply 11):
Tonystan, that five star airline's name wouldn't happen to start with a 'Q' would it?

Oh I couldnt possibly comment! lol



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 966 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 10118 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At least in the U.S is not as bad as Europe. There, particularly Italy, Spain and Greece, you married to your employees

User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1094 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 10032 times:

The most common problem that would cause an employer hardship about letting someone go, would be lack of documentation. Sure you can still do it, but you may have legal action on your hands.

You have to document the behavior and corrective action. Once you have a paper trail, the process is easy.


User currently offlinechootie From Germany, joined May 2007, 288 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 9912 times:

... knowing I will be Feathered, Tarred, and fed to the lions.

Has anyone event thought about the "Rif-Raf" of customers that are now flying due to the Lower prices??

Fly has become a commodity, and most folks have NO idea of how to behave themselves. It starts with the Hand bags that are WAY to large, and continues with the fools who have to keep talking on their cell phones while the person at the gate is asking them questions.

Long story short, 80% of the folks flaying need to take an etiquite course, or, perhaps learn how to be in society!!   



chootie
User currently offlinerdh3e From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1672 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 9810 times:

Quoting notdownnlocked (Reply 4):
What about those bad employees in the finance department that start and/or delete routes that cause red ink upon an airline finances. Same could be said about route planners, CEO's, CFO's and all others.

Yes, they get the canned all the time, you just don't hear about it because they don't whine and cry to a union about it. When someone gets canned in finance you would never hear about it, unless they are high enough up where they "resign".

[Edited 2012-03-28 07:18:57]

User currently offlineiad51fl From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 354 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 9774 times:

Quoting chootie (Reply 16):
.. knowing I will be Feathered, Tarred, and fed to the lions.

I no tar, feathers or lions here, I agree with you wholeheartedly.

There are bad apples in every company, but there are also bad customers as well. I have seen agents who are as nice and helpful as can be turned into "mean" agents just because of pressure coming from customers.

What happens when a gate agent announces a major delay or cancellation? 80% of the people in the holding area come up to the desk, and 1/2 of those start demanding this or that... some not even willing to wait in line. In some cases it's 2 gate agents vs. 100+ passengers. The pressure starts to build, then the dam breaks and things are said and done that normally don't occur.

In my career as a agent, supervisor and manager I had many run ins with "bad" customers. Had one gentleman show up late (10 min before scheduled departure), with his newspaper, coffee and McDonalds apologizing left and right that it was his fault he was late and is there any way we can get him checked in and to the gate for the flight. I looked at the flight, checked him in and told him he was lucky... the flight was delayed about 25 minutes. He went into a rage, wanted compensation which I denied and then eventually stormed off to the checkpoint.

Delayed flight.....we get the "ok" to board, board the flight and are missing one passenger. The agent paged the passenger 4 times throughout the terminal and 3 times in the boarding area. We had to go or would miss our wheels up time. I stood in the boarding area and loudly gave the call for the flight. The passenger never showed up so we closed it up and sent the flight out. As we were closing the flight a man comes up asking when the delayed flight was going to board. We advised him that it just left and that we had paged him many times both in the boarding area and the terminal. The gentleman became irate, called me every name in the book. He had been sitting in the boarding area the whole time and just zoned out I guess. He even looked at me when I gave the last call. And before anyone asks... no he was not deaf as he heard everything I was saying after cussing me out and he did not have anything like a ipod or bluetooth earpiece in his ear.

There are many more and I won't bore you with those... so it is not only on the airline side. As for the "I pay your salary" crowd... just because you partially pay my salary does NOT mean you can bully me, talk down to me, or treat me as someone inferior to yourself. The attitude you give will eventually be the attitude you get back. The last thing an agent at the counter or the gate wants is you in front of them after a major delay or cancellation, and believe me... they are working as hard as they can to get you out of the line. Don't take the frustrations out on them as they had no dealings with the cancellation or delay of your flight... they are just the ones who are stuck with it.

Chris



Enjoying the view of KIAH approach end of 27. 29.9758015, -95.2695694
User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10425 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 9562 times:

Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 12):
More on topic, I believe airlines actually get rid of poor staff (those not subject to seniority rights) by laying them off during downturns.

That would seem to imply that your "poor staff" have less seniority. Not necessarily, but then you knew that. People get canned all the time, you just don't hear about it. When I hired on with DL in '71, 7 ramp agents had just been fired for pilfering from bags. It always seemed (with DL) that it took alot for someone to get fired with DL, but when they did....they did. They didn't fire someone for just one infraction, but determined if there was a pattern, gave the employee every chance in the world to straighten up and if they still acted the same, then the ax came down.



As I mentioned previously and iad51fl has, also, it's a two way street. Customers should be expected to treat the employees just as well as they want to be treated.

Is there somewhere in the "passengers' bill of rights" where it says the pax have the right to treat the employees like crap?  


BTW, I sometimes think that some, angry, frustrated agents take out their frustrations with paying pax, on the non-revs.

[Edited 2012-03-28 08:12:11]


"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlinemaxpower1954 From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 1096 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 9521 times:

Quoting mayor (Reply 19):
BTW, I sometimes think that some, angry, frustrated agents take out their frustrations with paying pax, on the non-revs.

In my over 30 years in the industry I've observed the same thing - but it doesn't seem as bad as it once was.


User currently offlinenorcal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 9449 times:

Every place has a few bad apples, just like sometimes flights have a few bad customers.

The best thing that can happen is for HR to catch these people before they are hired, particularly at a union company.

One big issue is that unions have to defend any employee who is in trouble with the company. It doesn't matter what the union thinks about the employee, they have to do it otherwise face legal troubles. Bad apples usually try and sue anyone and everyone when the company tries to terminate them. It's unfortunate because often times fellow employees want to see the bad apples go.

It's analogous to a court appointed defense attorney having to defend a serial child rapist. The defense attorney knows his client is a piece of _____ but he still must defend him or potentially face disbarment. The union has to do the same thing, defend bad apples or face lawsuits that ultimately end up costing the rest of the members money.

If you want to blame anyone, blame the lawyers and our litigious society.

[Edited 2012-03-28 09:04:14]

User currently offlineflyboy80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1878 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 9385 times:

Flying has become absolutely misserable experience for many. And I agree with earlier posts that airline management hasn't taken accountablity for a lot it. The bag fees for instance have increased the carry-ons in the cabins, but the turn times are the same- now we are constantly providing a "dis-service" to customers by gate checking carry-ons on the airplane.

Passengers have become absolutely ridiculous as well with some of their expectations. The industry and it's services are catered for the average flyer in many cases- if you want first class service- you need to pay for it. Employees can't please customers when they aren't given the resources to do so.

Lastly, when you are constantly repairing your employers image, from events outside your individual control and caused by lacking competency somewhere else, eventually this will take away from dilivering quality customer service.


User currently offlinejuantrippe82 From Bahamas, joined Sep 2011, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 9142 times:

Quoting mayor (Reply 6):
Yes, we know all that, HOWEVER, it should also be a two way street. The customers MUST realize that it's not a master/slave relationship, but one in which the employee and customer should work together to make things as smooth as possible and resolve any problems that crop up. Having said that, the employees must realize this, too.



Agreed, there are two sides to every story and individuals must learn that the world doesn't revolve around them and their every whim but at the same time there are those who don't belong in customer service.



Don't worry, I'm never wrong.
User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 10425 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 8901 times:

Quoting juantrippe82 (Reply 23):
Agreed, there are two sides to every story and individuals must learn that the world doesn't revolve around them and their every whim but at the same time there are those who don't belong in customer service.

There are some instances, where someone might be put in another, NON-customer facing job, either permanently or until they get their act together.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7796 times:

Quoting Chicagoflight (Thread starter):
they are in the CUSTOMER SERVICE industry

No, they are not. They are not running a hotel. They are in the transportation industry.

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 3):
I've seen some of the hardest workers not pass because of a couple attendance hiccups and I have seen others raise some real red flags with regard their work ethic pass probation because they have perfect attendance throughout the period.

I have seen that as well. Attendance is most looked at in the airlines than anything else, they want you at work. Behavior comes second.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
25 rdh3e : To some degree both points are true. The broad title is CSR, Customer Service Representative.... But yes, the main job is to get pax on the plane so
26 Chicagoflight : The transportation industry is a subset of the customer service industry. Transportation companies provide a service to customers for which the trans
27 Sulley : They don't get rid of them. They promote them to management. *ba dum tss*
28 AirframeAS : Not always...... Your post is somewhat offensive as not all managers and supervisors are the bad ones. And no, I am not even in management at my airl
29 rdh3e : C'mon now....
30 Post contains images Sulley : I'm in management myself... 'twas just a little joke
31 Chicagoflight : methinks he doth jest ... lighten up (Bill Shakespeare)[Edited 2012-03-28 13:05:43]
32 737tdi : Really? You are asking this just of the aircraft industry? Go to Walmart, McDonalds, Lowes, Discount tire. It's not just the commercial aircraft carri
33 rwy04lga : Was it? Or did they promote YOU so as not to fire you?
34 EA CO AS : But it takes a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time to terminate people with attendance reliability issues thanks to FMLA. It's commonly misused and shields peopl
35 ridgid727 : I have been at the airlines for years, and let me tell you, there is hardly any other industry where incompetance takes a back seat to seniority.
36 trent1000 : How do they get rid of them? The same way as the other employees: the airline goes bust... There will always be bad apples that spoil the bunch. Or pe
37 zippyjet : Maybe I'm a bit defensive but, malfeasance is handled in our industry. As mentioned, attendance and punctuality are strictly enforced. We are one of
38 mayor : If we're just going to chalk it up to this and let it go, then the employees don't stand a chance.
39 zippyjet : Though it may seem pedantic, if I had to come up with ideas to rectify the problem I'd seriously consider adding basic manners and courtesy and negot
40 Post contains images mayor : Maybe I'm too naive when it comes to the social skills of the younger generation. I would hope that my grandchildren would learn some manners, respec
41 zippyjet : He makes my list. Some other factors: the increasing influence of lawyers on everyday life. Our you sue me I'll sue you mentality. Our education syst
42 gigneil : I don't think any reasonable person, including our FA and Pilot friends here, think airlines are effective at terminating the frontline employees that
43 tonystan : The problem (more so in the US i would imagine) is you cant just fire someone because they are "not doing a good job" or not being nice to people. The
44 zippyjet : I've worked in other industries and the same crap happens in those companies.
45 mayor : Well, that's when they moved them to someplace where they aren't in contact with customers. When I worked at SHV, we had this guy I worked with, get
46 tonystan : LOL I have no problem with them doing that!
47 4holer : If USAirway fires Philadelphia, I would consider flying them again.
48 L1011Lover : ... EXCELLENT post! Welcome to my RU list tonystan! Best regards L1011Lover
49 zippyjet : As long as there's an overall lousy world wide economy, an employer's market, business models run by bean counters and lawyers, and politicians that
50 OB1504 : It's how I lost my job. That being said, at my airline, the supervisors and managers took customer service issues very seriously. A common source of
51 mayor : I had a customer at air cargo in SLC once accuse me and the rest of the crew of being crooks as well as DL (in an office full of other customers)....
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Do Airlines Get Thier Flight Codes..? posted Tue Feb 13 2007 10:52:00 by Sparklehorse12
Why Did Silkway Airlines Get Rid Of Their DC8s? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 11:12:51 by Airevents
Why Did Olymic Airlines Get Rid Of The B-717? posted Mon Jan 12 2004 14:06:33 by Delta777Jet
Why Doesn't Singapore Airlines Get Rid Of A310's? posted Thu Nov 30 2000 08:17:03 by Qantas 747
How Far Do Airlines Go Out Of Their Way To Help... posted Sat Jul 8 2006 00:30:56 by AirCanada014
How Do You Get The Status Of International Airport posted Mon Sep 5 2005 04:17:43 by Fedexexpress
How To Get Rid Of Scope Clouses? posted Thu May 24 2001 15:28:11 by KUGN
How Do You Get New Airlines At Your Airport posted Sat May 12 2001 05:35:48 by Gsoflyer
How Many Pax. Do Airlines Get A Year? posted Sun Jan 16 2000 02:31:15 by Jetlink145
How Do Airlines Choose Which Alliance To Join? posted Tue Dec 13 2011 04:24:20 by Norwegian737