Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa Close To Order 15 A380s  
User currently offlineKevin From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 1144 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

According to www.gazeta.ru , Lufthansa's CEO Jurgen Weber said his company is ready to order 15 A380s. Congratulations for the Airbus and I'm still sad the 747X program didn't work.

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1957 times:

Sad the B747X didn't really work, but the B747 will always be mthe queen in my heart. Great to see another airline about to operate the big Jumbo.

alvin

Go LH!



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineDLL10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

I just have to ask J. Weber one simple question : Why buy the 380, when LH is constantly downsizing and reducing both capacities and frequencies ? That just seems to be a contradiction.

User currently offlineKevin From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 1144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

DLL 10:

According to Mr. Weber and Lufthansa specialists , the passenger cost on an A380 will be 15 to 20% less than on any other palne used by Lufty at the moment.


User currently offlineVictor Alpha From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1932 times:

Hi all,

Does LH really need such a capacity when its cutting back major routes and codesharing them out? Feels very ironic and contradictory, as DLL10 stated.

-Regards, VA


User currently offlineKevin From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 1144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

Victor:

I was hoping my comment makes sense


User currently offlineJuul From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

Lufthansa is scaling back some operations (like many are) bacause of the current economic situation. If they order A380, they'll only be delivered in about 5 years. By then this economic slump should long be gone and forgotten.

Greeings Big grin


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 days ago) and read 1830 times:

I'll give a good reason for LH to buy the A380-800: try getting a ticket on the SFO-FRA route in both directions--fat chance.

Just this route is one good reason why LH could use such a big plane.

I could see by 2008 LH flying the A388 on the FRA-SFO route year-round and the 747-400 on the MUC-SFO route year-round, especially with LH turning MUC into its second major hub like it's now doing.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21470 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1821 times:

It´s all about efficiency. If the A380 can actually cut seat/mile cost as promised and deliver comparable or better customer satisfaction than the 747 at the same time, it will make sense.

User currently offlineJoni From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1814 times:


Cutting frequencies and codesharing sound like good ways to fill big planes with low seat-mile costs.



User currently offlineGOT From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 1912 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

Since the 747X is out of business the A380 is the only option. And LH needs the additional capacity on some routes, for example FRA-SFO.

GOT



Just like birdwatching - without having to be so damned quiet!
User currently offlineP&M From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1763 times:

Sizing down frequencies makes sense. Less flights = less costs. LH will be able to carry more passengers and cargo while cutting down the number of trans-oceanic/pacific flights when they operate A380's.
The Hub-Spoke system which has been buildt up ( still growing ) during the last two decades is the way to go.
Point to Point only works on a way smaller scale because it is too expensive and unflexible.

In the future only Airlines which operate Mega Jumbos will be considered " Global players " .


User currently offlineCstarU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

Lufthansa to buy four 747s, wants 5 or 6 A380s

FRANKFURT, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Deutsche Lufthansa AG (quote from Yahoo! UK & Ireland: LHAG.F) plans to buy four 747-400s from Boeing Co (NYSE:BA - news) and cannot do without the giant Airbus A380 model, Chief Executive Juergen Weber said in a magazine article published on Monday.


In statements revealing that Airbus has another A380 customer in the bag, Weber said that Lufthansa could use five or six A380s and that the management would make a recommendation on the aircraft to the company's supervisory board in September.


more...
http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010813/l13314161.html


User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

this economic downturn not only hits airlines but aircraft manufactureres as well, so they need to sell their aircraft. so there´s a possibly a chance that LH gets a very good price from airbus, who knows?
btw, as Juul already pointed out, the economic slowdown will be over when the a380 comes out so i think there´s no big problem with that...
btw, Jürgen Weber repeatedly stated that the prime routes on which they could definitively use an a380 in a couple of years would be FRA-JFK, -DEL, -SIN and
-NRT.

cheers
daniel





If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1748 times:

P&M
Your comments are meant to criticize US airlines for not ordering the 380. Having by far the largest airlines in the world (and generating 50% of all RPK's on a 'global' basis) you can not say that UA, AA, NW, or CO are not 'Global Players.' They are.

The 380 is an evolutionary design. It does not bring anything new to the table but higher capacity. This does not appeal to all carriers and their marketing strategies.

I think the 380 is a great idea--for certain carriers. But the ideal that 'bigger is best' does not hold true in today's economy.


User currently offlineP&M From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1732 times:

Greg, I don't criticize any Airline for not ordering A380's. But I do think that within the next 10-15 years only those Airlines will have success on the Intercontinental market which will make the best use out of the dominating Hub's.
And the A380 is the right tool to feed this growing market.
The Airlines in the US which you mentioned are huge but their bread and butter business is the domestic traffic.
BTW, I guess that sooner or later some US Airlines will order A380's too.


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

I think it's a bit presumptuous to suggest the US or Global economy is going to rise and fall based on A380 delivery schedules, as was hinted in a previous post.

Japan has been suffering from an "economic downturn" for a decade.

The reality is the United States will have a budget deficit again before next summer if things (a sour economy and a congress run by people who think government can run on 10 or 12 bucks a day) continue the way they are.

The A380 will see passenger success primarily in the areas the 747-400 did...Asia and the Pacific Rim. It's simply not the kind of plane most US airlines need.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1709 times:

Heavymetal,

Only two US-based airlines have the type of traffic that could require the use of the A380-800: NW and UA.

I doubt they'll be ordering them until much later this decade.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa To Order 15 A380s posted Mon Sep 10 2001 01:21:44 by 9V-SPJ
CA To Order 15 B744 Wireless Systems posted Wed Feb 8 2006 04:58:27 by Smeagol
Air Madrid To Order 15 A350 Or B787 posted Fri Nov 25 2005 09:30:55 by PanAm_DC10
Saudi Arabian Airlines To Order 15 New Aircraft posted Sat Apr 23 2005 20:06:44 by LifelinerOne
China Southern To Order 15 A320 And 6 A319 posted Tue Jan 27 2004 15:30:55 by Teahan
FedEX To Order 10 A380s By This Month posted Wed Dec 19 2001 21:27:33 by Raggi
UAL's Fractional Biz To Order 15 A319CJ's. posted Tue Nov 20 2001 04:57:03 by Boeing nut
Surprise:JAL To Order 15 A340/330 posted Wed Feb 21 2001 12:52:34 by Na
Vasp Close To Order Up To 50 Embraer Jets! posted Sun Jan 21 2001 02:28:08 by Copacabana
Lufthansa Close To Buy The 380 (real Source) posted Fri Jan 5 2001 17:23:34 by L'Espace18