Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LH Next Two 748i Destinations: ORD And LAX!  
User currently offlinejreuschl From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 415 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 16013 times:

http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/p...o-los-angeles-and-chicago/673205/1

As a comment states, they use a A380 in the image  

53 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 10895 posts, RR: 100
Reply 1, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 15900 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Oh man, just as I was pulled off LAX-FRA duty (never flew...).

ORD would have been high on my 748I list. My firewall blocks the link. Any explination on why the 748I vs. A380 to LAX? I'm excited. I would like to know LH's logic between the 748I and A380 selection for each city.

Are these the correct seat counts?

Seat A380 748I
F 8 8
J 98 80
Y 420 298


Well, LH isn't going to be using F class quantitative demand to decide between the A380 and 748I for a city pair.  
The difference in J is only ~20%.
There is a staggering difference of 122 seats for Y. To myself, this implies either variable (seasonal?) business demand for Y with a lack of VFR demand (or low VFR yield) to fill Y.

I know my employer helps fill the LAX-FRA seats.  

Lightsaber


Life is short, Live it!
User currently offlineB747forever From United States of America, joined May 2007, 16598 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 15678 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 1):
Any explination on why the 748I vs. A380 to LAX?

Maybe their current schedule might explain it.

During the summer LH has 2 daily 747 flights to LAX from FRA, and during low season (winter) they have 1 daily 747 flight to LAX.

Maybe they need the extra uplift year round that the 748i can provide, but for which the A380 is too big for.

Also bear in mind that 2 747-400s (or 1 748i and 1 744) provide more capacity than 1 A380. That is why they might go for a combination of 748i/744 in the summer, instead of 1 A380 (reduced capacity) or 1 A380 and 1 744 (too much capacity).


Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 752 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 15511 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B747forever (Reply 2):
During the summer LH has 2 daily 747 flights to LAX from FRA, and during low season (winter) they have 1 daily 747 flight to LAX

I think its a matter of time before LH upgrades LAX to A380, at least for the busy season

User currently offlineB747forever From United States of America, joined May 2007, 16598 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 15364 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 3):
I think its a matter of time before LH upgrades LAX to A380, at least for the busy season

Yeah, I thought it was a given that they would operate the A380 at least during the summer, and still keep the 2nd daily flight. But I wonder now with the announcement of LAX as a 748i destination.


Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5085 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 14995 times:

Using SeatGuru seat dimensions for LH A380, and assuming similar dimensions for B748, the A380 holds nearly 37% more passengers than B748. Being wider by about 18 inches on main deck , A380 must have wider aisles if both aircraft use the same seats.

Seat........................ A380........ 748I........Difference(A380 over B748)
F(31.5W, 92" pitch)...... 8............. 8..............0%
J(19.6.5W, 60" pitch).. 98........... 80.............23%
Y(17W, 31" pitch)...... 420......... 298............41%
Total...........................526..........386.............37%

List Price(million)........$390........$333............17%

Someday an airline may go 11-abreast on Y, in which case A380 could end up with 47% more total seats in LH type layout.

User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 14548 times:

Hey neat, will look forward to seeing this. Thanks for posting.

User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21043 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 14329 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 3):
I think its a matter of time before LH upgrades LAX to A380, at least for the busy season

The 748 makes sense. 748 year round, seasonal second flight 744 for now until more 748s are in service.

Then, further in the future, you might see MUC upgraded to 748 and year round FRA flight go to A380, with second seasonal flight staying at 748. This is in the future, if Y growth requires it.


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 8, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 13619 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

That's good news.

LAX and ORD, 2 destinations I like flying to. So I have to bid for the IAD, LAX and ORD trips more often 

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinekonstantinkoll From Germany, joined Aug 2006, 97 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 13250 times:

Wilco, if you fly FRA-IAD on July 5th, it will be my pleasure to be on board! I'm really looking forward to my first 748 flight  

User currently onlineORDFan From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 13199 times:

Great news for ORD! So happy that the LH 747 legacy at ORD continues! Look forward to flying on her and seeing her often.

User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 11, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 13165 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting konstantinkoll (Reply 9):
Wilco, if you fly FRA-IAD on July 5th, it will be my pleasure to be on board! I'm really looking forward to my first 748 flight  

I am looking forward to my first 748i flight as well, but I will for sure not be on it on July 5th, sorry. I am on vacation on that day.

Quoting ORDFan (Reply 10):
Great news for ORD!

Indeed. Will be a nice sight in ORD.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 10895 posts, RR: 100
Reply 12, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 13027 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Which 744 does LH fly to LAX? I see two seat layouts on seatguru:

seat..........744(1)......744(2)
F.................8...........16
J................66...........52
Y..............270.........310

In some ways, if LH is flying the first type (8/66/270, which I suspect is the case, but I do not know), in particular during the winter, than we have a case where improving J and (to a small extent) Y was the goal. From what I know of the year round market, it seems there is demand for more J. Going from 66 to 80 would be helpful.

Quoting B747forever (Reply 2):
That is why they might go for a combination of 748i/744 in the summer, instead of 1 A380 (reduced capacity) or 1 A380 and 1 744 (too much capacity).

Thanks for the input. I forgot about the 2nd daily in the summer. However, I'm suspecting the 748I is for an increase in year round J demand.

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 5):
Someday an airline may go 11-abreast on Y, in which case A380 could end up with 47% more total seats in LH type layout.

I suspect sooner rather than later. Most Y class passengers are cheaping out. Yes, there is business long haul Y who want more room. Will their employer pay for it?

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 7):
The 748 makes sense. 748 year round, seasonal second flight 744 for now until more 748s are in service.

If LH adopts either a rotating 747 strategy or a 'park it for the winter' strategy that makes much sense. Which makes me wonder what they'll do with the A346s. But first LH must decide on the utilization of the remaining 744s.

Lightsaber


Life is short, Live it!
User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 122 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12952 times:

Can't wait to fly on it and get to spot it! Great news for us here. During the summer will this flight be DLH 456/457 or DLH 450/451?

Cheers
KLAXAirport   

User currently offlinetrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 3979 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12929 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

so anyone seen the LH 747-8I seating plan yet?

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 11742 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12896 times:

Assuming the B-747-8I achives all the airframe performance the B-747-8F has achieved in service, how likely is LH to exercise its 20 options with Boeing?

User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 122 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12868 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 12):
In some ways, if LH is flying the first type (8/66/270, which I suspect is the case, but I do not know)

LH flies the configuration you are stating, 8/66/270. There are 16 First Class seats but if you fly LH First Class you get one seat for a bed and one seat to eat on, they consider that one seat so it is 8 First Class seats. They just switched over from the 16 seat First Class.

Cheers
KLAXAirport   

User currently offlineliftsifter From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12837 times:

Finally! A Next-Gen VLA at ORD! it will be great to see this fabulous bird landing 9L!

Now for an EK A380...  


A300 A310 A319 A320 A321 A332 A342 A342 A343 A346 A380 B738 B736 B744 B757 B763 B772 B773 B77W Q400 E175 E190
User currently offlineStressedOut From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 69 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12680 times:

I am hoping that DEN will be one of the next destinations. I know that DEN got the proper exemptions from the FAA for the 747-8 to fly there for Lufthansa. They keep changing between a 744 and a A346 but I don't know if that is due to need at DEN or scheduling at other locations. If anybody has any inkling when the 747-8 will come to DEN I would appreciate any insight. When I have flown that route in the past the flights were completely packed so I think the loads are there for a -8.

User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12592 times:

LAX!!!! Yes!!!!             !!! With 744s and A346s, flying on LH FRA-LAX route, it makes perfect sence, that they deploy 747 8I on the route.

User currently offlineordjoe From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 586 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days ago) and read 12230 times:

Good week for ORD, QR sending its 787s here soon and the 748 coming on its way, now we just need EK to announce service for the trifecta

User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 16941 posts, RR: 57
Reply 21, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days ago) and read 12210 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 11):
I am looking forward to my first 748i flight as well, but I will for sure not be on it on July 5th, sorry. I am on vacation on that day.

You just love rubbing it in, don't you?  

User currently offlinekordcj From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 77 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days ago) and read 12103 times:

Quoting ordjoe (Reply 20):

Indeed it is. If EK announces A380 service to start in conjunction with 28C-10C opening, it'll be like christmas!


The most obvious proof for intelligent life in the universe is that they haven't tried to contact us.
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3223 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (1 year 2 months 4 days ago) and read 12069 times:

Quoting ordjoe (Reply 20):
QR sending its 787s here soon

Did you mean LOT? QR (still) has not announced ORD, but LO is putting the 787 on the ORD-WAW route from January 2013.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/lot...argo-flight-to-katowice-2012-03-28


Flown: 300 319 320 722 731/2/3/5/G/8 742 752/3 762/3 D9S D10 F100 M83/8 M90 CR2 CR7 ERD/4 SF3 DH8
User currently offlineordjoe From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 586 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 11724 times:

@ fwaerj
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...icago-as-787-deliveries-begin.html

There is a thread on this somewhere too

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31156 posts, RR: 76
Reply 25, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 11738 times:

Quoting ordjoe (Reply 24):

@ fwaerj
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...icago-as-787-deliveries-begin.html

There is a thread on this somewhere too


As FWA stated, QR has not announced QR. A rep said its a potential 787 route, and Bloomberg took it entirely out of context. While QR to Chicago is inevitable, it's still yet to be announced.


a.
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 10895 posts, RR: 100
Reply 26, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 10689 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KLAXAirport (Reply 16):
LH flies the configuration you are stating, 8/66/270.

Thank you.

So this change is to improve (mostly) J. Is LAX-FRA have poor yield in Y during the winter? I suspect the answer is 'weak yield.' Thus this is for the J traffic.

To myself, that makes sense to go with the 748I and let those who want to 'cheap out' connect at JFK onto the A380. Either that, or I've over-analyzed and LH just doesn't have enough A380s for LAX today. Even though LAX is my home airport, I would send the A380 to the following airports first: JFK, MIA, JNB, PEK, PVG... oh wait.  

Lightsaber


Life is short, Live it!
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 27, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 10338 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 12):
In some ways, if LH is flying the first type (8/66/270, which I suspect is the case, but I do not know),

Most 744's at the moment use the config: 8/ 80/ 234.

Quoting KLAXAirport (Reply 16):
LH flies the configuration you are stating, 8/66/270.

Only a few 744's have this configuration, or better said, during summer it is the small C class and during winter the bigger C class with 80 seats.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinedairy From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 237 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 9269 times:

There are three configs with Luftis 744 right now:

F8C80Y234:
D-ABTB, D-ABTD, D-ABTE, D-ABTL, D-ABVE, D-ABVF, D-ABVH, D-ABVL, D-ABVM, D-ABVW, D-ABVX

F8C66Y270:
D-ABTA, D-ABTC, D-ABTK, D-ABVC, D-ABVD, D-ABVK, D-ABVN, D-ABVR, D-ABVS, D-ABVT,D-ABVU, D-ABVY, D-ABVZ

F8C52Y310:
D-ABTF, D-ABTH, D-ABVO, D-ABVP,

The "New" First Class is with:
D-ABVC, D-ABVH, D-ABVK, D-ABVL, D-ABVM, D-ABVN, D-ABVO, D-ABVP, D-ABVR, D-ABVS


A318/A319/A320/A321 AB3/A306/A310/A333/A343/A346 732/733/735/736/744/752/763/764/772/773 DH3 F70 F100 CR2 CR1 CR7 ATR42
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4268 posts, RR: 2
Reply 29, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 9160 times:

Quoting dairy (Reply 28):
There are three configs with Luftis 744 right now:



A few month ago I saw a TV documentation that showed that LH reconfigures "on the fly" between two flights to have the right number of J and Y, an aircraft that came in from Argentina was reconfigured for Mexico to have more J. Is this an exception or regular practice?

User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 30, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 9153 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting dairy (Reply 28):

Where did you get that from? The list needs to be updated monthly as the config is changed a lot.

For example, I just flew on D-ABVY and you say it is 8/ 66/ 270, but we had it with 8/ 80/ 234.

And the version with 310 pax in Y class hasn't been around for a while. I haven't seen it at all in 1.5 years now.

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 29):

It is not done that often. Not for every flight. The change of config is quick, but not within 2 hours time or so.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineairproxx From France, joined Jun 2008, 555 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8766 times:

Wilco, will you fly the -8i type one day?
I'd be very excited to fly such a beast. The new wing shape looks gorgeous...
I saw a -8F of GSS some weeks ago in FRA, and I was impressed by the size...
Fantastic airplane...


If you can meet with triumph and disaster, and treat those two impostors just the same
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 32, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8835 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting airproxx (Reply 31):
Wilco, will you fly the -8i type one day?

Yes, I will get training on the -8i and then I am allowed to fly 744 and 748i.

Quoting airproxx (Reply 31):
I'd be very excited to fly such a beast. The new wing shape looks gorgeous...
I saw a -8F of GSS some weeks ago in FRA, and I was impressed by the size...
Fantastic airplane..

Yes, she looks gorgeous and for sure a nice addition to LAX with all the other 744s and the cargo 748's flying into LAX already.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offline_AA_777_MAN From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8644 times:

Does this mean no LH A380 service to ORD?

User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 34, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8723 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting _AA_777_MAN (Reply 33):
Does this mean no LH A380 service to ORD?

Chances dropped significantly now for the 380 to ORD. It will be during summer 330 and 748i and during winter only one daily flight. Plus the flight from MUC and DUS.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineAABB777 From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 454 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 7402 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 25):
As FWA stated, QR has not announced QR. A rep said its a potential 787 route, and Bloomberg took it entirely out of context. While QR to Chicago is inevitable, it's still yet to be announced.

The rep was the CEO. Therefore, while Akbar Al Baker did not give specific dates for the launches, he did commit to service 'within a year'. My guess is none of these routes will start until the New Doha Int'l Airport opens.

User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 10895 posts, RR: 100
Reply 36, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5830 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Question: Are all the 748i FRA based? Are any scheduled for MUC, BER, or DUS?

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 30):
we had it with 8/ 80/ 234

Ok, I'm now officially confused. So there is zero gain in F or J and an additional 64 Y seats?
I'm trying to figure out the nature of the LAX-FRA market. I'm getting feedback for more J demand. Is that just the opinion of my coworkers or a need? For if the number of J seats stays constant, then then I wonder why the 748I vs. 744 for LAX?

For the 8/80/234 configuration, I'm impress by the premium to economy ratio...

Lightsaber


Life is short, Live it!
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 37, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5815 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 36):
Question: Are all the 748i FRA based? Are any scheduled for MUC, BER, or DUS?

At the moment ONLY FRA. What the future brings, nobody knows. But I guess the 747s will remain in FRA and more 346 will get to MUC. BER and DUS: doubt it.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 36):
Ok, I'm now officially confused. So there is zero gain in F or J and an additional 64 Y seats?
I'm trying to figure out the nature of the LAX-FRA market. I'm getting feedback for more J demand. Is that just the opinion of my coworkers or a need? For if the number of J seats stays constant, then then I wonder why the 748I vs. 744 for LAX?

It is seasonal. LAX has a lot of C and F demand, but many people start their vacation there as well, so quite a bit of Y demand as well.
I don't have any information about the yield for the FRA-LAX-FRA sector. But I guess it has something to do with premium passengers as most of the time the 744s with the new Y and F class are sent to LAX. So I guess they want to upgrade the cabin even more and offer a new product.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 36):
For the 8/80/234 configuration, I'm impress by the premium to economy ratio...

That config is used in most 744s at the moment.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 3086 posts, RR: 9
Reply 38, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5737 times:

Does this mean the rumored DEL service is delayed? Or are these future destinations for the 748, which might start in parallel or later than DEL?


Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 39, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5762 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting Nimish (Reply 38):
Does this mean the rumored DEL service is delayed? Or are these future destinations for the 748, which might start in parallel or later than DEL?

As you said, rumour. DEL was only a rumour. And for the IAD, LAX and ORD trip you need all the 748i's we get at the beginning. So for now it is 'only' these 3.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 5106 posts, RR: 14
Reply 40, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3987 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 11):
I am looking forward to my first 748i flight as well, but I will for sure not be on it on July 5th, sorry. I am on vacation on that day.


When you do make your first flight, please take as many photos as possible  


頑張ろう日本!
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31156 posts, RR: 76
Reply 41, posted (1 year 2 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 3820 times:

Quoting AABB777 (Reply 35):

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 25):
As FWA stated, QR has not announced QR. A rep said its a potential 787 route, and Bloomberg took it entirely out of context. While QR to Chicago is inevitable, it's still yet to be announced.

The rep was the CEO. Therefore, while Akbar Al Baker did not give specific dates for the launches, he did commit to service 'within a year'. My guess is none of these routes will start until the New Doha Int'l Airport opens.


No commitment was made. He gave examples of possible 787 routes. That's it. Notice how nobody else has reported this except Bloomberg?


a.
User currently offlineblrsea From India, joined May 2005, 1228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 42, posted (1 year 2 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3009 times:

Have the LH 744s been refurbished at all with new seats,IFEs in economy?

User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 4002 posts, RR: 4
Reply 43, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2746 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 32):
Yes, I will get training on the -8i and then I am allowed to fly 744 and 748i.

when do you expect training to happen? I guess after that it depends where you are on the seniority list. Any guess/estimates when you might make your first flight with passengers?

User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 44, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2630 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting blrsea (Reply 42):
Have the LH 744s been refurbished at all with new seats,IFEs in economy?

No, 9 total.

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 43):
when do you expect training to happen? I guess after that it depends where you are on the seniority list. Any guess/estimates when you might make your first flight with passengers?

I guess in August I will get the training. I am rather new on the 744 so there are more senior pilots ahead of me. So I will have to be patient. But I can't wait  

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 434 posts, RR: 1
Reply 45, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

Okay so I'm confused regarding the actual launch dates for the LH 748i services, IAD is July 5th, what about the exact dates of ORD and LAX??

I'm flying between Germany and US in Sept-Oct this year, what are my options for FRA-USA flights on the 748 during that time?

I'm surely going to tailor my flights so that I get the awesome new jumbo experience!!    

Regds


If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 46, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2356 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 45):
IAD is July 5th

Exactly. Unless any further delay. On lufthansa.com it is still shown as B744.

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 45):
what about the exact dates of ORD and LAX??

Not announced yed. But earliest when the next airplanes join the fleet. August? September? Not sure yet.

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 45):
I'm flying between Germany and US in Sept-Oct this year, what are my options for FRA-USA flights on the 748 during that time?

Go via IAD and chances are very high as this will be flown daily with 748.

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 45):
I'm surely going to tailor my flights so that I get the awesome new jumbo experience!!    

Perfectly understandable. 

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinetailfin From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 47, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Quoting JOYA380B747 (Reply 45):
Okay so I'm confused regarding the actual launch dates for the LH 748i services, IAD is July 5th,

Where did July 5th come from as a launch date for 748 on FRA-IAD?

User currently offlineyeogeo From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 790 posts, RR: 14
Reply 48, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2157 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 8):
That's good news. LAX and ORD, 2 destinations I like flying to.

I understand that at O'Hare the 10C-28C runway will be Airplane Design Group VI capable (accommodating both 748 & 388 - the intermittent runway under construction visible at the south side in the satellite image below) but won't be complete until sometime in 2013, last I read, ....perhaps there's newer info.

I was wondering, wilco, will this lack of capability initially add to your workload a great deal when flying into ORD?





La pierre qui roule n'amasse pas mousse
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 49, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2131 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting yeogeo (Reply 48):
I was wondering, wilco, will this lack of capability initially add to your workload a great deal when flying into ORD?

Well, for landing it shouldn't be a problem for dry and wet conditions to land on shorter runways. ORD has many runways to offer where the 744 can land on without any problems and I am sure not different for the 748i.
Take off is a different story. But the flight ORD-FRA isn't the longest, so not too heavy and under normal conditions it shouldn't be a problem as well. Otherwise you leave some cargo behind, but that's about it. I doubt there are more restrictions then.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineyeogeo From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 790 posts, RR: 14
Reply 50, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2079 times:

When I was asking about workload I was thinking more along the lines of taxiway restrictions, having assumed that the runways at O'Hare were already ample for the 748 and 388 (apparently they could be a little more generous?)

So as far as you know, taxiing about ORD in an über-jet of either make won't encounter difficulties before 10C-28C is built?

yeo


La pierre qui roule n'amasse pas mousse
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined exactly 9 years ago today! , 8542 posts, RR: 78
Reply 51, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2076 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting yeogeo (Reply 50):
When I was asking about workload I was thinking more along the lines of taxiway restrictions, having assumed that the runways at O'Hare were already ample for the 748 and 388 (apparently they could be a little more generous?)

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood you here. The 748i has a body gear steering (just like the 744) which makes it rather easy to taxi. But due to the length there are restrictions, but even the 744 has restrcitions already due to the wingspan.
We get a new taxi chart for 748 and there is marked which taxiways are not allowed to be used.

wilco737
  


It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJOYA380B747 From India, joined Mar 2005, 434 posts, RR: 1
Reply 52, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2019 times:

Quoting tailfin (Reply 47):
Where did July 5th come from as a launch date for 748 on FRA-IAD?

Well according to the previous comments in this thread   

Quoting konstantinkoll (Reply 9):

Wilco, if you fly FRA-IAD on July 5th, it will be my pleasure to be on board! I'm really looking forward to my first 748 flight



If it wasn't for AI and those money mongers sitting in the parliament, 9W would have been as big as SQ...:(
User currently offlineyeogeo From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 790 posts, RR: 14
Reply 53, posted (1 year 2 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 51):
We get a new taxi chart for 748 and there is marked which taxiways are not allowed to be used.

Interesting, thanks! I was wondering how it was handled.

Happy flying!

yeo


La pierre qui roule n'amasse pas mousse
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Is AI Doing At ORD And LAX? posted Tue Dec 26 2006 16:49:31 by Mk777
Transit In ORD And LAX (help Needed) posted Thu Aug 12 2004 19:11:19 by Swissgabe
JL Introduces 777-300ER On NRT-ORD And NRT-LAX posted Wed Oct 28 2009 02:36:17 by Tradewinds
LH Committed To 748I And A380 posted Sun Jun 28 2009 07:59:04 by NA
LH Is Concidering Two New Destinations In China posted Fri Nov 30 2007 06:47:20 by LHBSL
Jet To Start SFO,LAX,ORD, And JFK In 2008 posted Sun Jul 22 2007 20:34:51 by LAXDESI
Two Reg Requests (AY And LH) posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:52:55 by SNATH
LH Airplane Type On MUC-LAX And LAX-FRA posted Thu May 18 2006 15:10:53 by Pilotjm
Two LH A300 At DUS Yesterday - Why And Where From? posted Sun Jan 22 2006 18:52:16 by Sabena332
Next Int'l Airline To ORD Will Be? posted Sun Mar 25 2012 18:18:06 by nomorerjs
LH Committed To 748I And A380 posted Sun Jun 28 2009 07:59:04 by NA
LH Is Concidering Two New Destinations In China posted Fri Nov 30 2007 06:47:20 by LHBSL
Jet To Start SFO,LAX,ORD, And JFK In 2008 posted Sun Jul 22 2007 20:34:51 by LAXDESI
Two Reg Requests (AY And LH) posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:52:55 by SNATH
LH Airplane Type On MUC-LAX And LAX-FRA posted Thu May 18 2006 15:10:53 by Pilotjm
Two LH A300 At DUS Yesterday - Why And Where From? posted Sun Jan 22 2006 18:52:16 by Sabena332
Next Int'l Airline To ORD Will Be? posted Sun Mar 25 2012 18:18:06 by nomorerjs
JL Introduces 777-300ER On NRT-ORD And NRT-LAX posted Wed Oct 28 2009 02:36:17 by Tradewinds
LH Committed To 748I And A380 posted Sun Jun 28 2009 07:59:04 by NA
LH Is Concidering Two New Destinations In China posted Fri Nov 30 2007 06:47:20 by LHBSL
Jet To Start SFO,LAX,ORD, And JFK In 2008 posted Sun Jul 22 2007 20:34:51 by LAXDESI
Two Reg Requests (AY And LH) posted Sun Dec 3 2006 23:52:55 by SNATH
LH Airplane Type On MUC-LAX And LAX-FRA posted Thu May 18 2006 15:10:53 by Pilotjm
Two LH A300 At DUS Yesterday - Why And Where From? posted Sun Jan 22 2006 18:52:16 by Sabena332
Next Int'l Airline To ORD Will Be? posted Sun Mar 25 2012 18:18:06 by nomorerjs