Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B6 Signs Codeshare With EK, JL  
User currently offlinejetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3018 posts, RR: 14
Posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jet...codeshare-with-emirates-2012-04-18

"NEW YORK and DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, April 18, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- JetBlue Airways JBLU -2.86% , New York's Hometown Airline(TM), and Emirates, the Dubai-based international carrier, today announced a codeshare agreement to connect the carriers' networks via New York's John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport.

The two airlines have been interline partners since 2010, enabling customers to enjoy the convenience of a single combined ticket for Emirates and JetBlue-operated flights, plus other benefits including one-stop check-in and baggage transfer."

The article goes on to mention that connections will be available via JFK to:

Boston (BOS)
Burlington, Vermont (BTV)
Buffalo, New York (BUF)
Charlotte, North Carolina (CLT)
Chicago/O'Hare (ORD)
Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FLL)
Jacksonville, Florida (JAX)
Orlando, Florida (MCO)
Portland, Maine (PWM)
Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina (RDU)
Tampa, Florida (TPA)
Washington/Dulles (IAD)

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-04/D9U6OU9O0.htm

Not to mention JL via JFK (16 destinations), LAX and BOS (13 destinations).

B6 currently has a code share program with AA, I believe, and also has plenty of INTERLINE (not code share) agreements with about a dozen international carriers out of JFK and BOS. Will those interline agreements soon become code share agreements?

This could bring significant revenue to B6, especially its JFK operations. It is so significant that I think B6 would be wise to add more medium and large city spokes that don't currently have plenty of international options (SAT, STL, MCI, MKE, DFW, MEM, CVG, CLE, IND). I know that B6 has trimmed JFK-Midwest flying (and JFK-domestic in general), but having significant code share agreements out of the nation's "premier" international gateway could be a great way to earn extra revenue. Just my $.02.

JetBluefan1


Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8652 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

I'm pretty sure SA)">B6 does not have a code share agreement with SA)">AA, but they do have it with various other carriers such as LH, SA and EI. I find it interesting that SA)">B6 is striking all these code-share agreements with foreign carriers.

User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1995 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3107 times:

Quoting jetbluefan1 (Thread starter):
Not to mention JL via JFK (16 destinations), LAX and BOS (13 destinations).

The interline goes through LAX, but the codeshare doesn't.

Quoting jetbluefan1 (Thread starter):
B6 currently has a code share program with AA, I believe

Not quite. It has an interline agreement and a program in which you can earn B6 miles on select AA int'l flights out of BOS or JFK (BOS-LHR being one), or earn AA miles on select B6 flights out of BOS or JFK (JFK-BTV being one).

Quoting jetbluefan1 (Thread starter):
Will those interline agreements soon become code share agreements?

Some might. Especially if B6 moves towards an alliance.

Quoting jetbluefan1 (Thread starter):
This could bring significant revenue to B6, especially its JFK operations. It is so significant that I think B6 would be wise to add more medium and large city spokes that don't currently have plenty of international options (SAT, STL, MCI, MKE, DFW, MEM, CVG, CLE, IND). I know that B6 has trimmed JFK-Midwest flying (and JFK-domestic in general), but having significant code share agreements out of the nation's "premier" international gateway could be a great way to earn extra revenue. Just my $.02.

With the 787, BOS is suddenly a possibility for many carriers. B6 wants to focus on top business markets from BOS and BOS is a lot less congested than JFK. Plus you will soon be able to move from Terminal C to Terminal E without leaving security. I'd love to see some codesharing out of BOS as well.

BTW, B6's codeshares are all one-way. While B6 does put its code on 9K flights out of BOS, it does not put its code on anything LH, JL, EK, HA, or (if this is a code share) SA flies.

[Edited 2012-04-18 16:52:28]

[Edited 2012-04-18 16:59:49]


2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17823 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3073 times:

What was B6's last add at JFK? Their growth strategy at JFK seems to be nothing but codeshares and interlines.


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineIndianicWorld From Australia, joined Jun 2001, 3028 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 3):
What was B6's last add at JFK? Their growth strategy at JFK seems to be nothing but codeshares and interlines.

Most airlines/airports hit that same point where either capacity or demand hit their peak at one point. I guess B6 has its eye on other places at this time in further enhancing its network.

Its not a bad idea to persue the codeshare/interline strategy to further boost its profitability across its network.

[Edited 2012-04-18 17:04:51]

User currently offlinebos2laf From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 377 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

Quoting BOStonsox (Reply 2):
BTW, B6's codeshares are all one-way. While B6 does put its code on 9K flights out of BOS,

The codeshare with 9K is no more. It is now just an interline ticketing and baggage agreement. However, the agreement has been extended to 9K flights out of SJU as well as their RSW-EYW route.


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1995 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2746 times:

Quoting bos2laf (Reply 5):
The codeshare with 9K is no more. It is now just an interline ticketing and baggage agreement. However, the agreement has been extended to 9K flights out of SJU as well as their RSW-EYW route.

I didn't realize that. That's too bad. I wonder what the status of their partnership is since they will now compete on SJU-STT, SJU-STX, and seasonally on BOS-ACK. Are they getting closer together, or further apart?



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineEY460 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2582 times:

All these codeshare agreements are one way. Would it cost a lot for B6 to put its code on the other airline's flights (i.e. JFK-DXB)?

User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2463 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

Its nice to see B6 codesharing/partnering with more OW airlines. Now we have AA, CX, LA, JL and soon to be TAM. I'm left wondering why its taking so long for BA, IB, AY, RJ, and AB to partner up.


The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8652 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2416 times:

Quoting Byrdluvs747 (Reply 8):
Its nice to see B6 codesharing/partnering with more OW airlines. Now we have AA, CX, LA, JL and soon to be TAM.

They do not codeshare with AA or CX. Only LA and JL = 2 OW carriers.
They codeshare with LH and TAM = 2 *A carriers
I'm not sure B6 has any interest in joining an alliance. Personally I don't think that would be a smart move.


User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2463 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (2 years 8 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

Quoting airbazar (Reply 9):
They do not codeshare with AA or CX. Only LA and JL = 2 OW carriers.
They codeshare with LH and TAM = 2 *A carriers

Notice I did say codeshare "slash" partner.

Quoting airbazar (Reply 9):

I'm not sure B6 has any interest in joining an alliance.

Well the B6 CEO has left the door open.

Terry Maxon at the Airline Biz blog reports that when "asked if today's deal could lead to JetBlue joining oneworld, [JetBlue CEO David Barger] said that 'our teams are real open to the path forward.'" American CEO Gerald Arpey said, "We'll see where things lead."

Will JetBlue Join an Airline Alliance?

Quoting airbazar (Reply 9):

Personally I don't think that would be a smart move.

Considering the presence of UACO in EWR, and DL in JFK, B6 isn't really needed in *A or ST. That leaves Oneworld. Joining an alliance won't prevent B6 from interlining with other airlines as it sees fit. I imagine that would be a condition for B6's membership.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
MEA Signs Codeshare With Sncf (French Railways) posted Tue Jun 6 2006 21:30:39 by BA
New SriLankan Codeshare With EK To Australia posted Thu May 5 2005 07:32:19 by 6thfreedom
Delta To Codeshare With EK: LGW-DXB And JFK-DXB? posted Wed Mar 17 2004 22:43:42 by Panamair
CO Plans Its Own DXB Flights & Codeshare With EK posted Fri May 16 2003 20:54:38 by ConcordeBoy
JL Signs MOU With Oneworld For Membership posted Wed Feb 8 2006 09:52:42 by Leelaw
LOT Signs Codeshare Agreement With UA posted Sat Sep 6 2003 17:52:38 by Codeshare
JL Codeshare With TG, Why? posted Wed May 29 2002 15:04:42 by Air Taiwan
Germanwings Launch Codeshare With OS posted Mon Apr 16 2012 05:30:56 by LOWS
WN: No Codeshare With FL Until Next Year posted Thu Mar 22 2012 16:09:05 by usflyguy
B6 Announces Partnership With KE posted Tue Feb 28 2012 10:24:32 by fat-g4