nomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 508 posts, RR: 0 Posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2994 times:
We've seen the WN/HOU/IAH spat lately and WN signing with Amadeus. So what is the impact at MDW? MDW is currently the largest "non-hub" airport for WN, with CUN service approved and going to start on FL this summer. Will WN have a similar int'l structure at MDW similar to TZ? MDW can support Mexico and Canada on O&D alone, but as a "non-hub?" I think MEX, GDL, PVR, YYZ, YUL, YEG, YVR, and others (SJU if you want to include this at Int'l).
apodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4287 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2800 times:
I don't believe FL ever served Canada, and with most of the cities in Canada you would think that WN would serve being pre clear stations, they could fly just about anywhere in the US. You wonder though with the switch to Amadeus if they might try the WestJet codeshare again, or just try their own canadian service? There are some high landing fees though at many of those airports, so don't get your hopes up.
As for Mexico, MDW does have an FIS so they could in theory fly just about anywhere in mexico from MDW. Mexicana had some service at ORD for a while, but with them belly up, there isn't much service outside of UA and AA in Chicago, and even that is limited at best. There is a hispanic population in Chicago though, so I think there would be enough to support some of the Mexican cities. SJU is a stretch though and I am not sure that WN's 737's would be able to get there from MDW with the short runways.
EWRandMDW From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 416 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2641 times:
IIRC TZ flew nonstop between MDW and NAS, MBJ, GCM and AUA in addition to several locations in Mexico. NAS, MBJ and AUA are pre-clearance facilities. Couldn't WN/FL at least fly to any or all of these places?
Mexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3045 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2530 times:
I think WN out of MDW will probably replicate what TZ had going in the early 2000s for international service. I don't see them doing much VFR routes in Mexico. Maybe GDL, leaving Volaris to handle that for them. In Mexico WN/FL can't fly to MEX, PVR and SJD from Chicago as all route authorities are taken up on U.S. side.
Quoting apodino (Reply 1): Mexicana had some service at ORD for a while, but with them belly up, there isn't much service outside of UA and AA in Chicago, and even that is limited at best.
AA and UA aren't the only airlines flying to Mexico from Chicago. At ORD there's AM with flights to BJX, CUN, DGO, GDL, MEX, and MTY. At MDW you have Volaris flying to GDL, MEX, MLM and ZCL. And the unknown status of the Vivaaerobus MTY-MDW flights.
type-rated From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2447 times:
The Pilsen neighborhood in Chicago is just about 6 miles north of MDW, right up Cicero AV. It's one of the biggest Latino neighborhoods in Chicago.
I imagine there would be room for one more carrier for the VFR flights.
Isn't Amedeus an evolution of the old EA System One? I think I read that somewhere. What confuses me is that why does Southwest want to go with a RES system that is used predominantly by European airlines? It would seem to me that they could have gotten something like like Worldspan much cheaper. Just wondering.