Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
USAirways Questions Part II  
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Posted (14 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1382 times:

Ok...that last topic was getting a bit long. But I still have a few more questions. So I've elected to start a new topic, regarding the "Darth Vader" airline.

First, regarding Express. Is the reason they use an "Allegheny", a "Piedmont", and a "PSA" is to maintain rights to the names and prevent any new airline from ressurecting those names a la Midway, Frontier, or Pan Am?

Second, when was the last 727-100 retired from the fleet and did any of them make it into the last red and blue USAir livery? I could not find any pix of them in the database.

Third, when and why were the MD-80's pulled off the West Coast routes?

Fourth, why did US go with the F-100 as opposed to the 737-500? Given the huge 737 fleet total, with a combined USAir/Piedmont, they could've no doubt saved themselves at least some financial headache with a standard fleet?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (14 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

F-100s were very cheap and efficient to operate. That's why AA still has those odd-balls.

No airline can pass up a great deal.

Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1345 times:

Matt... In reference to the 727-100's in the new scheme... I dont believe any of them made it. I am in fact, 95% sure of this.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 12428 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1335 times:

MD80s were brought east because they couldn't fly to the east coast hubs. (And, US bungled the merger.)

The 737-500 wasn't purchased most likely because it is too heavy. The much lighter F-100 is much better suited for short hops than the heavier 735.

Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LH Orders 20 747-8 And 7 A340-600 Part II posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:17:20 by Columba
Grissom Aeroplex Part II posted Tue Nov 28 2006 22:48:47 by Legend11
Looking Back Part II: USAir Shuttle At PHL posted Sun Nov 19 2006 00:07:20 by Matt D
FED EX Buys 15 X 777F, Cancels A380F Part II posted Wed Nov 8 2006 04:01:07 by Garri767
Swiss @ BSL Part II posted Thu Sep 21 2006 10:20:26 by RJ100
Hub Scenes From A Bygone Era (Part II) posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:23:40 by Matt D
Comair CRJ-100 Plane Has Crashed In LEX Part II posted Sun Aug 27 2006 21:23:47 by M180up
Bravo Air Congo (part II) posted Fri Aug 18 2006 18:25:36 by Iakobos
BEY Part II posted Fri Jul 14 2006 16:00:44 by BuyantUkhaa
JetBlue To Announce Two More Cities Soon Part II posted Tue Jul 11 2006 23:33:53 by Stl1326