Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
USAirways Questions Part II  
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 51
Posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 621 times:

Ok...that last topic was getting a bit long. But I still have a few more questions. So I've elected to start a new topic, regarding the "Darth Vader" airline.

First, regarding Express. Is the reason they use an "Allegheny", a "Piedmont", and a "PSA" is to maintain rights to the names and prevent any new airline from ressurecting those names a la Midway, Frontier, or Pan Am?

Second, when was the last 727-100 retired from the fleet and did any of them make it into the last red and blue USAir livery? I could not find any pix of them in the database.

Third, when and why were the MD-80's pulled off the West Coast routes?

Fourth, why did US go with the F-100 as opposed to the 737-500? Given the huge 737 fleet total, with a combined USAir/Piedmont, they could've no doubt saved themselves at least some financial headache with a standard fleet?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 599 times:

F-100s were very cheap and efficient to operate. That's why AA still has those odd-balls.

No airline can pass up a great deal.


Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineBoeing757fan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 584 times:

Matt... In reference to the 727-100's in the new scheme... I dont believe any of them made it. I am in fact, 95% sure of this.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 10561 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 574 times:

MD80s were brought east because they couldn't fly to the east coast hubs. (And, US bungled the merger.)

The 737-500 wasn't purchased most likely because it is too heavy. The much lighter F-100 is much better suited for short hops than the heavier 735.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LH Orders 20 747-8 And 7 A340-600 Part II posted Wed Dec 6 2006 23:17:20 by Columba
Grissom Aeroplex Part II posted Tue Nov 28 2006 22:48:47 by Legend11
Looking Back Part II: USAir Shuttle At PHL posted Sun Nov 19 2006 00:07:20 by Matt D
FED EX Buys 15 X 777F, Cancels A380F Part II posted Wed Nov 8 2006 04:01:07 by Garri767
Swiss @ BSL Part II posted Thu Sep 21 2006 10:20:26 by RJ100
Hub Scenes From A Bygone Era (Part II) posted Mon Sep 11 2006 00:23:40 by Matt D
Comair CRJ-100 Plane Has Crashed In LEX Part II posted Sun Aug 27 2006 21:23:47 by M180up
Bravo Air Congo (part II) posted Fri Aug 18 2006 18:25:36 by Iakobos
BEY Part II posted Fri Jul 14 2006 16:00:44 by BuyantUkhaa
JetBlue To Announce Two More Cities Soon Part II posted Tue Jul 11 2006 23:33:53 by Stl1326