Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa's New Low Cost Division On Long Range?  
User currently offlineCiC From Germany, joined Jun 2010, 55 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 10971 times:

Haven't found this topic in the forum...

Heard a rumour that LH's new "low cost division" (Germanwings together with LH's stations DUS/HAM/BER) get as well LONG RANGE ex DUS and BER (maybe FRA). One route might be Bangkok, as LH "mainline" already said they want to get rid of BKK due to low yields.
So they can keep the traffic rights and concentrate on "low yield" passengers...
High capacity 330's should be transferred to the new company.

Brand name (or maybe only company name, like the legal name of LH Cargo is still German Cargo) seems to be "Fly for you (fly4U), powered by Lufthansa"

Does anybody have news?
Seems the chinese whispering at the offices knows more than the crews...

Your thoughts?

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9097 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 10936 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting CiC (Thread starter):

There are a lot of rumours about it. LH CEO denied it, not gonna happen. but can we believe him? I don't know.

I doubt it will be long haul flights at the beginning, maybe short haul from DUS, HAM, BER, STR.

We will have to wait and see if they really do it. I hope not as the name Lufthansa needs to be alive as it is a good name in my opinion...

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineflyingalex From Germany, joined Jul 2010, 1019 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 10279 times:

I don't see it happening in the next two or three years, but you can bet that LH will be watching Scoot very, very closely.

If that ends up working out, I could see LH trying something similar.



Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
User currently onlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 585 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 10171 times:

Is there a single example in airline history, where a legacy carrier was able to establish a viable low-cost operation with long-term success? This reminds me a lot of Continental lite and everyone knows how that experiment ended.

User currently onlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9660 posts, RR: 31
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 10164 times:

Always re-invning the wheel-. Lufthansa had a low cost airline and it was called Condor Flugdienst. Still exists and I heard they are n friendly terms.. Why not leasing 2 or 3 44s to Condor and nam them Max und Moritz.


E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineflyingalex From Germany, joined Jul 2010, 1019 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9725 times:

Quoting PHX Flyer (Reply 3):
Is there a single example in airline history, where a legacy carrier was able to establish a viable low-cost operation with long-term success? This reminds me a lot of Continental lite and everyone knows how that experiment ended.

Depends what you mean by "long-term". Qantas's Jetstar subsidiary has been around for almost a decade now, and is still going strong.



Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
User currently offlineQFVHOQA From Australia, joined Mar 2012, 491 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 9680 times:

Quoting flyingalex (Reply 5):
Quoting PHX Flyer (Reply 3):
Is there a single example in airline history, where a legacy carrier was able to establish a viable low-cost operation with long-term success? This reminds me a lot of Continental lite and everyone knows how that experiment ended.

Depends what you mean by "long-term". Qantas's Jetstar subsidiary has been around for almost a decade now, and is still going strong.

It is argued quite often on a.net that JQ is going strong to the detriment of QF.


User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5865 times:

Quoting CiC (Thread starter):
"Fly for you (fly4U), powered by Lufthansa"

That would be an awful name, even worse than their 'Nonstop You' compaign.

Quoting QFVHOQA (Reply 6):
Quoting flyingalex (Reply 5):
Quoting PHX Flyer (Reply 3):
Is there a single example in airline history, where a legacy carrier was able to establish a viable low-cost operation with long-term success? This reminds me a lot of Continental lite and everyone knows how that experiment ended.

Depends what you mean by "long-term". Qantas's Jetstar subsidiary has been around for almost a decade now, and is still going strong.

It is argued quite often on a.net that JQ is going strong to the detriment of QF.

That's the biggest problem I see. Right now they can fill their planes and still dump their open seats out to those low yielding tourist passengers. If LH were to establish a low cost subsidiary (widebody service), they'd risk losing this passenger contingency and it would furthermore incentivize regular fare paying Y customers to move their business to the low cost branch.

The product distinction between LH Y and Fly4U Y would have to be substantial and I am not quite sure there's good money to be made in the longhaul super-low cost business, especially in the presence of the Gulf carriers. Etihad is offering €300 round trips between GVA-BKK-MXP. EK regularly offers BKK for €400 or less.

If LH wishes to address low yielding markets, they should take a bunch of 744s, put a business class product on the upper deck, 100 seats of premium economy and fill the rest up with high density economy seats. Which, incidentally, is exactly what Condor is doing, plus they sell their seat contingencies through tour operators.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 4):
Always re-invning the wheel-. Lufthansa had a low cost airline and it was called Condor Flugdienst. Still exists and I heard they are n friendly terms.. Why not leasing 2 or 3 44s to Condor and nam them Max und Moritz.

  

Would be nice to see Condor colored 744s again.



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 4):
Always re-invning the wheel-. Lufthansa had a low cost airline and it was called Condor Flugdienst. Still exists and I heard they are n friendly terms.. Why not leasing 2 or 3 44s to Condor and nam them Max und Moritz.

Oh la la, I wouldn't call DE a low cost airline at all. But feel free to have a different opinion on the matter.
Btw, I like the Max and Moritz idea. It's cheeky.


I don't think this Fly4U long-haul business is going to work.
First of all it creates costs that a LCC operation isn't going to favor, mainly, different aircraft which brings along new mx issues, type ratings and so on. Then you have the layovers of crews which suck up money, something that 4U has so far actively avoided.
Second thing is that LH will not compromise its long-haule routes, which are basically the only ones they do make money on. The potential of pax taking a low yield flight with maybe one transfer instead of taking mainline LH is too risky.
And third: AB is already eating up the leasure/long haule market ex Germany. If they can't make it work (which so far it seems the can't, having a look at the numbers), then why would another LCC be able to?

Quoting CiC (Thread starter):

Is there any link or reference at all which you could link us to? Rumour is a nice thing and speculations are fun, but hard facts and official statements are better.



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlineLHCVG From United States of America, joined May 2009, 1614 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5482 times:

Isn't that going to be OS, or more accurately VO d/b/a OS in the near(ish) future?   

User currently onlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9660 posts, RR: 31
Reply 10, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5244 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 8):
Oh la la, I wouldn't call DE a low cost airline at all. But feel free to have a different opinion on the matter.
Btw, I like the Max and Moritz idea. It's cheeky.

I am not sure oif you know that DF (Condor) hat, in early 70s 2 747-100s one was called Max and the other Moritz. The best is, they served the Meditarranean routes, I think DUS-PMI was sometimes twice daily by 747 and a couple of LTU Tristars as well, plus whatever else flew that route.

Condor is an airline that serves markets which LH won't. Called it what you want, they have a special product which makes destinaitons served once or twic weekly viable. I have no idea if their costs are below those of LH, but I would not be surprised.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4989 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 10):
Condor is an airline that serves markets which LH won't. Called it what you want, they have a special product which makes destinaitons served once or twic weekly viable. I have no idea if their costs are below those of LH, but I would not be surprised.

Condor pay is appreciably below Lufthansa, at least on the old contracts, but slightly above the regionals. They do have a pretty solid onboard product, and they do sell the majority of their seats through tour operators and travel agencies. They have the occasional promotion going on where they'll dump a large contingency of seats for decent fares, but usually it's very expensive to buy single seats on them through their website. FRA-BWI or FRA-SEA are never cheaper on DE than they are on LH. As far as their route network is concerned: They do fly to a bunch of very interesting destinations, among which are Manaus, Anchorage, Rangun and Baltimore. Most importantly though, they don't have a first class, a very limited business section and a premium economy class - such a layout is much better suited for low yielding tourist markets.



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlineJQflightie From Australia, joined Mar 2009, 1001 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4760 times:

Quoting PHX Flyer (Reply 3):

JQ - Jetstar, is celebrating its 8th birthday this month. For those that dont know about JQ it is QF 's LCC, started out domestic with B717's, swapping to A320's A321's and for Long Haul international routes A332's. Thats a pretty successful airline, constantly providing the QFGroup with strong profits.



Next Trip: PER-DPS-KUL-BKK-HKT-CNX-BKK-SIN-PER
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4987 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4610 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 1):

Totally agree...!

Quoting JQflightie (Reply 12):

Not to mention the airline has become more profitable than QF International which has been bleeding and is hopefully on a path to recovery...

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineSchorschNG From Germany, joined Sep 2010, 501 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4441 times:

It might work if a carrier is supplied "end of lifetime" aircraft that LH doesn't need any more.
Lufthansa has a big bunch of widebodies nearing retirement.
They have 26 A340-300, The oldest approach 20 years of age.



From a structural standpoint, passengers are the worst possible payload. [Michael Chun-Yung Niu]
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4987 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4335 times:

Quoting SchorschNG (Reply 14):

Any indications as to which type of aircraft to replace the A343 fleet...?

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4272 times:

Quoting something (Reply 11):
Condor pay is appreciably below Lufthansa, at least on the old contracts, but slightly above the regionals.

DE pay is appreciably below LH pay because LH pay is appreciably above all other pay. There's a very fine document on the DE homepage which shows the gradual increase of salary for FOs and CPTs for a 12-year period. I wouldn't call that at all a bad salary!



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4987 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4234 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 16):
DE pay is appreciably below LH pay because LH pay is appreciably above all other pay. There's a very fine document on the DE homepage which shows the gradual increase of salary for FOs and CPTs for a 12-year period. I wouldn't call that at all

Any links...?

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineSemaex From Germany, joined Nov 2009, 833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3821 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 17):
Any links...?

Didn't post because it's in german, but here you go: https://www.career.aero/condor/de/job/file/id/1037/token/upload12
A pdf which gives you a brief overview of DE pilot salaries. I'd say it's not too shabby, and definitely nothing LCCish.



// You know you're an aviation enthusiast when you look at your neighbour's cars and think about fleet commonality.
User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4987 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3692 times:

Quoting Semaex (Reply 18):

Cheers, online translator comes handy  

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7088 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (2 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3417 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 15):
Any indications as to which type of aircraft to replace the A343 fleet...?

A short while ago there was a thread based on a Flightinternational article hat LH might be the launch customer of the 787-10, BUT as there are a lot of things going on with LH right now they might no order any new planes anytime soon.

Some older A340 will definitely be replaced with A333 and at a later date we will seem them replaced by either A350s or 787s while I see a great chance for the 787-10.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Low Cost Carriers On Long Haul posted Sun Jun 22 2003 20:56:19 by Dirkou
LUFTHANSA, Is It Ready For New Low Cost Carriers? posted Mon Oct 14 2002 10:38:18 by Keesje
Thai Airways’ And Its New Low-cost Subsidiary posted Thu Mar 8 2012 22:35:00 by ZKOJH
IB Set Announce New Low Cost Airline posted Fri Sep 30 2011 16:45:49 by GSTBA
REDjet - New Low Cost Carry In Caribbean posted Mon Oct 18 2010 10:19:58 by wahdadli
New Low Cost Pier At CPH To Be A Disaster? posted Wed Mar 31 2010 05:31:01 by SKAirbus
Emirates To Manage New Low -Cost Carrier posted Tue Mar 18 2008 11:28:55 by Beaucaire
BRU:New Low-Cost Terminal posted Sun Feb 10 2008 06:17:27 by Sndp
Sama Airways-New Low Cost Airline From KSA posted Fri Jul 28 2006 01:41:21 by Detroiter
US To India: New Low Cost Carrier posted Fri Jun 16 2006 06:25:16 by Aseem
New Low Cost Pier At CPH To Be A Disaster? posted Wed Mar 31 2010 05:31:01 by SKAirbus
Emirates To Manage New Low -Cost Carrier posted Tue Mar 18 2008 11:28:55 by Beaucaire
BRU:New Low-Cost Terminal posted Sun Feb 10 2008 06:17:27 by Sndp
Sama Airways-New Low Cost Airline From KSA posted Fri Jul 28 2006 01:41:21 by Detroiter