Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Dominance At EWR, Conveniences And Higher Fares  
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16793 posts, RR: 51
Posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3133 times:

Interesting article discussing the dominance of UA at EWR (71% of the market) and how it "drives" up the fares.

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf...niteds_dominance_at_newark_li.html


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBDL757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 148 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Cool article! The EWR hub is probably one of the best assets in the UA/CO merger; once you get to Newark you can pretty much get everywhere!

User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3072 times:

which is even more impressive considering other hubs that can command these fare premiums usually have no meaningful competition (DFW... IAH ... CVG...) while NYC has 4 airlines hubbing

some can insist that JFK vs. EWR are 2 markets so therefore UA has a fortress hub but for all practical purposes, it's a single NYC market

[Edited 2012-05-21 18:19:04]

User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11387 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3056 times:

Quoting STT757 (Thread starter):
Interesting article discussing the dominance of UA at EWR (71% of the market) and how it "drives" up the fares.

The natural duality of having a huge hub - just like in many other cities. Fares are higher, but having a hub typically brings tons of convenient nonstop flights to lots of places, which in turn attract high-value businesses and their traffic (which are typically less susceptible to the higher fares, anyway). Perhaps most importantly, hubs bring worldwide connectivity and access to the globalized market - something that is becoming increasingly critical in today's environment.

Quoting BDL757 (Reply 1):
Cool article! The EWR hub is probably one of the best assets in the UA/CO merger; once you get to Newark you can pretty much get everywhere!

No question. EWR is one of the most valuable things about that merger, and indeed any airline would be lucky to have it - it's a phenomenal hub from a strategic perspective. It's one of only two airports in the northeast that can actually serve as omni-directional, day-long, domestic-and-international hubs (the other is PHL, which is obviously not on the same level as EWR).

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 2):
which is even more impressive considering other hubs that can command these fare premiums usually have no meaningful competition (DFW... IAH ... CVG...) while NYC has 4 airlines hubbing

some can insist that JFK vs. EWR are 2 markets so therefore UA has a fortress hub but for all practical purposes, it's a single NYC marker

While that is true, it's also a somewhat unfair comparison since the New York region dwarfs all others in local demand, and generates such a massive amount of domestic and international O&D - much of it premium and high-yielding - that there really is enough traffic to go around and support such a massive megahub at EWR plus a plethora of additional capacity from other U.S. and foreign carriers - including AA, Delta and JetBlue.


User currently offlinerampart From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 3103 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3006 times:

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 2):
some can insist that JFK vs. EWR are 2 markets so therefore UA has a fortress hub but for all practical purposes, it's a single NYC marker

I don't know many from NJ who drive to LGA or JFK unless they have to. (In other words, it has to be REALLY cheaper, or a destination not served from EWR). On the other hand, those from the core are of NYC proper would have all 3 major airports for a choice. Depends on what end of the metro area one lives. And it's unlike any other large metro area to have 3 very busy airports. MDW is busy but lacks choice that LGA has. Same with HOU and DAL. All the other airports in the LA area can't compare to LAX. Maybe San Francisco Bay area with SFO, SJC, and OAK.

Of course with that kind of dominance and higher fare trend at EWR, I'm more willing to trek out to LGA, or JFK. Even ABE becomes viable if I'm connecting somewhere anyhow and the fare is comparable.

-Rampart


User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2976 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 3):

While that is true, it's also a somewhat unfair comparison since the New York region dwarfs all others in local demand, and generates such a massive amount of domestic and international O&D - much of it premium and high-yielding - that there really is enough traffic to go around and support such a massive megahub at EWR plus a plethora of additional capacity from other U.S. and foreign carriers - including AA, Delta and JetBlue.

In a near perfect competitive environment at equilibrium, pricing leverage goes away if product offering is indistinguishable. Discount out JetBlue as LCC, one should still expect DL and AA to command the same yields as UA in NYC. Another example would be NRT+HND - huge market, 2 large carrier hubs, but near identical pricing.

Add to the fact that AA is supposedly more O&D focused at nyc (i.e. higher yielding traffic) and DL is the largest at both JFK and LGA IIRC, that makes UA ability to command *and sustain* the fare premium even more impressive.


User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2960 times:

Quoting rampart (Reply 4):
I don't know many from NJ who drive to LGA or JFK unless they have to. (In other words, it has to be REALLY cheaper, or a destination not served from EWR). On the other hand, those from the core are of NYC proper would have all 3 major airports for a choice. Depends on what end of the metro area one lives.

True, but similarly people out in suffolk county long island won't exactly trek out to EWR either, so wouldn't that be a wash ?


User currently offlineclickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9601 posts, RR: 69
Reply 7, posted (2 years 1 month 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2949 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

News flash! Hub-to-Hub prices are always more expensive when there is no competition. Either book a one-stop of fly from a non hub airport.

User currently offlinerampart From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 3103 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2487 times:

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 6):
True, but similarly people out in suffolk county long island won't exactly trek out to EWR either, so wouldn't that be a wash ?

Yes, it would.

Of course, Long Island has their own airport at ISP, a smaller facility, granted. LI has 1.3 million less people than all of NJ (7.5million vs. 8.8 million, still very large), and has, effectively, 3 airports: ISP, LGA, and JFK. Heading north, there's HPN and SWF for whatever population conglomerate one would use for the northern metro area. Unless one counts ABE and ACY, New Jersey has even more excuse to concentrate at EWR. See, now I'm arguing that maybe they are different markets.

-Rampart


User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2461 times:

Quoting rampart (Reply 8):
Yes, it would.

Of course, Long Island has their own airport at ISP, a smaller facility, granted. LI has 1.3 million less people than all of NJ (7.5million vs. 8.8 million, still very large), and has, effectively, 3 airports: ISP, LGA, and JFK. Heading north, there's HPN and SWF for whatever population conglomerate one would use for the northern metro area. Unless one counts ABE and ACY, New Jersey has even more excuse to concentrate at EWR. See, now I'm arguing that maybe they are different markets.

-Rampart

ABE/ACY/ISP/SWF are very small potato, but the southern half of Jersey can easily bleed to PHL too.


User currently offlineCompensateMe From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1020 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2428 times:

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 2):
some can insist that JFK vs. EWR are 2 markets so therefore UA has a fortress hub but for all practical purposes, it's a single NYC market

JFK/LGA and EWR are two different markets. Walk-up fares to EWR from most markets are significantly higher than those to JFK/LGA and the same trend is true at many other fare levels. No doubt it's because JFK/LGA have more competition, but if it was truly a single NYC market, the fares would be priced the same. It's similar to LAX and SNA -- there's a very large number of travelers willing to travel from either airport (dependent on fare & times), but there's also a very large market that will not travel to the other market (too far away from their business, etc.).



Hypocrisy: "US airlines should only buy Boeing... BTW, check out my new Hyundai!"
User currently offlinetommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2417 times:

It's been this way for a while. CO was expensive throughout the last decade to fly out of EWR, and it seems since the merger everything has been even more pricey.


"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlinerampart From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 3103 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2330 times:

Quoting mogandoCI (Reply 9):
ABE/ACY/ISP/SWF are very small potato, but the southern half of Jersey can easily bleed to PHL too.

Good point, I should have remembered that. I liken ABE, ACY, ISP and SWF to BUR and LGB in Los Angeles. ABE and SWF resemble GYY and RFD for Chicago.


User currently offlinetermbewr From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

EWR is absolutely more expensive in certain markets. For example, business markets such as CMH, PIT or IAH where they lack competition, the UA pricing is insane. However, the leisure routes where the premium demand doesn't exist or they have a competitor, you are fine. Flights to Europe tend to be competitive also. I suspect the guy quoted in the article tried to book a flight during a peak travel period.

Quite frankly, I don't begrudge UA for charging high fares from EWR. Airlines exist to turn a profit so why not get it while you can? As a consumer, I have the choice of flying them from EWR or choosing another carrier from LGA or JFK.


User currently offlineFlytravel From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2172 times:

Quoting rampart (Reply 12):
I liken ABE, ACY, ISP and SWF to BUR and LGB in Los Angeles.

ACY is more of an alternative for PHL than it is for EWR. ABE is about 20 miles maybe too far for acting like an alternative for either EWR or PHL, and acts more like a regional airport with typical high fares, and not enough in a way of low fare carrier service. If anything, UA at EWR enjoys pax traffic coming in from the ABE region than the ABE region offering much to NJ pax.

Another benefit for UA at EWR is that the airport to the south of it is PHL where US, it's alliance partner, has the same type of dominance on routes without competition.


User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3121 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2097 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 3):
While that is true, it's also a somewhat unfair comparison since the New York region dwarfs all others in local demand, and generates such a massive amount of domestic and international O&D

I was under the impression that LA was the country's largest O&D market, moreso than NYC due to it's isolated location. (whereas a lot of passengers from NYC to many destinations in the NE go by train, car, or bus). If I am mistaken, please correct me.


'902



life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11387 posts, RR: 62
Reply 16, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting TWA902fly (Reply 15):
I was under the impression that LA was the country's largest O&D market

LAX is the nation's largest O&D airport. New York (metro) is the nation's largest O&D market.


User currently offlinerampart From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 3103 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1949 times:

Quoting termbewr (Reply 13):
As a consumer, I have the choice of flying them from EWR or choosing another carrier from LGA or JFK.

Or, as I do, I find myself flying other airlines from EWR, via hub connections elsewhere (recently, WN, AA, and DL). I'm not so much wedded to the OnePass as I used to be. If I have to connect somewhere anyhow, I have a wide spectrum. I frequently fly to Colorado; UA and CO used to compete, but no longer, so other airlines come into my choice.

-Rampart


User currently offlineTWA902fly From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 3121 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (2 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1815 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 16):
LAX is the nation's largest O&D airport. New York (metro) is the nation's largest O&D market.

That makes sense - thanks commavia.

'902



life wasn't worth the balance, or the crumpled paper it was written on
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Low Will UA Go At EWR? posted Mon Aug 31 2009 14:11:03 by N62NA
UA Widebody At EWR Today? posted Sun Aug 2 2009 13:39:45 by COEWRNJ
Remember The UA Base At EWR posted Fri Feb 1 2008 19:59:21 by Tommy767
SAS Plane It By UA Plane At EWR posted Mon Apr 8 2002 10:51:42 by SK A340
UA 747 At EWR posted Mon Nov 26 2001 04:02:56 by 777gk
UA And AA At EWR posted Wed Jun 9 2004 01:50:10 by N62NA
New UA Express Upguages At EWR Already? posted Mon Nov 8 2010 12:06:24 by jadedchameleon
What Will Become Of UA's Red Carpet Club At EWR? posted Fri Sep 24 2010 11:01:24 by TOMMY767
Merging CO And UA Gates At Their Hubs. posted Sun Aug 22 2010 12:56:17 by kgaiflyer
Questions About The Largest At EWR And JFK posted Sat Jun 13 2009 17:52:44 by BACCALA