Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EK SYD Flight Re-Directed To BOM To Pick Up Pax?  
User currently offlinejayeshrulz From India, joined Apr 2007, 1027 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 12419 times:

Ive heard this from one of my friends, who regularly flies EK BOM-DXB-BOM route, that very recently his EK flight had got severely delayed at DXB (He was waiting in BOM for arrival) due to tech errors. The delay was 5 hours plus and yet no signs of arrival. Finally when they came in, there were two EK 77L arrivals back to back.
The first flight was for picking them up, and the other was the routine flight which was also full.
When he boarded, he spoke to the crew members. They said the first flight (on which he was there) was re-directed from SYD to pick up passengers at BOM since the flight was not full, and the other arrival (which was on time) flew in the cockpit crew which would fly the Sydney re-directed flight from BOM to DXB since the other crew was out of hours. The original crew then flew like passengers.

Now, can this happen? As far as i know, an airline may not have the authority to do this. But given EK and their presence in Indian markets, i do see this as a possibility.
Your thoughts?


Keep flying, because the sky is no limit!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12321 posts, RR: 35
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 11651 times:

I don't think this would be affected by the bilateral; basically, all EK was doing was diverting one of its flights to pick up pax and carry them on to DXB, which is has the right to do; now, if EK were to have dropped pax off at BOM, that would be a different issue altogether, but a simple pick-up is no problem.

Mind you, I can't think that the pax originating in SYD were too happy to divert to BOM; many probably had onward connections from DXB which were messed up by this!


User currently offlineleftyboarder From Turkey, joined Apr 2008, 693 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 11502 times:

Quoting kaitak (Reply 1):
Mind you, I can't think that the pax originating in SYD were too happy to divert to BOM; many probably had onward connections from DXB which were messed up by this!

In fact the detour only adds 23nm according to GCM, but given the extra time to land, take off plus the time to enplane and load luggage, it probably was an annoyance regardless. I sure would be pissed.


User currently offlineblueflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 3696 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 11479 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Either I'm not understanding the OP, or something's missing.

If the scheduled BOM aircraft makes it in at around the same time at the diverted SYD-DXB flight, then surely the SYD flight didn't land just to pick up passengers and crew. The passengers could have gotten on the original aircraft, and the SYD flight could have continued on to DXB non-stop without the need of a fresh crew.

The diversion must have been for a reason other than to pick up passengers, unless the DXB-BOM aircraft was a swap with a much smaller capacity and a large number of passengers would have been left behind...



I've got $h*t to do
User currently offlinemigair54 From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 1483 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 11376 times:

Airlines redirect flight everyday, is more common that we think, the problem can be connecting pax beyond DXB.

Actually it could have been also with any flight coming from DEL, DAC, CCU or even to DXB for example and no problem at all.

EK must be having very high load factors because with so many BOM flighs a day and they can´t rebook all the pax in them...

Actually the SYD diversion it´s a little bit weird because of the change of crew.

There´re a few example of re-routing in the atlantic to get pax on previously diverted planes for tech issues, sometimes sending a stby plane is soooo expensive and maybe you can accomodate if loads are not that high.


User currently offlinekl911 From Ireland, joined Jul 2003, 5084 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 11376 times:

Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
and the other was the routine flight which was also full.
Quoting blueflyer (Reply 3):
The passengers could have gotten on the original aircraft

The plane was full, thats why the SYD flight came to the rescue. That fflight was not full at all.



Next trip : DUB-AUH-CGK-DPS-KUL-AUH-CDG-ORK :-)
User currently offlineFN1001 From Moldova, joined Sep 2008, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10657 times:

Quoting kaitak (Reply 1):
Mind you, I can't think that the pax originating in SYD were too happy to divert to BOM; many probably had onward connections from DXB which were messed up by this!

Whenever I look for a connection between Europe and Oz and back, I struggle over EK with tempting good fares but infinite long stopover in DXB at crazy times. Maybe EK wanted to keep the passengers in the air instead of keeping them in the terminals.



Mai bine să-ţi fie rău decît să-ţi pară rău.
User currently offlineDTWLAX From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 760 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 9880 times:

Quoting kl911 (Reply 5):
Quoting jayeshrulz (Thread starter):
and the other was the routine flight which was also full.
Quoting blueflyer (Reply 3):
The passengers could have gotten on the original aircraft

The plane was full, thats why the SYD flight came to the rescue. That fflight was not full at all.

Wait a minute... all the passengers stranded at BOM were booked on the delayed flight back to DXB. How can that flight be full and have no space for the stranded passengers?


User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2883 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5114 times:

I doubt this very much:

1. EK415 (the only nonstop 777 between SYD and DXB) hasn't been operated by a 77L since the flight was reinstated last October (even as a sub). The timings also mean that the earliest it could be at BOM is just before midday, and by then EK505 from BOM would be boarded and left (if it was on time...)

2. EK419 (via BKK) would be passing BOM at about 4am so is out of the picture.

3. The EK Source isn't showing any diversions via BOM on either flight, and this is the sort of thing they would pick up.

4. It sounds like an operational nightmare.

5. It still doesn't fix most of the problem -- even if the flight from SYD had 100 seats free, they're still dealing with 200 pax would would be left behind. Another aircraft is going to have to be sent out for them, so it seems a lot easier to just have all 300 people waiting for a flight together.


User currently offlinejayeshrulz From India, joined Apr 2007, 1027 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2503 times:

Thanks for clarifying. So that means, it can happen. An airline CAN reroute planes to pick up other stranded passengers. Right?

Quoting migair54 (Reply 4):
Actually the SYD diversion it´s a little bit weird because of the change of crew.

There´re a few example of re-routing in the atlantic to get pax on previously diverted planes for tech issues, sometimes sending a stby plane is soooo expensive and maybe you can accomodate if loads are not that high.

The crew must have got expired of their hours by the time they reached DXB. EK must have planned well and sent the other crew to take the flight beyond Mumbai.

Quoting DTWLAX (Reply 7):
Wait a minute... all the passengers stranded at BOM were booked on the delayed flight back to DXB. How can that flight be full and have no space for the stranded passengers?

That flight never arrived. The Flight that came from Dubai was carrying the earlier passengers from DXB as well as the pax which might have been scheduled to fly on that flight.
I wasn't in the situation and don't want to shoot in the dark about that must have happened.

Quoting qf002 (Reply 8):
1. EK415 (the only nonstop 777 between SYD and DXB) hasn't been operated by a 77L since the flight was reinstated last October (even as a sub). The timings also mean that the earliest it could be at BOM is just before midday, and by then EK505 from BOM would be boarded and left (if it was on time...)

How can you be so sure that it might not have been operated by 77L?

Quoting qf002 (Reply 8):
2. EK419 (via BKK) would be passing BOM at about 4am so is out of the picture.

3. The EK Source isn't showing any diversions via BOM on either flight, and this is the sort of thing they would pick up.

4. It sounds like an operational nightmare.

You might be quite right on that pal. As i said, i wasn't involved in that situation and dint realize to ask him all the details. It was just a quick topic that came up while I and my friend were spotting. It struck me later to ask. But that guy is back in DXB now.

So on the whole, airlines can re-route the flights to destinations apart from the original to help other passengers. Correct?



Keep flying, because the sky is no limit!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK 2nd Flight To IAH...Again? posted Wed May 16 2012 06:03:10 by drerx7
Qantas Jnb - Syd Flight Just Returned To JNB posted Tue Nov 16 2010 09:40:08 by pfletch1228
How Are The Loads On EK A380 Flight To YYZ? posted Fri Jul 9 2010 14:47:48 by airplaneguy
Any Chance AC Will Pick Up Some 757s To Cover Gap? posted Mon Sep 29 2008 10:44:46 by YYZatcboy
Any Possibility For TG To Pick Up SQ's TPE-LAX? posted Sat Apr 5 2008 11:00:34 by FAH345
Any Airline Likely To Pick Up The LHR-SNN Route? posted Sun Aug 12 2007 13:17:55 by Gilesdavies
A Dozen Reasons For US Airways To Pick Up 747SP's posted Tue Jun 27 2006 07:50:00 by Thegooddoctor
Kingfisher Likely To Pick Up Stake In Air Sahara posted Wed Oct 19 2005 02:00:56 by Aseem
Awac To Pick Up Some Skywest Flights? posted Wed Aug 31 2005 21:07:43 by Mir
Flight 93 Re-Creation To Air On 9/11 posted Mon Jul 18 2005 21:40:12 by Vanguard737