Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
VS A330-300's - Information And Names?  
User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 912 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5874 times:

So VS currently has 3 A330's -

G-VKSS (Mademoiselle Rouge) (LGW, MAN, GLA)
G-VSXY (Beauty Queen) (LGW, MAN, GLA)
G-VRAY (Miss Sunshine) (LHR)

Now I have a few questions. I believe they have another one (G-VINE named Champagne Belle) although this is currently leased to Ryan International, is this correct? Will it be returning?

Are there any / going to be any leased to China Airlines?

How many more are due to be delivered and when?

Will the remaining deliveries all be LHR based?

Are G-VKSS and G-VSXY going to be refitted and based at LHR or are they staying where they are? Also I have heard they are going to be repainted with the newer metallic red (like G-VRAY) is this true?

Have the names been announced for the future deliveries?

Sorry for all of the questions,

Jordan  

[Edited 2012-06-06 08:23:25]


The amazing tale of flight.
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAuchmithie From UK - England, joined Sep 2010, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5799 times:

See http://www.thevssource.com/a330-300.html

User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3263 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5758 times:

http://www.jethros.org.uk/fleets/fleet_listings/virgin_atlantic.htm

This is usually reliable but I notice has a total of eleven A333s when I am sure they've only announced ten. The two Beach Fleet aircraft are expected to move to LHR but how this squares with the imminent withdrawal of G-VTOP I don't know. I suspect that they have to stay painted as they are, as it's rumoured that were VS to have a consistent fleet wide livery, the sky would fall in.....

[Edited 2012-06-06 08:49:29]

User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5251 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5659 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 2):
The two Beach Fleet aircraft are expected to move to LHR but how this squares with the imminent withdrawal of G-VTOP I don't know.

Well with ROM back in the fleet that would be a direct swap with TOP. (With ROM enabling the refits currently going on).

So what happens with the 2 LGW 330's?

Ok so 4 more new build 330 deliveries this year. Lets presume they replace 1 for 1 the A340-600's leaving the fleet this year.

Then there are 3 x 330's coming back from lease to Ryan & China Airlines.

My understanding is no more 340-300's leave until 2014 - thought I believe FAR is owned so that may go/be sold.

So will be interesting to see if the 2 x 330's at LGW do actually go up to LHR... perhaps more LHR 747's will go to LGW config? Personally I think keeping 2 330's in leisure config may be a good thing and possibly to open up new routes?
Will be interested to see how it all works out.


User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 912 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5642 times:

Quoting Auchmithie (Reply 1):
See http://www.thevssource.com/a330-300.html

Thanks! Great overall although there are a few mistakes.

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 2):

Thankss again!  


I've heard the end of this year, but is there a date for G-VTOP to be retired? How comes it is being retired?



The amazing tale of flight.
User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 912 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5628 times:

Quoting anstar (Reply 3):

Thank you for your answer. Yes it will be interesting  



The amazing tale of flight.
User currently onlinejwhite9185 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 1316 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5388 times:

Quoting virginblue4 (Reply 4):
How comes it is being retired?

More than likely end of lease and/or nearing a D check.

Names/Reg's for the A330's:

G-VSXY Beauty Queen (Del 3/11)
G-VKSS Mademoiselle Rouge (Del 3/11)
G-VLUV Lady Love (Lsd to China Airways)
G-VGEM Diamond Girl (Lsd to China Airways)
G-VINE Champagne Belle (Lsd to Ryan International)
G-VRAY Miss Sunshine (Del 4/12)
G-VWAG Miss England (Due 7/12)
G-VGBR Golden Girl (Due 8/12)
G-VNYC Liberty Bell (Due 10/12)
G-VUFO Lady Stardust (Due 11/12)

[Edited 2012-06-06 11:39:44]


A300,A319,A320,A321,A333,A343,A346,A388,732,733,734,735,738,741,742,744,752,763,772,77W,788,Q400,DC10,E145,E170,E175,E19
User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 912 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5324 times:

Quoting jwhite9185 (Reply 6):

Anyone know when the 3 leased aircraft are coming back to VS?



The amazing tale of flight.
User currently offlinesevenheavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1156 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5225 times:

Firstly.....G-VWAG, worst/nastiest a/c reg ever? I'd love to find out who ok'd that....

The 2 aircraft from China are back first, around the end of the year. G-VINE is early 2013 although there are some options on that.

G-VTOP has been mentioned many times as leaving. That's certainly a decent possibility but it's not a fixed plan, it depends very much on requirements at the time and can be retained, deferred or returned from lease.

The 2 LGW aircraft will be the last of all to be sent up to LHR, probably in time for summer 2013.

Depending on requirements, one additional B744 could be sent down to cover when the LGW A330s are sent to LHR. As things stand, there would still be a shortfall even with 'ROM coming back and there is further LGW/MAN expansion being looked at.

4 A346 will go back this year, possibly another 3 in 2013, leaving an eventual fleet of 12 for flights to LAX,JNB,CPT,HKG,SYD,NRT,PVG. B744s will do SFO,LAX,MIA,JFK. A333s will do JFK,ORD,DEL,BOM,IAD and some others yet to be publicly announced



So long 701, it was nice knowing you.
User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 912 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4616 times:

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 8):

Thanks for that, and yes, I agree about G-VWAG.

Will be nice to see G-VTOP stay in the fleet so will keep my fingers crossed!



The amazing tale of flight.
User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5251 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4569 times:

Quoting virginblue4 (Thread starter):
I believe they have another one (G-VINE named Champagne Belle) although this is currently leased to Ryan International, is this correct? Will it be returning?

Yes it will be coming back this year


Are there any / going to be any leased to China Airlines?

G-VLUV & G-VGEM were leased to China Airlines and will also be returning in 2012.

Quoting virginblue4 (Thread starter):
How many more are due to be delivered and when?

4 more new builds this year.

Quoting virginblue4 (Thread starter):
Will the remaining deliveries all be LHR based?

yes

Quoting virginblue4 (Thread starter):
Are G-VKSS and G-VSXY going to be refitted and based at LHR or are they staying where they are? Also I have heard they are going to be repainted with the newer metallic red (like G-VRAY) is this true?

Plan is for the 2 LGW ones to come back to LHR.

Quoting virginblue4 (Thread starter):
Have the names been announced for the future deliveries?

G-VINE Champagne ?? (belle?)
G-VLUV Lady Love
G- VGEM Diamond Girl
G-VWAG Miss England
G-VGBR Golden Girl
G-VNYC Liberty Belle
G-VUFO Lady Stardust


User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 1842 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4528 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 8):
Firstly.....G-VWAG, worst/nastiest a/c reg ever? I'd love to find out who ok'd that....
Quoting virginblue4 (Reply 9):
Thanks for that, and yes, I agree about G-VWAG.

Should have tried to shoe horn 'Essex' into the name for that reg!!!


User currently onlinejwhite9185 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 1316 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4486 times:

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 8):
Depending on requirements, one additional B744 could be sent down to cover when the LGW A330s are sent to LHR.

Ive had a funny feeling for a few years now that eventually all the 744's will end up at LGW.

Would make sense that extra capacity would be needed though. The A330's came in and effectively replaced the LHR 744's that were being sent down to LGW (to mostly operate the BGI route, although occasionally they were seen in MCO) to cover for VROM being away. With VTOP potentially going and the A330's going to LHR that will then leave the LGW fleet a member down again. Theres also a new route to Cancun to throw into the mix however the route to Kingston has been dropped to accommodate this.



A300,A319,A320,A321,A333,A343,A346,A388,732,733,734,735,738,741,742,744,752,763,772,77W,788,Q400,DC10,E145,E170,E175,E19
User currently offlineby738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2334 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4451 times:

Would be good to see some expansion from VS at GLA also. Some Caribbean/Mexico or LAS in addition to MCO would work Im sure. Was some rumours of GLA- Canada also. Interesting.

User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3263 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4289 times:

The order has swapped, next A333 due is G-VNYC.

User currently offlinesevenheavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1156 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4269 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 14):

Everything I had seen said that 'NYC would always be the next, not sure where the conflict came from...

Quoting by738 (Reply 13):

There is definately a good possibility of more leisure flying. GLA has been dong well but only additional MCO flying is realistic. LGW and MAN could see some more interesting additions.....



So long 701, it was nice knowing you.
User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5251 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 4196 times:

Quoting jwhite9185 (Reply 12):
Theres also a new route to Cancun to throw into the mix however the route to Kingston has been dropped to accommodate this.

Monetgo Bay is also increasing from 2 weekly to 3 weekly.

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 15):
LGW and MAN could see some more interesting additions.....

I would like to see a MAN-NYC option.... Perhaps the aircraft could do LHR-JFK-MAN-JFK-LHR or something on a LHR 330.

In saying that I still think a sub fleet of 2 LGW 330's could be a good way to open some new leisure destinations EX MAN/LGW.


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3263 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3820 times:

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 15):
Everything I had seen said that 'NYC would always be the next, not sure where the conflict came from...

Reply 6

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 15):
GLA has been dong well but only additional MCO flying is realistic.

Airtours succesfully ran Las Vegas for years from GLA and also PIK (I think). Given no one flies that market now, I suspect a summer only once weekly A333 might be a good bet.

Quoting anstar (Reply 16):
I would like to see a MAN-NYC option....

Tough gig, Delta with a massive feed at JFK just dropped JFK-MAN, United also dropped one daily EWR-MAN in favour of a new IAD-MAN. Even BA dropped MAN-JFK, I strongly doubt VS would try this. Can someone confirm that the A333 will be withdrawn from the Beach Fleet and sent to LHR once the B744 refits are done for LGW?


User currently offlinesevenheavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1156 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3793 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 17):

Sorry, I realise it was referenced in this thread. I meant where the information contained within it came from.

GLA-LAS could work but with the two leisure A333s tied up ( and ultimately moving to LHR) there isn't the aircraft available. It could work nicely, say a Saturday rotation to MCO, then Sunday to LAS, then Monday to MCO and a position back to MAN but a B744 would be too much.

It would also be pushing the A333s effective range a bit, but would probably be ok in the summer

GLA has been very successful for VS but I think there is only room for additional MCO flights for the foreseeable future, potentially a Friday service or even a weekly year round flight



So long 701, it was nice knowing you.
User currently onlinejwhite9185 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 1316 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3704 times:

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 18):
It would also be pushing the A333s effective range a bit, but would probably be ok in the summer

VS have used the A333 on the odd YVR service in the last couple of weeks so it should be do able.



A300,A319,A320,A321,A333,A343,A346,A388,732,733,734,735,738,741,742,744,752,763,772,77W,788,Q400,DC10,E145,E170,E175,E19
User currently offlinesevenheavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1156 posts, RR: 10
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3597 times:

Quoting jwhite9185 (Reply 19):

G-VRAY was used for the inaugurals, and I think the route will eventually be an A333. GLA-LAS should be ok in the summer but it could struggle in the winter as its a couple of hundred miles longer than LHR-YVR, which is already considered about the economical limit. It would also be in a higher density configuration which would give less flexibility with the ZFW.



So long 701, it was nice knowing you.
User currently offline1stfl94 From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 1455 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3556 times:

Quoting sevenheavy (Reply 18):
It would also be pushing the A333s effective range a bit, but would probably be ok in the summer

There's also the issue that VS doesn't have crew rest facilities on the A333s and I think YVR is about the limit before their required.


User currently offlinesevenheavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 1156 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3523 times:

Quoting 1stfl94 (Reply 21):

Good point. That's another reason why YVR is considered about the limit....if they really wanted to they could get around it by blocking some seats but it all adds to the complications.

If VS really wanted to look at some longer range flying from GLA or MAN they might be better keeping a couple of the A343s and reconfiguring them to a similar layout to the leisure A333s. They could fly more or less anywhere and additional LAS flying (which seems to be very successful for VS) would be no issue. It would also be a good way to increase frequency from MAN or even LGW.



So long 701, it was nice knowing you.
User currently offlineby738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2334 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3431 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 17):
Las Vegas for years from GLA and also PIK (I think). Given no one flies that market now

Thomas Cook do, and have done for past 3 years, albeit with only a few departures direct from GLA. I dont recall AIH operating LAS from PIK.


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3263 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3171 times:

PIK was on the B763 late 90s as Airtours and later MyTravel on the A332. Bottom of the class for forgetting TCX fly it now.

User currently offlineslinky09 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2009, 843 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (2 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3097 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 17):
Tough gig, Delta with a massive feed at JFK just dropped JFK-MAN, United also dropped one daily EWR-MAN in favour of a new IAD-MAN. Even BA dropped MAN-JFK, I strongly doubt VS would try this. Can someone confirm that the A333 will be withdrawn from the Beach Fleet and sent to LHR once the B744 refits are done for LGW?

I agree about MAN-JFK, it seems to need very good J loads as well as feeder traffic, and even the bigger hub and spoke airlines can't make it work over successive seasons.

As to the A333s in leisure config, they are indeed to be reconfigured for use at LHR, but then with VS you never know!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
787-9 Vs. A330-300 posted Tue Feb 23 2010 08:34:56 by ea772lr
Updated 767 400 VS A330-300 posted Fri Feb 16 2007 15:45:13 by Africawings
AirAsia X Boeing 777-300ER Vs A330-300 Selection posted Sat Jan 6 2007 00:39:18 by Keesje
Airbus 330-200 VS A330-300 posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:11:02 by YULYMX
Lufthansa A340-300 Vs A330-300 posted Sun Dec 4 2005 15:44:17 by Columba
KLM Orders A330-300's And ERJ's posted Thu Nov 18 2010 00:25:20 by mauriceb
EK And A330-300? posted Sun Dec 9 2007 09:09:49 by Kaitak
VS A340-300's And PE posted Wed Dec 6 2006 13:35:52 by V2fix
Difference Between A330-300 And A340-300 posted Fri Oct 15 2004 22:51:34 by Jfkaua
Questions On Qantas B747-300 And A330-300! posted Wed Jun 30 2004 08:41:53 by Udo