Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What If? Northwest Fleet Today  
User currently offlineKGRB From United States of America, joined Sep 2010, 721 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Just doing a little reminiscing about my all-time favorite airline Northwest and was thinking about the direction their fleet would be going in in 2012. They probably would be taking delivery of the 787s very soon, which would open up huge new route possibilities. And I think NW would have made the same deal Delta did to take the Southwest 717 fleet (there was speculation on here for years that NW would order the type when it was still in production). That is, if they didn't order the C-series. NW did seem to have an affection for Bombardier aircraft.

What about the early-build A320s and 757s? I could see an A320/A321NEO order, or even the 737-9MAX, if Boeing gave them a great deal. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. And what about additional 70+ seat RJs? Would XJ, 9E, and CP still be the only Airlink carriers, or would we see new players brought in like OO (who don't they fly for these days???) and RP?

And finally the 747s -- could we see the 747-8i or even the A380 at NWA?

Let the speculation begin!


Δ D E L T A: Keep Climbing
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedeltaflyertoo From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1664 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3013 times:

Well seeing how long the DC-9s stayed, and, that the merger was only 5 years ago and there were no other plans for new a/c other than as you mentioned the 787 I don't think things would be much different today. Maybe there would be a E190 order or CRJ-900 order, perhaps more A330s ordered, but that would be about it. I doubt they'd do 717 deal, I could still see DL doing that despite not merging w/ NW.

User currently offlineNC1844v From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2987 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Northwest was a great airline, They are missed from our skies that's for sure.

The 787 would have become the airline's flagship, and would have been great to see in Northwest colors.

I don't think they would have gone for the 717, due to as you said, "Affection" for bombardier aircraft and if NW did drop some money on the 717 it would be to replace their DC-9's and not start a whole new fleet category.

I'm sure the early build A320's and 757's would still have tons of life left in them at NW, I mean look at the DC-9's that have hung around so long.

Of course the 747-8i would have become a great addition to the fleet.



Steven Bates
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20368 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2922 times:

I recall seeing a PowerPoint put out by NW back in '06 or so where they went over their future fleet plan. They indicated that the 787 would be a 744 replacement, which I found puzzling. While the 787 offers lower operational costs and similar range performance, it's certainly not a valid successor to the 744. The 744 is good on high-density, long-haul routes where multiple frequencies are either not important or not available (slot-restricted markets).

NW's model tended to keep frames around for a long time. They never did retire the DC-9 and they were among the last to retire the DC-10 and 742. Thus, it stands to reason that they would have kept their 744's around for some time and probably replaced them with 777X or A350's.


User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20368 posts, RR: 59
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2842 times:

Quoting NC1844v (Reply 2):
Northwest was a great airline, They are missed from our skies that's for sure.

I grew up in Detroit and learned to hate them. The trouble was that they were the only nonstop service available between DTW and a lot of destinations.

Quoting NC1844v (Reply 2):
Of course the 747-8i would have become a great addition to the fleet.

I doubt it. If UA can't use it and DL can't use it, NW wouldn't have used it.


User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2645 times:

Longhaul fleet: A330s and 787 maybe A350s as a larger aircraft above the 787

757s would have been the new "Dc 9" in NWs fleet and would have stayed for a looooong time  

Shorthaul fleet A32x and Embraers, CRJs (NW would have been a potential CSeries customer in my opinion)



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined exactly 11 years ago today! , 2104 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2600 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 3):
I recall seeing a PowerPoint put out by NW back in '06 or so where they went over their future fleet plan. They indicated that the 787 would be a 744 replacement, which I found puzzling. While the 787 offers lower operational costs and similar range performance, it's certainly not a valid successor to the 744. The 744 is good on high-density, long-haul routes where multiple frequencies are either not important or not available (slot-restricted markets).

Would suggest that NW, if it had not merged with DL, was looking at more point-to-point flying to overfly NRT? I think if they'd taken their A340-300s in the 1990s there might have been a little bit more of that.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7982 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

Quoting NC1844v (Reply 2):
Of course the 747-8i would have become a great addition to the fleet.
Quoting DocLightning (Reply 4):
I doubt it. If UA can't use it and DL can't use it, NW wouldn't have used it.

Exactly; if NW could use the 748, why couldn't the current DL?

Also: do you think if the A340 line didn't shut down, they'd have taken some of their previously cancelled orders?
That's one thing I wish to see- a NW 340 or a DL 340



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2497 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 7):
Also: do you think if the A340 line didn't shut down, they'd have taken some of their previously cancelled orders?
That's one thing I wish to see- a NW 340 or a DL 340

No, absolutely not. Maybe some 2nd hand A340s if they would have come to the conclusion that they would need more range than a A330 had offered them.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7982 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2492 times:

Quoting columba (Reply 8):
No, absolutely not. Maybe some 2nd hand A340s if they would have come to the conclusion that they would need more range than a A330 had offered them.

I've always wondered but never got along to check, but what's the seating differences between the two?



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlinecolumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2440 times:

A330-300s and A340-300s are seatwise basically the same, as they share the same fuselage. Maybe NW would have been interested in the -600s series but I also doubt that they would have taken new build aircraft.


It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20368 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2361 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 7):
Also: do you think if the A340 line didn't shut down, they'd have taken some of their previously cancelled orders?

The current A330 is almost as capable as the A340. The 787 is more capable. I doubt they would have taken any A340s.


User currently offlineseabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 5856 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (2 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1940 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 7):
Also: do you think if the A340 line didn't shut down, they'd have taken some of their previously cancelled orders?

Not a chance. The A340 would have been exactly redundant with the 787.

Now secondhand A330s, on the other hand, would have been perfectly in keeping with NW's historical way of doing things. I think it's quite likely that they would have picked up a few early-2000s vintage A330-323X frames in the late 2010s as 787s were replacing them for other operators.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What If: Northwest-TWA Merger posted Fri Oct 8 2004 23:46:22 by 747buff
Pan Am Today, A What If Thread posted Thu Jun 23 2005 21:01:23 by MKEdude
What If WN Was Starting Up Today? posted Sat Mar 24 2001 21:51:35 by Kav92373
What If UA Got Rid Of Directv? posted Mon Jun 11 2012 11:52:30 by tommy767
What If 787 And A350 Kill The 777? (Part 2) posted Thu Mar 1 2012 03:12:31 by SA7700
What If 787 And A350 Kill The 777? (Part 1) posted Wed Feb 22 2012 03:01:54 by na
What If TWA Was Resurrected? posted Mon Apr 19 2010 09:09:29 by Blueman87
What If AS, QX, F9, And AA Sort Of Merged-ish? posted Sat Apr 17 2010 19:42:37 by Airport
What Happened To SQ951 Today? posted Tue Mar 23 2010 07:42:15 by afterburner
Merger "What If": United & AirTran posted Sat Mar 13 2010 13:18:35 by airmalejum