Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ANA Swaps 8's For 9's  
User currently offlinerotating14 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 663 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16950 times:

Hey folks,

I just read where ANA has opted to swap a number of their 787-8's for 787-9's. The frames that in question were to be delivered next year. The link below provides more insight to this. They must think that the -9 is a better fit for their long haul operation.


http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20120619/BLOG01/120619909

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16927 times:

It'll be interesting to see where they fly the -9's. Could they possibly visit JFK? How close to 777-300ER are the 787-9's?

User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12562 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16933 times:

Interesting:

Quote:

With the change, ANA has ordered a total of 36 787-8s, including those delivered, and 19 787-9 aircraft.

So not a huge swing.

Maybe now the QF guy can get a few earlier birds and quit his moaning.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16935 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, NH made a partial switch of 15 frames a couple of years back and at least some of those planes will be used as direct replacements for their domestic 777-200 fleet as the 787-9 and 777-200 have effectively the same cabin length.

Looks like they're going to use them to start replacing their international 777-200 fleet, as well.


User currently offlinerotating14 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 663 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16703 times:

Quote:
Looks like they're going to use them to start replacing their international 777-200 fleet, as well.

How old are those T7-200's?


User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16554 times:

Quoting rotating14 (Reply 4):
Quote:
Looks like they're going to use them to start replacing their international 777-200 fleet, as well.

How old are those T7-200's?

I believe they took delivery of a couple more PW4090 772ERs very recently.

Their international 772ERs are not in need of replacement. Their 772A and 773As will go first, I'd have thought. Got to be getting up there on cycles, been hammered to death.



What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlinestarrion From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1126 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16282 times:

That would probably account for the 'teens frames that will be going to Lion then.


Knowledge Replaces Fear
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 16226 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting starrion (Reply 6):
That would probably account for the 'teens frames that will be going to Lion then.

LN11, LN12, LN13, LN14 and LN18 are all in long-term storage, so I could see the first four being released back to Boeing for re-assignment.


User currently offlineSomeone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3388 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 16092 times:

Quote:
ANA said it has switched an order for four 787-8 aircraft, which were to be delivered beginning in 2013, to an order for four of Boeing's larger version of the Dreamliner, the 787-9.

This also implies deferring 4 787-8s to whenever the -9s kan be delivered


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 15875 times:

Quoting Someone83 (Reply 8):

I think it's more an implication that NH don't want those very early frames based on performance?



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinestarrion From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1126 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 15639 times:

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 9):
I think it's more an implication that NH don't want those very early frames based on performance?

I think ANA has been aware for some time of the performance of the



Knowledge Replaces Fear
User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 15605 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 3):
Looks like they're going to use them to start replacing their international 777-200 fleet, as well.

ANA has 217 and 306 seat versions of the 77E . Proportionally they could supplement their 158-seat 788's with something like 204 seat 789's. This might be the attraction .


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 15519 times:

Quoting starrion (Reply 10):
I think ANA has been aware for some time of the performance of the

And have likely been negotiating with Boeing all that time to not take those aircraft.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 15416 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 9):
I think it's more an implication that NH don't want those very early frames based on performance?

They've taken the three worst frames around - LN7, LN8 and LN9 - so I see this more as a combination of NH starting to grow international and needing larger frames and also accepting that Boeing will not have the other frames (LN11-14) ready before they could get new-build 787-9s. And for Boeing, they have customers willing to wait for those frames.

So while it's not true serendipity, NH and Boeing are both making lemonade out of lemons.


User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 15151 times:

The 789 at about 126t OEW should be good for about 41t payload based on a HND-FRA scheduled time of 12hr 10min. Fuel burn would be about 71t. Its cargo space permits a good payload with the premium cabin layout that ANA use on many of their international routes.

User currently offlineSASMD82 From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 771 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 14979 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

In an other thread not so long ago, there was discussed that ANA was sooo happy with the 788.....oh well....

This choice is very logical though (CASM e.g.).


User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12562 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 14903 times:

I don't know about you, but I'm at sixes and sevens on ANA's -8s and -9s!  


Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineebj1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 14903 times:

Quoting SASMD82 (Reply 15):
In an other thread not so long ago, there was discussed that ANA was sooo happy with the 788.....oh well....

I don't see anything in this thread that suggests ANA isn't happy with the -8. As has been suggested earlier in this thread, they need more of the -9s. They're still taking a goodly number of the -8s.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineKDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 14374 times:

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 5):
Their international 772ERs are not in need of replacement. Their 772A and 773As will go first, I'd have thought. Got to be getting up there on cycles, been hammered to death.

Maximum utilization for maximum profit, one could presume.

I believe Gigneil and Stitch predicted some time ago that the -9 would end up being the prefered bird for such use.


User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7560 posts, RR: 18
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 13325 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
LN11, LN12, LN13, LN14 and LN18 are all in long-term storage, so I could see the first four being released back to Boeing for re-assignment.

Weren't a few of these going to LA ?



次は、渋谷、渋谷。出口は、右側です。電車とホームの間は広く開いておりますので、足元に注意下さい。
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 12935 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 19):
Weren't a few of these going to LA?

LAN are tasked LN10 and LN16 and I believe in the 787 production thread a post was made that the airline intends to take them.


User currently offlineZKOJH From China, joined Sep 2004, 1703 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12337 times:

They would be looking at 2Q of 2014 after NZ for theses birds then, as long as the 787-9 stays on track now.  


NZ 787-9 flying between PVG - AKL ! CAN'T WAIT!!
User currently offlineseabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 5467 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12311 times:

Quoting starrion (Reply 6):
That would probably account for the 'teens frames that will be going to Lion then.

Hmm? Where did this rumor come from? First I've heard of it.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 23, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12160 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting seabosdca (Reply 22):
Hmm? Where did this rumor come from? First I've heard of it.

Batik Air, the long-haul subsidiary of Lion Air, placed an order for five 787-8s and it has been reported that they will come from the LN10-LN19 block currently parked at PAE. The order was firmed last week and reported on Boeing's O&D page, attributed to Lion Air.

[Edited 2012-06-19 16:20:05]

User currently offlineseabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 5467 posts, RR: 6
Reply 24, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12091 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 23):
Batik Air, the long-haul subsidiary of Lion Air, placed an order for five 787-8s

Thanks! I saw that part...

Quoting Stitch (Reply 23):
and it has been reported that they will come from the LN10-LN19 block currently parked at PAE

...but not that part.

An interesting development.


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21532 posts, RR: 59
Reply 25, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12204 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 13):
They've taken the three worst frames around - LN7, LN8 and LN9

And may have said "no mas" and negotiated to reject frames in the teens.

The real question becomes will other carriers want them, or are they some more VIP aircraft looking for a customer?

They might make good Air Force 2 aircraft in the future...



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31001 posts, RR: 86
Reply 26, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 12025 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 25):
The real question becomes will other carriers want them, or are they some more VIP aircraft looking for a customer?

Batik Air is evidently good for five, which would be all of NH's frames.


User currently offlineYULWinterSkies From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2179 posts, RR: 5
Reply 27, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 9232 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
How close to 777-300ER are the 787-9's?

How close based on what? Range? Capacity? Capacity-wise, nowhere close, rather near the A330-300.



When I doubt... go running!
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4397 posts, RR: 2
Reply 28, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 8199 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
How close to 777-300ER are the 787-9's?

About 3/4 in size, so far away. Near to the 777-200ER, but still slightly smaller, but if you put 9 abreast in the 789 you can get the same number of pax with lower comfort and much lower CASM.


User currently onlineCXB77L From Australia, joined Feb 2009, 2614 posts, RR: 5
Reply 29, posted (2 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6594 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
How close to 777-300ER are the 787-9's?

NH's 77Ws are configured in a 215-seat and 262-seat configurations (will be reduced to 212 and 250 seats respectively with the imminent introduction of premium economy).

The 77W is significantly larger in terms of cabin area, but if NH adopts a higher density set-up on the 787-9 it could easily be fitted with 215 seats or more, although given their preference for low density configurations on its long haul aircraft, I believe that is unlikely to happen.

Range wise, the 787-9 has the 77W beat. While the 77W's maximum range is 7930nm, the 787-9 can fly between 8000 and 8500nm.

The 787-9 seems to be the natural replacement for the 777-200ER as it is more or less the same size, but it isn't quite big enough to replace the 777-300ER.



Boeing 777 fanboy
User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 4988 posts, RR: 5
Reply 30, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 5644 times:

Quoting CXB77L (Reply 29):
Range wise, the 787-9 has the 77W beat. While the 77W's maximum range is 7930nm, the 787-9 can fly between 8000 and 8500nm

To get over 8000nm with the standard 285 seat configuration the OEW has to be about 120t. This seems unlikely at EIS. The usual ratio of MTOW/OEW of ~.5 suggests an OEW of ~125t which would put it at ~ 7600nm.


User currently offlineKDAYflyer From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

Quoting seabosdca (Reply 24):
Quoting Stitch (Reply 23):Batik Air, the long-haul subsidiary of Lion Air, placed an order for five 787-8s
Thanks! I saw that part...

Quoting Stitch (Reply 23):and it has been reported that they will come from the LN10-LN19 block currently parked at PAE
...but not that part.

An interesting development.

Indeed. I wonder how many early frames are likely to run into this scenario? Have any other carriers rejected the earlier frames who have been picked up by another carrier?


User currently offlineFyano773 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 784 posts, RR: 1
Reply 32, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4186 times:

@Stitch,

Do you happen to know about the slots or leases cancelled by Air Seychelles? IIRC, they were due to delivery by mid 2013 from ILFC.

Regards...


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13130 posts, RR: 100
Reply 33, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3319 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Stitch (Reply 13):
They've taken the three worst frames around - LN7, LN8 and LN9

Sorry to nitpick, but ANA was offered the prototypes that Boeing later put on their books. So not quite the worst of the 787s. But close.  
Quoting Stitch (Reply 13):
and needing larger frames and also accepting that Boeing will not have the other frames (LN11-14) ready before they could get new-build 787-9s.

I suspect this is the prime reason for the switch. My thoughts are:
1. Once 789s are available, why take the 788? That is analogous to taking 762ERs when 763ERs are available. We all know how the resale game played out there...
2. Guage has some to do with it. I suspect resale value also played a role.

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 25):
And may have said "no mas" and negotiated to reject frames in the teens.

Its all a question of price too. I'm sure ANA made a low ball offer. It is not surprising another customer might be willing to pay more. That is just business. Boeing is going to negotiate to maximize revenue and profit.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Panda! Special ANA Livery For 20 Years To China posted Sat May 5 2007 19:41:43 by Cloudyapple
ANA Announces Cabin Layout For 788 Domestic posted Wed Jan 18 2012 00:39:21 by carpethead
ANA Modifies Livery For 787s Delivered In FY2012 posted Tue Dec 27 2011 16:19:29 by bioyuki
CO-UA-ANA Anti-trust For Pacific posted Wed Dec 23 2009 16:49:56 by Globaldude
EgyptAir Swaps Two 777s For Eight 737-800s posted Sat Aug 8 2009 03:26:45 by Aviationbuff
Is CDG The Only International 747 Route For ANA? posted Thu Aug 6 2009 16:37:33 by 777-500er
Kingfisher Longhaul Plans - Swaps 5 X A345 For A332 posted Mon Aug 25 2008 06:38:39 by JerseyFlyer
Working For JAL/ANA If You Are Not Japanese posted Mon Aug 4 2008 12:31:44 by Cessna172RG
Use ANA/Hawaiian Points For A UA Flight? posted Wed Jul 2 2008 15:01:05 by DL767captain
ANA Will Pay Cash For 10 787 posted Thu Nov 29 2007 09:03:57 by USADreamliner
ANA Announces Cabin Layout For 788 Domestic posted Wed Jan 18 2012 00:39:21 by carpethead
ANA Modifies Livery For 787s Delivered In FY2012 posted Tue Dec 27 2011 16:19:29 by bioyuki
CO-UA-ANA Anti-trust For Pacific posted Wed Dec 23 2009 16:49:56 by Globaldude
EgyptAir Swaps Two 777s For Eight 737-800s posted Sat Aug 8 2009 03:26:45 by Aviationbuff
Is CDG The Only International 747 Route For ANA? posted Thu Aug 6 2009 16:37:33 by 777-500er
Kingfisher Longhaul Plans - Swaps 5 X A345 For A332 posted Mon Aug 25 2008 06:38:39 by JerseyFlyer
Working For JAL/ANA If You Are Not Japanese posted Mon Aug 4 2008 12:31:44 by Cessna172RG
Use ANA/Hawaiian Points For A UA Flight? posted Wed Jul 2 2008 15:01:05 by DL767captain