Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Easyjet Closes Down Madrid Base  
User currently offlinespantax From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 323 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13804 times:

Only in Spanish:

http://economia.elpais.com/economia/.../actualidad/1340206339_153860.html

But it says:

- beginning winter 2012-2013
- reason: high taxes, at Barcelona and Madrid taxes should be increased by 50%
- 8 planes leaving, 310 people
- Easyjet expects to reduce by 7% its flights to/from Spain

Well, good news for a highly tricky Spanish market. I presume Ryanair is going to take advantage of the situation.


A300.10.19.20.21.30.40,AN26,ATR42,AVR146,B717.27.37.47.57.77,B1900,C130,C212,CH47,CRJ200.700,DC9,DHC4,ERJ135.190,F27
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4461 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13661 times:

Quoting spantax (Thread starter):
- Easyjet expects to reduce by 7% its flights to/from Spain

AMS-BCN is rumoured to go away

Quoting spantax (Thread starter):
Well, good news for a highly tricky Spanish market. I presume Ryanair is going to take advantage of the situation.

I reckon that FR probably will have to pay these increased taxes as well (at least if they want to continue using MAD).


User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2656 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13432 times:

U2 isn't the kind of LCC which would look to relocate to an alternate airport when the premium one it uses has risen taxes and operating costs.
Be sure that Ciudad Real (Madrid Sur) airport isn't to MAD what LTN is to LHR.



I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlinemigair54 From Spain, joined Jun 2007, 1781 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13441 times:

Very bad news for people in Madrid.

Quoting LJ (Reply 1):
I reckon that FR probably will have to pay these increased taxes as well (at least if they want to continue using MAD).

For sure they will have to pay if they want to continue using MAD, no airline will get a discount.


User currently offlineDunaA320 From UK - England, joined Feb 2009, 614 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 12822 times:

In English

http://corporate.easyjet.com/media/l.../news-year-2012/20-06-2012-en.aspx

A sad day for all the crew in Madrid, especially feel for the ones I know.

I know that over the past year the MAD operation has been downsized considerably with routes being axed as well as aircraft and crew being moved to other bases. Just a shame it hasn't managed to work out in the end.


User currently offlineTalaier From Spain, joined May 2008, 490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 12263 times:

Blaming in on taxes is a nice way of putting it but I very much doubt that is the whole story. MAD is a bloodbath in terms of prices and yields, especially now that IB has tak

And I doubt FR will take over too much. There is still overcapacity in the market.


User currently offlineBasilFawlty From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 1329 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 11369 times:

So, it will be interesting to see which routes will survive and which routes will be axed.


'Every year donkeys and mules kill more people than plane crashes'
User currently onliner2rho From Germany, joined Feb 2007, 2687 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 9081 times:

This is terrible news for MAD customers. It is one thing for U2 to make capacity cuts, and a whole other to close one of their major bases with 300 employees. While it is true that airport fees (not taxes) at MAD and BCN have increased, it has been only to bring them more in line with other EU airports as up to now they had been significantly cheaper. The construction costs of the new terminals have to be paid off.

But if U2 claims (whether it is true, I have my doubts) they can't make any money in MAD... what about FR? Surely, airport fees would make up a higher proportion of their ticket price. And FR are usually the first ones to leave when an airport increases its fees. There's definitely something more behind this.

Either way, this is a clear victory for IB Express. UX could benefit too.


User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19236 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8936 times:

Quoting r2rho (Reply 7):
But if U2 claims (whether it is true, I have my doubts) they can't make any money in MAD

Not directly related, but EZY also ceased all their various Morocco-Spain services.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineBA777 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 2179 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8896 times:

An interesting decision, I have seen plenty of U2 flights in MAD packed to the rafters..but that doesn't mean they make a lot of money. Time will tell how other airlines react to this. I imagine IB express will try to accelerate their growth to maximise summer profits, or bide their time to make a plan for next year.

User currently offlineAquila3 From Italy, joined Nov 2010, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 months 6 days ago) and read 7866 times:

Sad decision and sad times for Spain as well.
I hope they do not decide to do the same with MXP. That would be the "coup de grace" for the airport and for the economy of the area as well. The politcs aiming to raise taxes for covering all the money that they waste does not pay.



chi vola vale chi vale vola chi non vola è un vile
User currently offlineTalaier From Spain, joined May 2008, 490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 6862 times:

Quoting BasilFawlty (Reply 6):

So, it will be interesting to see which routes will survive and which routes will be axed.

UK routes should be relatively safe. Italy and France are the ones I see with more potential to fall off the cliff.


User currently offlineacelanzarote From Spain, joined Nov 2005, 845 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 6635 times:

easyjet seem to be re-trenching a bit, and certainly in Spain/the Canaries.I don´t believe the taxes at MAD or BCN are the real reasion, with Spanair having also left the field I would have thought easy would have picked some of their pax up for a start.
Wonder if anywhere else after MAD is heading for the chop....



from the Island with sun and great photo's.. Why not visit Lanzarote
User currently offlineLehovec From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 296 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 6457 times:

Well Carolyn McCall said in her communication:
"The Madrid base is delivering returns well below all of easyJet’s other bases. This is due to a combination of over capacity in the Spanish airline market, leading to low revenue per passenger, combined with high airport charges which have more than doubled in the last two years and will be subject to further above inflation increases in the coming years."

She also said:
"As you know we have tried to improve the profitability of Madrid in recent years through removing underperforming routes and attempting to increase revenue through a range of marketing and sales initiatives. However, any improvements have been more than offset by significant increases in the airport charges."

So, it is not just the fees that killed MAD base but they certainly were the last straw. Probably most of the routes that can be operated by non MAD based a/c will be kept.

Hopefully there will be positions for all crew at other bases. I can see a/c going to France and Italy.


User currently offlineTWA85 From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 6100 times:

Would there be any bennift if U2 and IAG were to develop some sort of partnership in which IAG/VY operate services from Spain and possibly LHR, while U2 operates services throughout the rest of Europe?

User currently offlineTalaier From Spain, joined May 2008, 490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4560 times:

Quoting TWA85 (Reply 14):
Would there be any bennift if U2 and IAG were to develop some sort of partnership in which IAG/VY operate services from Spain and possibly LHR, while U2 operates services throughout the rest of Europe?

Not really. They target different passengers. U2 wants point to point. IB wants short haul to feed long haul. Not too long ago only London, Paris and Brussels actually made money out of short haul routes from MAD (with IB's previous cost structure).


User currently offlinef4f3a From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4532 times:

A bit of a shock
To pull out of Madrid I think France is still expanding for ezy and is unlikely to go
The same way. Higher yields and less competition make it a better
Prospect. Italy is also quite big 15 plus a/c in mxp alone can't see that one
Going . I think maybe sxf may be the next to give concern
New airport charges and problems with staff there etc.

The key here is mad may be making money but as with U2
Before they can make more elsewhere . They are limited
In expansion plans due to stelios argument so have to be ruthless
With roi on each aircraft.

The best routes will prob be kept via w patterns etc while dropping
The bad ones


User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4461 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4344 times:

Quoting r2rho (Reply 7):
Either way, this is a clear victory for IB Express. UX could benefit too.

But the question is whether IB Express and UX can make money in these markets. It's relatively easy for easyJet to redeploy their aircraft in more profitable markets. However, IB Express and UX don't have this option, thus must stick to the Spanish market or downsize.


User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7372 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

Quoting spantax (Thread starter):
- reason: high taxes, at Barcelona and Madrid taxes should be increased by 50%

Taxes on the airline or the residents? I guess they have to pay off their country's massive debt.  


User currently offlinereifel From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 1364 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 4287 times:

However IB Express is also heavily used as feeder for mainline IB and for other Oneworld partners (i.e. AA/LA). This will give them easialy more loads and yields, since it's part of a european/medium haul/long haul tiket.
UX is a little different, as they don't have such a big "hub" operation in Madrid, but they still can feed their longhaul flights to South America/Caribbean and their few US destinations, but obvisouly in a much lower scale than IB and Oneworld (UX can't really feed a lot of Skyteam longhaul in MAD...).

Everything that U2 and FR can't.


User currently offlinerichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3755 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4252 times:

Quoting Lehovec (Reply 13):
Well Carolyn McCall said in her communication:
"The Madrid base is delivering returns well below all of easyJet’s other bases. This is due to a combination of over capacity in the Spanish airline market

Was this over capacity present when they set up the base at MAD?

Do the Madrid residents prefer to fly on airlines without free seating and speedy boarding?


User currently offlinereifel From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 1364 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

Quoting richardw (Reply 20):
Do the Madrid residents prefer to fly on airlines without free seating and speedy boarding?

Maybe someone in Spain can tell more, but my impression is that in Spain basically all the airlines are similar when it comes to point to point...
VY, FR, U2, IB Express... All serve major airports, all charge for nearly everything (however some of them would assign you a seat)...
Now compare this with IB, ex JK, UX (which could be considered as "legacy" carrier) on the same routes, and servicewise there is no real difference: No free food on board, no drinks etc...

Obviously when it come to frequent travellers, some offer frequent flyer programs, some have lounges, some offer hub operations (IB, IB Express, UX, VY), but once you are on the plane the difference in my eyes is marginal....

All Spanish airlines, except maybe Air Nostrum, from a passenger point of view run a low cost operation once seated when it comes to intraeuropean flights.


User currently offlineGT4EZY From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2007, 1794 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3973 times:

MAD wasn't performing. Increase the fee's at MAD and it's not going to help that situation. I don't think it was a Ryanair style knee jerk reaction.

In response to some previous comments.

MXP: Safe. Even with a failing economy Italy is still important and MXP is EZY's second largest base. LIke other bases however, a reduction in aircraft is always possible but in MXP's case I think we'd be talking two or three.

France: Alot of focus has been placed on France and this will continue. EZY is determined to increase market share in this important market.

SXF/BER: New airport next year but in my opinion, this is perhaps the Continental base that would see a similar situation as MAD rather than MXP etc. Still unlikely though.

Despite all that, aircraft will be redeployed between various bases. The economic uncertainty plus the fleet cap (Thanks to Stelios) means that aircraft may get sent to where they can make the absolute best return. Gone are the days, atleast for now, where delivery's come thick and fast and Easy could literally throw them across Europe. Opportunities and expansion will probably come at the cost of other bases. Probably not base closures but certainly the number of based aircraft at a base could change one way or the other.



Proud to fly from Manchester!
User currently offlinespantax From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 323 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 4 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3776 times:

Quoting reifel (Reply 21):
All Spanish airlines, except maybe Air Nostrum, from a passenger point of view run a low cost operation once seated when it comes to intraeuropean flights.

Since a couple of months ago Air Nostrum charges also for beverages-food on board.



A300.10.19.20.21.30.40,AN26,ATR42,AVR146,B717.27.37.47.57.77,B1900,C130,C212,CH47,CRJ200.700,DC9,DHC4,ERJ135.190,F27
User currently offlineUALWN From Andorra, joined Jun 2009, 2858 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (2 years 4 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 18):
Taxes on the airline or the residents? I guess they have to pay off their country's massive debt.  

At the end of 2011 Spain's debt stood at 68% of GDP. Large, but not particularly massive when compared to that of, say, Germany (82%), the USA (103%) or Canada (85%).



AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/AB6/310/319/320/321/330/340/380
25 r2rho : It is true that there is cut-throat competition in the Spanish airline market, together with UK the most competitive in Europe. Air traffic at MAD has
26 Talaier : They are all similar in terms of service but their income streams are different. Given competition in national routes is brutal (high speed train + o
27 RCS763AV : No no no! Not only is MAD a much more expensive airport to fly out of than the other spanish stations, one of the cheaper options is leaving!
28 richardw : Is it the Ryanair effect or the airport charges effect that upsets their operations? EZY tried Irish routes from LGW and Ryanair competed head on, EZY
29 Pe@rson : Almost certainly the increased fees and that MAD has become something of a competitive bloodbath. But about EZY and FR, a more important question is
30 LJ : Feeding the long haul operation doesn't mean automatically a higher yield. It depends on how IB distribute the revenue from the fare between its long
31 richardw : That may be currently but considering the route history Were the under performing routes because of FR?[Edited 2012-06-23 06:35:02]
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EasyJet To Set Up Base At Doncaster Robin Hood posted Wed Dec 9 2009 21:25:00 by Gilesdavies
Fly Yeti Halts Operations, Closes Down. posted Wed Jul 2 2008 04:06:33 by QatarA340
EasyJet Website Down posted Tue Nov 8 2005 01:33:50 by LeonB1985
Alaska Closes PDX FA Base posted Tue Jan 18 2005 20:16:18 by Jpdx
Woman Closes Down Airport To Avoid Holiday With BF posted Fri Apr 9 2004 12:18:58 by MAS A330
EasyJet Announces Major New Base At Berlin Schönef posted Wed Nov 5 2003 13:57:49 by Tombezza
Easyjet Suggests Madrid As New Base! posted Wed Mar 22 2006 14:22:46 by BDKLEZ
EasyJet To Open A Base In Lisbon posted Fri Oct 28 2011 05:14:32 by santos
Easyjet New Base Is Lisbon posted Mon Oct 18 2010 08:10:18 by Lehovec
Rumour: EasyJet's New Base AMS posted Tue Aug 10 2010 11:28:45 by Lehovec