Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Latam Plans To Decide On Alliance In 6-12 Months  
User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8862 posts, RR: 5
Posted (2 years 6 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5882 times:

The LATAM alliance decision will be confirmed within the next six to twelve months. It's interesting to note that while LAN stays in oneworld; TAM may operate as an unaligned carrier for an unknown period of time.

Quote:
The chief of LAN’s international division, Damian Scokin, told CAPA at last week’s IATA AGM in Beijing that LATAM expects to make an alliance decision in the next six to 12 months...Mr Scokin confirms that having LAN stay in oneworld while having TAM become unaligned is an option now being reviewed by LATAM. This scenario could be attractive as it could allow TAM to continue codesharing with the over 10 Star members serving Brazil. Joining oneworld could force TAM to end these relationships but it is also possible for TAM to broker carve outs as part of a deal for joining oneworld, something oneworld would likely agree to given the value TAM would add if it became a member.
Avianca-TACA and Copa put Star on top in Latin America but the victory will be short-lived

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinecrAAzy From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 803 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 6 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5836 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

A rather drawn out process but no big surprise given they were supposed to have made a decision back in April.

Serving as an unaligned carrier would also let TAM begin codesharing with OW members, specifically AA since they are ending their codeshare agreement with GOL in August this year.

I wonder if any of this timing has to do with trying to delay the decision long enough for US-Brasil open skies to go into full effect so AA/TAM won't have to give up any GRU/GIG landing slots?


User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8862 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (2 years 6 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5780 times:

Quoting crAAzy (Reply 1):
Serving as an unaligned carrier would also let TAM begin codesharing with OW members, specifically AA since they are ending their codeshare agreement with GOL in August this year.

The last line of the statement is very interesting. AA was forced to discontinue code-sharing with G3 due to Delta's investment in GOL. Besides, does AA really need to code-share with TAM since AA serves seven destinations with-in Brazil and plans on adding two more new destinations? Regardless, TAM and AA will be competing heavily on most routes between the U.S. and Brazil. AA will deploy their B77Ws to Brazil, and TAM will deploy their B77Ws to MIA...


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8496 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (2 years 6 months 23 hours ago) and read 5058 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SCL767 (Reply 2):
The last line of the statement is very interesting. AA was forced to discontinue code-sharing with G3 due to Delta's investment in GOL. Besides, does AA really need to code-share with TAM since AA serves seven destinations with-in Brazil and plans on adding two more new destinations? Regardless, TAM and AA will be competing heavily on most routes between the U.S. and Brazil. AA will deploy their B77Ws to Brazil, and TAM will deploy their B77Ws to MIA...

YES they each need feed at the foreign end. While they compete between JFK & MIA and GIG & GRU they need feed from the other, in Brazil AA from TAM and in the USA TAM from AA. Brazil is a vast country and TAM flies to many remote areas away from the "Capitol" cities. AA will never be able to cover Brazil like TAM or that other internartional airline that blankets the country, TAP Air Portugal.


User currently offlinePRAirbus From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2005, 1144 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (2 years 6 months 21 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld!!!!! I hope oneworld does not let this one slide!!!!! :O

User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8862 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (2 years 6 months 21 hours ago) and read 4594 times:

Quoting PRAirbus (Reply 4):
oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld, oneworld!!!!! I hope oneworld does not let this one slide!!!!! :O

TAM will leave the Star Alliance and will most likely end its code-share agreements with those alliance members soon:
LAN And TAM Launch Latam Airlines Group S.A. (by SCL767 Jun 22 2012 in Civil Aviation)


User currently offlinerafabullara From Brazil, joined Dec 2010, 38 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 6 months 18 hours ago) and read 3673 times:

TAM will not remain in Star for 6-12 months! This is impossible, now that AV/TA is now part of Star Alliance too!

User currently offlineExL10Mktg From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 66 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 6 months 17 hours ago) and read 3445 times:

If TAM joins oneworld than of course code sharing with AA (and everyone else in the alliance) will be part of the deal. As an independent, I'm not so sure they will jump back in bed with AA. I happen to know that they were not terribly happy with that arrangement when they had it a few years ago. I'm not sure of the specifics but the feeling went very high up the management chain.

User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 6 months 17 hours ago) and read 3346 times:

The question I still have is ATI between AA and JJ. Can they apply before 2015 in anticipation of the open skies implementation, or do they have to wait until the treaty is in effect?


If granted, all arguments about competition between the two will become irrelevant.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SAA To Decide On Fleet Decisions In 2008 posted Thu Nov 22 2007 22:36:18 by Flying-Tiger
Mayrhuber: LH "Not In A Hurry" To Decide On 748I posted Tue Nov 14 2006 08:55:38 by Leelaw
RAF Jets Scrambled 6 Times In 12 Months To Escort. posted Wed Nov 1 2006 21:27:23 by Cumulus
MAS To Join An Alliance In 2 Months posted Sun Apr 4 2004 22:43:32 by Aussieboggie
Virgin Australia: No Plans To Join Star Alliance, posted Thu Apr 5 2012 23:28:47 by ZKOJH
JAL To Boston On 787 In April 2012 posted Fri Aug 19 2011 18:37:37 by vulindlela744
Plans To Consolidate Star Alliance To DME? posted Fri Dec 31 2010 07:14:36 by planenutz
British Airways To Decide On Big Twin This Year posted Mon Jan 12 2009 09:31:05 by Keesje
D/FW To FRA On DL In The 1990's posted Sun Jun 1 2008 17:44:18 by IrishAyes
Atlas Blue To Decide On New Fleet posted Tue Apr 8 2008 07:15:47 by Flying-Tiger