Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
2 Months On: JL Boston 787 Flights  
User currently offlineSQ452 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1110 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 17169 times:

It's been about 2 months since the launch of 787 to the US and the first non-stop flight from Boston to Asia on JL's 787. I read that initial forward bookings back when the flight launched were healthy.

Anyone have an update as to how the flight is doing? What are the load-factors like, How many passengers O&D and how many connect to points elsewhere, cargo etc. etc. etc.

Sure the crews and airport staff are in a rhythm now. Sure this flight will be around for a long long time.


SIN > CVG > BOS
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJAAlbert From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1548 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 16141 times:

Good question. I am boarding a UAL flight at BOS right now and the 787 just taxied by! I almost caused a scene but contained myself. I knew just by seeing the tail its a 787. Huge engines in comparison to the fuselage.

User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 939 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 14543 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I hope JAL finds sucess at BOS

Don't know why but I feel JAL will do better at San Diego than Boston


User currently offlinepenguins From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 266 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 14315 times:

I lived in Boston and there were many Japanese people who I went to school with. They were going to Japan almost every summer and were usually doing so through ORD. It seems like there is a market in Boston from what I have observed.

User currently offlineflyby519 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 14039 times:

I'd bet there would be a healthy amount of fresh tuna being shipped back as cargo to NRT.


These postings or comments are not a company-sponsored source of communication.
User currently onlinecivetfive From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 9241 times:

There is probably significant first-mover advantage in being the only nonstop Asian service. Not sure how well JL would so side-by-side with, say KE, but for now its JL's market to lose.

User currently offlineairportugal310 From Palau, joined Apr 2004, 3573 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 9169 times:

I finally got a great sight this past week of the 787 as it was passing overhead on approach to the 4's while I was sitting on the Neponset Bridge...my best friend commented on how "crazy the wings were curving"  

That's flex for ya   



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlineGoBoeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2682 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 8647 times:

It's almost more than just flexing on the 787...more like envisioning a model airplane made of something flexible hanging from the ceiling with fishing line tied to the wingtips.

User currently offlineMcoov From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 128 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 8568 times:

So who's next into BOS? I'd heard of direct service to PEK on HNA, but that didn't work out.

User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 544 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 8298 times:

What I'd like to know, preferably from seasoned travellers who might be able to make a comparison, is if there is a discernible difference in the cabin humidity level corresponding to less dry nose/throat, & generally less effect from jet lag flying long haul across so many time zones. That's what a lot of Boeing's marketing promoted. Now, is the proof in the pudding??

User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 8248 times:

I flew the 787 from Frankfurt to Haneda, and no, there was no discernible difference in cabin humidity. Let's face it - your basically asking if there is a difference between 5% and 15%. 15% is still extremely low.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 7106 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 9):
What I'd like to know, preferably from seasoned travellers who might be able to make a comparison, is if there is a discernible difference in the cabin humidity level corresponding to less dry nose/throat, & generally less effect from jet lag flying long haul across so many time zones.

I absolutely notice the difference. I get completely dried out on normal aircraft for any flight over about 3 hours. I've gone over 18hrs on a 787 and noticed no significant drying.

Quoting MEL (Reply 10):
Let's face it - your basically asking if there is a difference between 5% and 15%.

I agree that's the question; it's obviously somewhat an individual effect but, for me, it makes a huge difference. Statistics are funny things...you can take the same number and say the 787 has three times as much moisture in the air.

Tom.


User currently offlinecol From Malaysia, joined Nov 2003, 2093 posts, RR: 22
Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6715 times:

Tom, How is the noise level in the cabin? I cannot wait to try the 787, as I hear some great things, but you seem to fly a lot so an idea would be great.

User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6243 times:

Quoting col (Reply 12):
Tom, How is the noise level in the cabin?

It depends where you're sitting. Forward of the wing it's incredibly quiet (quietest Boeing I've ever flown). The engine noise is very low throughout. Aft of the wing you start to get more noticeable air noise and, at the extreme aft, you start to hear the supplemental cooling units. Overall it's quieter than any other Boeing and quieter than most Airbuses I've flown (but I haven't flown the A380).

There's also a pretty noticeable transient as the center hydraulic pumps spin up to high speed but that only happens at takeoff and approach when there's lots of other stuff going on anyway so I don't find it obtrusive for the majority of the flight.

Quoting col (Reply 12):
I cannot wait to try the 787, as I hear some great things, but you seem to fly a lot so an idea would be great.

I have a skewed impression since most of my time is on the flight deck (which is *by far* the quietest flight deck I've ever experienced) but I've gotten my share of cabin time and I find it very pleasant. The noise is low, the humidity and pressure are high; I get off a 787 feeling like I've just been at the office, rather than been on an airplane for hours.

Tom.


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8189 posts, RR: 24
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5950 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 2):
Don't know why but I feel JAL will do better at San Diego than Boston

Dude have you ever been to Boston? You can't throw a stick without hitting a gaggle of Japanese tourists with their tiny new high tech cameras. I have a feeling the route is doing just fine.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlinewjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5103 posts, RR: 18
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5715 times:

Couldn't agree with you more, Tom. Haven't flown the 787, but I think that most people would notice a 10% humidity difference. As an example, 55% is a pretty typical setting for a dehumidifier, and the humidity will swing a bit around that and end up with something at the fringe of okay. Let that 55% rise to 65%, most people are feeling pretty darn sticky. In my bedroom right now, the humidity is 51% and I'm comfortable-ish. An hour ago, it was at 58% and I turned on the air conditioner because it felt sticky. So 10% is a noticeable difference at the moist end of the spectrum. I have to believe that it's a godsend when it's bone-dry.

I think that the perception of this stuff probably varies from person-to-person, and the effects can be subtle. For example, I have flown the 717 a lot. In more recent years with FL, but back when I was flying TW a lot, I found myself connecting from DC9 to 717 or vise-versa not infrequently. After one of my first couple-hour flights on the 717, with the 100% fresh air and improved cabin environment control, I found myself feeling unusually...I don't know the exact word...maybe "fresh". I remembered thinking that it was an unusually-nice flight, and didn't give it too much more thought. A little later that evening, I remembered the allegedly-improved cabin environment, and connected it to that feeling. A few subsequent times, I had the same reaction, and each time it was getting off the 717 leg. It was subtle, but I have to believe it was a result of the improved system over the DC9. Of course, most people don't know what's going on with the aircraft systems, but it can't hurt the airline if pax get off the plane feeling good and like it was a nice flight.


User currently offlinejustloveplanes From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1036 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 5629 times:

Physiology plays a part too I think. Long flights dehydrate me now, and I never noticed before.

Some people will notice more than others for sure, I can vouch for that.


User currently offlineMAV88 From United States of America, joined May 2011, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5061 times:

I'd be interested to see how loads are doing now that the route has been running for 2 months. Once Massport releases their number for May we will be able to at least find out the load factor for the flights.

User currently offlineordjoe From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 691 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4965 times:

It is my understanding fares are really high for this route compared to if one connected through EWR or JFK. I could see this doing well, BOS has tons of biotech, venture capital and other finance, big name law firms, tech, and all the universities especially MIT and Harvard. Those types will pay the fares to avoid connections
Cargo could see doing well, especially overnight

Quoting g500 (Reply 2):
Don't know why but I feel JAL will do better at San Diego than Boston

San Diego will probably do fine, but to me it seems that BOS is more of a business center whereas San Diego is more tourism. I could be wrong on that.


User currently offlineMAV88 From United States of America, joined May 2011, 183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4225 times:

Massport released the May numbers for BOS. A total of 6,121 flew on the route during May. That works out to an average load of 180 passengers a flight, or a 96.7% LF.

Will be interesting to see how these number adjust since the flight went daily starting June 1.


User currently offlinewjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5103 posts, RR: 18
Reply 20, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3819 times:

Also not to be overlooked is the fact, as my Japanese friends have explained to me, that native Japanese, as a broad sweeping generalization, will go out of their way to fly a Japanese carrier. As I understand it, despite their best efforts, other nations' carriers have a hard time providing the kind of attentive, mannered customer service and interactions that Japanese folks expect to and do receive at home. My Japanese friends will notice, and not be pleased by, things like f/a's standing in the galley kvetching during a flight, or even just walking past them without acknowledging that they have a request. In other words, conduct by service professionals that we Americans would just roll our eyes at and blow off, native Japanese will see as moderately serious misconduct, and it grates on them. If they don't have to deal with it, they will take the opportunity not to. Accordingly, it doesn't surprise me that JAL can get a premium fare and high load factor when providing this nonstop, because if the hometown carrier also has the convenient nonstop flight, the folks originating in Japan would really prefer to use it.

User currently offlinecol From Malaysia, joined Nov 2003, 2093 posts, RR: 22
Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3779 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
It depends where you're sitting. Forward of the wing it's incredibly quiet (quietest Boeing I've ever flown). The engine noise is very low throughout. Aft of the wing you start to get more noticeable air noise and, at the extreme aft, you start to hear the supplemental cooling units. Overall it's quieter than any other Boeing and quieter than most Airbuses I've flown (but I haven't flown the A380).

Thanks Tom, this is good news, was getting tired of all the white noise BS coming from some at Boeing. The 380 is very quiet, upstairs especially.

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
There's also a pretty noticeable transient as the center hydraulic pumps spin up to high speed but that only happens at takeoff and approach when there's lots of other stuff going on anyway so I don't find it obtrusive for the majority of the flight.

Pretty much same as all Airbus and Boeing, Airbus have that loud gear down locking sound to wake you up on approach, free wake up call.

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 13):
The noise is low, the humidity and pressure are high; I get off a 787 feeling like I've just been at the office, rather than been on an airplane for hours.

Again, this is great news, I have this feeling when travelling on the 380, so the 787 sounds like it will offer an even better ride for long haul travellers. I hope the 777NG picks up the lessons learnt from the 787 and not the 77W, in terms of PAX comfort.

Quoting MAV88 (Reply 19):
Massport released the May numbers for BOS. A total of 6,121 flew on the route during May. That works out to an average load of 180 passengers a flight, or a 96.7% LF.

Great start, maybe they could look at direct NRT to BDL, will save me the tunnels and pike run.


User currently offlineASA From Bangladesh, joined Dec 2010, 721 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3428 times:

Quoting MAV88 (Reply 19):
Massport released the May numbers for BOS. A total of 6,121 flew on the route during May. That works out to an average load of 180 passengers a flight, or a 96.7% LF.

Will be interesting to see how these number adjust since the flight went daily starting June 1.

That is HIGH ... great LF number!!! Meanwhile, BOS-NRT-??? fares on JAL or AA are still too high (beyond my reach   ) ... is that a sign of great demands and bookings for a while to come ... ... (and thus good load factors ahead as well?)


Edited for typoes

[Edited 2012-06-27 07:04:10]

User currently offlineJAAlbert From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1548 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3368 times:

Quoting ordjoe (Reply 18):
whereas San Diego is more tourism. I could be wrong on that.

San Diego is a big medical and technology research and development center. Qualcomm, which designs the chips that go in every cell phone in existence and many other electronics is headquartered here. Qualcomm alone sees many Asian visitors - engineers and marketing types - coming through its doors every day (per my partner who works there). I think JAL knew exactly what it was doing when it announced a non-stop flight!


User currently offlineSANMAN66 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 784 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3169 times:

Quoting JAAlbert (Reply 23):
Qualcomm, which designs the chips that go in every cell phone in existence and many other electronics is headquartered here. Qualcomm alone sees many Asian visitors - engineers and marketing types - coming through its doors every day (per my partner who works there). I think JAL knew exactly what it was doing when it announced a non-stop flight!

Qualcomm pretty much owns San Diego, especially in the Sorrento Valley area. More than half the skyscrapers
has the name "Qualcomm" on the side of them. As for flights, I've heard Qualcomm has their own fleet of private
jets to get the high-ranking executives around. JAL will also be available to connect the other Qualcomm employees
and other medical and technology firms with Japan. Also connecting navy personnel with military bases in the
Asia-Japan area.



PSA Gives you a lift!
25 ECFlyer : I work in Boston and tried to book BOS-NRT-HKG about a month ago (just to do it, and fly the long leg right out of Logan for once). I was unable to fi
26 SEPilot : You will probably be disappointed. The main reason that the 787 was able to increase cabin pressure and humidity is the CFRP fuselage; the pressure b
27 col : Thanks for heads up. I am hoping they get some internal noise out of it mostly. By this time there may be lots of 787/350/380 options, will be spoilt
28 SEPilot : I suspect that most of the noise improvement on the 787 and A380 is because the engines themselves are so quiet. I would expect any new tech engine t
29 WarmNuts : Don't forget San Diego also has the largest biotech presence in the country (even larger than Boston), and in addition to Qualcomm, both Nokia and So
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Odd Flight Numbers On JL Flights posted Wed May 4 2005 08:47:44 by Ktachiya
Meals On Late Night Intercontinental Flights posted Tue Sep 6 2011 09:26:26 by AirbusA6
DL Mainline On All JFK-BOS Flights. posted Tue Sep 15 2009 09:17:55 by JBAirwaysFan
DC3's Go On And On. Will The 787 Do The Same? posted Mon Jul 27 2009 11:00:31 by Art
Pax Loads On G4 GSP-PGD Flights? posted Tue Apr 28 2009 12:52:36 by GSPSPOT
Whats Going On With These US Flights? posted Thu Dec 18 2008 13:42:34 by Clrd4t8koff
Security Screening On Cape Air Codeshare Flights posted Mon Aug 11 2008 10:31:21 by Hatbutton
Forward Bookings On New Int'l Delta Flights? posted Tue Apr 8 2008 11:57:24 by Timo007
BBC News To Be Shown On AF LHR-LAX Flights posted Sun Apr 6 2008 04:44:40 by TUIflyer
Delta Not To Give Up On Santa Fe (SAF) Flights posted Fri Mar 28 2008 07:16:09 by 1337Delta764