Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could San Diego-London For Work Virgin With A 787?  
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 939 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 9320 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I noticed Virgin Atlantic likes holiday destinations, and California is one of the prefered U.S destinations for English tourists. I wonder if they're going to look at San Diego when they receive their 787s?

BA already flies into SAN, and there are like 11 daily flies between LHR-LAX. That might dissuade Virgin

opinions

[Edited 2012-06-23 13:45:06]

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 2966 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 9301 times:

Sure SAN-LHR can work, but as you point out, BA already flies the route. I'm not sure is SAN could support two LHR flights yet. It's similar to asking if a PDX-LHR or PDX-CDG flight would work, considering that they are smaller markets. Probably, but maybe not enough to support a second flight.

SAN is probably best served by only one Europe flight at this point until if and when the market grows enough for someone like VS or DL or AF to come in with another non-stop.


User currently offlinegingersnap From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2010, 893 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 9276 times:

VS need to ensure their onboard product is up to scratch before they try and compete on thinner routes.


Flown on: A306 A319/20/21 A332 B732/3/4/5/7/8 B742/4 B752 B762/3 B772/W C152 E195 F70/100 MD-82 Q400
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5340 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 8889 times:

VS has reportedly shown interest in SAN in the past. Their best time to jump was probably right after Zoom failed (in the fall of 2008) and the market was wide open, yet BA was still waiting on the ATI to be in place before they would come back to town. Lack of suitable equipment probably was the reason Virgin did nothing but, IMHO, that would have been their best shot at the market. Had they jumped then, would BA have still started the route last year? I don't know.

If they were to try it now, VS would not be eligible for any of the intercontinental incentives that SAN offers -- no flight from anywhere in Europe would -- since those are locked up by BA for, I believe, one more year. Once the incentive is again available, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see LH (or someone else on the Continent) start up service to SAN. I do beleive there is enough traffic from SAN, including connections, to support another flight to a large hub in Europe. (The more 787s that are out there in operation, the more likely we are to see more intercontinental service...)

Two cx to London though? Honestly, that WOULD surprise me.

bb


User currently offlineSANMAN66 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 784 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 8734 times:

I suppose it would be possible if VS did SAN-LGW, instead of LHR (already occupied by BA).
They wouldn't be competing with each other, or maybe to MAN (like they do from LAS).

Quoting SANFan (Reply 3):
If they were to try it now, VS would not be eligible for any of the intercontinental incentives that SAN offers -- no flight from anywhere in Europe would -- since those are locked up by BA for, I believe, one more year. Once the incentive is again available, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see LH (or someone else on the Continent) start up service to SAN. I do beleive there is enough traffic from SAN, including connections, to support another flight to a large hub in Europe.

I guess that's another factor to think about. Apparently, VS is scheduled to get 787-9s in 2014, so
I suppose that would be a timeframe to look at if they are thinking about SAN, (the incentives should also
be open again during that time too.)

[Edited 2012-06-23 16:35:56]


PSA Gives you a lift!
User currently offlineredrooster3 From United States of America, joined Oct 2010, 229 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 8417 times:

Quoting g500 (Thread starter):
California is one of the prefered U.S destinations for English tourists.

I work at a local drug store close to the airport, and the beaches. And I can tell you, every day has been busy for us, since the weather is ideal here, we get a lot of people that go to the beach. And we get people from ALL over Europe, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand. Not to mention, every Friday, we have military graduation just one mile from us.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
I'm not sure is SAN could support two LHR flights yet.

From looking at the CAA, we see summer times literally full. February being the worst month. Thats where SAN could see possible 787 flights during the winter with BA. Or VS being seasonal during the winter months. But during the summer times, I can see VS and BA operating somewhat economically.

June = 85.7%
July = 89.0%
August = 95.0%
September = 92.0%
October = 90.0%
November = 73.6%
December = 79.5%
January = 76.5%
February = 67.0%
March = 91.6%
April = 91.0%

Source

SAN seems to be turning into a One World hub, BA, AA, and JL will show OW presence. How about QF/Jetstar with a 787.   (Almost) Both OW members, (Jetstar is a possible candidate for OW membership)

Quoting SANFan (Reply 3):
If they were to try it now, VS would not be eligible for any of the intercontinental incentives that SAN offers -- no flight from anywhere in Europe would -- since those are locked up by BA for, I believe, one more year.

By then, the green project should be up and running and can support more international planes.



The only thing you should change about a woman is her last name.
User currently offlineWarmNuts From United States of America, joined May 2006, 94 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 8003 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
Sure SAN-LHR can work, but as you point out, BA already flies the route. I'm not sure is SAN could support two LHR flights yet. It's similar to asking if a PDX-LHR or PDX-CDG flight would work, considering that they are smaller markets. Probably, but maybe not enough to support a second flight.


The difference between us and PDX is we draw over 20 million tourists a year. While the lion's share of those drive down from LA, LA and San Diego are in so many ways worlds apart - we are in and of ourselves a major tourist destination. Maybe I'm something of a hopeless romantic, but I like to think that JAL is simply the first - and not the last - international carrier to fly the 787 to SAN.  


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12845 posts, RR: 100
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 7723 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting g500 (Thread starter):
I wonder if they're going to look at San Diego when they receive their 787s?

I suspect we'll see more 787s at SAN. The question is who and when. LHR slots are too precious for a 2nd flight to SAN. I could see FRA, CDG, or AMS thought.

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 1):
It's similar to asking if a PDX-LHR or PDX-CDG flight would work, considering that they are smaller markets. Probably, but maybe not enough to support a second flight

{checkmakrk

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 5):
August = 95.0%
September = 92.0%
October = 90.0%

Thank you for the numbers. But a 3 month a year service is not going to be able to compete versus year round.

Does anyone have the O&D numbers?


Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineslinky09 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2009, 818 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 7375 times:

I believe VS has other priorities than SAN, and those are dependent on slots let's not forget. VS is missing out when it comes to Brazil, and China is high on the list. I'd discount talk of Hawaii direct on the 787, it'll be a long, low yield route, South America and Asia offer the right potential.

Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 5):
we get people from ALL over Europe, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand

San Diego is a wonderful place, but let's not forget that many visitors arrive into LAX and do the loop.

Quoting gingersnap (Reply 2):
VS need to ensure their onboard product is up to scratch before they try and compete on thinner routes.

That seems a bit snipey, VS's on board product is among the best in J class, and it's PE is about the best there is (up there with ANZ).


User currently offlineWarmNuts From United States of America, joined May 2006, 94 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 weeks ago) and read 7110 times:

Quoting slinky09 (Reply 8):
San Diego is a wonderful place, but let's not forget that many visitors arrive into LAX and do the loop.


I used to transit regularly between the US and India and when my return routing brought me back TPAC, that transfer through LAX - just to make that last 109nm jump from LAX to SAN - more often than not semed like the longest part of the journey (and that's saying something when the journey began at HAL, or BOM). Given the choice of arriving at LAX combined with the sheer joy of driving south on the 405 for several hours or breezing through customs at SAN, the above load numbers for BA's daily demonstrate there is no shortage of pax willing to forego the former for the latter. In the end, I guess if a carrier can make money on the route, they wil fly it.


User currently offlinemikey72 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2009, 1780 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 weeks ago) and read 7063 times:

Quoting slinky09 (Reply 8):
That seems a bit snipey, VS's on board product is among the best in J class, and it's PE is about the best there is (up there with ANZ).

The hard product is good but if you believe the airline review websites it's the crew (not all) that let them down.



Flying is like sex - I've never had all I wanted but occasionally I've had all I can stand.
User currently offlinelaca773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4002 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 weeks ago) and read 7006 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think the bottom line will be the a/c with the right fit for a market like SAN. FRA would be a great transfer point in addition to LHR. However, the LH fleet doesn't currently have an a/c to fly without marked operational restrictions nonstop. This definitely would be a perfect route for the 787. AB will be getting them, but don't know if this is a good fit for their network, other than being heavily leisure, albeit, is changing a bit with the introduction into OW.

User currently offlineWarmNuts From United States of America, joined May 2006, 94 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 weeks ago) and read 6898 times:

Quoting laca773 (Reply 11):


Using BA as an example, they have four daily flights between LHR-LAX, yet they are drawing good traffic on their one daily into SAN. And in December, JL - who operates half as many NRT-LAX daily flights as BA - inaugurates their NRT-SAN route with the 787. Considering AF/KL have four daily flights serving CDG-LAX and AMS-LAX respectively, might they consider a CDG-SAN or AMS-SAN route between them with one of the 25 787s they'll be receiving? Similarly, QF (3 daily flights to LAX) and NZ (4 AKL-LAX flights daily) might find it a profitable route once their own 787s enter service.


User currently offlineabrown532 From UK - Northern Ireland, joined Feb 2008, 151 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6749 times:

I am not sure they will look at this option, as they already fly to LAX and with their codeshare with Virgin America I am not sure this route would need serious thought, UNLESS, BA are doing very well on that route and VA want to muscle into some of that traffic, in which case, the 787 would be pretty good on that route!

User currently offlinemikey72 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2009, 1780 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6482 times:

Quoting abrown532 (Reply 13):
UNLESS, BA are doing very well on that route and VA want to muscle into some of that traffic, in which case, the 787 would be pretty good on that route!

Revert back to type you mean ?

  



Flying is like sex - I've never had all I wanted but occasionally I've had all I can stand.
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5340 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6051 times:

Quoting laca773 (Reply 11):
FRA would be a great transfer point in addition to LHR. However, the LH fleet doesn't currently have an a/c to fly without marked operational restrictions nonstop. This definitely would be a perfect route for the 787. AB will be getting them, but don't know if this is a good fit for their network, other than being heavily leisure, albeit, is changing a bit with the introduction into OW.

I expect that a large hub operation with lots of opportunities for connections would be needed to make another SAN-Europe flight profitable, such as LH at FRA, KL at AMS, or AF at CDG. Would TXL fit the bill? AB does seem to have a pretty solid network of flights which would offer some connections but as far as I can tell, it's not as large as the other 3 cx mentioned.

And I don't know if AB being in OW ultimately helps or hinders the possibilities of serving SAN...

bb


User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 939 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 5979 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting laca773 (Reply 11):
I think the bottom line will be the a/c with the right fit for a market like SAN

I think that is the bottom line. I doubt VS could fill up an A340 or A330 on this route, specially with BA already on it.. If Mr. Branson ever gives SAN a go, it'd be with the 787


User currently offlineRWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3109 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (2 years 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5533 times:

Quoting WarmNuts (Reply 6):
The difference between us and PDX is we draw over 20 million tourists a year. While the lion's share of those drive down from LA, LA and San Diego are in so many ways worlds apart - we are in and of ourselves a major tourist destination. Maybe I'm something of a hopeless romantic, but I like to think that JAL is simply the first - and not the last - international carrier to fly the 787 to SAN

PDX will not draw those tourist flights like SAN can, but I'd love to see VS beat anyone else to PDX with a 787, but as someone stated earlier, there are plenty of routes VS would tackle before PDX and to a lesser extent SAN. I doubt JL's will be the only 787 that SAN will see for sure. I hope we land one here in PDX sometime too.



AA-AC-AQ-AS-BN-BD-CO-CS-DL-EA-EZ-HA-HP-KL-KN-MP-MW-NK-NW-OO-OZ-PA-PS-QX-RC-RH-RW-SA-TG-TW-UA-US-VS-WA-WC-WN
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
London To San Diego For 265 Pounds: Beat IT! posted Wed Sep 25 2002 22:38:32 by Capt.Picard
AS Unveils San Diego State University Q400 posted Thu May 31 2012 18:46:07 by AS77W
Cyber-attacks Possible With 787 Computer Chips? posted Wed May 30 2012 06:56:54 by CALPSAFltSkeds
AS/QX To Unveil San Diego State Q400 Livery posted Mon May 21 2012 12:16:31 by Airport
Norwegian DY With 787 Maintenance Agreement posted Sat Mar 17 2012 02:23:36 by Mortyman
JAL To Launch Helsinki And San Diego posted Mon Feb 13 2012 17:25:39 by mah4546
Air India - Possible New Routes With 787 posted Thu Dec 9 2010 05:48:24 by brahmin
San Diego-Tijuana Airport Ped Bridge Proposed posted Sun Aug 1 2010 19:43:21 by LAXintl
CO To Launch IAH-LOS 11/16/2011 With 787 posted Mon Jun 14 2010 08:12:25 by CODC10
Allegiant Ending Monterey To San Diego Flights posted Sat May 29 2010 09:03:22 by FATFlyer