Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Fokker 100  
User currently offlinePanther From Bahamas, joined Jun 2000, 224 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1640 times:

Has anyone flown on AA's F100s, how are they from a passengers point of view? How do pilots like the airplane? I have never flown on a F100 and I'm very curious about the airplane.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Mark Abbott



14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUS330 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 3871 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

I have always liked them. They look from the outside like they are small, but because of the large windows, it gives the illusion that, from the inside, the aircraft is MD-80 or 737 sized. Their engines are real distinctive, but at takeoff, they are about the same, noise level wise, as the MD-80, and sometimes can be a bit quieter.

User currently offlineNBC News1 From UK - England, joined May 2001, 324 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

It's not a good thing when its engines are a bit quiet "sometimes."

User currently offlineChuckles1225 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 160 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

To me when i fly in a F100 it feels very scrunched in. Im not clostrophobic either. Otherwise it is quiet and fun to fly on. I hope someday you get to fly on it. Smile



ask not what your pilot can do for you, ask what you can do for your pilot
User currently offlineChe From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1520 times:

A decent aircraft! Its like a mini MD-80. I love the large windown. Also its smooth and comfortable. I imagine pilots like it as the flightdeck looks very modern and clean. Have fun

che


User currently offlineSkychuck From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1519 times:

the flight attendants HATE it because there is no tailcone exit.

User currently offlineKtliem@YVR From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 161 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1513 times:

I've flown the F100 several times. It's a nice quiet airplane, especially when you're seated up front. However it's a little bit noisier when you're close to the engine.

If you can, try the all business class F100 out of Dallas Love Field. It has a different more roomy seating arrangement than the other F100s in AA fleet.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Barry Crawford



User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Large windows? I've always thought they were smaller than the Boeings, Airbuses and McD-Ds. They're pinholes compared to the ERJs' windows.

User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2046 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

As a side note, AA is finding the business class F-100's out of DAL to be quite profitable. There is a great deal of walk-up ticket purchasing at Love Field and those folks are paying big bucks for the ride. I was concerned that with the demise of Legend Airlines, American would reconfigure the planes BACK to original, but it appears the idea is a winner.


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineCV640 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 952 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

From what I've talked to about the flying qualitites and the pilots, they all seem to love the cockpit set up and the way it handles. Very sports car like, but it lacks the muscle. The engines are basically modified GIV engines so they lack the punch with the heavier load. They also dislike the lack of slats, hurts performance with ice and also T/O and landings.

User currently offlineAmericanF100 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 243 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 1464 times:

I have flown on the Fokker 100 3 times and loved it all 3. It's very quiet inside compared to some of the other rear engined airplanes and it doesn't feel any less roomy than say an MD-80. The seats are the same size too. I hope you like it. By the way, I also flew on the first Fokker 100, N1400H, delievered to AA!

Matt~


User currently offlineGregg From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

I hate the F-100. Some of the reasons have been mentioned already.
There is no rear (cone) exit. If he fuel tanks burn after an accident, everyone behind the wing is in trouble.
I find the inside very small. A normal sized cary on bag will not fit in the overhead.
It has a very low dispatch reliability. The plane is commonly used from hub airports to smaller airports. If the plane won't start in a hub, you'll probably have options, if it does not start in a smaller airport, time to go to the rental car counter.
The plane is quite for a rear engine a/c.
If the plane is all that great, how come many airlines want to dump them, but they can't find buyers. (Usairways was trying to push them on AMR, just one of many examples.)

I think the the lack of a rear exit on a 100 pax a/c should have kept it from getting certified.



User currently offlineAirT85 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 1457 times:

The plane is and was a good airplane. however, now with Fokker gone, MX costs are getting extremely high and parts are getting low. And with airlines trimming fleet types, the Fokker 100 is a great airplane but a misfit one at that. I personally love the Fokker 100. I get on them alot from PHL-PIT and back on USAirways. Also flew ISp-PIT on one. Definately beats out the DC-9 =)
Tony


User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1437 times:

About the rear door. As you have said flight attendants have found not having a rear door a pain. I looked thtough some pictures and noticed something. All of the American carriers had no rear doors along with some European Carriers (KLM UK, and AF), while others have a emergency exit door at the back on the left. If it is such a pain why didn't the American Carriers opt for this extra door? Is it because of the number of pax in the aircraft?


Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
User currently offlineFallingeese From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2097 posts, RR: 18
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

here's an example of the rear door.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Paulo carvalho




Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
56-seat AA Fokker 100? posted Fri Aug 6 2004 23:35:25 by Tony Lu
AA Fokker 100 Registrations posted Fri Jan 23 2004 22:40:40 by Pilottim747
AA's Fokker 100's posted Fri Dec 28 2001 01:51:16 by Sleekjet
AA - Fokker 100's - Where? posted Sat Oct 20 2001 20:24:20 by Usa4624
AA Fokker 100 posted Sun Aug 19 2001 20:44:01 by Panther
AA Fokker 100 In Landing Accident Will Be Retired posted Sat Jun 30 2001 02:33:11 by Tupolev154B2
Has Anyone Flown On An AA Fokker 100 posted Thu May 25 2000 14:51:45 by F-100
AA Fokker-100 At MSP posted Thu Sep 2 1999 05:59:20 by AAmericanguy
Why Did AA Get Rid Of Their Fokker 100's? posted Mon Sep 21 2009 08:43:06 by TSS
AA And The Fokker 100 posted Wed Oct 20 2004 02:41:33 by Thrust