Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Control Tower For SFO  
User currently offlineSFOA380 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 185 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5085 times:

Just ran across this at sfgate.com



Construction kicks off Thursday, The new tower will be located between T1 and T2. Ful article is here:

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/place/...-have-a-torch-like-air-3664702.php

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinemodesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2801 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4886 times:

I was waiting to hear news about the new control tower. Looking forward to this new addition to the SFO skyline!

User currently offlineSANMAN66 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 793 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4849 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That's a very interesting design. It looks so much more imaginitive than the basic cookie-cutter design control towers
seen at most U.S. airports. Torch design, I wonder if the Olympic torch was an inspiration?

[Edited 2012-06-27 09:24:23]


PSA Gives you a lift!
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25346 posts, RR: 49
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4849 times:

Kinda old news - A new tower was part of the larger T-2 redesign project.

Was covered here with planned designs
SFO Terminal 2 Occupants (by Mcmax Dec 30 2009 in Civil Aviation)#menu27

=



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineSFOA380 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4776 times:

The design is what is newsworthy, not the news of a new tower.

User currently offlineanonms From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 620 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 4619 times:

Quoting SFOA380 (Reply 4):

The design is what is newsworthy, not the news of a new tower.

This is also pretty newsworthy: "At the same time, the compact dimensions required that the lower neck of the tower be as narrow as possible, since room was needed for a pair of corridors between Terminals 1 and 2, one for general visitors and one for passengers who already had passed through security."

Looking at the second rendering, though, the corridor has such an afterthought-like look to it. You'd think they could've made it more integrated into T2's redevelopment.



This is my signature.
User currently offlineN126DL From United States of America, joined May 2010, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4470 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

How old is this rendering? Notice the old DL widget livery on the planes?


DH8 E145 E175 CR2/7/9 A319/20/21 A332/3 D95 M83/88/90 712 737/8 752/3 763/4 77L
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6140 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4361 times:

Quoting N126DL (Reply 6):
How old is this rendering? Notice the old DL widget livery on the planes?

This a new design. I spoke with some of the construction companies personnel the other day as they moved into the 4th floor. It's design was finished 6 months ago according to one of them.

I highly doubt the a/c in the background really matter. That's not the focus of attention.

On a side note. Those of you locally coming through SFO can see the artist renderings of the E concourse just outside the closed TSA screening area. Looks beautiful and as an added note, nothing like T2.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlinezippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5478 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 4328 times:

I sure as heck hope this cool looking new tower improves SFO's ATC and reduces delays. SFO has been making a run in the delay derby with CLT, BOS, EWR and LGA.


I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineanonms From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 620 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4272 times:

Quoting as739x (Reply 7):
On a side note. Those of you locally coming through SFO can see the artist renderings of the E concourse just outside the closed TSA screening area. Looks beautiful and as an added note, nothing like T2.

Is it anything like this PDF? http://www.sfgov3.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1720



This is my signature.
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6140 posts, RR: 23
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4085 times:

Quoting anonms (Reply 9):

Thanks for posting the link.

However the artist renderings are nice and more details then this.

[Edited 2012-06-27 17:51:03]


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8267 posts, RR: 23
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4064 times:

How old is the current tower? Doesn't seem a new one is neccessary- not like they're adding concrete that requires new sight lines.


This Website Censors Me
User currently onlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2077 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4023 times:

Quoting N766UA (Reply 11):

It is not really the age but the current tower was not built to survive a substantial earthquake. The new tower will be built to survive up to an 8.0.



John@SFO
User currently onlineN782NC From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4012 times:

Quoting N766UA (Reply 11):

As far as I know, the current tower is about 30 years old, built around the same time T2 was turned into the Intl. terminal in 1984. They're replacing it because a FAA report said that the tower would not be able to survive a large earthquake.



Stairway to Seven
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8267 posts, RR: 23
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3964 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 12):
It is not really the age but the current tower was not built to survive a substantial earthquake. The new tower will be built to survive up to an 8.0.

Ah, that makes more sense. 8.0 is kinda low-balling it, though, isn't it? What was Chile, 8.8? It's not like bigger isn't possible/probable.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineaviateur From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1352 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3938 times:

Finally, a tower with some architectural pizazz here in the US.

No surprise to find it at SFO, one of the few American airports that bothers to distinguish itself.

Over at LGA, on the other hand, we recently lost one of the country's most distinctive towers. Frequent flyers remember this building well -- hourglass-shaped and of modest height, bejeweled with a top-to-bottom series of portholes. It was an odd, playful structure.

The new LGA tower is what you might call the FAA Standard Model A1 -- a control tower that looks like every other American control tower put up over the past 20 or 30 years. I think they come prefab in a great big packing crate.

The old one may not have been state-of-the-art, but it was a welcoming, almost mischievous visual flourish in an otherwise joyless vista of seawater and concrete. It lent a friendly touch to an airport that, in most respects, is anything but friendly. It was, almost literally, an exclamation point. It said: LaGuardia!

Airports, like the planes that serve them, have become painfully generic. Functionality aside, part of any major airport building’s job is to create a sense of identity, inside and out – the kind of place that, when you glimpse it TV or in a movie, even for just a second, you know * exactly * where it is.

A dwindling number of airport facilities are distinctive in this way. The spidery "Theme Building" at LAX is the most enduring. The main terminal at Denver is another, as is the one at Washington-Dulles (Eero Saarinen).

And, we shan’t forget my sentimental favorite, the twin-stanchion control tower at Boston-Logan.

If only its 16th floor observation deck were still intact.


- PS

[Edited 2012-06-27 19:25:52]


Patrick Smith is an airline pilot, air travel columnist and author
User currently onlineN782NC From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3938 times:

Quoting N766UA (Reply 14):

The main reason is that they're different types of faults. In Chile, the Nazca plate is subducted beneath the South American plate. In California, the Pacific and North American plates rub up against and slip past each other. Subduction zones can create far more powerful earthquakes than faults like the San Andreas/Hayward faults are capable of. I might be wrong, but I believe the largest earthquake that the San Andreas can create is around 8.0-8.5.

[Edited 2012-06-27 19:27:51]


Stairway to Seven
User currently offlinemexicana767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 59 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3872 times:

On a quick side note...does anyone have the link to the renderings or the proposals for the redevelopment of T1? They where posted a while ago and i havent been able to find the link.

Thanks!
Mexicana767



"Never, Never, Never Quit" -Winston Churchill
User currently onlineN782NC From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3850 times:

Quoting mexicana767 (Reply 17):

Here are some of the general plans released by SFO.

This is from 2009
http://aci-na.org/static/entransit/Fantoni.pdf
pgs 32-50

updated version from 2011
SFO.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.wtsinternational.org/assets/84/22/WTS_022311_SFO.pdf
pgs 19-36



Stairway to Seven
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 33
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3759 times:

Quoting aviateur (Reply 15):

The old one may not have been state-of-the-art, but it was a welcoming, almost mischievous visual flourish in an otherwise joyless vista of seawater and concrete. It lent a friendly touch to an airport that, in most respects, is anything but friendly. It was, almost literally, an exclamation point. It said: LaGuardia!

  
The old LGA tower was terrific. How difficult or expensive would it be to give control towers a little more flair? They're a distinctive, stand-out part of an airport and should look like it. Good for SFO.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 522 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3598 times:

Quoting zippyjet (Reply 8):
I sure as heck hope this cool looking new tower improves SFO's ATC and reduces delays. SFO has been making a run in the delay derby with CLT, BOS, EWR and LGA.

That would be nice, but unfortunately, the new tower doesn't solve the issue of runway spacing. The only way that's ever getting fixed is if the FAA grants a waiver to the visual rules or the bay gets filled and another runway installed (which is politically impossible). SFO's really stuck between a rock and a hard place in that regard...



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineshengzhurou From China, joined May 2010, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3565 times:

Does anyone here have info for future terminal 1 after the renovation of the E concourse at T3 and the new build tower? SFO is been packed with airplanes on ground lately with specially with UA airplanes.


Sheng Zhu Rou
User currently offlinemnik101 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 173 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2558 times:

Quoting N782NC (Reply 18):

So what is the latest news on the T1 plans? Are they going to build it? If


User currently onlineN782NC From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2418 times:

Quoting mnik101 (Reply 22):

As of now, yes. The plan is for Terminal 1 to be redeveloped after work on E and the new tower are completed.

For some reason the last link I posted didn't work properly. Here's their updated plans from last year. The T1 project starts on page 20.

http://www.wtsinternational.org/assets/84/22/WTS_022311_SFO.pdf



Stairway to Seven
User currently offlinephlwok From United States of America, joined May 2007, 504 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2342 times:

Quoting N782NC (Reply 16):
The main reason is that they're different types of faults. In Chile, the Nazca plate is subducted beneath the South American plate. In California, the Pacific and North American plates rub up against and slip past each other. Subduction zones can create far more powerful earthquakes than faults like the San Andreas/Hayward faults are capable of. I might be wrong, but I believe the largest earthquake that the San Andreas can create is around 8.0-8.5.

This is correct - low 8's is about the strongest the San Andreas is expected to generate. Not that anything like that wouldn't be a massive disaster, but it's still not as bad as a 9. The last three major quakes the San Andreas generated were the Fort Tejon quake of 1857 at 7.9, the infamous 1906 San Francisco quake at 7.8, and the Loma Prieta quake of 1989 at 6.9. And SFO needs to be very concerned about that fault - it's within three miles of it along I-280 and San Andreas Lake (see http://www.thulescientific.com/san-andreas-fault-map.html)


User currently offlinesjc4me From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 373 posts, RR: 1
Reply 25, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2278 times:

Quoting zippyjet (Reply 8):
I sure as heck hope this cool looking new tower improves SFO's ATC and reduces delays.

Because the old tower had a fog generating machine?



Unable.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Time For New Control Tower At BHX? posted Thu Feb 17 2005 01:15:04 by BALandorLivery
Lauderdale Executive/FXE Getting New Control Tower posted Wed Jan 18 2012 13:44:51 by KFLLCFII
Will MSP Ever Get A New Control Tower? posted Tue Dec 13 2011 15:32:42 by CIDFlyer
New ATC Tower For CLE posted Tue Aug 26 2008 06:39:20 by CLE757
LaGuardia's New Control Tower posted Fri May 2 2008 18:23:44 by Lga1011
IND New Control Tower Opens 4/29. posted Thu Apr 20 2006 15:07:48 by 7E72004
NCL's New Control Tower posted Wed Dec 28 2005 19:03:30 by Sean377
ATL New Control Tower posted Tue Apr 19 2005 09:01:15 by DALMD88
IND New Control Tower Up And Running Yet? posted Tue Jan 25 2005 18:16:12 by 7E72004
LHR's New Control Tower To Be Moved Next Thursday. posted Sat Oct 23 2004 18:42:53 by Leezyjet