Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AUS Int'l Service - Condor / Thomas Cook?  
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8473 times:

AUS has been trying to land a long haul flight for as long as I can remember. Now with the 1st year of Formula 1 commencing at Circuit of the America's in November their is now a desire by a number of charter companies to bring wide bodies directly into AUS to include clearing these passengers through customs. Now that the city council has voted against a temporary building (would have been built and maintained by Siemens) due to a $5 million price tag, AUS still has to decide how to deal with the 4-5 wide bodies (777 size and larger full of fans from S.Amer., Emirates and EU) that are wanting to arrive at the same time just days before the weekend event.

Couple that with the fact that many in Austin feel that this clearly seasonal demand is leading to a public desire for a mainline DL, AA, UA service of AUS to LHR, CDG or FRA. The general consensus is that the Central Texas market is still to small to support a mainline long haul flight.

I am wondering whether or not AUS officials should be actually looking to land a low cost discount EU carrier to launch such a service? Would a carrier like Condor of the Thomas Cook group possibly fit the bill in the short/long term by launching a X2 weekly AUS-DUS on one of thier 13 763 in the fleet?

57 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCompensateMe From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8415 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Thread starter):
Would a carrier like Condor of the Thomas Cook group possibly fit the bill in the short/long term by launching a X2 weekly AUS-DUS on one of thier 13 763 in the fleet?

Condor and Thomas Cook focus on European POS, primarily packaged tours to lesiure destinations (think Allegiant). Austin's a great city, but not the ideal Holiday for hoards of Europeans.

[Edited 2012-07-05 18:50:44]


Hypocrisy: "US airlines should only buy Boeing... BTW, check out my new Hyundai!"
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17510 posts, RR: 45
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8383 times:

Quoting CompensateMe (Reply 1):
but not the ideal Holiday for hoards of Europeans.

Idunno Germans looooooove Texas and the Southwest, and AUS comes as close to their idea of Texas plus it's just a great place in general. I wouldn't say it's that far fetched and if I were AUS airport it might not be a bad way to break into the market.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineCompensateMe From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8372 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 2):

Idunno Germans looooooove Texas and the Southwest, and AUS comes as close to their idea of Texas plus it's just a great place in general. I wouldn't say it's that far fetched and if I were AUS airport it might not be a bad way to break into the market.

Thomas Cook Group would go banrkupt if it staked its future on selling Austin holiday packages to Europeans.



Hypocrisy: "US airlines should only buy Boeing... BTW, check out my new Hyundai!"
User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3299 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8357 times:

AUS is going to be an absolute nightmare in the week before the race. I mean clusterf*** of epic proportions. I absolutely love my city and our airport, and I understand why they turned down this customs facility (we're set to expand the east concourse, including where the temporary building would've been, in the next 5 years), but nothing will say "Welcome to Austin" like a 3 hour line at customs. Even if we could get additional staffing, there's no space. As I recall, our CBP facility only has 3 lanes. Our only alternative is to use the South Terminal, which is just another beautiful pre-fab building that's currently unoccupied (Viva Aerobus used to "live" here before the swine flu outbreak), but even still, that's only another 2 lanes. And that building felt crammed with a 737-300 marginally full of vacationers to Cancun, never mind a full 777. I'm not even sure a full 777 would be under the maximum occupancy of the building! And baggage claim is basically just a rack. Totally unfit for a widebody.

So I'm honestly not sure what our alternatives are going to be. It wouldn't shock me to see a slew of direct flights, via a larger port of entry like DFW or IAH, but I just don't think even a reasonably full widebody is likely, for logistical reasons. If they stagger them enough throughout the day, we could get a few in here, but it's still going to be a disaster.

This will be an interesting few years for Austin. I'm certain Austin is not fully prepared for the massive influx of people they're about to see in mid-November. The question is, can they right the ship for next year's race? Traffic in and out of the COTA is terrible (a two lane road is the main entrance...), and last I read every hotel room in the Austin area is booked, a third of the rooms in San Antonio are booked, and half of the rooms 100 miles north in Waco are booked. Neither our music festivals nor UT football games will approach the huge out-of-state crowds F1 will bring in.

Another thing I'm certain of is how the world's eyes are about to be widely opened to what an amazing place Austin is. From my experiences abroad, less than half of people knew of Austin, and even fewer knew about Austin. The few that did were familiar with our music festivals, and possibly had heard good things, but little else. There's no doubt in my mind that with this large group of foreigners coming to Austin on a regular basis, it will see its notoriety and popularity rise dramatically abroad. I recently showed a couple of people around Austin (both originally from outside the US), and they were absolutely blown away. Texas has a...stigma abroad, at least in my experience. Austin is very different from the rest of Texas, and the whole world is about to see that.

So to come full circle, will any of this lead to long haul service at AUS? My honest opinion is no, at least in the short term. I think you may be onto something regarding it's popularity going forward, but I still think there's not enough demand, either from the business world or leisure, to support anything right now. I won't be shocked at all to see widebodies in Austin around the F1 race date, but it remains to be seen if they'll be scheduled and/or recurring, and where, if any place, they stop on their way into the US.

As a final word, if any a.nutters are coming into Austin for the race (or otherwise), I really enjoy showing people my city. Please hit me up, and at the very least, we'll grab a beer or something.

Also, I am renting out my apartment, and while most prices are really high (I've seen apartments going for well in excess of $1,000/night), I'd be willing to cut an a.netter a deal. So if any of you are still looking for a place, I'm just throwing that out there, as well.

I look forward to hearing others' thoughts on this topic.

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineshanderawx From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8340 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Long haul European flights live on business class fares from corporate tickets, look at the number of Fortune 500 companies in Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth and you can see why they respectively have about 12-13 and 6-7 daily flights to Europe. If San Antonio and Austin had joined forces years ago, the pull of SA's 4-5 Fortune 500 companies and the combined populations bases might have pulled off intercontinental flights. But as it stands I doubt either airport can sustain them.

User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3299 posts, RR: 44
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8334 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 2):
it might not be a bad way to break into the market.

I think this is exactly right. I can't think of a better way to get Austin international exposure than an event like this. Again, I don't see it happening any time soon, but our odds are a lot better now than they were before this race was announced. Simply put, we aren't anywhere near the top of foreigners' lists of cities to visit when coming to the US right now. We are on the C/D-list or so of cities to visit, even though I think we firmly deserve a spot on the B-list.

Quoting CompensateMe (Reply 3):
Thomas Cook Group would go banrkupt if it staked its future on selling Austin holiday packages to Europeans.

   This is also correct. While Austin has plenty of culture, the demand simply isn't there. It makes much more sense to take one of the many nonstop options to one of the two Texas fortress hubs, and then hop on a 30 minute flight to get here.

At the absolute height of the dot-com boom, I maintained (and still do, honestly) that AA could've supported a widebody service to NRT 2x weekly. But even still, it just makes more sense to route people through DFW. For a time, AA60/61 was actually AUS-DFW-NRT, with a change of gauge at DFW. This shows how influential the high tech traffic market was into AUS. But that's all I can really make an argument for, and it's by no means a super strong one.

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17510 posts, RR: 45
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8308 times:

Quoting CompensateMe (Reply 3):
Thomas Cook Group would go banrkupt if it staked its future on selling Austin holiday packages to Europeans.

Who said 'staked their future'? But a few roundtrips in the middle of European Winter perhaps incentivized by the AUS airport and/or tourist groups...it wouldn't shock me at all if it worked. At the very least it would provide the AUS promotion groups some valuable experience.

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 6):
Simply put, we aren't anywhere near the top of foreigners' lists of cities to visit when coming to the US right now. We are on the C/D-list or so of cities to visit, even though I think we firmly deserve a spot on the B-list.

Whitehorse.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineaznmadsci From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 3670 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8235 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 4):
Texas has a...stigma abroad

Yes, thanks to Dallas.   



The journey of life is not based on the accomplishments, but the experience.
User currently offlinehuxrules From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 8142 times:

Continental used to have a flight 34 - AUS to LHR. It just happened to stop in Houston and switch from a 737 to 777. But in all seriousness Austin is in for some real pain. Everything in the city is ready and set to go - for the population in 1995. As it stands right now it is nearly impossible to get through AUS in a reasonable amount of time in the summer. I've had employees miss their flights because it takes hours to get through security in the morning. I think you have the right idea- rent the house and skip town that weekend.

User currently offlineaznmadsci From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 3670 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 8065 times:

Quoting huxrules (Reply 9):
I've had employees miss their flights because it takes hours to get through security in the morning. I think you have the right idea- rent the house and skip town that weekend.

Has the wonderful TSA opened up all lines of security in the morning? I've traveled through AUS on early morning flights to IAH and there would be long lines at security because they would only have one line open during busy times and all lines open when there is no one.



The journey of life is not based on the accomplishments, but the experience.
User currently offlineCompensateMe From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 8001 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 7):
Who said 'staked their future'? But a few roundtrips in the middle of European Winter perhaps incentivized by the AUS airport and/or tourist groups...it wouldn't shock me at all if it worked. At the very least it would provide the AUS promotion groups some valuable experience.

To convince European tourists to spend their Holiday in Austin, you would need the best marketing team, not an inexperienced one. Thomas Cook specializes in package beach markets. Not even cosmopolitan cities such as Los Angeles and Chicago have been able to sustain regular European Holiday package charter service.



Hypocrisy: "US airlines should only buy Boeing... BTW, check out my new Hyundai!"
User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9389 posts, RR: 29
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7873 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 2):
Idunno Germans looooooove Texas and the Southwest, and AUS comes as close to their idea of Texas plus it's just a great place in general. I wouldn't say it's that far fetched and if I were AUS airport it might not be a bad way to break into the market.

We dooooo, but then we fly to DFW or IAH and take the tour from there. Landing right in Willie's backyard and just go to see AUS and Luck, TX ain't just enough. Plus, the local, lesser known musicians who regularly tour Europe each year (and my town, which I'm proud of, is a regular stop for gigs) won't fill a widebody either.

I wonder where the F1 cargo flights will land, do they fly the equipment to AUS or will it go via IAH where they are used to the An124?



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 7547 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 12):
(and my town, which I'm proud of, is a regular stop for gigs)

Based on your quote and user profile name...might I be correct that you are in Hamburg? If so, my wife says hello as she is also a fellow Hamburger. In fact, she had been working for both Lufthansa and Lufthansa Technik a few years before we married and moved to Houston. We go at Xmas on the A380 for yet another annual visit along with a ski trip down to Austria.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 12):
I wonder where the F1 cargo flights will land, do they fly the equipment to AUS or will it go via IAH where they are used to the An124?

A number of sources are indicating that all F1 cargo traffic including cars will land at AUS and be transported from the airport the short distance to the COTA track 6 miles away. AUS has enough ramp space to support a number of wide bodies away from the main terminal with one healthly 12,000 ft runway from the days it was Bergstrom AFB. They may also close off a number of underutilised taxiways if thier are more than a few widebodies to store before and after the race.

AUS is expecting the usual compliment of cargo flights that fly into other scheduled race event airports and will be supported by the cargo area ground crews likely to include staff from Fedex and UPS as if I recall from working at Fed Ex ramp a few years ago these companies have all the ground equipment necessary to assist with offload efforts. The race in Abu Dhabi ends on Nov. 4th and flights should leave shortly afterwards from UAE bound for the Austin (taking basically an Emirates / QR routing like going to IAH) race set to begin on Nov. 18th. After this race, F1 packs up its road show and heads south 10hrs for the Brazil race less than a week later.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 12):
won't fill a widebody either.

BUT, what about a narrow body? Do any of the charters possess what KLM used to fly into IAH a few years ago like a reconfigured 737 or A320/1 that was geared for Biz class pass. and had extra baggage container sized fuel pods to make the A320 in particular go the distance? An A321 could work for Austin charters with these secondary tanks couldn't it?


User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9389 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 7520 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 13):
Based on your quote and user profile name...might I be correct that you are in Hamburg? If so, my wife says hello as she is also a fellow Hamburger. In fact, s

My business roots are in HAM where I started my business life but meanwhile I live in a suburb of Wiesbaden, 30 km from FRA airport and we have a club here that features regularly musicians from the AUS music scene (Americana) , besides others. Best act IMHO we had here was Kimmie Rhodes and I had a good talk with her and her son Gabe. A good "hummel hummel" to your wife.

Back to AUS, yes, i know it was Bergstrom AFB , have been there a couple of years ago and what i liked about the airport was the micro brew and live music. Nice terminal.

US customs will be busy when the F1 circus arrives.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23022 posts, RR: 20
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 7073 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 4):
So I'm honestly not sure what our alternatives are going to be. It wouldn't shock me to see a slew of direct flights, via a larger port of entry like DFW or IAH, but I just don't think even a reasonably full widebody is likely, for logistical reasons. If they stagger them enough throughout the day, we could get a few in here, but it's still going to be a disaster.

SAT is also an option. It's closer than either DFW or IAH and has a decent FIS facility. The drive from SAT to COTA isn't too much different from the drive from GRU to Interlagos.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinevin2basketball From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 317 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6995 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 4):
AUS is going to be an absolute nightmare in the week before the race. I mean clusterf*** of epic proportions. I absolutely love my city and our airport, and I understand why they turned down this customs facility (we're set to expand the east concourse, including where the temporary building would've been, in the next 5 years), but nothing will say "Welcome to Austin" like a 3 hour line at customs. Even if we could get additional staffing, there's no space. As I recall, our CBP facility only has 3 lanes. Our only alternative is to use the South Terminal, which is just another beautiful pre-fab building that's currently unoccupied (Viva Aerobus used to "live" here before the swine flu outbreak), but even still, that's only another 2 lanes. And that building felt crammed with a 737-300 marginally full of vacationers to Cancun, never mind a full 777. I'm not even sure a full 777 would be under the maximum occupancy of the building! And baggage claim is basically just a rack. Totally unfit for a widebody.

So I'm honestly not sure what our alternatives are going to be. It wouldn't shock me to see a slew of direct flights, via a larger port of entry like DFW or IAH, but I just don't think even a reasonably full widebody is likely, for logistical reasons. If they stagger them enough throughout the day, we could get a few in here, but it's still going to be a disaster.

This will be an interesting few years for Austin. I'm certain Austin is not fully prepared for the massive influx of people they're about to see in mid-November. The question is, can they right the ship for next year's race? Traffic in and out of the COTA is terrible (a two lane road is the main entrance...), and last I read every hotel room in the Austin area is booked, a third of the rooms in San Antonio are booked, and half of the rooms 100 miles north in Waco are booked. Neither our music festivals nor UT football games will approach the huge out-of-state crowds F1 will bring in.

Another thing I'm certain of is how the world's eyes are about to be widely opened to what an amazing place Austin is. From my experiences abroad, less than half of people knew of Austin, and even fewer knew about Austin. The few that did were familiar with our music festivals, and possibly had heard good things, but little else. There's no doubt in my mind that with this large group of foreigners coming to Austin on a regular basis, it will see its notoriety and popularity rise dramatically abroad. I recently showed a couple of people around Austin (both originally from outside the US), and they were absolutely blown away. Texas has a...stigma abroad, at least in my experience. Austin is very different from the rest of Texas, and the whole world is about to see that.

So to come full circle, will any of this lead to long haul service at AUS? My honest opinion is no, at least in the short term. I think you may be onto something regarding it's popularity going forward, but I still think there's not enough demand, either from the business world or leisure, to support anything right now. I won't be shocked at all to see widebodies in Austin around the F1 race date, but it remains to be seen if they'll be scheduled and/or recurring, and where, if any place, they stop on their way into the US.

As a final word, if any a.nutters are coming into Austin for the race (or otherwise), I really enjoy showing people my city. Please hit me up, and at the very least, we'll grab a beer or something.

Also, I am renting out my apartment, and while most prices are really high (I've seen apartments going for well in excess of $1,000/night), I'd be willing to cut an a.netter a deal. So if any of you are still looking for a place, I'm just throwing that out there, as well.

I look forward to hearing others' thoughts on this topic.

Cheers,
Cameron


Just as a question (haven't been to AUS recently during peak vacation time) do you know how heavily the seasonal CUN flights tax CBP?

I concur that Austin is seriously underrated, and suffers from the misconceptions about Texas as a whole. There's actually a lot to do in Austin, but I still think we need that one defining tourist attraction (Disney World, Empire State Building, Hollywood, et. al - except on a smaller scale) to really start driving in that leisure traffic.

Biz traffic is only likely to grow; AUS is such a talent magnet, especially in tech fields, that most lists have it ranked near the top in terms of GDP growth over the next ten years.

Quite honestly, I can see the MSA population hitting 2.5 million by 2022, and real GDP, which is at $78 billion right now and ranked 38th, growing to around 110-120 billion and moving up into the top 25.

And in terms of high yield traffic, Austin should be able to support a long haul flight 10-15 years from now, as well as several Latin American flights, b/c fares into Austin are relatively high.

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 6):
At the absolute height of the dot-com boom, I maintained (and still do, honestly) that AA could've supported a widebody service to NRT 2x weekly. But even still, it just makes more sense to route people through DFW. For a time, AA60/61 was actually AUS-DFW-NRT, with a change of gauge at DFW. This shows how influential the high tech traffic market was into AUS. But that's all I can really make an argument for, and it's by no means a super strong one.

I actually think that the first long haul carrier AUS is likely to get will be Emirates. I know this sounds crazy, but AUS continues to see an expansion in it's Asian population, the Indian tech workers in particular. 10 years from now, with potentially 150,000 Asian-Americans, strong biz links to East Asia b/c of tech, Emirates may be able to support 3w A350-900


User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6855 times:

Re: The temporary international terminal that the City Council voted down:

Here's a link to the presentation, showing renderings and the traffic flows within the facillity.

Austin Bergstrom International
Airport
GateOne ‐ CapacityPlus
Presented by Siemens Industry, Inc.


And here is a link to the backup information:

International passenger arrivals for COTA events

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 4):
I understand why they turned down this customs facility (we're set to expand the east concourse, including where the temporary building would've been, in the next 5 years),

Actually, that was the one good thing about the temporary facility. If you read those backup comments, it said that the temporary facility would have allowed for expansion of the current international facilities in the terminal without a disruption in service.

One question I have is - when these international visitors return home, they won't have to clear customs in Austin, so are they at least going to be able to leave from here, or will they still have to take a flight to DFW, IAH, etc and then continue on to their final destination?

I agree that Austin will be a nightmare that weekend - not just at the airport or on the roads leading to the Circuit of the Americas, but downtown as well. I think they're planning on having an average of 75,000 people on the streets of downtown that weekend - typically what we see during SXSW and New Year's Eve. God only knows how many streets will be closed - and that affects all the Capital Metro Bus service. Half the time when these streets get closed my bus is detoured and I never know where to go to catch it.

Oy vey - we are definitely a city that is having growing pains.

LoneStarMike


User currently offlinehomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2244 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 6754 times:

Quoting LoneStarMike (Reply 17):
I agree that Austin will be a nightmare that weekend - not just at the airport or on the roads leading to the Circuit of the Americas, but downtown as well. I think they're planning on having an average of 75,000 people on the streets of downtown that weekend - typically what we see during SXSW and New Year's Eve.

Is there a way to confirm the numbers, especially for Downtown? I have an entry for AUS in my travel info website with an estimate of 120,000 for the race itself, but no info on peripheral events that weekend...



"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6619 times:

Quoting vin2basketball (Reply 16):
actually think that the first long haul carrier AUS is likely to get will be Emirates. I know this sounds crazy, but AUS continues to see an expansion in it's Asian population, the Indian tech workers in particular. 10 years from now, with potentially 150,000 Asian-Americans, strong biz links to East Asia b/c of tech, Emirates may be able to support 3w A350-900

What I think would make more sense is that another Asian carrier or two begin serving IAH like VN Vietnam Airlines (large Vietnamese pop.) or China Southeastern, China Airlines, or even Air China. NZ even has gone on the record of wanting to possibly start IAH-AKL. Either way, Austin will be a struggle in getting any kind of long haul service without business end contracts as many posters have spoke of.


User currently offlinetoxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1306 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6619 times:

It should not be a problem for AUS to handle any special freight flights from overseas. The runways are long enough and capable of handling Group V's and even the AN-124 on occasion. And they have the cargo facilities. Customs is where they will have problems, at least from a passenger standpoint.

User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6603 times:

Quoting homer71 (Reply 18):
Is there a way to confirm the numbers, especially for Downtown? I have an entry for AUS in my travel info website with an estimate of 120,000 for the race itself, but no info on peripheral events that weekend...

Hi Homer - my comments were just based on what I'd read in an article that ran in the local paper last month.

Austin City Council hears plans for city's role in Formula 1 event
Austin American-Statesman
June 14, 2012


Quote:
When people are not at the race, many are expected to attend several downtown festivals, which will require street closures.

"We're preparing for upwards of 75,000 people (a night) downtown, which equates to Halloween and the city's New Year's Eve events," said Melissa Alvarado, a spokeswoman for the city's Economic Growth and Services Office.

LoneStarMike


User currently offlinecat3dual From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6561 times:

With two major fortress hubs in the same state, any hopes of long-haul services to AUS are a pipe dream. It simply will not happen. Period.

User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17510 posts, RR: 45
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6562 times:

Quoting CompensateMe (Reply 11):
Not even cosmopolitan cities such as Los Angeles and Chicago have been able to sustain regular European Holiday package charter service.

They can't compete with the cheap Y fares already existing in the market.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 12):
We dooooo, but then we fly to DFW or IAH and take the tour from there. Landing right in Willie's backyard and just go to see AUS and Luck, TX ain't just enough. Plus, the local, lesser known musicians who regularly tour Europe each year (and my town, which I'm proud of, is a regular stop for gigs) won't fill a widebody either.

I disagree--but as I said incentivized by AUS it and timed for one of the better known festivals it could be a interesting way for the area to dip their toe in the international longhaul market. It's a risk, but it might pay off.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6515 times:

Quoting LoneStarMike (Reply 17):
One question I have is - when these international visitors return home, they won't have to clear customs in Austin, so are they at least going to be able to leave from here, or will they still have to take a flight to DFW, IAH, etc and then continue on to their final destination?

My thinking would be if they arrive on an international charter, then they will likely leave on the same charter minus customs / immigration from the US. No different then leaving IAH for overseas. One article I read indicated that AUS has 3 gates that they will likely be utilizing on the eastern end of the terminal in gates 1-3. Gate 1 I believe is a true int'l gate with a ramp that allows for loading from the main terminal and door that leads to the customs / immigration level below for arrivals.


User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 25, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6578 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 23):
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 12):
We dooooo, but then we fly to DFW or IAH and take the tour from there. Landing right in Willie's backyard and just go to see AUS and Luck, TX ain't just enough. Plus, the local, lesser known musicians who regularly tour Europe each year (and my town, which I'm proud of, is a regular stop for gigs) won't fill a widebody either.

I disagree--but as I said incentivized by AUS it and timed for one of the better known festivals it could be a interesting way for the area to dip their toe in the international longhaul market. It's a risk, but it might pay off.

And I know which your thinking ....

* SXSW Music / Media / & Film Festival (3rd Full Week in March - really is a 2 week event)

* ACL (Austin City Limits) outdoor music fest (4 day weekend in Sept.)

*Formula 1 (November)

* Moto GP (no date yet) - this seems to be an interest my Moto GP to bring a race to COTA (Circuit of the Americas)

* Austrailian V8 (no date yet) - another event that might happen also to stage at COTA


User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Reply 26, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 6529 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 24):
One article I read indicated that AUS has 3 gates that they will likely be utilizing on the eastern end of the terminal in gates 1-3. Gate 1 I believe is a true int'l gate with a ramp that allows for loading from the main terminal and door that leads to the customs / immigration level below for arrivals.

Gate 1 is a ground level gate that hasn't been used in years. The only airline that ever used it was Austin Express (formerly Conquest.) Gate 2 is the international gate. I think it's what you call a swing gate, The jetway has two sets of doors - one leading to customs and the other leading out onto the main concourse. When an international flight arrives, the doors leading to the main concourse are locked - forcing you to go to customs. Gate 3 is a domestic gate with the jetway from the plane leading out into the main concourse. It's the one formerly used by NW and now currently used by DL. (DL also uses Gates 5 & 6, but Gate 4 is vacant. I read somewhere that the airpot might ask DL to use Gate 4, freeing up Gate 3, but even then, it seems like you'd still have to wall off Gates 1, 2 & 3 from the rest of the concourse to keep people who deplane at Gate 3 from wandering out into the main concourse.

For reference, here's the layout of gates in the concourse.

AUS - Concourse Level

LoneStarMike


User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2628 posts, RR: 1
Reply 27, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6344 times:

With DFW and IAH sort of next door chances are almost none that AA or UA would show interest to fly long-haul from AUS (or SAT for that matter). AA or UA to somewhere in Latinamerica/Caribbean out of AUS/SAT or AV-TA/CM flying there, that's another subject.
That pretty much leaves non.U.S. airlines to woo to one day start flights to AUS/SAT and the most logical options IMHO would be - given if there's a huge incentive from the Texas side and companies with interests on the route. AUS/SAT most likely would have to settle for an European non-stop either by BA (LGW) or LH (MUC). While a daily flight may be the dream, best is to settle for probably seasonal 3/4 times per week.
BA flies to MIA, MCO and TPA in Florida, while AUS/SAT is no TPA, AUS/SAT could learn from TPA airport dealings with BA, also AUS/SAT still have to learn how RDU has kept its European non-stop and replicate that model.
I can't visualize IB @ AUS/SAT, as almost all the Texas Hispanics and Latin-immigrants aren't Spain-centric.



I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlineaznmadsci From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 3670 posts, RR: 5
Reply 28, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6270 times:

Why couldn't AC or AM maintain their AUS service? Were they given incentives to start service?


The journey of life is not based on the accomplishments, but the experience.
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 29, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6248 times:

Quoting the Statesman's Ben Wear 'City to consider $5.5 million customs facility for F1 flights'

Updated: 10:40 p.m. Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Published: 10:29 p.m. Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Currently, Austin's only regular international service involves AirTran and United flights to and from Cancún, Quintana Roo, typically on Boeing 737 airplanes with 130 to 140 seats. The existing customs facility can handle 90 to 120 passengers an hour, the city said.

Austin should expect several chartered jumbo jets from overseas, each carrying 350 or more passengers, in the days before the race, based on the experience of other U.S. cities that have hosted F1 races, Smith said. Charter carriers are not required to notify an airport more than 30 days out that they are coming, Smith said, so the city does not know how many might show up.

"We may get no charters. We may get 15," he said.

Indianapolis, which hosted F1 races from 2000 through 2007, had six to 12 international charter flights per year, Smith said. The result here, he said, would be very long lines and a several-hour wait for people to get through customs.

"That's not the way to put your visitors in a good mood," Austin City Council Member Bill Spelman said.

The alternative to building a temporary facility, Smith and Spelman said, is to inform charter operators that they will have to land in Dallas-Fort Worth or Houston instead. Race fans would then have to take connecting flights to Austin or get here via car or bus.

"That would be a viable option and wouldn't cost any money," Smith said. "The downside is that it wouldn't help Austin's image."


User currently offlineDariusBieber From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6226 times:

In all seriousness, this won't ever happen unless DFW or IAH gets shut down.

[Edited 2012-07-06 08:47:29]


Darius Bieber
User currently offlinehomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2244 posts, RR: 14
Reply 31, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6212 times:

Quoting LoneStarMike (Reply 21):
my comments were just based on what I'd read in an article that ran in the local paper last month.

Thanks for the info, Mike


As for the East Concouse expansion, how many additional gates are they planning to add?



"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offlineDariusBieber From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6200 times:

Quoting cat3dual (Reply 22):
With two major fortress hubs in the same state, any hopes of long-haul services to AUS are a pipe dream. It simply will not happen. Period.

California has two major fortress hubs (LAX and SFO) and San Diego has BA service.



Darius Bieber
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 33, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6150 times:

Quoting DariusBieber (Reply 32):

Good point! But San Diego is a LGW service correct?


User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Reply 34, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 6108 times:

Quoting homer71 (Reply 31):
As for the East Concouse expansion, how many additional gates are they planning to add?

From what I've read, the expansion will add 9 new gates, but they'll be added in two phases. Phase 1 will add 4 new gates, with the other 5 gates being added in Phase 2. There's more information at the link below:

Capital Improvement Program
Austin Bergstrom International Airport
Presented by Jacobs Consultancy


LoneStarMike


User currently offlineDariusBieber From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5640 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 34):

Good point! But San Diego is a LGW service correct?

Actually, as a matter of fact, it is LHR service.



Darius Bieber
User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 36, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4246 times:

Why does AUS need a nonstop flight to Europe, who wants to go to Austin Texas. Just make a connection

It's like asking why isn't there a nonstop flight from OKC to Europe


User currently offlineDariusBieber From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 4002 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 38):
It's like asking why isn't there a nonstop flight from OKC to Europe

Whole different dynamics there. AUS has a population of almost 1 Million, plus they have the world renowned University of Texas. Loads of music festivals, etc... lure people to that city.

SAT has a population of over 1.4 Million now, 7th largest city in the US. SAT attracts more tourists than any other city in Texas. It has Sea World, the River Walk, the Alamo, and various other Missions.

OKC isn't up to those standards. Apples and Oranges there.



Darius Bieber
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 38, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3871 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 38):

Hmmm...the same thing could be said for places like CLT (we all know LH is supporting its German companies in the surrounding areas this much is true, but you enjoy the priviledge correct?), SAN (its had BA to LHR for awhile and just landed JP 787 recently...but it still has LAX & SFO for connections right?) or even Ireland's SNN (a secondary very small airport with the usual 2-3X daily Aer Lingus flights from JFK & BOS but also for a time had DL flights from JFK and ATL).

For AUS its rather simple really..support for the tech industry abroad in relation to Dell's HQ, Samsung's factory prescence in both Austin as well as its sister link abroad in Germany, Whole Food's HQ supporting its presence in EU, the Siemens, the Statoil's, the IBMer's, the Microsoft's, the Apple's, 3M's, the Motorola's, even the Film and Music industry (Austin is the little Hollywood here in Texas the last 15 yrs), and how about the Stars of the entertainment industry (I'm sure Sandra Bullock, Matthew McConnahey, or even Dennis & Kim Buffington-Quaid would much rather travel in 1st class out of AUS occassionally? Then their are the throngs of students int'l & domestic (100k+ strong when you take into account Univ. of Texas, Texas State, St. Edward Univ. and even Austin Community College). Now dare we say tourism attractions like SXSW (last count for 2012 the attendance was 30,000 and included a great deal of international bands and spectators), Formula 1 (Austin expects 120,000 people for that doozie of an event and everyone knows that F1 fans are not from around these parts  and the list could go on. The bottom line I think that Austinites are seeking from some kind of opportunity for an overseas flight is global exposure and alittle bit of prestige that goes with it ...


User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 39, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3580 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 40):

Nope.. Do you see two huge fortress hubs aroun CLT. Oh yea that's right it's ATL and CLT. U guys under estimate CLT

Quoting DariusBieber (Reply 39):

Orlando has seaworld. Who in there right mine would fly from europe to go to SAT to go to seaworld

Orlando is the one that comes in my head of vacation


Quoting DariusBieber (Reply 39):
SAT has a population of over 1.4 Million

No need for it European service , DFW and IAH are such a short hop away

[Edited 2012-07-08 15:46:53 by srbmod]

User currently offlineRGElectra80 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 361 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3459 times:

Quoting DariusBieber (Reply 39):

I agree it's apples to oranges, but your points don't really support the case. SAT is largely a small town disguised as a major metropolis. Large employers of the area don't really have large international operations. Valero and Tesoro are probably the exceptions, but Whataburger and USAA are mostly serving North America. Rackspace has a bigger slice of international business but definitely not enough to justify medium-to-long-haul international non-stop service out of SAT. Valero and Tesoro folks who travel abroad have a plethora of options out of IAH to large oil industry hubs worldwide. Probably half of the 35-50-minute IAH-SAT flight is spent taxiing at IAH on most days so it's essentially a hop away and thus not a large nuisance to go to IAH to catch a flight to DOH or DXB.

Sea World is a joke. Want to throw in Fiesta Texas, too? :p Why would tourists from abroad come to San Antonio for Sea World when they can go to the Orlando one and couple it with visits to Disney parks and Universal Studios to boot?



Feel free to check out my Flight Diary: flightdiary.net/alenart
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23022 posts, RR: 20
Reply 41, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3420 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 41):
Nope.. Do you see two huge fortress hubs aroun CLT.

That argument makes no sense. A Europe-CLT flight flies straight over EWR, JFK (2 legacy hubs), PHL and IAD.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 42, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3299 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 45):

How does it not make sense. CLT and ATL are huge hubs. It's like asking why does GSP not have a direct flight


User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3299 posts, RR: 44
Reply 43, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3251 times:

Well whatever we may get, I guarantee you we won't have 3 777s arrive within an hour like we did today! AA 81 from LHR, AA 37 from MAD, and EK 211 to IAH all diverted here!

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineUNITED91 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 3218 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 41):
Nope.. Do you see two huge fortress hubs aroun CLT. Oh yea that's right it's ATL and CLT.

I do not see how this argument is relevant here. It doesn't matter if DFW and IAH are near by, if there is enough demand for a AUS-Europe flight it shouldn't make a difference.

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 38):
who wants to go to Austin Texas. Just make a connection

As MaverickM11 stated earlier, Austin is a great place in general, and I have to agree. The few times I've been there I've been quite impressed, great city.


User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 45, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3046 times:

Quoting UNITED91 (Reply 49):

If there is enough demand where is the flight


User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 46, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3048 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 45):

Europe-RDU flies over EWR,IAD,JFK,PHL


User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3299 posts, RR: 44
Reply 47, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3013 times:

Quoting southwest737500 (Reply 50):

Look, you seem to be dead set on misrepresenting what people are saying, all the while pretending to know it all, and frankly, it's kind of annoying. I don't think anyone is saying Austin as it stands right now could support service to a European city, but many people on here rightly identify the opportunities Austin will have to grow in international popularity in the coming years. Will this translate to intercontinental service? More than likely no. But there are plenty of cities (SAN and SJC come to mind) that are very close to large hubs with international service, yet still have service of their own. You've given absolutely no indication you understand anything about the city of Austin, or why there would be international demand for such a city. In situations like that, it's best to not pretend you do (life lesson worth learning, btw).

There is almost zero chance that you'd ever see AA or UA (or any US airline, for that matter) start an AUS-Europe flight, for the reasons which you and everyone else have made abundantly clear repeatedly. But that's only one half of the equation. The point being raised in this thread is Austin, in the coming years, has a fairly unique opportunity to raise its international profile, which, with a city of its quality, will almost assuredly increase the travel demand. I've never met a single person from abroad that didn't love Austin. Does that mean there will be sufficient demand to bypass US fortress hubs? Probably not. But it is certainly not as ridiculous a topic as you seem to think it is.

The Austin MSA is one of the 3 or 4 largest MSAs to not have had any intercontinental service (SMF, MCI, and CMH are the others, if I'm not mistaken). And cities smaller than Austin (Hartford, for example) have had European service. It's also the fastest growing MSA in the top 100 (by a considerable margin), and the second fastest growing overall. When you combine its growth rate, its international appeal (read: industries), and its opportunities to increase international exposure, it makes sense to think about.

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 48, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2995 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 52):

Well make a thread for me the day the service is announced  


User currently offlineUNITED91 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 2992 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 52):

Completely agree, well put.

Austin is a great city, and has a lot going for it. The city is one of the fastest growing in the country, and I think it's only a matter of time before Austin gets some European service.


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23022 posts, RR: 20
Reply 50, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2836 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 52):
There is almost zero chance that you'd ever see AA or UA (or any US airline, for that matter) start an AUS-Europe flight, for the reasons which you and everyone else have made abundantly clear repeatedly.

I actually don't know that that's true. The TATL joint ventures, when more fully developed, may create an opportunity for something like AA to LHR a few times a week (LHR slots are an obvious problem). I still think we'll see AA flying 757s from some smaller cities to London (PIT, BDL, DTW, etc.). If that works, it seems that widebodies to markets that are similar or a bit stronger but outside of 752 range is the sensible next step.

You are absolutely correct that AUS is going to be large and dynamic enough to support TATL service at some point in the future. The first mover is going to have a tremendous advantage, and I think any legacy would be wise to get in early.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 51, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2653 times:

Quoting RGElectra80 (Reply 44):

Let's not forget the another driving force behind a SAT arguement....Uncle Sam ...2 major Air Force Installations (Lackland & Randolph), plus the army's Fort Sam HoustonPost, and don't forget the largest medical complex in the armed forces Brooke Army Medical Center that is about to get even larger, then their are the AF contractors including Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin that are all based at Kelly City Base which supports the global maintenance requirements of most if not of all the Air Force's Heavy Lift Command C5 Galaxy's, C-17 Globemasters, C141's, and fueling tankers. Then thier is the National Security Agency facility in N. San Antonio which have a number of agents supporting the war on terror that frequent the EU routinely. All of these entities do require a travel element abroad with regard to our foreign bases and offices globally (Germany & UK come to mind as most frequent locales) where Air Force assests in particular exist. Further to this point, the gov't is utilizing more and more commercial carriers to cut down on using its own more costly assets to move its personell on official business. Again, this is just alittle firepower that can be considered in support of a SA or even a regional CENTEX case with the inclusion of Austin.

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 56):
Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 52):There is almost zero chance that you'd ever see AA or UA (or any US airline, for that matter) start an AUS-Europe flight, for the reasons which you and everyone else have made abundantly clear repeatedly.
I actually don't know that that's true. The TATL joint ventures, when more fully developed, may create an opportunity for something like AA to LHR a few times a week (LHR slots are an obvious problem). I still think we'll see AA flying 757s from some smaller cities to London (PIT, BDL, DTW, etc.). If that works, it seems that widebodies to markets that are similar or a bit stronger but outside of 752 range is the sensible next step.

I think we can all agree that the 757 will not have the range to perform any kind of AUS-EU missions. It would likely have to be a 767-200ER or wait for an abundance of 787's is my thought, which would then also raise questions on how the market would be able to support 180+ seats 2x-3x weekly. BUT, I was also thinking about an alternative option concerning the use of a 2 class 90 seat (12 biz and balance economy while not using the middle seats A319LR that has been utilized on other routes for business only class purposes for ex. BA's JFK. Carriers like AF, LH, and QR have also been utilizing the A319LR on their thinner / niche type routes as well. In fact, according to Wiki the range on the LR is supposedly up to 5,600nm and the distance between AUS-LHR is 4,900 if I am correct which would still leave reserves at 700 nm. Any one have any thoughts on the feasibility of this "pipe dream" including what kind of pax config this flight could safely carry?  Anyway you cut it, I do believe this would be a less than weekly occurrence (maybe X2 or even seasonally say during summer months).

LR: 5,600 nmi (10,400 km; 6,400 mi)


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23022 posts, RR: 20
Reply 52, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2641 times:

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 58):
Any one have any thoughts on the feasibility of this "pipe dream" including what kind of pax config this flight could safely carry?

AUS doesn't have the yields for the premium narrowbody services, which serve a very small niche. But it's important to remember that all of the US legacies are expecting quite a few widebody deliveries in the next decade, and that can lead to growth in widebody fleets depending on the rate of retirement of the older aircraft. That leads to all sorts of interesting opportunities.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinefxramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 7298 posts, RR: 85
Reply 53, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2432 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

How I miss you Austin.

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 4):

Someone suggested SAT after you posted this; a joke. Rent out your place for $2k large. Remember UT homes games bring top dollar. I don't really see the necessity for a n/s into AUS with a lot high rollers flying in private jets, but bring it.

Quoting GEsubsea (Reply 13):
AUS is expecting the usual compliment of cargo flights that fly into other scheduled race event airports and will be supported by the cargo area ground crews likely to include staff from Fedex and UPS as if I recall from working at Fed Ex ramp a few years ago these companies have all the ground equipment necessary to assist with offload efforts. The race in Abu Dhabi ends on Nov. 4th and flights should leave shortly afterwards from UAE bound for the Austin (taking basically an Emirates / QR routing like going to IAH) race set to begin on Nov. 18th. After this race, F1 packs up its road show and heads south 10hrs for the Brazil race less than a week later.

FX will be bringing almost exclusively all F1 team cars on a charter flight basis. The flight numbers are stc.

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 14):
US customs will be busy when the F1 circus arrives.

Busy or actually functioning for once.

Quoting vin2basketball (Reply 16):
I actually think that the first long haul carrier AUS is likely to get will be Emirates. I know this sounds crazy, but AUS continues to see an expansion in it's Asian population, the Indian tech workers in particular. 10 years from now, with potentially 150,000 Asian-Americans, strong biz links to East Asia b/c of tech, Emirates may be able to support 3w A350-900

EK via IAH add on with 777.

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 43):
Well whatever we may get, I guarantee you we won't have 3 777s arrive within an hour like we did today! AA 81 from LHR, AA 37 from MAD, and EK 211 to IAH all diverted here!

AA via DFW add on with 777.

As much as I'd love to see AUS blow up with heavy traffic an F1 race, ACL, SXSW, and UT football doesn't justify it.


User currently offlineGEsubsea From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 54, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2309 times:

So, based on an interview dated June 22nd conducted by the Austin Chronicle with Austin's Economic Growth and Redevel­op­ment Services Office Deputy Director Rodney Gonzales, "There are ongoing discussions with airlines about when regularly scheduled intercontinental flights may be feasible, and Gonzales told the city council a route to London Heathrow could be viable within the next three years."

http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/...2/council-briefed-on-f1-prep-work/

So, the question is not so much as when now, but who are the likely suitors currently in discussions with the city? A 787 is likely the equipment based on the 3 year timetable.


User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Reply 55, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2207 times:

I'm thinking this 3 year timeline is based on something I read in the City of Austin's Performance Review for Fiscal Year 2010

Link

(The airport stuff starts on page 114.)

In the section about Airline costs per enplaned passenger it noted:

Quote:
The airlines’ landing fees are based on the estimated landed weight of commercial and cargo carriers and are set to recover the City’s costs for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the airfield. Terminal rents are paid by the airlines and are intended to recover the capital, operating, and maintenance costs associated with the airlines’ use of the terminal. Since airlines are charged on a cost recovery basis for certain expenses, this measure improves with lower airport operating costs as well as higher passenger traffic. This number is very important to airlines when considering new or expanded service in Austin. Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (ABIA) is considered a moderate cost airport.

[SNIP]

Next Steps: Aviation department is committed to controlling and maintaining moderate airline costs to attract future business for the growing Austin air traveler market. One of the airport’s long term goals is to secure a non-stop transatlantic service by October 2015. A five year goal was established to reduce our dependency on airline revenue by decreasing airline revenue to 40% of the operating revenue by 2015. In order to reduce airline costs in FY 2010-11, the airport implemented budgetary reductions in most of the commodities and contractuals, resulting in a total savings of approximately $1.5 million.

LoneStarMike


User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3299 posts, RR: 44
Reply 56, posted (2 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2019 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 50):

How many US airlines have transoceanic routes out of cities they don't have a seriously elevated presence in (hub, focus city, or the like)? Maybe DL out of PDX and SEA? AA out of BOS (and I would argue AA's position at BOS is "elevated")? There is just no way either of the Texas airlines would start a transatlantic flight from a spoke city less than 45 minutes away from their fortress hubs. Which really leaves us with DL and US (snicker). Not a chance either one of those do it.

This really leaves us with the foreign airlines. It's easier to generate traffic where you already have an established presence, which means the US traffic would be trying to generate US traffic. Since it seems more likely that AUS's demand for foreigners increases than AUS suddenly and dramatically increase its supply of foreign travelers, I'd say foreign airlines stand a better chance of being able to generate more travelers on their ends. Certainly, a nonstop will make foreign travel more appealing to Austinites, but you can't deny that LH starting FRA-AUS (where they can get feed from FRA) would be more successful than AA starting AUS-FRA (where there's no feed on either end). You could make an argument that with the JVs, UA would have more success than AA because of the *A connection the FRA end, but I still don't think it'd be as successful as something initiated on the Europe side.

Quoting fxramper (Reply 53):
How I miss you Austin.

We miss you too, buddy. Hope you're doing alright.

Quoting LoneStarMike (Reply 55):

Interesting stuff, Mike. Thanks for sharing. I hope they (we) succeed.

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23022 posts, RR: 20
Reply 57, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1903 times:

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 56):
How many US airlines have transoceanic routes out of cities they don't have a seriously elevated presence in (hub, focus city, or the like)?

DL/PIT
AA/RDU
NW/BDL
DL (and NW)/EWR
DL (and NW)/PDX
DL (and NW)/SFO
DL (and NW)/LAX
DL (and NW)/ORD

Remember, too, that with revenue sharing, all 3 big legacies now have, in essence, a hub in Europe.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa Sells Condor/Thomas Cook.... posted Fri Dec 22 2006 14:02:23 by Beaucaire
Did Condor/Thomas Cook Stop Flying To TPA? posted Mon Nov 17 2003 00:52:08 by SWA TPA
Condor/Thomas Cook Reducing Fleet posted Mon Jul 14 2003 13:16:00 by Na
Smoking On Condor (Thomas Cook) Flights? posted Thu Jan 9 2003 17:38:15 by Sabena332
Condor? Thomas Cook? posted Fri Jun 7 2002 06:43:42 by Flyingbronco05
Thomas Cook Condor And The 767 posted Thu Dec 16 2010 10:00:01 by abibus
Thomas Cook/Condor - Back In Profit + Good Results posted Tue Mar 7 2006 18:37:51 by B742
Thomas Cook Condor Airlines - Insane Summer Fares posted Sat Jan 7 2006 12:08:17 by Moparman
Thomas Cook A320 To Condor... posted Thu Dec 8 2005 10:31:48 by Atco2b
Thomas Cook/Condor From Germany To YYZ posted Sat Jun 26 2004 17:04:06 by Alespesl