Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aer Lingus To Move JFK Operations To T5  
User currently offlineB6MoneyGuyJFK From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 231 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4987 times:

See link below.

This has been long roumored, and now is official.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/jetblu...irelands-aer-lingus-120000677.html


Opinions are like @ssholes. Everyone has one, and everyone thinks everyone elses stinks!
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4981 times:

Great news, this has been floating around for a while. Now if they could just try and move in with UA at ORD and UA/B6 at BOS to eliminate the need to re-clear security for connections after landing from Ireland.

Flight EI109 (DUB-JFK) doesn't pre-clear in Ireland though so how will this work?

[Edited 2012-07-09 05:43:36]


Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 27239 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 4935 times:

Impressive connection times and nice move by EI . I wonder if they will have a new lounge there or use someone elses. Are there currently lounges in that Terminal?

User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 4769 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 2):
I wonder if they will have a new lounge there or use someone elses. Are there currently lounges in that Terminal?

Interesting, I never thought of that. There are no lounges in Terminal 5 but there is free Wi-Fi throughout the terminal and plenty of nice dining options. I wonder what EI will do about this though as they will (obviously) need a lounge...



Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3005 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4600 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 2):
I wonder if they will have a new lounge there or use someone elses.

I was wondering the same. Then again, the Oasis lounge that they currently use at T4 is nothing special, and being located before security it's almost more of a hassle than it's worth. I mainly use it for the wi-fi, so with free wi-fi throughout T5 I'd be just as happy to find a quiet spot in the terminal to send emails and wait to get a drink on the plane. It will be nice to have the better dining options in T5, since I like to eat dinner before the 108 and maximize my sleeping time.

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 1):


Flight EI109 (DUB-JFK) doesn't pre-clear in Ireland though so how will this work?

In the very near future T5 will have customs and immigration, so this issue will go away. I'm not sure if there will be any interim period when they might need to clear at T4 and tow over to T5, as JetBlue does with their own aircraft, but that wouldn't be too big a deal.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2900 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4545 times:

Based on the Press Release from B6

http://investor.jetblue.com/phoenix....-newsArticle&ID=1712623&highlight=

"JFK-bound Aer Lingus customers will clear U.S. Customs and Immigration formalities in Ireland, allowing them to get on their way quickly in New York without the need for queuing after a transatlantic journey. Customers traveling onward with JetBlue to other destinations in the Americas will particularly benefit from the pre-clearance service in Ireland to make fast, same-terminal connections at Terminal 5."

So maybe all EI flights will be pre-clearing now?



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlinepoLOT From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2312 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4516 times:

Why doesn't EI pre-clear this flight? Not enough pre-cleared gate space at the time of its departure?

User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3005 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4500 times:

Quoting poLOT (Reply 6):
Why doesn't EI pre-clear this flight? Not enough pre-cleared gate space at the time of its departure?

The pre-clearance at DUB only operates during the morning hours, when most flights to the US are scheduled. It's closed by the time EI109 departs.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4350 times:

Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 5):
So maybe all EI flights will be pre-clearing now?
Quoting poLOT (Reply 6):

Why doesn't EI pre-clear this flight? Not enough pre-cleared gate space at the time of its departure?

The preclearance closes around 15:00/16:00 at DUB and opening hours are fully controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. Also, the morning flight from Dublin to Boston (EI133) doesn't preclear due to apparent congestion.



Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlineEIBusiness From Ireland, joined Feb 2010, 643 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4309 times:

Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 5):
So maybe all EI flights will be pre-clearing now?

Correct  



Vivo Per Lei...
User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4152 times:

Quoting EIBusiness (Reply 9):
Quoting B6JFKH81 (Reply 5):
So maybe all EI flights will be pre-clearing now?

Correct

Absolutely not. The DHS has a few issues in relation to preclearance here that need attention. The DUB facility is apparently understaffed at times during the busy morning rush (hence why flight EI133 cannot preclear); it does not open in the evening when EI109 departs (in the winter this departure time comes forward to 15:45 so it may preclear from October-April but probably not if the last few winter seasons is to considered) and now the SNN facility is facing cuts meaning flight BA3 will no longer be able to preclear. So that's three Ireland-USA flights that still have to land at international gates in the US. The system is far from consistent but unfortunately nothing can be done about it at this side of the pond.

Back on topic, even if EI109 needs to clear immigration and customs on arrival at JFK, it's good to hear T5 will have an international pier so it is all under one roof for both B6 and EI.



Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3005 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4146 times:

Quoting EIBusiness (Reply 9):

Ok, so does that mean (a) the pre-clearance hours are being extended, or (b) EI109 is moving earlier?

Either way, not a good development from my perspective. For anyone like me with Global Entry, it's much easier to clear on arrival at JFK than to wait in the pre-clearance line at DUB, and for business class passengers it's annoying to have to leave the lounge early to go through immigration and then to the crowded gate area. At least at that hour the line shouldn't be too bad.



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineEIBusiness From Ireland, joined Feb 2010, 643 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4096 times:

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 10):
Absolutely not. The DHS has a few issues in relation to preclearance here that need attention. The DUB facility is apparently understaffed at times during the busy morning rush (hence why flight EI133 cannot preclear); it does not open in the evening when EI109 departs (in the winter this departure time comes forward to 15:45 so it may preclear from October-April but probably not if the last few winter seasons is to considered) and now the SNN facility is facing cuts meaning flight BA3 will no longer be able to preclear. So that's three Ireland-USA flights that still have to land at international gates in the US. The system is far from consistent but unfortunately nothing can be done about it at this side of the pond.

Do calm down A Shamrock. Have you considered the possibility of the departure of the EI109 moving to an earlier time all year round?

Quoting FoxBravo (Reply 11):
Either way, not a good development from my perspective. For anyone like me with Global Entry, it's much easier to clear on arrival at JFK than to wait in the pre-clearance line at DUB, and for business class passengers it's annoying to have to leave the lounge early to go through immigration and then to the crowded gate area. At least at that hour the line shouldn't be too bad.

100% agreed with your secondary points. I was on the 109 two weeks ago: Cleared in JFK within about 5 minutes. However, if on the 105 from March through October I don't even go to the lounge anymore: such is the queue at Pre-Clearance: quite often up to 2 Hours.

EIBusiness



Vivo Per Lei...
User currently offlineein105 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4056 times:

Quoting EIBusiness (Reply 12):
Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 10):Absolutely not. The DHS has a few issues in relation to preclearance here that need attention. The DUB facility is apparently understaffed at times during the busy morning rush (hence why flight EI133 cannot preclear); it does not open in the evening when EI109 departs (in the winter this departure time comes forward to 15:45 so it may preclear from October-April but probably not if the last few winter seasons is to considered) and now the SNN facility is facing cuts meaning flight BA3 will no longer be able to preclear. So that's three Ireland-USA flights that still have to land at international gates in the US. The system is far from consistent but unfortunately nothing can be done about it at this side of the pond.

Do calm down A Shamrock. Have you considered the possibility of the departure of the EI109 moving to an earlier time all year round?

The booking engine/timetable indicates that the 109 is moving to the winter departure time of 15.45. That can obviously change, but it would tie in with the announcement of moving to T5 in JFK


User currently offlinejcwr56 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 537 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3968 times:

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 1):
Great news, this has been floating around for a while. Now if they could just try and move in with UA at ORD and UA/B6 at BOS to eliminate the need to re-clear security for connections after landing from Ireland

Actually, AA was trying to get them to use L10 in ORD.

As for UA, given the arrival time of the flight, UA has enough issues gating their own flights and LH.

Ever wonder why LX, SK, TK, CM still use T5 at ORD?


User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3942 times:

The 15:45 departure time has always been a seasonal change from 17:10 and even still, does not preclear in Dublin. I can't seem to find any actual opening hours for the preclearance facility.

Quoting jcwr56 (Reply 14):
Actually, AA was trying to get them to use L10 in ORD.

Really? I hadn't heard this. Would that not be awkward with the EI/UA codeshare partnership?

Quoting jcwr56 (Reply 14):
LX, SK, TK, CM still use T5 at ORD?

Well I assumed that EI would have a slight advantage given the A330 would not need to be towed over to Terminal 1 after arrival at Terminal 5. It could arrive and depart T1.

[Edited 2012-07-09 11:17:19]


Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlineB6JFKH81 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2900 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3934 times:

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 10):
it's good to hear T5 will have an international pier so it is all under one roof for both B6 and EI.

Groundbreaking for T5i will not even take place until the end of the summer so we're not seeing an international pier at T5 until probably 2014. EI is moving into T5 in 2013, so I am thinking something is going to be done to pre-clear all flights as T5 will be a "domestic" terminal until T5i is constructed as it really wouldn't make sense operating out of both T4 and T5...both financially or operationally.



"If you do not learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it"
User currently offlinejcwr56 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 537 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 15):
Quoting jcwr56 (Reply 14):Actually, AA was trying to get them to use L10 in ORD.
Really? I hadn't heard this. Would that not be awkward with the EI/UA codeshare partnership?

Considering AA is/was looking to generate revenue, they were proposing a far cheaper rate overall than the rates/charges at T5.


User currently offlineAmricanShamrok From Ireland, joined May 2008, 2967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 3779 times:

Quoting jcwr56 (Reply 17):
Considering AA is/was looking to generate revenue, they were proposing a far cheaper rate overall than the rates/charges at T5.

Interesting. I wonder what made EI decline. It would have made things much easier for connections.



Shannon-Chicago
User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1445 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 2):
I wonder if they will have a new lounge there or use someone elses. Are there currently lounges in that Terminal?

What happened to the "new" EI lounge that was opened and operated in cooperation with LAN back at the start of the Noughties when the IAB was first rebuilt?

Quoting FoxBravo (Reply 11):
For anyone like me with Global Entry, it's much easier to clear on arrival at JFK than to wait in the pre-clearance line at DUB, and for business class passengers it's annoying to have to leave the lounge early to go through immigration and then to the crowded gate area. At least at that hour the line shouldn't be too bad.

Im still amazed that they never built a smaller transatlantic lounge after preclearance when T2 was being built! Missed oppurtunity!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 3005 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3642 times:

Quoting tonystan (Reply 19):
Im still amazed that they never built a smaller transatlantic lounge after preclearance when T2 was being built! Missed oppurtunity!

Definitely. I've wondered the same thing. Then again, the line is usually so long that by the time I'm through preclearance my flight is boarding already!



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1993 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3430 times:

Quoting AmricanShamrok (Reply 1):
Now if they could just try and move in with UA at ORD and UA/B6 at BOS to eliminate the need to re-clear security for connections after landing from Ireland.

Seeing them move to Terminal C with B6 would not surprise me at all. UA is moving out next year, freeing up some space for them. Though I may have heard that Terminal C may not be able to hold an A330?

Either way, Massport is connecting Terminals C and E so that pax can connect airside from B6 to their int'l partners and their own int'l flights, so this will work here in BOS soon as well!



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8571 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (2 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3082 times:

Perhaps they don't pre-clear some flights in order to accommodate connections to/from other points in Europe? It makes sense to pre clear only the flights with the highest volume of locally originating passengers.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aer Lingus To Anchor New Terminal 2 At Dublin posted Fri Jun 25 2010 09:00:49 by bestwestern
Aer Lingus To Suspend Shannon - US Flights. posted Wed Jun 16 2010 05:03:00 by bastew
Aer Lingus To End All Its LGW-Europe Flights posted Wed Jan 27 2010 05:17:59 by Mozart
Aer Lingus To Cut Jobs, Salaries posted Wed Oct 7 2009 10:45:20 by Force13
Aer Lingus To Cut Routes From BFS, DUB posted Tue May 12 2009 09:12:41 by AmricanShamrok
Aer Lingus To Resume SNN-LHR Route posted Mon Dec 22 2008 03:56:12 by AmricanShamrok
Fight For Viability: Aer Lingus To Cut 1500 Jobs posted Mon Oct 6 2008 05:27:23 by Gosimeon
Transfer At ORD From Aer Lingus To UA posted Sat Jun 21 2008 08:19:37 by Ansett767
Aer Lingus To Suspend LAX; Reduce U.S. Capacity posted Fri Jun 6 2008 06:20:41 by MAH4546
Ryanair Ups Stake In Aer Lingus To 25% posted Wed Nov 29 2006 21:34:40 by ThePRGuy