Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
787 Chief Test Pilot Randy Neville Interview (Vid)  
User currently offlinesoundtrack From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 284 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Here are some interesting thoughts of the 787 and the flying display at Farnborough. Apparently he piloted the plane during the aerial display. Unfortunately the Qatar 787 departed on Thursday.

Why hasn't Boeing done more flying displays? This was the first since 1984.

http://airutopia.com/aviation_network_channel_detail.php?id=11

[Edited 2012-07-12 11:50:05]

[Edited 2012-07-12 11:59:58]

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31119 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3655 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting soundtrack (Thread starter):
Why hasn't Boeing done more flying displays? This was the first since 1984.

Liability and Public Relations concerns should an accident happen, I imagine.


User currently offlinecmf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3518 times:

Quoting soundtrack (Thread starter):
Why hasn't Boeing done more flying displays? This was the first since 1984

A successful display has no influence on an airlines buying decision. A failure may.

On the public relations side (passengers) a failure may prove extremely costly. A successful display may earn some media time and whatever positive that may bring. And now it is time for the can of worms. There is only so much much media will allocate to aviation and if your competition is providing a more exciting display it is pretty good odds media will use images of them. This is where Airbus protections come in to play. Because of them Airbus is comfortable to make the display a little bit more exciting. Boeing can do the same maneuvers but because what is at risk they want a bit more margin before doing them at low altitude with plenty of people and cameras focused on them.

All in all very limited upside and while the risk is extremely small the downside of a failure is likely very costly.


User currently offline757gb From Uruguay, joined Feb 2009, 676 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3426 times:

Good video, thanks for sharing...
You can really get the idea of the size of the windows as he taxis past and the pilot is visible. They are huge!



God is The Alpha and The Omega. We come from God. We go towards God. What an Amazing Journey...
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5675 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3394 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):
Liability and Public Relations concerns should an accident happen, I imagine.
Quoting cmf (Reply 2):
A successful display has no influence on an airlines buying decision. A failure may.

On the public relations side (passengers) a failure may prove extremely costly.
[....
]
All in all very limited upside and while the risk is extremely small the downside of a failure is likely very costly.

But this is exactly why a flying display is valuable and makes such an impression, a memorable impression.... the company is putting everything, essentially, on line and is so confident, so certain, that their plane is great, that their plane is capable of, and does, what has been promised that they can and will put it out there and prove it.

It is important and impressive simply because of this, you are putting your money where your mouth is.

And yes, I understand the real risks and the real downside that people here explain. I get it, I know it is real.

You know the saying: Bullshit walks and money talks. Well, you could reword it to say:

"Weak planes sit and great planes FLY".

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31119 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3303 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

But no airline would ever fly an airplane in those maneuvers with passengers aboard as part of normal flight operations, so just because a 787 can do a highl-vertical-aspect climb or an A380 can perform a hard bank at low altitudes doesn't really mean anything other than it's kind of "cool" if your an avation geek and would have no influence on an airline looking to purchase a model.

If an airline wants to fly their plane near the envelope - like QF and GF do at Formula One Grands Prix - more power to them, but I don't really see any benefit to an OEM.


User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Reply 6, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2985 times:

Great Interview!! It is great that they managed to get Pilot Randy Neville, behind the scenes.

I was actually at the show watching the aerial display and it was fantastic to see a Boeing comercial airplane joining in the daily flying display. Hopefully Boeing can have a repeat at next years Paris Air Show.

It is a shame that Boeing did not bring along the 748i. It would have been great to compare both these aircraft in the sky on both size and noise footprint.

Regards,
Wings



Aviation Is A Passion.
User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 7, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2549 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 4):
But this is exactly why a flying display is valuable and makes such an impression, a memorable impression.... the company is putting everything, essentially, on line and is so confident, so certain, that their plane is great, that their plane is capable of, and does, what has been promised that they can and will put it out there and prove it.

The company puts FAR more on the line by flying paying passengers than they ever do at an airshow. Airliners flying at airshows is just showing off for the sake of showing off...no tangible upside, huge downside.

Tom.


User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5675 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (2 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2442 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 7):
The company puts FAR more on the line by flying paying passengers than they ever do at an airshow. Airliners flying at airshows is just showing off for the sake of showing off...no tangible upside, huge downside.

Sort of. When passengers are on board they do not fly the planes to the "limits" (I know they do not fly the planes to their absolute limits at the airshows either). In fact passenger flying is as constrained as it can possibly be within the requirements for doing the job.

An airshow demonstration, as you ALWAYS point out, has a huge downside if something goes wrong, so the company is putting itself at risk for the companies that will be at risk for actual loss of life when the plane is in service. In essence the airlines can see that the company is willing to bet the farm before they bet the farm. I know all the testing that goes on prior to certification is far more than what is put on at an airshow and that is why it is how a plane is deemed qualified to fly passengers. But again to do it over and over again is putting your company at risk which and that shows that you KNOW your plane can do this (or else you wouldn't do it). I think airlines, and I know people, like to see this.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Official 787 Flight Test Tracking Thread - Part 5 posted Thu Oct 21 2010 00:31:59 by moderators
787 Flight Test Tracking Thread - Part 4 posted Sat Jul 24 2010 04:28:15 by moderators
787 Flight Test Tracking Thread - Part 3 posted Tue May 4 2010 03:07:17 by moderators
787 Flight Test Tracking Thread - Part 2 posted Fri Feb 19 2010 19:26:54 by moderators
787 Flight Test Tracking Thread posted Sun Jan 3 2010 14:54:23 by Moderators
787 Wing Test Successfully Completed posted Sat Nov 28 2009 14:21:00 by Aircellist
787 Taxi Test posted Tue Jul 7 2009 11:17:10 by Mattcawby
787 Evacuation Test posted Sun May 3 2009 14:57:30 by USAFDO
787 Flight Test Plan posted Wed Apr 29 2009 12:54:49 by GBan
787: Why Test To Destruction The Weak Wingbox? posted Sat Apr 12 2008 05:36:17 by A380900