Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL126 Returns To JFK After Strange Device Found  
User currently offlineAA94 From United States of America, joined Aug 2011, 605 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 9745 times:

Details are extremely spotty, but Delta 126 (N1613B, 763), flying JFK-MAD, returned to JFK this evening after a "suspicious device" was discovered in the lavatory.

There are many conflicting reports, including one that says 3 FAMs were onboard, and have taken a passenger into custody. Others say that the FAM discovered the device.

With regards to the device itself, some have speculated that it could have been just a loose ceiling panel or aircraft part with wires attached, but others specifically identify "a piece of luggage with wires attached."

FBI Bomb Squad is enroute.

Tonight's flight path: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/D...6/history/20120712/2335Z/KJFK/KJFK

News story: http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...ion=news/local/new_york&id=8734676

News story: http://jalopnik.com/5925680/delta-fl...ackage-on-board-suspect-being-held

[Edited 2012-07-12 19:51:34]


Choose a challenge over competence / Eleanor Roosevelt
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9588 times:

Hmmm.....could this be a repea if the incident earlier this year where a flight from JFK to DUB diverted because a cell phone was left in the lav? Not joking, seriously wondering if it could.

User currently offlinedavid21487 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9532 times:

It's scheduled to depart for MAD at 1:00am.

They've already replaced the flight attendants.



-- Step! Jump! Slide! --
User currently offlineAA94 From United States of America, joined Aug 2011, 605 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9373 times:

It appears that previous reports

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 1):
Hmmm.....could this be a repea if the incident earlier this year where a flight from JFK to DUB diverted because a cell phone was left in the lav? Not joking, seriously wondering if it could.

Ding ding ding. Folks, we have a winner. Alert has been cleared. Bomb squad found no suspicious device.

http://www.nycaviation.com/2012/07/d...-landing-jfk-airport/#.T_-Vw46MfpY



Choose a challenge over competence / Eleanor Roosevelt
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9317 times:

Quoting AA94 (Reply 3):

As for the article:

1. I don't think 45 minutes counts as "shortly after takeoff".
2. I love when a journalist admits that some journalism (whether there own or not) was false.

But getting serious, I'm glad it was nothing and that everybody is OK.


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7978 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9253 times:

Quoting AA94 (Thread starter):
including one that says 3 FAMs were onboard

Wow, 3? I know that this is just one report, but how many FAMs do we have flying on all these flights? Must be expensive...



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9231 times:

Also, looking at the flightpath, why didn't they just divert to BOS?

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9199 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 6):
why didn't they just divert to BOS?

Does DL have B763 service to BOS?

I'd say the main reason to return to the flight origin is that if the flight was cancelled, it would be a lot easier on the passengers.

Also BOS was a bit too close. It takes about 100-150nm to conduct a normal descent from FL370 where the plane was flying.


User currently offlinespacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3669 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 9143 times:

No device found: http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...ion=news/local/new_york&id=8734676

"it did not appear to even rise to the level of a hoax device"

Surprise.



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 8888 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 7):
Does DL have B763 service to BOS?

They used to fly them to AMS. That's where N185DN was going when it clipped the CRJ900.

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 7):
I'd say the main reason to return to the flight origin is that if the flight was cancelled, it would be a lot easier on the passengers.

Also BOS was a bit too close. It takes about 100-150nm to conduct a normal descent from FL370 where the plane was flying.

That makes sense.


User currently offlinespiritair97 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 1231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 8888 times:

By the way, it's now scheduled to depart at 3am from JFK!

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 11, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 8347 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 9):
That makes sense

I forgot to mention last night - according to various threads on these forums - the B767 series aircraft don't have fuel dump capacity, so the extra miles flown toward JFK help get the landing weight lower.


User currently online777222LR From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 135 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 8280 times:

Quoting spiritair97 (Reply 9):
That makes sense.

To me it does not make sense to return to JFK. In this type of emergency situation, the standard protocol seems to be to get the plane on the ground as fast as possible. Perhaps BOS was better able to accommodate this. If you think about it, what if there WAS a bomb and it was on a timer set for 45 min. You could return to BOS in 30, JFK in 46 min. Of course the pilots don't know what is on board, but whatever airport can get you on the ground the quickest in this situation makes the most sense.

Technical, medical, and mechanical returns, if possible, should probably head back to airport of origin. That said, I was once on a flight from FRA-DFW on AA with a medical diversion right over LHR. We diverted to GLA instead with the 777. Go figure?

Lots of things play into where and when you divert I guess.


User currently offlineMaddogJT8D From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7428 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 11):

Absolutely incorrect. Man, every time there is an incident with a Delta 767-300ER, somebody says this and is blatantly wrong...


User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 7295 times:

Quoting 777222LR (Reply 12):
To me it does not make sense to return to JFK. In this type of emergency situation, the standard protocol seems to be to get the plane on the ground as fast as possible. Perhaps BOS was better able to accommodate this. If you think about it, what if there WAS a bomb and it was on a timer set for 45 min. You could return to BOS in 30, JFK in 46 min. Of course the pilots don't know what is on board, but whatever airport can get you on the ground the quickest in this situation makes the most sense.

Nice way to armchair QB this after the fact. How can you possibly make this statement if you weren't in the information loop as this incident is happening? There are any number of reasons why going back to JFK is the best decision.

Quoting 777222LR (Reply 12):
Technical, medical, and mechanical returns, if possible, should probably head back to airport of origin.

You just contradicted yourself. So if a passenger's heart has stopped they shouldn't get the plane on the ground as soon as practical?

Quoting MaddogJT8D (Reply 13):
Absolutely incorrect. Man, every time there is an incident with a Delta 767-300ER, somebody says this and is blatantly wrong...

Amen.

Incidentally, flight track is here: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/D...6/history/20120712/2335Z/KJFK/KJFK


User currently offlinecokepopper From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1190 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5160 times:

Quoting 777222LR (Reply 12):

I don't know why, but I'm continued to be amazed at those who feel they know best how
to handle the situation than the PIC of the A/C who has much more information
than those sitting behind a computer screen at home or office.


User currently offlineQantas744er From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1295 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5041 times:

Quoting MaddogJT8D (Reply 13):
Absolutely incorrect. Man, every time there is an incident with a Delta 767-300ER, somebody says this and is blatantly wrong...
Quoting catiii (Reply 14):
Amen.

Incidentally, flight track is here: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/D.../KJFK


Exactly. Every 767-200/300 Non-ER/ER with a MTOW above 360,000lbs was delivered with fuel dump system.

I believe DL's 763ERs are all 407,000lbs or 412,000lbs MTOW aircraft.

[Edited 2012-07-13 12:28:31]


Happiness is V1 in Lagos
User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 3091 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (2 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4715 times:

Quoting cokepopper (Reply 15):
I don't know why, but I'm continued to be amazed at those who feel they know best how
to handle the situation than the PIC of the A/C who has much more information
than those sitting behind a computer screen at home or office.

Sheesh, ain't it the truth. And on top of that, to be so definitive about it.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA 747 Returns To JFK After Engine Sparks posted Sun Jan 1 2006 01:50:34 by AerospaceFan
Thai LAX- Bangkok Returns To LAX After Bomb Threat posted Tue Sep 7 2010 23:13:12 by ukoverlander
AF A380 Returns To JFK posted Mon Nov 30 2009 11:46:51 by Ryu2
AA Flight To SJU Returns To BOS After Smoke posted Sat Jul 25 2009 06:53:56 by ADiZzy
AF Returns To BOS After Failed Engine posted Wed Jul 22 2009 09:54:09 by IKECVN69
Delta 737 Returns To SEA After Engine Failure posted Sat Jan 10 2009 21:31:26 by 787seattle
AA Flight Returns To JFK posted Thu Dec 11 2008 14:51:23 by JETnyc
AC 777-300ER Returns To YYZ After Mech Problems posted Thu Sep 25 2008 04:41:03 by NW7E7
Ryanair Plane Returns To Dublin After Take-off Inc posted Thu Sep 11 2008 06:04:37 by Oa260
CSA A310 Returns To JFK With Engine Problems posted Fri Aug 1 2008 07:28:56 by Beaucaire