Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DOT Fines Trip Advisor – Fare Advertising  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24320 posts, RR: 47
Posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

The DOT office of Aviation Enforcement is out with a $80,000 civil consent order fine against Internet portal Trip Advisor for failure to comply with fare advertising requirements and disclosure of codeshare arrangements.

Following an investigation, the DOT found that between March and June 2012, Trip Advisor lacked compliance in display of the full fare pricing consumers would pay including taxes and fees. The website returned consumer itineraries with base fares in front of and in the same font size as total fare making it difficult to distinguish between various travel options based on total cost.

Additionally the department found, Trip Advisor failed to properly disclose existence of code-share arrangement when advertising code-share flights. Specifically the site did not display the name of the transporting carrier listed on its flight itinerary pages. Consumers were instead obliged to rely on a hover text feature to learn the identity of the airline that would actually operate the segment.


Order-2012-7-16


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21088 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1433 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Following an investigation, the DOT found that between March and June 2012, Trip Advisor lacked compliance in display of the full fare pricing consumers would pay including taxes and fees. The website returned consumer itineraries with base fares in front of and in the same font size as total fare making it difficult to distinguish between various travel options based on total cost.

Without an image of what was actually being displayed, it's tough to make a judgement here.

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):

Additionally the department found, Trip Advisor failed to properly disclose existence of code-share arrangement when advertising code-share flights. Specifically the site did not display the name of the transporting carrier listed on its flight itinerary pages. Consumers were instead obliged to rely on a hover text feature to learn the identity of the airline that would actually operate the segment.

Definitely worthy of sanction. Hover text shouldn't be acceptable for revealing required information like who is actually operating the flight. Flight duration, aircraft type, meal service, etc. - that stuff is fine.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DOT Fines Vision – Reporting & Advertising Viol. posted Fri Jul 13 2012 08:00:37 by LAXintl
DOT Fines G4 For Advertising Disability Violations posted Wed Feb 15 2012 15:31:27 by fat-g4
DOT Fines Virgin Atlantic - Advertising Violations posted Mon Sep 26 2011 13:46:37 by LAXintl
DOT Fines Bahamasair - Consumer Violations posted Thu Jul 5 2012 10:39:19 by LAXintl
DOT Fines – Volaris – Deceptive Pricing posted Fri Jun 22 2012 11:59:02 by LAXintl
DOT Fines People Express - Before They Even Fly! posted Thu May 10 2012 07:34:37 by LAXintl
DOT Fines DL Connection(ASA) For Discrimination posted Wed May 2 2012 12:04:14 by LAXintl
US DOT Fines AZ, FI, LO And OZ posted Tue Jan 24 2012 05:59:46 by LAXintl
DOT Fines Skywest & Spirit posted Tue Nov 22 2011 09:21:42 by LAXintl
DOT Fines United For Civil Rights Violations posted Wed Nov 2 2011 10:57:10 by LAXintl