Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA Adds 3rd Daily TLV Flight From LHR  
User currently offlineomerlich From Israel, joined Oct 2010, 44 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12413 times:

BA announced already its intention to switch to A321 EX BD,today they announced that a 3rd flight to TLV will be added.
According to BA israel manager the planes will use BD real buisness class(unlike club europe) and that the departure will be from T1 and not T5.
any guesses on the scheduale of the 3rd flight?
pics of the biz class gladly appreciated  

link (in hebrew) : http://www.educational.co.il/article.php?id=2454

[Edited 2012-07-18 01:08:25]

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTCX69K From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2012, 135 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12376 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12305 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

TCX is that the bmed/bmi seat or the refurbishment using the Swiss business class seats that are being installed ?

User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 11945 times:

Well there you have it, we now have a Medium Haul cabin! Club Midi perhaps? lol


My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlinejumpjets From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 820 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11672 times:

If this additional service is linked to a change to an all A321 service then looking at the seating plan above it seems that overall there will be a similar number of daily seats to those currently available - though no first class, as is currently available on one of the two existing flights per day, or premium economy.

User currently offlinePs76 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11598 times:

Hi!

Just thought I'd make a couple of points.

I'm not sure if this BMI expansion was really good in that BA is no longer a predominantly T5 airline at Heathrow. Maybe it is just me but a large part of the BA thing for me when buying tickets was that they almost always flew from T5. To me that added a lot to their appeal. Yes they have expanded but they have lost something too in my eyes.

And the other thing is I have a jewish friend who flies to Israel sometimes and says he always flies BA and the main reason he chooses them is that he doesn't like all the questioning and stuff on El Al even though that is his true national carrier. I know the reasons why they have to question and I'm not saying it's a bad thing but I wonder if he's alone in his thinking or if the easier security attracts lots of people from flying on El Al.

Many thanks.

Pierre


User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11534 times:

Quoting Ps76 (Reply 5):
I'm not sure if this BMI expansion was really good in that BA is no longer a predominantly T5 airline at Heathrow. Maybe it is just me but a large part of the BA thing for me when buying tickets was that they almost always flew from T5. To me that added a lot to their appeal. Yes they have expanded but they have lost something too in my eyes.

Well simply put, T5 is too small! It only opened 4 years ago and even since then they have had a divided operation between T5 and T3. But even with T1 now in the fold it is far better then the days of T4. IMHO I do not think BA will be in T1 for long. It ill be a short to medium term thing until T2 is complete and perhaps that will attract more passengers out of T3 and free up space for BA to amalgamate the remaining services back into a 2 terminal operation.

Far too much of the current T1 which BA will be using is either cannabilised or just too old to be maintained for much longer. The jettys are falling to pieces, Gates 70-90s are not really fit for purpose and to be honest, I just dont think the terminal can continue for much longer!

My guess is that all Domestic and ROI flights will eventually move to T5. A handful of medium haul routes operated by the former BMI 321 aircraft will move to T1 (such as TLV, CAI etc) and a few other european routes! All other longhaul stuff will stay as they are!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11448 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

T1 will be around for a few years yet .

Phase 2 of Heathrow east is along way out and T2/2a. Won't fit all of *A either !

Virgins interest in the new T2 might be interesting as it could allow BA to consolidate into T3/5 in a few years in swap over opration.

The Ireland pier is scheduled to remain well into the foreseeable future and may even remain as part of the phase 2 development !

Further the ex bmi A319s may never get to operating out of T5 on regular basis as they are bulk load and not palletised.

As for three terminal operations it's something BA really are used too isn't it


User currently offlineLY777 From France, joined Nov 2005, 2682 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11412 times:

This is disappoiting...
BA has been sending 763/777s for ages, and now, they send A321s...Really bad...



אמא, אני מתגעגע לך
User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11355 times:

Quoting LY777 (Reply 8):
BA has been sending 763/777s for ages, and now, they send A321s...Really bad...

Why LY? Do you see a smaller aircraft but with a similar onboard product as a downgrade? They are offering more seats overall on the route with increased frequency which can only be a good thing!
The service onboard will be the same longhaul product and I believe the refurbished 321s will have AVOD throughout so no problems there. Not to mention that the 321s tend to have more cabin baggage space then the 767 which operate one of the current services!

The only thing lacking is First and WTP which are both cabins which are probably unneccasary on such a short flight!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3592 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 11336 times:

Quoting LY777 (Reply 8):

Actually, this will be a step up from the ratty 763s with their nasty old club world layout.


User currently onlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2501 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11173 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 10):
Actually, this will be a step up from the ratty 763s with their nasty old club world layout.

Correct...

Ultimately, the services will free up some 777, 767 and 744 that can be used elsewhere...

We might even see the A321s serve Moscow.



Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlinescrappy27 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2008, 281 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11167 times:

any chance of a link in English????

User currently offlinemadhatter From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11137 times:

And has it been confirmed that all three flights will be A321 operated or could it be something like 1 x 772, 2 x 321 operated?

User currently offlinePs76 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11127 times:

Hi!

Quoting scrappy27 (Reply 12):
any chance of a link in English????

This is a very bad good translate:

British Airways will continue from October 28, a third daily flight line London - City. New flight will take off from Israel to London in the evening and morning hours.

At the same time to add the flight, the line will be replaced by jet aircraft type wide - narrow body aircraft - Airbus body 321 with an improved configuration will include 23 seats in business class bed.

According to Yael Katan, British director in Israel, is adding 11% of seating capacity on the line. "Israel will be the first line will enjoy new configuration, the aircraft is received by us Bi.am. Van islands keep the product U Long - Hole Quality."

Includes economy class seats and 131 also include improvements compared to other companies. "The third flight will promote the continued Shtksno goals to reach before. A small plane - the world's first body to run a wide plane - a body. Include business class flat beds seven feet long.'s Product is tailored specifically to Israel and has never been tried in the world", she added.

She says middle class and first class spend the time idly in favor of improved leather seats with four modes of sitting in economy class. Another change is that the flights to and from land and take off from Terminal 1 instead of Terminal 5.

Lufthansa announced last week the aircraft beyond the narrow - efficiency measures as part of the body. The move of leaving the Swis British and the only European representative Iberia aircraft operators throughout - body lines to Israel.

Hope it might help.

Pierre


User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5242 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 10965 times:

Quoting tonystan (Reply 9):

Why LY? Do you see a smaller aircraft but with a similar onboard product as a downgrade?

Depends... if you compare a BA 321 in Mid haul config vs a euro LH plane then id take the BA one.

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 10):


Actually, this will be a step up from the ratty 763s with their nasty old club world layout.

And a step up compared to KL, LH, OS etc that send euro shorthaul aircraft to TLV


User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days ago) and read 10763 times:

Quoting anstar (Reply 15):

Depends... if you compare a BA 321 in Mid haul config vs a euro LH plane then id take the BA one.

Just issued on the BT website....

http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...ms-fully-flat-seating-on-bmi-a321s

So getting the new Thales IFE similar to that found on the B777-300 too. So all in all its going to be a pretty comfy ride!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
User currently onlineAIR MALTA From Malta, joined Sep 2001, 2501 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days ago) and read 10678 times:

It is now confirmed on BA.com.

http://www.britishairways.com/travel...nter-flights-schedule/public/en_gb

Tel Aviv and Cairo are moving to Terminal 1. Tel Aviv is to be served 3 times daily while Cairo will only be served once daily.

Terminal 1 means obviously A321s and no widebodies.

Tblisi, Yerevan, Dammam, Bishkek and Khartoum are all axed.



Next flights : BRU-ZRH-CAI (LX)/ BRU-FCO-TLV (AZ)
User currently offlineju068 From Vanuatu, joined Aug 2009, 2640 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days ago) and read 10663 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AIR MALTA (Reply 17):

Does that mean Cairo will be operated with an A321 or..?


User currently offlineblue100 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 44 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 months 2 days ago) and read 10623 times:

Despite the extra frequency, this is disappointing news for me. For years, I've been able to connect with relative ease to both the morning and evening flights to TLV, so the extra frequency will not add much in terms of additional options. With the move to terminal 1, connecting between terminals is a hassle that I am going to want to try to avoid going forward when possible; especially after my recent poor experience of doing a similar connection at CDG from 2E to 2D.

User currently offlinedanfearn77 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2008, 1813 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 10587 times:

When all the satellites are open in T5, is that when BA will fully operate from T5? When will Thursday come?


Eagles may soar high, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines!
User currently offlinePs76 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 10573 times:

Hi!

Quoting blue100 (Reply 19):
Despite the extra frequency, this is disappointing news for me. For years, I've been able to connect with relative ease to both the morning and evening flights to TLV

I can imagine if you flew into and out of T5 this will come as quite a big downer. T5 really is nice. As far as I know United still fly to terminal 1 so maybe you could take United if they fly the route you want to T1 and then go from there so you wouldn't need the Terminal change which can be a hassle. T1 is quite depressing but it is not too bad airside.

Many thanks.

Pierre


User currently offlineiainbhx From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2008, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 10563 times:

Quoting AIR MALTA (Reply 17):
Tblisi, Yerevan, Dammam, Bishkek and Khartoum are all axed.

Looks like TBS is safe and becoming direct.

"In addition, bmi’s previous routes to Almaty, Amman, Baku, Beirut, Dublin, Freetown and Tbilisi (the latter to become a direct service) will become British Airways destinations while its overlaps with Cairo, Moscow, Riyadh and Jeddah will see some bmi flights dropped. Underperforming routes to Amritsar, Bishkek, Casablanca, Dammam, Khartoum and Yerevan will be suspended throughout September and October in the changes."



iainbhx
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7531 posts, RR: 17
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 10548 times:

The link provideed toystan also announces the following changes:

"The news was confirmed as BA announced the next part of its integration of Bmi into this winter's operations at Heathrow. Key points include:

" •A new three times-daily service to Rotterdam from December 9

" •Three flights per week to Alicante from October 28

" •BA flights to Gibraltar will increase from seven to nine flights per week

" •The carrier’s Tel Aviv route will increase from 14 to 20 services per week, with the new A321s serving flights from the new year

" •Bmi services to Dammam will cease on September 16, with routes to Bishkek and Khartoum stopping on October 1, Yerevan on October 13, and Amritsar and Casablanca on October 28

" •Bmi services to Cairo, Moscow, Riyadh and Jeddah will cease, although BA’s flights to these destinations will continue

" •BA’s flights to Riyadh will be served with a B747 rather than the current B777"


User currently offlinetonystan From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 1437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 10446 times:

Quoting danfearn77 (Reply 20):
When all the satellites are open in T5, is that when BA will fully operate from T5? When will Thursday come?

All the satellites are built!!! There are no plans at present to develop T5D! What we have now will be T5 for the foreseeable future.

I think personally that they should consider extending the T5 track transit to T3 and allow check in at either end!



My views are my own and do not reflect any other person or organisation.
25 hovitzer : According to ba.com: BA167 departs LHR at 10:55. No information for the return BA166 flight however.
26 LY777 : Although these A321s will get a nice interior, for me, nothing can beat a twin aisle a/c... This is far more comfortable, you can walk in the plane...
27 tonystan : Well on such a short flight a widebody is a mere nicety. If the demand is there then great but as luck would have it, it would appear that frequency
28 ilyag : This comes as a huge disappointment - I don't mind the 321s, definitely the new cabin looks better then that old 763s, and even the 777s BA put on thi
29 Post contains images LY777 : This is good for LY
30 skipness1E : Why do we always fixate on the glass half empty? There will come day when T1 is rubble and T3 is better than T5 but BA MUST survive and grow if they
31 sq_ek_freak : The routes being kept are not surprising, however I'm a bit surprised by Bishkek being axed? Thought along with Baku these were two strong routes to
32 BA174 : BA don't want to be fully in T5 and enjoy being in T3 and now T1 as it was never intended for BA to solely be in T5. Using other terminals allows BA
33 Ps76 : Hi! Point taken. I'm no businessman and don't know if the purchase of BMI and expansion makes sense but if it does help the airline thrive then yes ha
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Canada Drop 2nd Daily Flight From LHR To YVR posted Sun Nov 2 2008 04:17:59 by Jessb
AA Adds 3rd Daily BOS-LHR; CX Code-share Soon posted Tue Jan 14 2003 04:54:12 by Bigo747
AirTran Adds 3rd Daily ROC-BWI Flight posted Fri Aug 9 2002 02:35:11 by DCA-ROCguy
What Is The Longest Non-stop Flight From LHR? posted Sun Sep 30 2007 03:19:49 by UAL747
B6 Adds 3rd JFK-MSY Flight Today posted Wed Apr 20 2005 18:22:02 by MSYtristar
NW Adds 3rd Daily OKC-MSP posted Wed Dec 22 2004 08:06:34 by Northwestair
British Airways Flight From LHR-RST (Rochester, MN posted Sun May 30 2004 21:19:22 by Aviationwiz
Enough Demand For 3rd Daily BA LHR-SFO Flight? posted Wed Mar 26 2008 14:07:24 by 8herveg
BA Adds LHR-BLQ Plus Additional AMS Flight posted Thu Nov 10 2011 18:13:07 by VV701
BA/VS's 3rd/2nd Daily HKG-LHR Flights posted Sun Jan 10 2010 02:56:50 by United Airline