Future Routes (Loaded in reservation systems and for sale)
ET
ADD-DXB - August 1, 2012 (Seems tough since they don't even have their first one yet)
ADD-JNB - August 1, 2012
ADD-CAN - September 2, 2012
ADD-HRE - October 28, 2012
ADD-LUN - October 30, 2012
JL
NRT-SIN - October 28, 2012
HND-SIN - October 28, 2012
NRT-SAN - December 2, 2012
NH
NRT-SEA (Initially loaded as 77W)
UA
DEN-NRT - March 31, 2013
Future Routes (Officially announced but not loaded in the reservation system)
redrooster3 From United States of America, joined Oct 2010, 217 posts, RR: 2 Reply 1, posted (10 months 12 hours ago) and read 3494 times:
I would think QR and EY should deploy their 787's on a LAX/SFO route. I'm suprised they both haven't tried launching that route. DOH-LAX should be no problem with 787's. Maybe their waiting for Boeing to reduce those final overweight birds and for on-spec performance?
The only thing you should change about a woman is her last name.
747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (9 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3209 times:
Quoting redrooster3 (Reply 1): I would think QR and EY should deploy their 787's on a LAX/SFO route. I'm suprised they both haven't tried launching that route. DOH-LAX should be no problem with 787's. Maybe their waiting for Boeing to reduce those final overweight birds and for on-spec performance?
I would welcome DOH-LAX, because the 787 is the world most comfortable airliner, and it would be nice to have more 787 service to LAX.
Now that AM and Boeing have announced that AM will also order 10 789s (in addition to previously ordered 8 788s), the whole long-haul routemap of AM will become 787-operated. This means: MEX-SCL/EZE/GRU/MAD/CDG/NRT/PVG. I am sure there will be shorter sectors operated with 787s every now and then, such as MEX-MTY/JFK.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2346 posts, 
From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7177 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
